Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0347, written 3 Oct 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Oct 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0347 |
| Deceased | Amy El-Keria |
| Coroner | Penelope Schofield |
| Coroner area | East Sussex |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 5 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Ms Mary Harpley, Chief Executive, Hounslow Borough Council, Hounslow Civic Centre, Lampton Road, London TW3 4DN CORONER | am Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner, for the area of West Sussex, sitting as Assistant Coroner for East Sussex. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 1* June 2016 |, together with a Jury, concluded the inquest into the death of Amy Rose El-Keria born 14"" May 1998 (aged 14 yrs), who died on 13"" November 2012. The Jury determined that Amy had died from the complications arising from Hypoxic Ischaemic Brain damage following the tying of a ligature around her neck. The Jury return a narrative questionnaire in which they found that Amy's death had been contributed to by Neglect and they also found that there were a number of causative failures which led to her death. A copy of the narrative questionnaire is attached. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Amy El Keria was aged 14 years old at the material time. She had a range of complex needs associated with a number of mental health diagnoses. Up until the time of her hospital admission she lived with her mother and sister in Hounslow. Following her exclusion from school in early 2012 her mental health deteriorated and she started to ligature. In August 2012 she was seen for an emergency outpatient assessment and a planned inpatient admission was sought. However there were no specialist Child and Adolescent high dependency beds available immediately and Amy had to be admitted to the Priory Hospital at Roehampton. The following day she transferred to the Ticehurst House Hospital which is part of the Priory Group. During her stay at Ticehurst Amy’s mental health fluctuated and at times she had to be forcefully restrained and sedated On 12" November 2012, having told staff earlier in the day that she wanted to kill herself, she tied a ligature, namely a football scarf, around her neck and suspended herself from a radiator in her room. She subsequently died from her injuries the following day. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:- (1) The evidence given at the Inquest showed that there was a clear misapprehension by Hounslow Social Services as to their role in supporting Amy whilst at Ticehurst. It appears that Social services did not appreciate their important ongoing role to ensure Amy’s welfare whilst placed at Ticehurst all the Court expert, gave evidence that Hounslow may have seen this health 5981872.1 funded placement as a stand-alone intervention that did not require their input. (2) Social Services clearly have a vital role to play in ensuring family contact where a child is placed far from their family home where difficulties arise. There was no assessment carried out to assess whether there was any need to provide support to a child in need under Section 17 Children Act 1989 even when Amy’s mother had specifically raised the difficulties she was having with contact with Amy , including the cost of travel, with her support worker. (3) The family gave evidence to the extent that having better contact with Amy and more input into her care may have brought about a different outcome particularly when she was distressed. | consider that the issues raised in this case should be addressed so that future deaths do not occur in similar circumstances and that action should be taken to reduce the risk of deaths of other children. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action by addressing these issues. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28" November 2016. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1 2. The Priory Grou 3. 4. 5. West London Mental Health Trust | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a coniplete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or_of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about thé release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. / DATE: 3% October 2016 SIGNED: Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner, West Sussex sitting as Assistant Coroner, East Sussex 1 5981872.1
a ae KS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt, Minster for Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London, SW1A CORONER | am Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner, for the area of West Sussex, sitting as Assistant Coroner for East Sussex. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On. 1* June 2016 |, together with a Jury, concluded the inquest into the death of Amy Rose El-Keria born 14"" May 1998 (aged 14 yrs), who died on 13" November 2012. The Jury determined that Amy had died from the complications arising from Hypoxic Ischaemic Brain damage following the tying of a ligature around her neck. The Jury return a narrative questionnaire in which they found that Amy’s death had been contributed to by Neglect and they also found that there were a number of causative failures which led to her death. A copy of the narrative questionnaire is attached. