Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0091, written 1 Apr 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 1 Apr 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0091 |
| Deceased | Jake Perry |
| Coroner | HG Mark Bricknell |
| Coroner area | Herefordshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
H G Mark Bricknell Senior Coroner for County of Herefordshire REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: FS Medical Director, Wye Valley NHS Trust CORONER | am Hugh Gregory Mark Bricknell, Senior Coroner for County of Herefordshire CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 2 August 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of Jake Thomas PERRY CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Parenteral Nutrition had water soluble vitamins in the B Group removed CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — Concern relates to the variation of the Parenteral Nutrition and communication ls Patients with a medical condition overseen by another hospital should have a named Consultant at their local hospital. 2. Where a patient is admitted and has a medical condition overseen by another hospital the specialist department (generally involved in the patient's care) of the overseeing hospital (in addition to any other specialist hospital or department) should be consulted. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by the 27th May 2020 |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: | Chief Medical Officer, Birmingham Women and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust 1am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Dated 1 April 2020 ie gre for County of Herefordshire
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Chief Medical Officer
Executive Team
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHSFT
Steelhouse Lane
Birmingham
B4 6NH
www.bwc.nhs.uk
Mr H G Mark Bricknell
Senior Coroner for County of Herefordshire
BY EMAIL
C/O Nigel Phillips
Coroner’s Officer
coroners@herefordshire.gov.uk
28 April 2020
Dear Mr Bricknell
Re: Jake Perry; Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
I write in response to your Regulation 28 Report issued to Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation
Trust on 1 April 2020, following the inquest into the tragic death of Jake Perry.
We would like to reiterate our sincere condolences to Jake’s family, who sadly have lost a very special young
person.
The matters of concern you raised in your Report refer to the variation of Parenteral Nutrition and communication of
such. Specifically, you are concerned that secure procedures are required in connection with changes to Parenteral
Nutrition and that consideration should be given to the production of a standard Parenteral Nutrition which is varied
on specific instructions of the prescribing consultant. I will respond to each of your concerns in turn.
You are aware that immediately following this incident, the Trust commissioned an investigation into the care and
treatment we provided to Jake. Following the investigation of this incident a significant amount of work has been
undertaken by the Trust to improve our own internal processes. We have ensured that national guidance such as
that the best practice guidance on Homecare medicines, issued in 2011 and known as ‘the Hackett Report’1, has
been put into practice. For ease of reference, the relevant sections within the report are reproduced below:
1 http://media.dh.gov.uk/network/121/files/2011/12/111201-Homecare-Medicines-Towards-a-Vision-for-the-Future2.pdf
5.15 Ensure governance arrangements in relation to patient safety state aspects of care for which the following are
responsible
• Hospital
• Homecare Company
• GP
• Health professionals
• Patient
• Availability of backup advice and support
5.16 It should explain:
• How will the treatment plan be communicated to the patient, homecare company, GP other healthcare
providers.
• How will the initial prescription and repeat prescriptions be produced, and who will check this prescription in
the Trust before communicating to the home healthcare company.
• What level of clinical checking of the prescription and patient will the home healthcare company undertake.
• How will the clinical and laboratory monitoring be undertaken.
• What are the arrangements for patient safety incident reporting, performance monitoring and outcome
monitoring?
All these reports should be shared with the Trust and then the NRLS.
The Trust should have a formal way of reviewing these reports and taking necessary action.
5.17 The home healthcare company should also provide to the Trust electronic copies of medicines policies, control
of infection policies, and other policies impacting on patient safety and clinical effectiveness.
The Hackett Report was written generally, for all medicines delivered by homecare companies and not specifically
for home Parenteral Nutrition. It has therefore taken some time to agree the details of such arrangements for this
specialised area. There have been improvements at a national level, such as an agreed national template for the
initial prescription and improved working with homecare suppliers to identify errors and learn from them.
Improvements have also been made to the National framework. There is a national review being undertaken on the
safety and resilience of aseptic services, including the production of home Parenteral Nutrition2. Birmingham
Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust has submitted evidence to this review on various aspects of
paediatric services including the lessons learnt directly from Jake’s case.
As you are aware, we have reflected upon Jake’s sad and untimely death in detail and we have put measures in
place in an attempt to prevent any recurrence of such an incident. In order to strengthen the measures we have put
in place locally, the Trust considers that computerised prescription should be used throughout the ordering process
of PN. However, unfortunately, the Trust is not in a position to effect such a change in the market; the requirement
for a single format electronic prescription for PN would require a mandate by NHS England.
