Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Julius Little

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0371, written 28 Oct 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Oct 2019
Reference2019-0371
DeceasedJulius Little
CoronerGraeme Irvine
Coroner areaInner North London
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Julius Jake Little died 7th June 2019 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 
Dean of Students  

University of the Arts London 
272 High Holborn 
London WC1V 7EY 
United Kingdom  

2. 
Chief Executive - Claire Marchant 
UCAS 
Rosehill 
New Barn Lane 
Cheltenham 
Gloucestershire 
GL52 3LZ 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Mr Graeme Irvine 
           Assistant Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  12th  June  2019  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the 
investigation 
death  of  Julius  Jake  Little  aged  20.  The 
concluded  at  the  end  of  the  inquest  on  9th  October  2019.  I 
made a determination at inquest  of suicide, recording that;  

"At  1.03  am  on  7th  June  2019  Julius  Jake  little  was  found 
unresponsive  in  his  room  in  student  halls  of  residence.  A  self 
applied  ligature  secured  to  a  wardrobe  clothes  rail  was  tied 
around  his  neck.  Despite  efforts  to  resuscitate  him,  life  was 
pronounced extinct at 02.03." 

The medical cause of death was recorded as; 

   "1.a suspension by ligature" 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mr Little was a first year undergraduate at UAL living in halls of 
residence. On 7th June 2019 he was found hanging from a belt 
attached  to  a  clothes  rail  in  his  wardrobe.  Mr  Little  had  a 
history  of  depression  and  was  receiving  treatment  in  the  form 
of psychotherapy and medication overseen by a psychiatrist  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest,  the  evidence  revealed 
matters  giving  rise  to  concern.  In  my  opinion,  there  is  a  risk 
that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is  taken.  In  the 
circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

In  the course  of  hearing  an  inquest  at  Poplar  Coroner's Court 
on  9/10/19  into  the  death  of  Julius  Jake  Little,  evidence  was 
considered  in  relation  to  available  support  services  offered  to 
undergraduates  at  UAL  who  have  a  history  of  mental  health 
problems. 

The  Dean  of  Students  at  UAL 

,    gave 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 evidence that applicants to UAL make an online application to 
the    admissions  organisation  UCAS.  The  application  invites 
them  to  disclose  any  history  they  have  of  mental  health 
problems,  upon  being  accepted  on  a  course  of  study  this 
information is provided to the admitting university. 

indicated 

the  mental  health  disclosure 
information is used to target students that may require support, 
and at UAL emails are sent to undergraduates, inviting them to 
register with the university's support services. 

that 

Regrettably,  it  would  appear  that  of  UAL's  cohort  of  students 
that  disclosed  mental  health  problems  to  UCAS,  only  66%  of 
undergraduates  responded  to  the  email  invitation  offering 
mental health support. The remaining 33%, a total of some 200 
students, did not respond to the offer. 

I  asked 
  whether  the  identity  of  students  who  had 
made  a  mental  health  disclosure  in  their  UCAS  application  
was communicated to tutors and halls of residence staff at the 
university.  I  was  informed  that  this  information  was  not  so 
disseminated  as  it  would  be    breach  of  data  protection 
legislation, this appears to be a missed opportunity. 

I  cannot  suggest  a  solution  to  this  problem,  however  it  does 
appear  to  be  a  lost  opportunity  to  secure  this  valuable 
information but not to utilise it effectively. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths 
and  I  believe  that  your  organisation  have  the  power  to  take 
such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of 
the date of this report, namely by 23rd December 2019.  I, the 
coroner, may extend the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 proposed  to  be  taken,  setting  out  the  timetable  for  action. 
Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

  The  Office  for  Students,  Nicholson  House,  Lime  Kiln 

Close, Stoke Gifford, BRISTOL BS34 8SR 

  University Mental Health Advisers Network (UMHAN). c/o 
Impact  Hub,  Walker  Building,  58  Oxford  Street, 
Birmingham, B5 5NR 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of 
your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or 
redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report 
to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time 
of  your  response, about  the  release or  the  publication  of  your 
response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

DATE    28th October 2019                                           

SIGNED BY ASSISTANT CORONER GRAEME IRVINE 

4

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Ual (PDF)
Udl:

; 23 DEC 2019

Mr Graeme Irvine 20 December 2019
Assistant Coroner

Inner North London

St Pancras Coroner’s Court

Camley Street

London

NiC 4PP

__ Dear Mr Irvine,

| write on behalf of University of the Arts London in response to the Prevention
of Future Deaths report dated 28 October 2019, related to the death of Julius
Jake Little. My response describes improvements made in the university’s
processes for the 2019/20 academic year with the aim of preventing future
deaths, | also explain our approach to sharing information.