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Amy El Keria was aged 14 years old at the material time. She had a range of complex needs associated with a number of mental health diagnoses. Up until the time of her hospital admission she lived with her mother and sister in Hounslow. Following her exclusion from school in early 2012 her mental health deteriorated and she started to ligature. In August 2012 she was seen for an emergency outpatient assessment and a planned inpatient admission was sought. However there were no specialist Child and Adolescent high dependency beds available immediately and Amy had to be admitted to the Priory Hosptial at Roehampton. The following day she transferred to the Ticehurst House Hospital which is part of the Priory Group. During her stay at Ticehurst Amy's mental health fluctuated and at times she had to be forcefully restrained and sedated On 12 November 2012, having told staff earlier in the day that she wanted to kill herself, she tied a ligature, namely a football scarf, around her neck and suspended herself from a radiator in her room. She subsequently died from her injuries the following day. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) The Jury in this Inquest found that the staffing levels, which were in line with the ONIC staffing ratio, were inadequate to give Amy sufficient one to one time in accordance with her care plan. It is understood that in December 2014 the Department of Health tasked NICE with developing guidance on staffing levels for inpatient CAMHS units but this appears to have §981872.1 been discontinued. There is currently no national guidance on staffing levels for inpatient CAHMS (2) There continues to be a shortage of acute mental health beds for young people close to where they live. This means that families have to travel long distances to visit their child and they are unable to provide the necessary day to day support to their child. Family support can play a very significant role in managing risk of suicide by avoiding and mitigating distress. | consider that the issues raised in this case should be addressed so that future deaths do not occur in similar circumstances and that action should be taken to reduce the risk of deaths of other children. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action by addressing these issues. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28" November 2016. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1 2. The Priory Group 3. Hounslow LB 4. I 6. West London Mental Health Trust | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. DATE: 3 October 2016 SIGNED: Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner, West Sussex sitting as Assistant Coroner, East Sussex 1 5981872.1
5 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
*, ~ A From Nicola Blackwood MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health and Innovation Department Richi dt He of Health 079 Whitehall London SWIA 2NS Ms P A Schofield Senior Coroner | | West Sussex Record Office Orchard Street Chichester West Sussex PO19 1DD Dy Ms Saft Thank you for your letter dated 5 October 2016, following the inquest into the death of Amy Rose El-Keria. I was very sorry to hear of Miss El-Keria’s death. Please extend my sincere condolences to her family. You have raised the following matters of concern: e The staffing levels at Ticehurst House Hospital and availability of national guidance on staffing levels for inpatient Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) e An on-going shortage of acute mental health beds for young people close to the community where they live. NHS England and Health Education England (HEE) are working to improve the capacity and capability of workforce delivering mental health care for children and young people, so that by 2020 an additional 70,000 receive effective treatment per year. This work extends to supporting training programmes for staff working in inpatient CAMHS to improve team functioning and delivery of evidence-based care. I have been advised that in 2016, NHS England commissioned the Royal College of Psychiatrists and National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH) to develop guidance on the implementation of the staffing required to deliver safe, effective and compassionate care in inpatient and community mental health care for children, young people and adults. The guidance will be relevant to commissioners, providers, young people and parents, and will contain: e A methodology for delivering safe, effective, compassionate and sustainable staffing; e Guidance on staffing to support delivery of the evidence-based treatment pathways (these include pathways for children and young people); e Recommendations on minimum staffing numbers and competences required across different mental healthcare settings; e Positive Practice Examples and Helpful Resources pack This programme is expected to be completed by December 2017 and will inform future revisions of the service standards for the Quality Network for Inpatient CAMHS (QNIC), which are reviewed every two years. You have also raised concerns about the quality of care provided to Miss El-Keria whilst she was in Ticehurst House Hospital and in particular the ability of staff to mitigate risks of suicide and self-harm. The Government revised the Mental Health Act 183 Code of Practice in 2015, which we expect all mental health providers to implement. The Code of Practice is clear that patients should have in place a robust care plan developed by a multi-disciplinary team and that this should include effective risk assessment. The Department of Health published good practice guidance on assessing and managing risk in mental health in 2009. This can be accessed through the GOV.UK. website at the following