Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0021, written 20 Jan 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 20 Jan 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0021 |
| Deceased | James Colton |
| Coroner | Geraint Williams |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Worcestershire Health & Care Trust . 2. 3. 1 | CORONER | am Geraint Urias Williams, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area. of Worcestershire 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 6" November 2013 | commenced an investigation into the death of James Paul COLTON then aged 35 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 January 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative the medical cause of death being 1a) carcinomatosis, 1b) malignant melanoma . 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Colton was a serving prisoner at HMP Long Lartin. In June 2013 he complained of back pain and was diagnosed with a mechanical back problem, His health deteriorated until he became critically unwell on the 29" of August 2913, at which time he was taken to the Alexandra Hospital, Redditch, where he died 2 days later. 5 | CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) The doctors and nurses at the prison failed to properly diagonose, treat and care for Mr Colton in that they assumed that the diagonosis of mechanical back pain was accurate and took no steps to revisit the diagonosis or to escalate his treatment despite his obvious continuing decline. The failure to consider alternate diagnosis led to them missing his developing cancer and which may, therefore, have contributed to his early death. (2) The procedure and processes for providing Mr Colton with adequate anelgeasia were defective and there were occassions when Mr Colton did not receive Tramadol to control his pain. This meant that his last days in prison were distressing and increasingly painful for him to the extent that he was at times unable to get off his bed to receive medication. (3) There appeared to be no continuity of care for Mr Colton, little or no adequate communication as between Healthcare nurses‘and doctors, and no coherent plan for his care. There appeared to be no appropriate review of Mr Colton's care or treatment. (4) The evidence given was that there was an extremley heavy workload which meant (to quote one of the GP's who gave evidence) that he was unable to get on top of the work that was required-of him and that reviewing prisoners in Healthcare was not a priority. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action, specifically, to consider the Staffing arrangements at HMP Long Lartin Healthcare to ensure that there adequate doctors and nurses available at all times to give proper care for patients, and further, to consider whether it is in any way appropriate for a consultant psychiatrist to be the responsible individual to monitor the standard of work of GP's at the Health Cenire. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 20 March 2015 |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sentac ny report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested | am also under’a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner, GU Williams . 20th day of March 2015 H M Senior Coroner
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Worcestershire Health and Care NHS) NHS Trust Chief Execuiive’s Office Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust Isaac Maddox House Shrub Hill Road Worcester WR4 SRW. Tel: 01905 733674 Our Ref www.hacw.nhs.uk Date: 16 March 2015 Mr G U Williams HM Senior Coroner for the County of Worcestershire The Court Office Bewdley Road STOURPORT ON SEVERN Worcestershire DY13 8XE Dear Mr Williams Re: the late James Paul Colton Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths | write further to your letter sent pursuant to Regulation 28 of the Coroner’s Rules to Prevent Future Deaths dated 5 February 2015. Prior to addressing paragraph 6 of your PFD report | thought it was important to identify some of the learning that had taken place following the tragic death of Mr Colton. | know that you will already be aware of the action plan that had been brought together taking account of the issues identified in the Prison and Probation Ombudsman report, Clinical Review and internal root cause analysis review. | understand that the action plan was submitted as part of the evidence at the inquest and you will therefore already be aware of how several processes have changed since Mr Colton’s tragic death and how we have embedded such changes. | have identified below some of the most significant changes that have taken place which will all improve care provided at HMP Long Lartin. Importantly, a couple of study sessions were held in which staff were taken through the case notes of Mr Colton and had an opportunity to discuss learning identified and how they may act in future situations. Whilst there are a number of learning objectives for the day, principally, staff were asked to be open and to be curious in clinical situations. | understand from my Deputy Head of Healthcare at HMP Long Lartin that staff still talk about the learning generated from this case and in the last week there has been an example of staff raising an issue and being encouraged to consider alternative options. Additionally, the daily lunchtime meeting at HMP Long Lartin is now properly minuted with actions being allocated and recorded in patient records. This meeting is attended by a range of staff and encourages greater discussion about the care of particular individuals. As a result of some of the issues raised in Mr Colton’s case, there have been changes to practices such as nurses undertaking pain scores. | am aware that individual nursing staff are more frequently recording pain scores in order to allow a judgment to be made as to whether a problem is persisting or becoming increasingly painful or resolving itself. 