PN is an intravenous medication, with more than 50 ingredients and additives, and as such is liable to medication
errors, especially in paediatric patients where all the calculations are weight-based. Computerised prescription,
whether standardised or bespoke to the individual patient, ought to be used in the ordering process of PN. We
therefore consider that computer assisted prescribing software for PN should become readily available, as a
standard for all units set out in the national Home PN Framework as these programs can save time, decrease
prescription and compounding errors, and improve the quality of nutritional care.
We have recommended a national standardised electronic prescribing system for Parenteral Nutrition as we noted
that there needed to be improved communication between Trusts and suppliers, specifically with clarity on
responsibilities. This issue was also highlighted within our RCA.
2 https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/call-evidence-pharmacy-aseptic-services-review/
Furthermore, the Trust’s Chief Pharmacist has been asked by the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer of England to
provide a synopsis of the lessons learnt in Jake’s case for pharmacy professionals nationally. There are
mechanisms for sharing such learning through a number of networks including the All England Chief Pharmacists’
Network, Medication Safety Officer Network and through presentations at local and national professional meetings.
The findings will also be shared with the National Homecare Medicines Committee who have input into the national
framework for the procurement of homecare products. The national lead for outsourced medicines has advised the
Trust on improvements following the incident involving Jake’s Parenteral Nutrition and will also receive a copy of
the lessons learnt.
In response to your concern regarding the production of a standard Parenteral Nutrition which is varied on specific
instructions of the prescribing consultant, I have discussed this matter with Dr Protheroe and can respond as
follows;
There are two Parenteral Nutrition (PN) solutions available for use. Those are a) standard feeding regimens known
as All-in-One (AIO) or multi-chamber bags (MCB) which contain all the required nutritional components, or b)
individually compounded mixtures which are manufactured in a suitable pharmacy manufacturing unit and contain
bespoke nutritional requirements for an individual patient.
Commercially prepared mixtures of vitamins and minerals are available and will provide well-balanced amounts of
all essential vitamins and trace elements. These mixtures must be added to individually compounded bags of PN or
AIO bags under controlled aseptic pharmaceutical conditions.
Standard PN bags are used for children and young people in hospital on a short term basis only. This is in order to
reduce the risk of ordering errors, as well as the risk of compounding errors in the hospital pharmacy, which deals
with many different PN prescriptions on a daily basis. These commercially batch-produced standardised PN bags
require an addition of parenteral multi-vitamins shortly before infusion. This is a limitation that requires proper
handling to assure aseptic conditions and to avoid errors and as a consequence is not an option available for home
use. Moreover, the inclusion of various trace elements may shorten the shelf life of the standard bag.
Regular use of standard formulations in infants and children requiring PN for prolonged periods (such as those on
home PN particularly over longer periods of time), may be less than optimal for growth and development and as a
result, these patients require bespoke formulations of PN, as was the case with Jake.i
There are a number of reasons why a patient will require individualised PN;
A] patients with chronic intestinal failure requiring long term home PN (HPN)
B] particularly where parenteral nutrition is a supplement to oral intake and
B] children and rapidly growing adolescents on HPN in order to meet their specific nutritional requirements.
Jake fulfilled all of these three criteria and consequently was prescribed individualised PN.3
As you heard in evidence provided at Inquest, an adequate supply of micronutrients is essential for patients on PN
to prevent clinical deterioration. Specific patient related requirements for parenteral vitamins, trace elements and
minerals vary among patients depending on their clinical and metabolic status and the need to replace any losses
or prevent toxicity. It is for this reason that long-term PN patients, who have their PN administered at home, require
a bespoke formulation rather than a standard preparation.
3 https://www.bapen.org.uk/85-nutrition-support/parenteral-nutrition
I hope that this information serves to adequately address your concerns. Jake’s death has had a significant impact
on staff caring for Jake and we are truly sorry for the errors in processes that led to Jake’s death. Once again, I
would like to offer my sincere condolences to Jake’s family.
Yours sincerely
Chief Medical Officer
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHSFT
i https://www.espen.org/files/ESPEN-Guidelines/Pediatrics/ESPGHAN_ESPEN_ESPR-guidelines-on-pediatric-
parenteral-nutrition-Standard-versus-individualized-parenteral-nutrition.pdf
2018 ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Standard versus individualized
parenteral nutrition
Trust Head Quarters
County Hospital
Union Walk
Hereford
HR1 2ER
Tel:
01432 364000
Ref: DM/VJ
Date: 1 June 2020
Mr Mark Bricknell
Herefordshire Coroner
Town Hall
St Owen Street
HEREFORD
HR1 2PJ
Dear Mr Bicknell
Re: Jake Thomas Perry
Thank you for granting me a 14-day extension to allow me to respond to your regulation 28 report to
prevent future deaths with regard to Jake Perry. I am sorry that the current situation with regard to
Coronavirus has delayed this important communication.