address: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assessing-and-managing-risk-in- mental-health-services You have also raised concerns about access to CAMHS inpatient beds close to where they live. I am aware of instances where children have had to travel too far away from home to access care. The Prime Minister announced in January 2017 that by 2020/21 no child will be sent out of their local area for non-specialist care. You may also be aware that NHS England has reviewed CAMHS inpatient services nationally which has resulted in an additional 56 CAMHS inpatient beds being commissioned across the country to meet demand. However, we should also be seeking to avoid unnecessary admissions to hospital wherever possible. That is why the Government is developing a comprehensive set of community-based mental health service pathways and standards so that more people can be treated in the community closer to home. We have also invested £400 million to improve crisis care services in the community so that people receive the right care Department of Health in the right place when they experience a mental health crisis. Every local area now has a mental health crisis care action plan in place. This Government is committed to achieving parity of esteem for mental and physical health. We have invested £1.4bn over the course of this Parliament in children and young people’s mental! health and we remain committed to delivering the vision set out in the Five Year Forward View for Mental Health and Future in Mind to transform mental health services. Every area in the country now has a children and young people’s transformation plan in place to achieve this and every area has developed a sustainability and transformation plan to deliver long-term improvements to health services. Every death of a person in a mental health setting is a tragedy and every patient has the right to expect high quality and safe care. This is why we commissioned the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to review the way in which deaths of people in NHS settings are investigated and learned from to avoid further tragedies. On 13 December 2016, the CQC published the findings of its review in a report titled Learning, candour and accountability: A review of the way NHS trusts review and investigate deaths of patients in England. It concluded that learning from deaths is not currently being given sufficient priority within the NHS and that bereaved families and carers have poor experiences with providers. The Secretary of State accepted the CQC’s recommendations for improvement and a programme to deliver his commitments is underway. The first stage will be the delivery this year of a National Framework on Learning from Deaths for NHS providers. The aim is to standardise and improve practice across providers by providing clear expectations in relation to identifying, reporting, reviewing, investigating and learning from deaths, and significantly, engaging with bereaved families and carers. From April 2017, Trusts will be required to publish specified information on deaths each quarter, including estimates of how many deaths were judged more likely than not to have been associated with problems in care. Trusts will also be required to publish evidence of learning and action as a result of the information. This increased transparency, through improved data collection and reporting, is about supporting a systemic, NHS-wide approach to learning from deaths. The CQC will also strengthen its assessment of providers by covering learning from deaths. In addition, as a result of cases such as that of Miss El-Keria’s, earlier this year I set out measures for how we will improve the recording and monitoring of deaths of patients under the care of inpatient child and adolescent mental health services, with every death now directly reported to Ministers. I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Miss El-Keria’s death to my attention. ows acer. 2@ NICOLA Oh ooD
PRIORY GROUP OF COMPANIES 27" January 2017 Ms Penelope Schofield Senior Coroner: West Sussex Coroner’s Office West Sussex Record Office Orchard Street Chichester West Sussex, PO19 1DD Private and confidential Dear Ms Schofield Re. Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths following the Inquest concerning the death of Ms Amy El Keria Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 18 November 2016 addressed to MMM of the Priory Group. Please note that I—Mhas now stepped down as Chief Executive Officer of the Priory Group and I have been appointed to that position with effect from 1 December 2016. I am therefore responding to your report on behalf of the Priory Group as Chief Executive Officer. Addressing your concerns 1. Adequacy of staffing levels We note your comments in relation to the QNIC guidance published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and we consider that this is still an appropriate reference point for the staffing of CAMHS units and continues to be used by many providers in determining and monitoring appropriate staffing levels. More generally, staffing levels at the Child and Adolescent High Dependency Unit (HDU) at Priory Hospital Ticehurst (and indeed on all our wards) are kept under constant review to ensure they are appropriate to the ever-changing needs and numbers of patients. Reviews of patient behaviours and their needs (as set out in care plans and risk assessments) are carried out at the beginning of each shift as part of the formal handover and adjustments made to staffing levels and mix as appropriate. In assessing adequacy, the following factors also need to