Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

William Wilkes

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0161, written 17 May 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report17 May 2017
Reference2017-0161
DeceasedWilliam Wilkes
CoronerThomas Osborne
Coroner areaMilton Keynes
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedMilton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Thomas Ralph Osborne 
Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  Joe Harrison, Chief Executive Milton Keynes 
University Hospital 

1 

CORONER 

I am Thomas Ralph Osborne, Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes.                                      

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 22nd September 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mr William Frederick 
Wilkes, aged 80. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10th May 2017. The 
conclusion of the inquest was that he died as the result of an accident. 
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

4 

The deceased was admitted to Milton Keynes University Hospital on 4th July 2016 following a fall 
at Neath House Residential Home. 

By 19th July 2016 the deceased was ready for discharge from the hospital.  Neath House 
indicated that they were unable to meet his needs unless a carer could be provided to stay with 
him 24 hours a day. 

A Continuing Healthcare Checklist was completed on 26th July 2016.  The Decision Support Tool 
was completed and an assessment by a Continuing Healthcare Nurse Assessor was completed 
on 8th August 2016. 

The report and confirmation of funding was completed on 17 August 2016. 

The Continuing Healthcare Team was unable to find a suitable placement for the deceased. 

The file was misplaced in the non-eligible tray that added to the delay from 19th August 2016 to 
the 30th August 2016.   

The failure to discharge the deceased resulted in him being cared for on Ward 18 which was 
inappropriate to meet his needs. 

There was a failure in communication between the hospital, the CCG and the family. 

The deceased was placed on one-to-one enhanced care but it was not always provided.   

The deceased suffered a further fall on 18th September 2016 and fractured his hip. 

The deceased died on 22nd September 2016. 

HM Coroners Office, Civic Offices, 1 Saxon Gate East, Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3EJ 
Tel 01908 254327    |    Fax 01908 253636 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it 
is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

During the course of the inquest it became apparent that the protocol and procedure for 
discharge of someone from hospital was cumbersome and time-consuming.  The result in this 
case was that, although the deceased was ready for discharge to a nursing home on the 19th 
July, he was not able to be transferred to a more appropriate care home prior to his death on 
22nd September. 

I also heard from the patient discharge lead from the hospital that the system was in urgent need 
of review.  

In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.  

Concerns 
1. That a system needs to be put in place locally so that the procedures for effecting discharge 
can be implemented within days rather than weeks. 
2. That a local protocol should be considered by both the Hospital Trust and the Clinical 
Commissioning Group for Milton Keynes. 

HM Coroners Office, Civic Offices, 1 Saxon Gate East, Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3EJ 
Tel 01908 254327    |    Fax 01908 253636 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power 
to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 
11th July 2017. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 

•  The family of Mr Wilkes 
•  The Care Quality Commission 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Dated 17th May 2017 

Signature_________________________ 
Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes 

HM Coroners Office, Civic Offices, 1 Saxon Gate East, Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3EJ 
Tel 01908 254327    |    Fax 01908 253636

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Respondent Not Named (PDF)
NHS)

Milton Keynes
University Hospital

NHS Foundation Trust

Standing Way

Our ref: JH/tw/hw Eaglestone
Milton Keynes
MK6 5LD

Date: 10" July 2017 01908 660033
www.mkhospital.nhs.uk

For people who have hearing loss
Minicom 01908 243924

Private and Confidential

Mr T R Osborne

Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes
HM Coroner's Office

Civic Offices

1 Saxon Gate East

CENTRAL MILTON KEYNES
MKQ9 3EJ

Dear Mr Osborne

Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Further Deaths

| am writing to formally respond to the Regulation 28 Report, received by my office 24 May,
arising from the Inquest you held on 10 May into the death of Mr William Wilkes at this

hospital.

That Mr Wilkes was unable to be discharged from hospital because an appropriate care
placement could not be found is deeply concerning, and | would like to record my sincere
regret to his family that the local health and care system did not give him the support and
setting he needed as soon as he was medically fit to be discharged from hospital.

| would like to assure you of our commitment to improving the speed and efficacy of the
discharge process for those patients who remain in our care, despite being medically fit to
leave hospital. We, with our partners in the wider local health care system, are dedicating
significant time and attention to try to resolve the problem of delayed discharges on a
sustainable basis.

