Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Ronald Compson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0030, written 24 Jan 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Jan 2018
Reference2018-0030
DeceasedRonald Compson
CoronerZafar Siddique
Coroner areaBlack Country
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedThe Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Chief Executive, The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust 

1 

CORONER 

I am Zafar Siddique, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of the Black Country. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  the  29  November  2017,  I  commenced  an investigation into  the  death  of  Mr  Ronald 
Compson.   The investigation  concluded  at  the  end  of the  inquest  on  18  January  2018. 
The conclusion of the inquest was a short narrative conclusion of accident. 

The cause of death was:   

1a    
  b 
  c   
II   

Subdural Haematoma 
Fall 

Parkinsons Disease 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

i)  Mr  Compson  had  a  medical  history  including  Parkinsons  disease  and  was 
admitted to Russells Hall Hospital on the 16 November 2017 after a period 
of confusion and drowsiness. 

ii)  He  was  initially  treated  for  sepsis  and  then  later  his  medication  for 

Parkinson's revised.   

iii)  On  the  18  November  2017  at  9.40pm  he  had  an  unwitnessed  fall  from  a 
chair  near  his  bed  and  sustained  a  head  injury.    Initially  his  neurological 
observations were within normal range.  

iv)  There  was  a  failure  to  notify  a  Doctor  and  no  examination  took  place  by  a 
Doctor  until  the following morning  at  around  3.30am.   At  this  stage  he  had 
vomited on two occasions and a CT scan was requested.  

v)  His  condition  declined  and  he  became  unresponsive at  around  7am  and  a 

CT scan revealed a subdural haematoma.  

vi)  He  wasn't  deemed  suitable  for  neurosurgery  and  placed  on  an  end  of  life 

care pathway and sadly died on the 25 November 2017.  

1 

[IL1: PROTECT] 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my  opinion  there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is  taken.  In  the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1.  Evidence  emerged  during  the  inquest  that  there  was  a  failure  to  contact  a 
Doctor  and  it  isn’t  clear  if  this  was  a  system  failure  through  the  “nerve  centre” 
system designed to inform the on call Doctor.    

2.  There were two separate incidents of vomiting and poor record keeping of when 

these occurred. 

3.  There was poor communication to the family about the initial fall. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

1.  Given the examples of poor record keeping, poor communication with the family 
and notification/escalation issues to a Doctor for examination.  You may wish to 
consider reviewing your policy and/or additional training given to those involved. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 21 March 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following  Interested 
Persons; Family. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or  of  interest.  You  may  make  representations  to  me,  the  coroner,  at  the  time  of  your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

 24 January 2017                                                   

Mr Zafar Siddique
Senior Coroner 
Black Country Area 

2 

[IL1: PROTECT]

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dudley Group NHS Trust (PDF)
Ref: Reg28/RC/Mar18                                                                         

Russells Hall Hospital 
DUDLEY 
West Midlands 
DY1 2HQ 

20 March 2018 

Private and Confidential 

Mr Zafar Siddique, 
Senior Coroner  
Black Country Coroner’s Court 
Jack Judge House 
Halesowen Street 
Oldbury 
West Midlands 
B69 2AJ 

Dear Mr Siddique, 

Re: Response to Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – The late Mr Ronald Compson 

I am in receipt of your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths following the inquest and your ruling on  
18 January 2018, in respect of the late Ronald Compson. I should extend again the condolences of the Trust to  
Mr Compson’s family. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  

1.  Evidence emerged during the inquest that there was a failure to contact a Doctor and it isn’t clear if this was a 

system failure through the “nerve centre” system designed to inform the on-call Doctor. 

2.  There were two separate incidents of vomiting and poor record keeping of when these occurred. 

3.  There was poor communication to the family about the initial fall. 

The important issues you raise have been taken very seriously and I enclose a summary of the Root Cause Analysis 
(RCA) investigation undertaken by the Trust regarding these. The investigation has shown that there was no nerve 
system failure identified, the failure to contact a doctor was as a consequence of human error due to the input of 
incorrect patient details into the system. 

The enclosed action plan confirms the actions taken subsequent to the investigation and target dates for completion of 
those actions.  

I trust the information provides assurances to you that The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust has taken appropriate 
action to address the matters of concern raised. 

Yours faithfully, 

Diane Wake 
Chief Executive 

Chairman:  Jenni Ord                                                                                                   Chief Executive:  Diane Wake 

Chief Executive:

Related reports

Other reports by Zafar Siddique

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.