Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0222, written 27 Oct 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Oct 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0222 |
| Deceased | Martin Barrett |
| Coroner | Joanne Andrews |
| Coroner area | North East Kent |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
North East Kent Coroners Cantium House County Hall Sandling Road Maidstone Kent ME14 1XD Telephone New and Current Cases: 03000 410502 General Enquiries: 03000 410503 Email: kentandmedwaycoroners@kent.gov.uk Date: 27 October 2020 Case: 333890 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 1 THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Priory Group CORONER I am Joanne Andrews Area Coroner for North East Kent CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 2 (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 9 March 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Martin Thomas BARRETT. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was that Mr Barrett had taken his own life on 25 February 2020 and as such I gave a conclusion of suicide The medical cause of death after post mortem was 3 1a Suspension by the Neck 1b 1c II CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Martin Thomas Barrett took part in a telephone consultation assessment with the Priory Group by a Cognitive Behavioural Therapist for anxiety at 8am on the morning of his death. During that assessment, he stated that he had thought about suicide and planned how this may occur but did not indicate any immediate intent. The Therapist informed the Court that she considered that he was high risk of suicide but that he had engaged with her safety planning and had agreed to take steps to keep himself safe. The Therapist therefore made an internal referral for a same day appointment with a Consultant Psychiatrist at the Priory Group for further assessment. This referral was made after the appointment and considered by the Consultant after his morning clinic which was around lunchtime. The Psychiatrist declined the referral as he considered that the needs of Mr Barrett were too complex and would be better resolved within the NHS. This decision was not communicated to Mr Barrett. Sadly he was found hanging at his home address around 3pm that day. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – During oral evidence, I was advised that when an onwards internal referral is made to another clinician within the Priory Group which is then declined this is not communicated directly to the patient if the treatment is funded by way of insurance cover. In those cases a notification would be provided to the insurers or the policyholder and then the Priory Group would not have any further contact with the patient. As such, patients that are considered to be higher risk by the clinician at initial assessment may not therefore have the opportunity to imminently consider alternative sources of treatment or receive any advice as to safety netting in the interim as this information is not being provided by clinicians to the patient. From the evidence that I heard it would be reliant on their insurers or corporate policy holders (who may well not be clinicians) to make contact with the patients to inform them of this during which time their health may have further declined or their risk increased. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe the Priory Group has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE 4 5 6 You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 26 December 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 7 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 8 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 27 October 2020 9 Signature Joanne Andrews Area Coroner for North East Kent
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
CEO, Priory Group
Fifth floor
80 Hammersmith Road
London, W14 8UD
Tel.
Case number:
Tuesday 12 January 2021
By email to: kentandmedwaycoroners@kent.gov.uk
Ms Joanne Andrews, Area Coroner: NE Kent
North East Kent Coroners
County Hall
Sandling Road
Maidstone
Kent, ME14 1XD
Dear Ms Andrews
Death of Mr Martin Thomas Barrett; Date of birth: 21 October 1977 – Date of death: 25
February 2020
I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 Report dated Tuesday 3 November 2020 issued
following the Inquest touching the death of Mr Martin Thomas Barrett.
Your Regulation 28 Report identifies that arrangements should be put in place so that newly-
referred clients with a higher risk profile are provided with advice on how to secure alternative
treatment (rather than this being the responsibility of the insurers or corporate policyholders).
We have given due consideration to the concerns raised and our response is provided below.
Corporate Client Team arrangements
Please note that direct contact is now made by the Corporate Client Team (CCT) with all newly
referred clients following treatment authorisation. An e-mail will be sent in the event that the
newly referred client cannot be reached by telephone.
Guidance has been put in place for the CCT on the actions to take if a client is experiencing
an immediate crisis. The guidance includes a script to be used by the staff member to instruct
the client to make contact with their family, friends or colleagues or crisis counselling services.
Additionally the script makes reference on how to obtain emergency professional assistance
(for example, by attending their nearest accident and emergency department).
1
Therapist arrangements
In order to secure prompt clinical input, an appointment with a consultant psychiatrist is now
booked to take place in the same week as the therapy assessment. The appointment is
released should the outcome of the therapy assessment be that the consultant psychiatrist
assessment is not required.
Therapists have also been given guidance – similar to that outlined above – on the advice that
they should give to any newly referred clients who they feel are higher risk. They have also
been reminded that it is not always possible for an assessment by a consultant psychiatrist to
take place on the same day as the initial therapy assessment and this needs to be taken into
account when providing advice and guidance to a higher risk client.
Documentation and communication
The CCT and the therapists have been reminded that they should document their interventions
and must communicate with each other and the newly referred client promptly – they should
not expect this to be the responsibility of the insurer or corporate policyholder. Audits of client
contacts will be carried out by the CCT from time to time in order to ensure this aim is
achieved.
I trust that the actions outlined above will provide the assurances you seek in respect of this
matter.
Yours sincerley
Chief Executive Officer
Priory Group
2
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.