be taken into account: i. nursing staff on a ward should not be considered in isolation from the support and input provided by other professionals on the ward (for example, one to one sessions are provided by a number of clinical professionals including therapists and doctors); ii. CAMHs patients attend school and therapy in the day (this therefore increases the staff/patients ratios remaining on the wards); iii. ward managers and other supernumerary staff are not taken into account in determining appropriate staff/patient ratios (but they do of course interact with patients throughout their shift); iv. staff can be called in from other wards at any time but particularly in an emergency; Priory Centrat Services are accredited by Priory Group, Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, W1i4 8UD Tel: 020 7605 0910 Fax: 020 7605 0911 info@priorygroup.com www.priorygroup.com Priory Group No. 1 Limited trading as the Priory Group, Registered Office: Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD. Registered in England No. 07480152. Part of the Priory Group of Companies, PGO1381/Oct13 vy. there are robust on-call arrangements which all senior managers must participate in; and vi. we encourage a culture of openness and team working and if employees have concerns around staffing they can raise those with the ward manager, clinical services manager or hospital director. 2. Risk assessment and management including the Risk Assessment Tool I am pleased to advise you that an enhanced Risk Assessment Tool was launched on 28 November 2016 and that staff briefings in relation to using the too! are underway. The new tool enables a better assessment of behavioural risk prior to admission and encourages patients to become more involved in understanding their risks and how to manage them. Feedback from our staff about the tool has been very positive. 3. Observations and information sharing In common with all healthcare providers and as part of its commitment to continuous improvement, Priory Group keeps all of its operational policies and procedures under constant review including in relation to observation and engagement. Observation recording forms have been enhanced and are now more user friendly with clear instructions on what should be recorded. We have also endeavoured to make the policy clearer in relation to information sharing. Local site compliance with observation procedures is monitored. via out-of-hours unannounced internal audits. 4. Emergency procedures Please note that in relation to BLS and ILS, monthly simulation drills are undertaken and these involve all staff and involve a variety of different emergency life support scenarios. Feedback from the drills has been very positive and indicates that staff are continually putting into practise the skills that they have been taught. Having reviewed your comments in relation to ALS training carefully, we consider there is greater overall benefit for the hospital if we retain an expert in ALS/resuscitation who will deliver training and coaching to our staff. The expert is to be retained under appropriate contractual arrangements and will provide face-to-face training for nursing and medical staff and will work with the hospital management team on developing and implementing the emergency scenarios and provide objective feedback. I do hope that these actions will provide you with the reassurance that you require. If I can be of further assistance then please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely ‘ Trevor Torrington Chief Executive Officer Priory Group
From Nicola Blackwood MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health and Innovation Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SW1A 2NS I© 02 MAR 2017 Department of Health Ms P A Schofield Senior Coroner West Sussex Record Office Orchard Street Chichester West Sussex P019 1DD Thank you for your letter dated 5 October 2016, following the inquest into the death of Amy Rose El-Keria. I was very sorry to hear of Miss El-Keria’s death. Please extend my sincere condolences to her family. You have raised the following matters of concern: • The staffing levels at Ticehurst House Hospital and availability of national guidance on staffing levels for inpatient Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) • An on-going shortage of acute mental health beds for young people close to the community where they live. NHS England and Health Education England (HEE) are working to improve the capacity and capability of workforce delivering mental health care for children and young people, so that by 2020 an additional 70,000 receive effective treatment per year. This work extends to supporting training programmes for staff working in inpatient CAMHS to improve team functioning and delivery of evidence-based care. I have been advised that in 2016, NHS England commissioned the Royal College of Psychiatrists and National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH) to develop guidance on the implementation of the staffing required to deliver safe, effective and compassionate care in inpatient and community mental health care for children, young people and adults. The guidance will be relevant to commissioners, providers, young people and parents, and will contain: • A methodology for delivering safe, effective, compassionate and sustainable staffing; • Guidance on staffing to support delivery of the evidence-based treatment pathways (these include pathways for children and young people); • Recommendations on minimum staffing numbers and competences required across different mental