Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Prevention of Future Deaths report 2014-0398

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0398, written 10 Sep 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Sep 2014
Reference2014-0398
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Smethwick Council House

High Street
Smethwick
Robin J. Balmain ‘ West Midlands
SENIOR CORONER op B66 SNT
ee Tel: 0845 352 74
BLACK COUNTRY CORONER’S DISTRICT Bee tpiee tee ee
(SANDWELL ° DUDLEY ¢ WALSALL « WOLVERHAMPTON mail:
Metropolitan Borough Councils) P|
Date: Our Ref: RJB Your Ref:

10 September 2014

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Care Quality Commission

City Gate

Gallowgate

Newcastle-upon-Tyne
NEI 4PA

Dear Sirs,
i, CORONER

I Robin John Balmain am the Senior Coroner for the Black Country Coroners
Jurisdiction

vs CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under {paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3. INVESTIGATION AND INQUEST

On 4t and 5% September 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of JAMES
DWAYNE CLARKE. The medical cause of death was recorded as “Asphyxia
compounding severe old head injuries’ and the conclusion was “Neglect
Compounding Accidental Injuries”.

4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
On 15 March 2014 Mr. Clarke was riding a motorcycle unsuitable for the road on
15 March 2009. He collided with the rear of another motor cycle, fell off and
collided with a car. He was not wearing a crash helmet. He became paraplegic and
had a tracheotomy tube. He was discharged home eventually. Carers were
employed at home to care for him, particularly at night. Two carers employed at
night did not notice that his tracheotomy tube had become blocked resulting in death.

5s CORONERS CONCERNS
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows :-

i
This Office is open Monday to Thursday 8am to 4pm. Friday 8am to 3pm

H.M. CORONER
10 September 2014 Continuation

My concerns are that two carers having been employed, the expectation was that one
would be with James constantly. The written instructions from the care home said
“Call is to check James throughout the night and carry out tracheotomy care/suction
if necessary”. Whilst there was no further explanation of what “throughout the
night” meant, the evidence I had was that the carers sat in a room on the other side of
the corridor to James’s bedroom, they were watching television and playing
computer games and talking, they did not check him between 1.a.m and 4.a.m. and
again did not check him between 4.10 a.m and 6.a.m and only then because his peg
feed alarm sounded. He was found dead at that stage. The carers had had
theoretical training, but no practical training had been given to them by the care
company who employed them. Their employers were Complete Care Services,
which is the trading name of C.C.S. Central Limited of West Midlands House, Gypsy
Lane, Willenhall, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV13 2HA and I was told that the
company are registered with the Care Quality Commission. I was concerned that the
standard of care provided for James was seriously lacking and that if that standard of
care was reflected in the care given to others, to whom CC.S. provided services, then
there may be a risk to other members of the public.

6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have
the power to take such action.

. YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of the
report, namely by 5 November 2014.

8. COPIES and PUBLICATIONS

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following interested
Persons :

MED | 2es's Mother)
C.C.S. central Ltd
Tam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief

RJ. Balmain
Senior Coroner

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Care Quality Commission (PDF)
CareQuality
Commission

Mr R J Balmain
HM Senior Coroner Black Country
Smethwick Council House
High Street
Sm ethwick
West Midlands B66 3NT

23 February 2015

Dear Mr Balmain

Care Quality Commission
Citygate
Gallowgate
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4PA
Telephone:03000 616161
informalion.access@’cqc.org.uk
www.cqc.org.uk

Re: Inquest into the death of James Dwayne Clarke

I apologise for the delay in responding to your letter dated 10 September 2014, but as you
are aware in order to inform a fully considered response to your report we have sought
additional details about the inquest given that we were an interested person in the
proceedings.

We were very sad to read about the death of Mr Clarke and the circumstances in which
he died. Thank you for your report and the requirement for us to review what actions
should be taken to try to prevent the occurrence or continuation of such circumstances in
the future.

Please treat this letter as the formal response of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to
your report dated 10 September 2014.

