Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0422, written 29 Nov 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 29 Nov 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0422 |
| Deceased | Rex Hall |
| Coroner | Emma Brown |
| Coroner area | Birmingham and Solihull |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Health and Care Professions Council CORONER tam Emma Brown Area Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 10 August 2016 | commenced an investigation into the death of Rex Brook Hall. The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on 21 November 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was natural causes. mH CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The Deceased passed away at the Solihull Hospital on the 28 July 2016 at 16:10. The Deceased had arrived at Solihull Hospital by ambulance at 14:39 with a reported history of right arm pain and atrial fibrillation, however, at 15:37 an ECG identified that he was experiencing a myocardial infarction and he was admitted to resuscitation but went into cardiac arrest at approximately 15:50 from which he could not be resuscitated. ECGs taken by paramedics at 13:59 and 14:03 showed ST elevation; this was not recognised by the paramedics nor were the ECGs reviewed on arrival at hospital. If ST elevation had been identified Mr Hall would have been transferred for assessment at the PCI unit at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital but although possible, it is unlikely that he would have survived. Based on information from the Deceased’s treating clinicians the medical cause of death was determined to be: 1a) ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken, in the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: — That there may be deficiencies in the foundation training of paramedics: 1. one of the paramedics who qualified in 2015 after a 2 year foundation degree gave evidence that he had never had any formal testing on interpretation of 12 lead ECG; : 2. the same paramedic gave evidence that he was not aware from his training that arm pain is a recognised, albeit, atypical sign of myocardial infarction; and 3. two paramedics did not identify obvious ST elevation (the other paramedic completed a diploma in paramedic science in August 2012). 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 23 January 2016. i, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: West Midlands Ambulance Service, the Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust and the family of Mr. Hall. | have also sent it to Public Health England who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. ac 9 29/11/2016 Signature Emma Brow! ee | a Coroner Birmingham and Solihull
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Park House tel +44 (0300 500 6184 health & care 184-186 Kennington Park Read — fax +44 (0}20 7820 9684 professions London SE11 4BU www.hcope-uk.org council Mrs Louise Hunt Senior HM Coroner Birmingham and Solihull Areas 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE Your re: 115215 - REX BROOK HALL (EB/RP) 2 December 2019 Dear Mrs Hunt Rex Brook Hall — Deceased | am writing further to your letter of 20 November 2019, addressed to Marc Seale, concerning the HCPC’s response to the Report to Prevent Future Deaths sent on 29 November 2016. | am responding as Mr Seale is no longer the Chief Executive of the HCPC. | must first apologise that | have not been able to retrieve a copy of any response send to 2016/2017. In view of this please find a response to the actions taken relevant to the matters of concern raised. We note the concerns raised regarding foundation level training for paramedics. We have taken significant steps within the sector to support the development of paramedic practice. In particular, in March 2018 we determined it necessary to raise the threshold level of entry to the Register to degree level (levels 6/9/10 on the relevant UK qualifications frameworks). The threshold level for entry to the Register for paramedics was changed to degree level for the following reasons: e A large majority of respondents to the public consultation argued that degree level was necessary for safe and effective contemporary practice. e The profile of paramedic education and training has continued to develop — Degree level programmes now account for almost half of all approved paramedic programmes. e Degree level education and training is necessary to deliver the Standards of proficiency to the depth required for contemporary paramedic practice (see bullet point above). The descriptors of qualifications at level 6/9/10 articulate requirements for ‘personal responsibility’ and decision making in ‘complex and unpredictable circumstances’ which is consistent with what stakeholders told us about the contemporary requirements of paramedics in practice. Whilst there were no significant changes to the standards of proficiency (SOPs) themselves, the nature of paramedic practice necessitated a raising of the level of learning required to achieve them, as articulated by the revised threshold level of entry. It is important to note that this change would not affect any current registrants who will not have trained to the new level. The new level will be applied from September 2021, at which point all training routes into the paramedic profession will be set at degree level (or equivalent). The SOPs for paramedics set out the knowledge, skills and abilities individuals must meet and maintain to register with us, and practice safely and effectively as a paramedic. These standards have been revised periodically, to ensure they remain relevant to current practice for the paramedic profession. In relation to the specific points regarding the training of the paramedics in question, the SOPs for paramedics include specific reference to the need for paramedics to: e understand the structure and function of the human body, together with knowledge of health, disease, disorder and dysfunction, relevant to the paramedic profession (13.1) e understand the following aspects of biological science, including: human anatomy and physiology, especially the dynamic relationships of human structure and function and the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, endocrine, urinary, reproductive, integumentary and nervous systems (13.8) e understand the following aspects of clinical science, including: pathological changes and related clinical features of conditions encountered in pre-hospital and out-of-hospital practice & physiological, pharmacological, structural, behavioural and functional changes in patient presentation (13.11) e be able to conduct appropriate diagnostic or monitoring procedures, treatment, therapy or other actions safely and effectively (14.3) e be able to conduct a thorough and detailed physical examination of the patient using appropriate skills to inform clinical reasoning and guide the formulation of a differential diagnosis across all age ranges (14.12) The SOPs were last revised and republished in 2014, and are applied to all levels of training currently in existence (and in existence at the time of the events in question), including any of those set at Foundation degree level. We approve education and training programmes that can demonstrate their curriculum and assessment ensures that all individuals who receive the final award leading HCPC registration have successfully met all the SOPs (including those highlighted above). It is on this basis that all individuals are deemed eligible to apply with us for registration. Once registered, all registrants must continue to maintain their adherence to these standards to remain on the register, including showing evidence of their continuing professional development if audited. We are currently undertaking a review of the SOPs and will liaise with the College of Paramedics on the concerns raised in your report to explore whether any amendments should be made in this regard. Where specific concerns are raised around an identifiable registrant's practice, we can investigate and if necessary consider their fitness to practise further. We can also investigate identified approved education and training providers, if there were concerns raised about the teaching and learning being provided. Should any specific concerns be raised as a result of your investigation, we will consider these and take appropriate action. Yours sincerely Ze Book John Barwick Interim Chief Executive and Deputy Registrar
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.