Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0214, written 18 Sep 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 18 Sep 2017 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2017-0214 |
| Deceased | Reginald Dixon |
| Coroner | Zafar Siddique |
| Coroner area | Black Country |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive, West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 2. Chief Coroner 1 CORONER I am Zafar Siddique, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of the Black Country. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 10 July 2017, I commenced an investigation into the death of the late Mr Reginald Dixon. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 4 September 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was a short form conclusion of accidental death. The cause of death was: 1a b c II Fractures Aspiration Of Gastric Contents Subdural And Traumatic Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Skull Fractures And Cerebral Contusions Systemic Hypertension, Left Clavicle, Left Rib And Left Neck Of Femur 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH i) On the 26th June 2017 at 1853 hours a 999 call was received by West Midlands Ambulance service (WMAS) to reports of a 70-year-old male, Mr Dixon who had an unwitnessed fall downstairs sustaining a head and back injury. ii) Initially it was reported the patient was conscious and breathing. The location of the incident was in Norton, Stourbridge. The call was triaged through Pathways and a category 3 response assigned. At that time, there was no available resource to immediately assign to the case. iii) At 1921 hours a second 999 call was received for the patient and this to was triaged through Pathways and a category 3 response assigned. It was reported that the patient’s condition had changed and they were now vomiting and becoming drowsy. There was still no available resource to immediately assign to the case. iv) At 1931 hours a third 999 call was received for the patient and it was reported that the patient’s condition had deteriorated further and following triage a category 2 response assigned. An ambulance was assigned to 1 [IL1: PROTECT] the case within 4 minutes but was some distance away from the incident. v) At 1945 hours a fourth 999 call was received and during this call the ambulance arrived on scene at 1950 hours, 57 minutes from the time of the original call. vi) The patient was found by the ambulance crew with a lowered conscious level and multiple injuries. Following assessment, the patient was conveyed to the major trauma centre during the transfer the crew were intercepted by the MERIT team, who anaesthetised the patient prior to continuing to hospital. vii) He was taken to Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham where it was identified the patient had an un-survivable head injury and wasn’t deemed suitable for neurosurgery and sadly passed away the same day. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. Firstly, evidence emerged during the inquest that the second call received by the WMAS operator at 1921 hours had been incorrectly triaged as Level 3. The evidence of vomiting and drowsiness should have resulted in a Level 2 categorisation and therefore faster response time. 2. Evidence also emerged during the inquest that there were insufficient resources available and average response times of 29 minutes. This delay posed a risk to patients. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 1. You may wish to consider further training of those staff involved in triaging response calls given the issues identified. 2. You may wish to consider further consultation with the Clinical Commissioning Group(s) in relation to the level of resource provided to deal with the Black Country population in light of insufficient resources being available in a timely manner as identified during this inquest. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 13 November 2017. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 2 [IL1: PROTECT] 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons; Family. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 15 September 2017 Mr Zafar Siddique Senior Coroner Black Country Area 3 [IL1: PROTECT]
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
West Midlands Ambulance Service Black Country Coroners Court Jack Judge House H les ow n a e St et Oldbury West Midlands B69 2AJ re Dear Mr Siddique I McIi Waterfront Business Park Brierley Hill West Midlands DY51LX Tel: 01384 215555 website: www.wmas.nhs.uk Thank you for your letter attaching the report to prevent future deaths. Please find our response below. Matter of concern - Firstly, evidence emerged during the inquest that the second call received by the WMAS operator at 1921 hours had been incorrectly triaged as Level 3. The evidence of vomiting and drowsiness should have resulted in a Level 2 categorisation and therefore faster response time. Response - The second 999 call had failed the audit completed against the Pathway system. The audit identified that the call assessor did not fully establish during the call the level of consciousness of the patient, further probing was required, due to the lack of probing on the call It is unclear whether the category 3 response which was generated was appropriate. As the category of call disposition depends on the answers provided by the caller it is not possible to determine whether this call would have generated a category 2 response. Action should be taken - You may wish to consider further training of those staff involved in triaging response calls given the issues identified, Response - Pathways is a national triage tool used by VVMAS to categorise 999 calls, our call assessors are not clinically trained therefore are guided by Pathways and the answers they gain from the caller in relation to the disposition of the call. Pathways provides its national training package to WMAS tutors. who in turn provide training to our call assessors. Pathways annually quality assesses our lead Tutor. who is then required to assess all WMAS tutors. Following this sertous ,nc,dent WMAS have ncIuded further education and refresher training around head injuries durhg NHS Path:;ays pdaie due to take place n o obc’ v rb Response - The number of ambulances on duty is done on historic demand data along with local intelligence. Resourcing is matched against a presumed demand profile. On this date resourcing for the Black Country division was above the predicted demand level. Despite this extra resourcing the demand experienced on the ambulance service during the time of this incident outstripped the available resources. Actions should be taken - You may wish to consider further consultation with the Clinical Commissioning Group(s) in relation to the level of resource provided to deal with the Black Country population in light of insufficient resources being available in a timely manner as identified during this inquest. Response - The Trusts Director of Clinical Commissioning and Service Development/ Executive Nurse has personally written to the Clinical Commissioning Group over the current resourcing provision and has included within that letter the Preventing Future Death report. Please find attached the letters of communication for your information. Yours Sincerely Head of Patient Safety
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.