healthcare settings; • Positive Practice Examples and Helpful Resources pack This programme is expected to be completed by December 2017 and will inform future revisions of the service standards for the Quality Network for Inpatient CAMHS (QNIC), which are reviewed every two years. You have also raised concerns about the quality of care provided to Miss El-Keria whilst she was in Ticehurst House Hospital and in particular the ability of staff to mitigate risks of suicide and self-harm. The Government revised the Mental Health Act 183 Code of Practice in 2015, which we expect all mental health providers to implement. The Code of Practice is clear that patients should have in place a robust care plan developed by a multi-disciplinary team and that this should include effective risk assessment. The Department of Health published good practice guidance on assessing and managing risk in mental health in 2009. This can be accessed through the GOV.UK website at the following address: https://www.gov.uk/govemment/publications/assessing-and-managing-risk-in- mental-health-services You have also raised concerns about access to CAMHS inpatient beds close to where they live. I am aware of instances where children have had to travel too far away from home to access care. The Prime Minister announced in January 2017 that by 2020/21 no child will be sent out of their local area for non-specialist care. You may also be aware that NHS England has reviewed CAMHS inpatient services nationally which has resulted in an additional 56 CAMHS inpatient beds being commissioned across the country to meet demand. However, we should also be seeking to avoid unnecessary admissions to hospital wherever possible. That is why the Government is developing a comprehensive set of community-based mental health service pathways and standards so that more people can be treated in the community closer to home. We have also invested £400 million to improve crisis care services in the community so that people receive the right care Department of Health in the right place when they experience a mental health crisis. Every local area now has a mental health crisis care action plan in place. This Government is committed to achieving parity of esteem for mental and physical health. We have invested £1.4bn over the course of this Parliament in children and young people’s mental health and we remain committed to delivering the vision set out in the Five Year Forward Viewfor Mental Health and Future in Mind to transform mental health services. Every area in the country now has a children and young people’s transformation plan in place to achieve this and every area has developed a sustainability and transformation plan to deliver long-term improvements to health services. Every death of a person in a mental health setting is a tragedy and every patient has the right to expect high quality and safe care. This is why we commissioned the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to review the way in which deaths of people in NHS settings are investigated and learned from to avoid further tragedies. On 13 December 2016, the CQC published the findings of its review in a report titled Learning, candour and accountability: A review ofthe way NHS trusts review and investigate deaths ofpatients in England. It concluded that learning from deaths is not currently being given sufficient priority within the NHS and that bereaved families and carers have poor experiences with providers. The Secretary of State accepted the CQC’s recommendations for improvement and a programme to deliver his commitments is underway. The first stage will be the delivery this year of a National Framework on Learning from Deaths for NHS providers. The aim is to standardise and improve practice across providers by providing clear expectations in relation to identifying, reporting, reviewing, investigating and learning from deaths, and significantly, engaging with bereaved families and carers. From April 2017, Trusts will be required to publish specified information on deaths each quarter, including estimates of how many deaths were judged more likely than not to have been associated with problems in care. Trusts will also be required to publish evidence of learning and action as a result of the information. This increased transparency, through improved data collection and reporting, is about supporting a systemic, NHS-wide approach to learning from deaths. The CQC will also strengthen its assessment of providers by covering learning from deaths. In addition, as a result of cases such as that of Miss El-Keria’s, earlier this year I set out measures for how we will improve the recording and monitoring of deaths of patients under the care of inpatient child and adolescent mental health services, with every death now directly reported to Ministers. I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Miss El-Keria’s death to my attention. NICOLA BLACKWOOD