Improvements in our processes

For the 2019/20 academic year we have made improvements to our processes
for engaging disabled students, including those with long-term mental health
conditions, with our support services. At the point that the information in
respect of mental health conditions is shared with the university by UCAS, a
pre- and post-enrolment email campaign is initiated, asking students to
engage with support services. Our Disability Advisers make contact with
students who have declared a disability and are requesting support. In
addition, Disability Advisers are now actively following up on those students
who have not engaged with support services. This has enabled us to
significantly reduce the number of students who declared a long-term mental
health condition prior to enrolment and are not engaging with support services
from 33% in 2018 to 4% in 2019. Our Disability Advisers are continuing to
follow-up with those students.

Our approach to sharing information

Members of staff within the Disability Service are aware of the condition or
impairment of individual students, including in relation to when there are
concerns in respect of mental health. We then develop an individual support
agreement with the student which includes making reasonable adjustments
including adapting the environment, in order to meet their needs. This
information is shared more widely with the express permission of the student.

Disability-related information is classified as ‘special category personal data’
under the GDPR. This means there are very limited circumstances in which we
can share such data without the informed consent of the student in question.

University of the Arts London 272 High Holbom +44(0)20 7514 8852
London WC1V 7EY m.crawley@arts.ac.uk
United Kingdom www.arts.ac.uk

The GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 permit such data to be shared
only where there is a risk of harm to self or others. In such circumstances we
share information about the student on a case by case basis if we believe it is
necessary to protect the individual or others from harm.

We regularly review our policies and procedures around data sharing in the
context of mental health to ensure we are both compliant with the law and
supporting the needs of students effectively.

| believe this response provides the information requested. If you require
further details please contact me.

Yours sincerely
orcs of Students
Response from Ucas (PDF)
UCAS Ref: CM/SN UCAS

Mr G Irvine Rosehill
Assistant Coroner 5 r New Barn Lane
Inner North London

St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street

London N1C 4PP

Cheltenham
GLS2 3LZ

t +44 (0)1242 222 444
f +44 (0)1242 544 960

www.UCas.com

18 December 2019

Dear Graeme Irvine,

Thank you for sending a copy of the Regulation 28 report of 28 October 2019, concerning
the inquest into the tragic death of Julius Little on 7 June 2019.

UCAS is an independent charity, running the UK’s national higher education admissions
service. Every year, we help around 700,000 students apply for full-time undergraduate
courses at nearly 400 UK universities and colleges.

We are committed to ensuring that everyone who can benefit from higher education can do
so —and to go on to succeed once they have started their course. We work in partnership
with charities and other organisations, to provide practical and inspiring information, advice
and resources for underrepresented groups, as well as producing reports to inform public
debate.

As part of this commitment, we regularly review our products and services to ensure that
they are fit for purpose. We have been reviewing the questions we currently ask applicants
on the UCAS application, and considering how we can improve the flow of information
between the student and the course provider. A key area we have been focusing on is the
question that allows applicants to disclose a disability, learning difference, illness or mental
health condition, acknowledging that there are changes we could make to facilitate
disclosure and reassure students about how this information is used. However, the data
collected by UCAS flows into the systems of nearly 400 universities and colleges across the
UK, and into a range of other data collection exercises, such as the Higher Education
Statistics Agency (HESA) Student Record, so significant planning and engagement across the
whole higher education sector is necessary to implement any changes - it isn’t just a change
to the UCAS application.

In order to initiate work on the question, we held a roundtable discussion in July 2019 with
representatives from higher education sector bodies, expert organisations and course
providers to understand the most appropriate and effective ways in which this question
could be improved. Subsequently, we have drafted changes to the language of the question
and the accompanying help text in response to the points raised, and we have just finished
collating feedback on the first draft. We anticipate the improved version will be in place for

actions, which we will are now looking to take forward in the new year. Most significantly,
JCQ (Joint Council for Qualifications) has agreed to move their A level results embargo to
8am to minimise the time gap between students receiving results and accessing support.
Additionally, UCAS will be working collaboratively with JCQ, the Department for Education
and other stakeholders to develop good practice for schools, colleges and HE providers to
Promote consistency in how results are communicated to students, and the support
offered.

| hope this offers clarification on how UCAS has been working to collaboratively with experts
and course providers to improve the applicant experience and support students with mental
health concerns. We will update you on the details of the reviewed question and good
practice once they are finalised, along with any future developments, in due course.

Yours sincerely
Clare Marchant
Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Graeme Irvine

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.