Two matters of concern were raised in the Regulation 28 Report:-

1. That a system needs to be put in place locally so that the procedure for effecting
discharge can be implemented within days rather than weeks.

2. That a local protocol should be considered by both the Trust and the Clinical
Commissioning Group for Milton Keynes.

As you undoubtedly appreciate, the discharge process for those patients in need of onward
care immediately following their discharge from hospital, is reliant on the hospital, the
Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), the local authority and providers of community or
other relevant care settings working effectively together.

..../cont’d

We CAR 3 As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for Acting Chairman: Simon Lloyd

our patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you may be Chief Executive: Joe Harrison
asked to participate in a clinical trial. Please speak to your doctor or nurse if you have .
any concerns.

10" July 2017
For the attention of : Mr TR Osborne — Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes

Capacity in community and nursing care settings remains limited as demand continues to
increase, and with Milton Keynes’ growing older population, will continue to rise. The Trust is
aware that the CCG is currently working to address this issue, working with the Local
Authority. The Trust will provide every support within its remit to its partners in working to
improve and increase the number of community-funded beds available.

The Trust is also committed to a number of internal and partnership measures, including:-

4

Compliance with national guidance that 100% of patients waiting for Decision
Support Tool (DST) assessments are allocated a community bed whilst awaiting the
assessment. This will be through engagement with the Clinical Commissioning Group
to discuss the possible option of spot purchase community beds for this patient group
(a funding without prejudice approach).

Continue to improve patient flow across the organisation and the facilitation of early,
effective patient discharge. The Red2Green' project (part of the SAFER care
bundle) which was launched across the Trust in the week commencing 3rd July is a
nationally recognised improvement tool, ensuring that each patient bed day is
effective and has purpose. This evidence-based approach has seen demonstrable
improvements in pilot Trusts. We have piloted the project on two wards to test its
impact and success. It is now rolling out to the rest of the wards each week to ensure
staff are supported to make it a success. Red2Green is about ensuring that
patients’ time is not wasted and that every part of their care and experience during
their admission is valuable. Within this we are involving patients’ families and are in
the process of putting communications together to support and empower patients
and families with information and questions to ask to facilitate better discharge from
hospital. All these tools will ensure we are all planning for discharge from the point of
admission, as well as improving communication to patients, relatives and all
stakeholders.

Review of the Trust Discharge policy incorporating the guidance from the National
Institute for Health Care and Excellence (NICE) and NHS England’s Choice Policy
‘Patient's Choices To Avoid Long Hospital Stays’, incorporating a multi-agency
approach (including the CCG). This policy supports patients’ timely effective
discharge from an NHS inpatient setting, to a setting, which meets their needs and is
their preferred choice amongst available options. It applies to all adult inpatients in
NHS settings, and will be utilised before and during admission to ensure that those
who are assessed as medically fit for discharge can leave hospital in a safe and
timely way.

Patients whose discharges are delayed will continue to be tracked daily by the
Trust's Discharge Team at the daily huddle and as a key performance indicator on
Trust dashboards. This is discussed daily via email updates with the Local Authority
and Continuing Healthcare team. There is a system wide teleconference once a
week, and a weekly length of stay meeting, which is also system wide and includes
ward staff. Here we discuss all patients who have been in the hospital for over seven
days.

10" July 2017
For the attention of : Mr TR Osborne — Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes

5. Although the Continuing Healthcare process is not managed by the Trust, it is
anticipated that with the actions above and through collaboration with the CCG,
improvements can be made with patients placed in the most appropriate beds in a
timely manner.

| have also seen a copy of Milton Keynes CCG’s response to the Regulation 28 Report,
which sets out the wider health and care system working to address the matter of delayed
hospital discharge due to a lack of community capacity.

| hope this response provides adequate information and assurance that we are taking this
matter seriously and acting appropriately to improve matters for those patients who no
longer need acute care but onward support in an appropriate community setting.

Yours sincerely

-—
© al
OFESSOR JOE HARRISON

Chief Executive Officer

‘  https:/Awww.england.nhs.uk/south/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/1 2/rig-red-green-bed-
days.pdf

Related reports

Other reports by Thomas Osborne

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.