In your report and pursuant to the requirements of Regulation 28 of the Regulations, you
require the CQC to provide details of any action that has been taken or which is proposed
to be taken in response to the concerns highlighted in your report, or an explanation as to
why no action is proposed if appropriate.

In terms of background and context, the provision of care to Mr Clarke at the time of his
death was provided through an organisation Complete Care Services, trading as CCS
Central Limited, West Midlands House, Gypsy Lane, Willenhall, Wolverhampton, West
Midlands WV1 3 2HA. This organisation was registered with the CQC under the Health
and Social Care Act 2008 in October 2010. The organisation was registered to provide
In April
the regulated activity “personal care” from a location in Gypsy Lane, Willenhall.
2012 the organisation voluntarily de-registered the location in Gypsy Lane, Willenhall and
applied to register to provide the same regulated activity from a location in Stafford Street,
Willenhall.

1

 We have had a number of changes in structures and personnel since the time of Mr
Clarke’s death, so I am somewhat reliant on information from our computer record
systems to provide the following information.

We were notified of the death of Mr Clarke by the local authority on 11 April 2011. This
was logged on our system as information of concern. The record was closed on 21 April
2011 without any record of activity taken by CQC, the local authority or the police. The
inspector who held this provider on their portfolio recalls that they were aware that a
safeguarding investigation was to proceed. We hold no further records of that or its
outcome.

In terms of actions that we have undertaken, in May 2011 we carried out a responsive
inspection unannounced. This was the service’s first inspection under the Health and
Social Care Act 2008. This would have focused on the issues considered relevant at the
point of inspection and any information of concern that we held. We inspected against
four of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
These were:

• Regulation 9 which relates to how the provider protects the care and welfare of

people using the service

• Regulation 10 which relates to how the provider assesses and monitors the quality

of their service provision

• Regulation 11 which relates to the arrangements that the provider has in place to
safeguard people from abuse (which includes neglect and acts of omission)

• Regulation 17 which relates to the arrangements the provider has to deal with

complaints

At that inspection it was our judgement that the provider was compliant with Regulation
11, and had appropriate arrangements in place to protect people from abuse. However, it
was found that risk assessments were not up to date so the provider was required to
improve these.

Since that time, we have inspected the organisation’s location at Stafford Street and
found it to be compliant with all regulations inspected. There have been no concerns
sufficient to trigger further responsive inspections or regulatory action.

As your office has confirmed, CQC were not informed about the inquest proceedings and
we were not invited to contribute or respond at that time.

Our inspection in May 2011 found that there were shortfalls in the provider’s approach to
assessing and mitigating risk to people using services. Our inspections since then

2

 (although to a different location and therefore different legal entity) have not found any
shortfalls.

I hope that you find this of some reassurance.

In April 2015 CQC will adopt the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities)
Regulations 2014, known as the “fundamental standards’. The changes in the regulations
have emerged from the Robert Francis recommendations that there should be very
obvious standards below which care must not fall. Regulation 9 will ensure that people
receive care and treatment that is personalised for them and meets their needs;
Regulation 12 is intended to prevent people from receiving unsafe care and treatment,
and prevent avoidable harm or risk of harm. These regulations in particular will require
providers to ensure that care is planned and delivered in a way that makes it crystal clear
to care staff what is required of them, and that staff are experienced, trained and
competent in the areas where they are providing that care.

In implementing the new fundamental standards, our inspection processes have been
developed. We will conduct longer, more in-depth inspections with a team approach
designed to “get under the skin” of care services. We have key lines of enquiry which are
explored and reported on consistently. Each care service will be rated either
Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement or Inadequate. We will continue to use our
enforcement powers where services do not deliver safe services.

We will ensure that your report is noted and informs the next ratings inspection that takes
place of Complete Care Services; although the information is now a little dated the issues
are well worth a further examination of their processes and training provision.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information. I am the Head
of Inspection for the Black Country and would be happy to hear from you about this or any
other situation of concern, and would welcome a meeting if you would like to hear more
about CQC and our current activity in your area.

With best wishes

Yours sincerely

Head of Inspection
Central (West) Adult Social Care

3

Related reports

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.