lay London Borough mit of Hounslow , Executive Director Penelope A Schofield Senior Coroner Coroner’s Office West Sussex Record Office Orchard Street Chichester West Sussex P019 1DD Dear Senior Coroner Schofield, Children’s and Adults’ Services Civic Centre, Lampton Road Hounslow TW34DN 'i'l Date: 24/11/2016 I write to respond on behalf of the Chief Executive, Mary Harpley, to whom you wrote on 05/10/2016. On 03/10/2016, and following the Inquest hearing touching upon the death of Amy Rose El- Keria, you issued a Preventing Future Death Report request from the London Borough of Hounslow, to deal with three particular issues, as follows: 1) The evidence given at the Inquest showed that there was a clear misapprehension by Hounslow Social Services as to their role in supporting Amy whilst at Ticehurst. It appears that Social Services did not appreciate their important ongoing role to ensure Amy’s welfare whilst placed at Ticehurst. , the Court expert, gave evidence that Hounslow may have seen this health funded placement as a stand-alone intervention that did not require their input. 2) Social Services clearly have a vital role to play in ensuring family contact where a child is placed far from their family home where difficulties arise. There was no assessment carried out to assess whether there was any need to provide support to a child in need under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989, even when Amy’s mother had specifically raised the difficulties she was having with contact with Amy, including the cost of travel, with her support worker. 3) The family gave evidence to the extent that having better contact with Amy and more input into her care may have brought about a different outcome particularly when she was distressed. The London Borough of Hounslow has re-drafted and updated its Thresholds Guidance & Assessment Protocols to ensure specific reference is made to these matters. Advice was sought from Mental Health professionals as part of this process. The London Borough of Hounslow will ensure that this information is disseminated across Children’s Social Care, and that refresher and update briefings will be delivered to all relevant social workers and staff. The information will be disseminated across Children’s Social Care teams the week of 28/11/2016 and Heads of Service and Team Managers will ensure that all managers and practitioners are fully briefed. Information will be shared by Heads of Service at their next Management Meetings and with social work staff at their next Team Meetings. An additional development session for refreshing knowledge will be delivered to Managers, Independent Reviewing Officers, and Advanced Practitioners at the next Managers’ Forum in the New Year. www.hounslow.gov.uk Your online A-Z of services These staff briefings and development sessions will specifically cover the local authority’s duties to children placed in hospital and other settings away from home under S85 and S86 of the Children Act 1989 and assistance in those circumstances under S17 Children Act 1989. They will additionally highlight to all social care staff that when notified of a Tier 4 mental health inpatient, the expectation is that the local authority shall undertake a S17 or S47 assessment as commensurate with its duties under the Children Act 1989. In both instances, the social worker assessment should consider issues of contact, including promotion and support of contact between those children and their families as appropriate. The threshold document is available to the public on the council’s website and specifically on its Local Safeguarding Children’s Board site. The document is public facing but is primarily aimed at assisting those professionals working with children to understand how thresholds are applied and how child protection professionals make decisions in respect of appropriate action. Assistance to children in need under S17 of the Children Act 1989 for children placed in a hospital or other setting is referenced at section 3.9 (pages 12-14) under the headings ‘Children Receiving Tier 4 Inpatient Provision’ and ‘Children Act 1989 Section 85 & 86 Duties’. The threshold document assists professionals to take appropriate action in relation to children in need and now has a specific section on children with mental health disorders to ensure that the specific needs of the vulnerable are highlighted and referrals are made to children’s social care as required. The threshold document is also published on Hounslow’s internet, which is publicly accessible and contained within the Children’s Social Care’s procedure manual. Specific reference is made to promotion and maintenance of contact between children and their families, following an assessment of needs. The awareness of social workers of their duties to children placed in health settings away from their homes and the importance to those children of regular contact with their families will be reinforced by the staff briefing sessions referenced above, as well as the express references in the threshold document. The London Borough of Hounslow is confident that the concerns expressed by you are and will be addressed by these actions, and will ensure that there is clarity and consistency in social work practice where children are placed in health and other settings away from home. Please don’t hesitate to contact me should you require further clarification or information. Yours sincerely, Director of Children’s Safeguarding & Specialist Services London Borough of Hounslow u
P^ICRY
GROUP OF COMPANIES
27th January 2017
Ms Penelope Schofield
Senior Coroner: West Sussex
Coroner's Office
West Sussex Record Office
Orchard Street
Chichester
West Sussex, P019 1DD
Private and confidential
Dear Ms Schofield
Re. Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths following the Inquest
concerning the death of Ms Amy El Keria
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 18 November 2016 addressed to Mr Tom
Riall of the Priory Group. Please note that
has now stepped down as Chief Executive
Officer of the Priory Group and I have been appointed to that position with effect from 1
December 2016. I am therefore responding to your report on behalf of the Priory Group as
Chief Executive Officer.