From the outset, I would like to extend my deepest sympathies to Jake’s parents and family.
Jake suffered from a rare gastrointestinal disease, which rendered it necessary for him to receive
nutrition through an artificial feeding line. He was under the care of the gastroenterology team at
Birmingham Children’s Hospital and the children’s community nursing team in Hereford. He had direct
access to the children’s ward in Hereford.
On Saturday 15 July, he attended the children’s ward at Wye Valley Trust because he had been unwell
with vomiting and constipation. Jake suffered these type of episodes quite often but usually managed to
cope with them at home. In addition, he complained of increasing weakness of his legs.
After examination, an initial diagnosis of Guillain Barre Syndrome was made and the paediatric
neurologist at Birmingham Children’s Hospital contacted. Following the review by second paediatric
consultant later in the day Jake’s low folate result was noted and the team planned to discuss this with
Jake’s gastroenterology team at Birmingham Children’s Hospital.
The next day Sunday 16 July, Jake continued to deteriorate with increased weakness. The neurologist at
Birmingham Children’s Hospital was contacted again and both teams were still of the opinion Jake was
suffering from Guillain Barre Syndrome.
Printed on 100% recycled paper to support our commitment to the environment and careful use of resources.
Glen Burley, Chief Executive
Russell Hardy, Chairman
Jake was reviewed again on 17 July in Hereford when it was felt that some of his signs and symptoms
could represent a nephrological problem and the plan was made to discuss with the renal team at
Birmingham Children’s Hospital. Jake underwent a lumbar puncture on 18 July following which the
consultant team at Hereford contacted the neurological team at Birmingham Children’s Hospital for a
further opinion. Later that day Jake became increasingly unwell. He required intensive resuscitation in
our intensive care unit and theatre and because of a concern that he may have suffered damage to
bowel underwent a laparotomy that evening. Jake continued to deteriorate following a laparotomy and
sadly died at 2030 that evening.
Subsequent investigation has revealed that the parenteral nutrition Jake was receiving had been
deficient in B vitamins and had been for several months. Jake’s inquest reached the conclusion that this
deficiency of B group vitamins led directly to his death.
We conducted our own internal investigation into Jake’s death to establish how our care could be
improved. The four main findings were:
1. It would have been best practice to have contacted Jake’s gastroenterology team at Birmingham
Children’s Hospital on admission.
2. Although we established that Jake suffered a low folate we did not discuss this with our own dieticians
or the parenteral nutrition team at Birmingham Children’s Hospital.
3. We did not consider alternative diagnoses as a cause for Jake’s presentation. We became focused on
the diagnosis of Guillain Barre Syndrome.
4. Our resuscitation and treatment of Jake’s metabolic acidosis and impending shock was not timely.
We immediately instigated an action plan to improve our practice. This included the following:
1. To improve the information held on patients with open access to the children’s ward.
2. To develop a proforma to include details of all health professionals involved in the care of the patient
and the management plan for admission
3. These information proforma’s will be updated and reviewed annually by the consultant paediatrician
team.
4. An open access standard operating procedure would be developed.
5. The “situational awareness for everyone programme”, designed by the Royal College of paediatrics
and Child health would be implemented on the ward.
In addition, your regulation 28 report stipulates two actions I need to take:
1. Patients with a medical condition overseen by another hospital should have a named consultant at
their local hospital.
2. Where a patient is admitted and has a medical condition overseen by another hospital the specialist
Department (generally involved in the patient’s care) of the overseen hospital (in addition to any other
specialist hospital or Department) should be consulted.
Glen Burley, Chief Executive
Russell Hardy, Chairman
I can confirm that we have developed a standard operating procedure for both the medical division and
the surgical division (the paediatric department is contained within the surgical division) which address
both of these issues. In addition, I have confirmed with the associate medical directors of the respective
divisions,
through the relevant governance processes in the respective divisions and are in operation.
that the standard operating procedures have been
and
I trust the above reassures you and Jake’s family that we have reviewed the circumstances around
Jakes tragic death, and learned important lessons from it.
Yours sincerely
David Mowbray M RCOG
Medical Director
Wye Valley NHS trust
Glen Burley, Chief Executive
Russell Hardy, Chairman
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.