Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Rex Hall

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0422, written 29 Nov 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Nov 2016
Reference2016-0422
DeceasedRex Hall
CoronerEmma Brown
Coroner areaBirmingham and Solihull
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Health and Care Professions Council

CORONER

tam Emma Brown Area Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 10 August 2016 | commenced an investigation into the death of Rex Brook Hall. The investigation
concluded at the end of an inquest on 21 November 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was natural
causes.

mH
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The Deceased passed away at the Solihull Hospital on the 28 July 2016 at 16:10. The Deceased had
arrived at Solihull Hospital by ambulance at 14:39 with a reported history of right arm pain and atrial
fibrillation, however, at 15:37 an ECG identified that he was experiencing a myocardial infarction and he
was admitted to resuscitation but went into cardiac arrest at approximately 15:50 from which he could
not be resuscitated. ECGs taken by paramedics at 13:59 and 14:03 showed ST elevation; this was not
recognised by the paramedics nor were the ECGs reviewed on arrival at hospital. If ST elevation had been
identified Mr Hall would have been transferred for assessment at the PCI unit at Birmingham Heartlands
Hospital but although possible, it is unlikely that he would have survived.

Based on information from the Deceased’s treating clinicians the medical cause of death was determined
to be:

1a) ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken, in the circumstances it is my statutory
duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: —

That there may be deficiencies in the foundation training of paramedics:
1. one of the paramedics who qualified in 2015 after a 2 year foundation degree gave evidence
that he had never had any formal testing on interpretation of 12 lead ECG; :
2. the same paramedic gave evidence that he was not aware from his training that arm pain is a
recognised, albeit, atypical sign of myocardial infarction; and
3. two paramedics did not identify obvious ST elevation (the other paramedic completed a diploma
in paramedic science in August 2012).

6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take
such action.

7 YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by
23 January 2016. i, the Coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: West
Midlands Ambulance Service, the Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust and the family of Mr. Hall. |
have also sent it to Public Health England who may find it useful or of interest.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.

ac
9 29/11/2016

Signature
Emma Brow!

ee |

a Coroner Birmingham and Solihull

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Hcpc (PDF)
Park House tel +44 (0300 500 6184 health & care
184-186 Kennington Park Read — fax +44 (0}20 7820 9684 professions
London SE11 4BU www.hcope-uk.org council

Mrs Louise Hunt

Senior HM Coroner
Birmingham and Solihull Areas
50 Newton Street

Birmingham

B4 6NE

Your re: 115215 - REX BROOK HALL (EB/RP)

2 December 2019
Dear Mrs Hunt
Rex Brook Hall — Deceased

| am writing further to your letter of 20 November 2019, addressed to Marc Seale,
concerning the HCPC’s response to the Report to Prevent Future Deaths sent on 29
November 2016. | am responding as Mr Seale is no longer the Chief Executive of the
HCPC.

| must first apologise that | have not been able to retrieve a copy of any response
send to 2016/2017. In view of this please find a response to the actions taken
relevant to the matters of concern raised.

We note the concerns raised regarding foundation level training for paramedics. We
have taken significant steps within the sector to support the development of
paramedic practice. In particular, in March 2018 we determined it necessary to raise
the threshold level of entry to the Register to degree level (levels 6/9/10 on the
relevant UK qualifications frameworks). The threshold level for entry to the Register
for paramedics was changed to degree level for the following reasons:

e A large majority of respondents to the public consultation argued that degree
level was necessary for safe and effective contemporary practice.

e The profile of paramedic education and training has continued to develop —
Degree level programmes now account for almost half of all approved
paramedic programmes.

e Degree level education and training is necessary to deliver the Standards of
proficiency to the depth required for contemporary paramedic practice (see
bullet point above). The descriptors of qualifications at level 6/9/10 articulate
requirements for ‘personal responsibility’ and decision making in ‘complex and
unpredictable circumstances’ which is consistent with what stakeholders told
us about the contemporary requirements of paramedics in practice.

Whilst there were no significant changes to the standards of proficiency (SOPs)
themselves, the nature of paramedic practice necessitated a raising of the level of
learning required to achieve them, as articulated by the revised threshold level of
entry. It is important to note that this change would not affect any current registrants
who will not have trained to the new level. The new level will be applied from
September 2021, at which point all training routes into the paramedic profession will
be set at degree level (or equivalent).

The SOPs for paramedics set out the knowledge, skills and abilities individuals must
meet and maintain to register with us, and practice safely and effectively as a
paramedic. These standards have been revised periodically, to ensure they remain
relevant to current practice for the paramedic profession. In relation to the specific
points regarding the training of the paramedics in question, the SOPs for paramedics
include specific reference to the need for paramedics to:

e understand the structure and function of the human body, together with
knowledge of health, disease, disorder and dysfunction, relevant to the
paramedic profession (13.1)

e understand the following aspects of biological science, including: human
anatomy and physiology, especially the dynamic relationships of human
structure and function and the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, respiratory,
digestive, endocrine, urinary, reproductive, integumentary and nervous
systems (13.8)

e understand the following aspects of clinical science, including: pathological
changes and related clinical features of conditions encountered in pre-hospital
and out-of-hospital practice & physiological, pharmacological, structural,
behavioural and functional changes in patient presentation (13.11)

e be able to conduct appropriate diagnostic or monitoring procedures,
treatment, therapy or other actions safely and effectively (14.3)

e be able to conduct a thorough and detailed physical examination of the patient
using appropriate skills to inform clinical reasoning and guide the formulation
of a differential diagnosis across all age ranges (14.12)

The SOPs were last revised and republished in 2014, and are applied to all levels of
training currently in existence (and in existence at the time of the events in question),
including any of those set at Foundation degree level. We approve education and
training programmes that can demonstrate their curriculum and assessment ensures
that all individuals who receive the final award leading HCPC registration have
successfully met all the SOPs (including those highlighted above). It is on this basis

that all individuals are deemed eligible to apply with us for registration. Once
registered, all registrants must continue to maintain their adherence to these
standards to remain on the register, including showing evidence of their continuing
professional development if audited. We are currently undertaking a review of the
SOPs and will liaise with the College of Paramedics on the concerns raised in your
report to explore whether any amendments should be made in this regard.

Where specific concerns are raised around an identifiable registrant's practice, we
can investigate and if necessary consider their fitness to practise further. We can
also investigate identified approved education and training providers, if there were
concerns raised about the teaching and learning being provided. Should any
specific concerns be raised as a result of your investigation, we will consider these
and take appropriate action.

Yours sincerely

Ze Book

John Barwick
Interim Chief Executive and Deputy Registrar

Related reports

Other reports by Emma Brown

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.