Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Frederick Davidson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0258, written 14 Oct 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report14 Oct 2013
Reference2013-0258
DeceasedFrederick Davidson
CoronerMartin Flemimg
Coroner areaSurrey
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEpsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT
IN THE MATTER OF:
__________________________________________________________
The Inquest Touching the Death of Frederick Davidson
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths
__________________________________________________________
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
Secretary of State for Health
1 CORONER
Martin Fleming Assistant Coroner for Surrey
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 paragraph 7,
schedule 5 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations)
Regulations 2013.
3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 28th December 2011 I opened the inquest into the death of Frederick
Davidson, who at the date his death was 80 years old. The inquest was
resumed and concluded on 23/9/13.
I found that the cause of death to be:
1a – Aspiration pneumonia secondary to recurrent epileptic seizures
complicated by misplacement of nasogastric tube
2 – Ischaemic heart disease mixed Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia.
I concluded with a narrative conclusion as follows:
On 9/12/11 Frederick Davidson who had a history of advanced dementia
and chronic seizures was admitted to Epsom General Hospital with
aspiration pneumonia. It was subsequently discovered that he had
developed a pneumothorax as a result of being fed via an unnoticed and
incorrectly placed nasogastric tube, which on the balance of probabilities
hastened his death on 20/12/11.
RT3713 1
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Frederick Davidson was admitted to Epsom General Hospital on 9/12/11
upon referral by his consultant doctor, after he was found to have
developed aspiration pneumonia. He had suffered two seizures the week
before his admission. He was fed via a naso gastric tube which was
misplaced and unnoticed for 24 hours notwithstanding several chest x
rays taken. As a consequence he suffered a pneumothorax but despite
treatment he succumbed and died on 20/12/11.
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the inquest who conducted the SI Report
provided very helpful evidence and the following concerns were
highlighted: ‐
 Staff’s note keeping practices, in relation to the placement of the
nasogastric tube, were inadequate.
 The inappropriateness of the use of a naso gastric tube given Mr
Davidson’s known history of advanced dementia and seizures
 Unexplained and important gaps in the clinical notes
 Breakdown in communication between the junior doctor and
consultant.
 The lack of recognition of the pneumothorax on the x ray and the
subsequent delayed medical treatment.
 The junior Doctor authorised feeding by way of the naso gastric
tube prior to full checks being made. There was no note of this
authorisation.
 Delay in the forwarding and receipt of x ray reports from
radiology
I would ask that you consider the guidelines on the urgency of x rays and
staff training needs when a pneumothorax is suspected and/or concerns
raised about the placing of a nasogastric tube.
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that the Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust has
the power to take such action.
RT3713 2
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I
may extend that period on request.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must
explain why no action is proposed.
8 COPIES

 – Director

 Chief Coroner
9 Signed: Martin Fleming, HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey
DATED this 14 day of October 2013
RT3713 3

Related reports

Other reports by Martin Flemimg

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.