2 | am aware that in Mr Colton’s case there were issues about his medication although | do now feel that as a result of work between healthcare and discipline staff, there are improved relationships between these different groups which enables staff to feel more confident when challenging, such as asking for patients to be unlocked during a period of lockdown. | recognise that in Mr Colton’s case there was a lack of continuity of care and | am able to notify you that now every patient who is on the inpatient facility has a named nurse and this is identified on each cell door so that the discipline officers are also aware of the identity of the named nurse. For those individuals who are on normal location, there are two nurses assigned to each wing so that there is a greater continuity of care for all prisoners. There are also now regular nursing meetings to discuss individual patients that take place both in respect of physical and mental health patients. | understand that you have been made aware as part of the action plan of an audit that took place in respect of care planning in January 2014 which showed an improvement in previous performance. However, | am not complacent about the need to ensure effective care planning and would confirm that the Trust has now appointed a quality and safety lead for offender healthcare as well as a new lead for SystmOne, our prison patient record, both of whom will work across the three prisons that this Trust provides healthcare in respect of and ensure best practice in areas such as care planning audits, improving our functionality and training on the patient records system. Discussions are taking place in the Trust as to introducing some further training on care planning and how SystmOne may be adapted to support improved practice in this area. As part of our continuing efforts to provide safe, high quality care in all of our services, | was keen to share with you some recent initiatives. A new standard operating system for inpatient prisoners is being conducted, at which time a review of previous entries is conducted. This is an additional review aimed at ensuring that no significant issues or tests are missed, as well as reviewing patient care. Further, the Deputy Head of Healthcare has identified an opportunity to accompany the Prison’s Disability Liaison Officer when undertaking her activities, to raise awareness of the healthcare function, especially for hard to reach groups, as well as identifying any issues being raised about the healthcare provision. In respect of the workload of clinicians at the prisons, there is no national guidance as to staffing levels within prison environments. You may be aware that for other inpatient areas there is a NICE accredited tool entitled Safer Nurse Care Tool (SNCT) which provides a framework for assessing the number of qualified and unqualified staff on a particular ward. As a result of having no national guidance for identifying the establishment, the Trust is undertaking an assessment of nursing numbers in offender healthcare based upon the range of task undertaken and the headcount. The Trust is also having discussions about the assessment of our other medical inputs involving our commissioners. The Trust has been involved in discussions for some time with the South Worcestershire Federation to seek agreement for having dedicated GPs in place in the prison and | am pleased to report that this agreement has been concluded and we are now just awaiting the security clearances for the staff to be physically working at HMP Long Lartin. Discussions are underway with the senior GP from the Federation to arrange for clinical supervision for the general practitioners at the prison to be provided through this mechanism. However, | do need to also raise the issue as to whether it is appropriate for a consultant psychiatrist to be the responsible individual to monitor the standard of work for GPs at the health centre. The Trust has a management structure in which there are clinical directors for a number of different areas of specialism including a clinical director for offender healthcare. The role of the clinical director is to provide assurance and clinical leadership for the care delivered within that service delivery unit. Whilst | note that there may be concerns about appropriate clinical supervision of an individual clinician, | do not agree that it is not appropriate for management supervision to be provided by either a different professional or a professional of the same nature but of a different specialism. Whilst | agree that clinical supervision should be provided by somebody appropriate skills and experience | do not think it is necessary for there to be management supervision similarly so provided. 3 At HMP Long Lartin, the GPs who provide sessional cover do have a weekly opportunity when they are both in the prison at the same time to discuss individual cases and share good practice. | consider that this is a positive move and as well as formalising the new process for the obtaining of clinical supervision, which | anticipate will be through the South Worcestershire Federation, | consider that this provides adequate support for any individual clinician. Overall, | do consider that it is entirely appropriate for a clinical director from a different specialism (psychiatry) to manage other doctors from other specialties. If this was not appropriate we would inevitably have a position where we had to have lead clinicians for every type of professional within the organisation and | think that this would neither be desirable nor an appropriate use of scarce public funds. | do hope that you feel that the Trust has taken seriously the issues raised in respect of Mr Colton’s tragic death and | confirm that | had already, prior to the inquest, written to to express my apologies in respect of the standards of care provided to her brother. | confirm that | have sent to her a copy of my response to your letter. If you have any further queries do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely Sarah Dugan Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.