Addressing your concerns
1. Adequacy of staffing levels
We note your comments in relation to the QNIC guidance published by the Royal College of
Psychiatrists and we consider that this is still an appropriate reference point for the staffing
of CAMHS units and continues to be used by many providers in determining and monitoring
appropriate staffing levels.
More generally, staffing levels at the Child and Adolescent High Dependency Unit (HDU) at
Priory Hospital Ticehurst (and indeed on all our wards) are kept under constant review to
ensure they are appropriate to the ever-changing needs and numbers of patients. Reviews
of patient behaviours and their needs (as set out in care plans and risk assessments) are
carried out at the beginning of each shift as part of the formal handover and adjustments
made to staffing levels and mix as appropriate. In assessing adequacy, the following factors
also need to be taken into account:
i.
nursing staff on a ward should not be considered in isolation from the support and input
provided by other professionals on the ward (for example, one to one sessions are
provided by a number of clinical professionals including therapists and doctors);
ii. CAMHs patients attend school and therapy in the day (this therefore increases the
staff/patients ratios remaining on the wards);
iii. ward managers and other supernumerary staff are not taken
in
determining appropriate staff/patient ratios (but they do of course interact with patients
throughout their shift);
into account
iv. staff can be called in from other wards at any time but particularly in an emergency;
Priory Group, Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD
Tel: 020 7605 0910 Fax: 020 7605 0911
info@priorygroup.com www.priorygroup.com
Priory Group No. 1 Limited trading as the Priory Group, Registered Office: Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD.
Registered in England No. 07480152. Part of the Priory Group of Companies.
CHKS
3
l
t
c
O
/
1
8
3
1
0
G
P
Priory Central Services are accredited by
v.
there are robust on-call arrangements which all senior managers must participate in;
and
vi. we encourage a culture of openness and team working and if employees have concerns
around staffing they can raise those with the ward manager, clinical services manager
or hospital director.
2. Risk assessment and management including the Risk Assessment Tool
I am pleased to advise you that an enhanced Risk Assessment Tool was launched on 28
November 2016 and that staff briefings in relation to using the tool are underway. The new
tool enables a better assessment of behavioural risk prior to admission and encourages
patients to become more involved in understanding their risks and how to manage them.
Feedback from our staff about the tool has been very positive.
3. Observations and information sharing
In common with all healthcare providers and as part of its commitment to continuous
improvement, Priory Group keeps all of its operational policies and procedures under
constant review including in relation to observation and engagement. Observation recording
forms have been enhanced and are now more user friendly with clear instructions on what
should be recorded. We have also endeavoured to make the policy clearer in relation to
information sharing. Local site compliance with observation procedures is monitored via
out-of-hours unannounced internal audits.
4. Emergency procedures
Please note that in relation to BLS and ILS, monthly simulation drills are undertaken and
these involve all staff and involve a variety of different emergency life support scenarios.
Feedback from the drills has been very positive and indicates that staff are continually
putting into practise the skills that they have been taught.
Flaving reviewed your comments in relation to ALS training carefully, we consider there is
greater overall benefit for the hospital if we retain an expert in ALS/resuscitation who will
deliver training and coaching to our staff. The expert is to be retained under appropriate
contractual arrangements and will provide face-to-face training for nursing and medical staff
and will work with the hospital management team on developing and implementing the
emergency scenarios and provide objective feedback.
I do hope that these actions will provide you with the reassurance that you require. If I can
be of further assistance then please do not hesitate to contact me.
Chief Executive Officer
Priory Group
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.