Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Sheldon Farnell

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0081, written 25 Mar 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Mar 2021
Reference2021-0081
DeceasedSheldon Farnell
CoronerDerek Winter DL
Coroner areaCity of Sunderland
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Child Death (from 2015)
Organisation namedSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Derek Winter DL 
Senior Coroner for the City of Sunderland 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 

1 

CORONER 

I am Derek Winter DL, Senior Coroner for the City of Sunderland 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 28th November 2018 I commenced an Investigation into the death of Sheldon Gary 
Farnell, who was born on 28th September 2014 and died on 26th November 2018, aged 4 
years. The Investigation concluded at the end of the 5-day Jury Inquest on 19th March 
2021. The conclusion of the Inquest was Natural Causes, the medical cause of death 
being: - 
1a Overwhelming Sepsis (Group A Streptococcus Pyogenes) 
1b Acute Left Otitis Media 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The Jury recorded, as follows: - 

Sheldon Gary Farnell died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on Monday 26th November 2018 at 
08:42hours. Sheldon had presented at Paediatric Accident and Emergency Department on 
Friday night as very unwell and was admitted. Sheldon had a number of contacts with 
medical staff and nursing staff during his admission, together with a range of tests and 
observations. The clinical team believed he was improving. Sheldon was discharged from the 
hospital before antibiotics for adverse blood test results (known about shortly after his 
discharge) could be given, and he was not able to be recalled to the hospital for that purpose. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

Civic Centre, Burdon Road, Sunderland, SR2 7DN 
Tel 0191 5617843    |    Fax 0191 5537803    |    DX 60729 Sunderland 
www.sunderlandcoroner.co.uk 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: – 

1.  Guidance for the recognition of sepsis may be in need of expedited revision with 

protocols reflecting up to date NICE guidelines. 

2.  Sepsis training should be mandatory and delivered by doctors with relevant 

experience of current research and guidance. 

3.  The messaging about the timely and prompt prescribing of antibiotic medication is in 
need of a review, as the Inquest highlighted issues of a possible overly cautious 
approach in their use, when there was no impediment to such use, and they may have 
saved Sheldon’s life. 

4.  Contact details for families need to be positively given (not confirmed) at the time of 

admission and discharge within a hospital setting. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 21st May 2021. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: - 
•  Family 
•  South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust and their Counsel and 

Solicitors 

•  Risk and Inquest Manager, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust 
, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Director of Child Health and 
•  Dr 

his Counsel and Solicitors 

•  Dr 
•  Care Quality Commission (CQC) 

, Senior Paediatric Trainee and her Counsel and Solicitors 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Dated this 25th day of March 2021 

Signature
Senior Coroner for the City of Sunderland

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dept. of Health Social Care (PDF)
From Nadine Dorries MP 
Minister of State for Patient Safety, 
Suicide Prevention and Mental Health 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

20 July 2021 

Mr Derek Winter 
HM Senior Coroner, City of Sunderland 
HM Coroner's Office 
Civic Centre 
Burdon Road 
Sunderland SR2 7DN 

Dear Mr Winter 

Thank you for your letter of 25 March 2021 to Matt Hancock about the death of Sheldon 
Farnell.  I am replying as Minister with responsibility for hospital care quality and patient 
safety and I am grateful for the additional time in which to do so.  

Firstly, I would like to say how deeply sorry I was to read the circumstances of Sheldon’s 
death and I offer my most heartfelt sympathies to his family and all those affected by his 
death.  I appreciate how devastating it must be to lose a child and that the pain must be 
particularly hard to bear when there are concerns about the care provided.  

We must do all we can to learn from such tragic incidents to ensure the safety of health 
services and prevent future deaths.  

In preparing this response, my officials have consulted widely with health system 
organisations including NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEI), the National 
Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the 
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AOMRC), the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child 
Health (RCPCH), and Health Education England (HEE).  

Sepsis can be a devastating condition and patients rightly expect the NHS to be able to 
recognise and diagnose it early and provide the highest quality treatment and care.  

Over recent years, the NHS has become much better at spotting and treating sepsis 
quickly.  This means that more people are being identified as at risk of sepsis and mortality 
rates are falling.  However, we know that some patients who deteriorate with sepsis are 
still not being diagnosed quickly enough.  NHSEI is working to ensure that clinical staff 
caring for patients with infections in all settings are trained to spot and manage sepsis.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Good progress has been made in improving guidance and educational tools for the 
detection of sepsis since 2018.  In April 2018, a National Early Warning Score patient 
safety alert was issued to support providers to adopt the revised National Early Warning 
Score (NEWS2) to detect deterioration in adult patients, including those with suspected 
sepsis1.  NHSEI has, in recent years, with support from the Department of Health and 
Social Care, used NICE guidelines to disseminate guidance to clinicians on sepsis, 
ensuring they can diagnose early and implement the correct treatment.  

The Government continues to work closely with NHS Trusts to design policies and best 
practice for improving the diagnosis and management of sepsis.  Public Health England 
and NHSEI have recently developed a prototype for real time patient level data.  We are 
committed to developing data linkage of infection, treatment and resistance histories to 
optimise life-saving treatments for serious infections, including sepsis.  
We understand what a fast moving and complex area of diagnosis sepsis can be. Sepsis 
is not a single disease but a syndrome, has no specific diagnostic test or standard case 
definition and presentation can vary.  As a result, we recognise it can be difficult to 
recognise and diagnose.  

Guidance which takes account of differences in the population, including age groups, is 
therefore vitally important.  With respect to detection of sepsis in children, we are 
continuing to improve.  NHSEI is working with clinical specialists to develop a single, 
nationally validated observation (i.e. vital sign) based system to improve the recognition of, 
and aid to, children who are deteriorating.  The use of a national early warning score in 
adults, NEWS2, has standardised the approach to acute deterioration in this population 
group and is now in widespread use across the NHS.  

The Paediatrics Early Warning System (PEWS) programme board was established to 
address difficulties with standardised early warning systems in children.  It brings together 
a wide-ranging group of child health experts, including input from the Royal Colleges, to 
look at how the system identifies and responds to deteriorating children in all settings and 
presentations.  

The system to detect early deterioration in children is due to be implemented in the coming 
months and will be named the System-wide Paediatric Observations Tracking (SPOT) to 
recognise that deterioration may occur from primary and community care, through 
ambulance services, emergency departments and into hospitals.  

In relation to sepsis training, we agree that proper training for clinicians to recognise sepsis 
is critical so that early signs of deterioration are diagnosed in patients.  Improved 
awareness and clinical recognition of acute deterioration has led to an increase in the 
number of people identified and diagnosed as at risk of sepsis in recent years.  

Multiple training resources have been made available by HEE2.  These include: 

1 Patient_Safety_Alert_-_adoption_of_NEWS2.pdf (england.nhs.uk) 

2 Sepsis awareness | Health Education England (hee.nhs.uk) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  A ‘Think Sepsis’ learning package designed to help clinicians spot the early sign of 

sepsis in children and infants; 

•  Training for GP reception staff to spot deteriorating patients and serious conditions 

including sepsis;  

•  Work to support sepsis identification in both adults and children across both primary 

and acute care that can be accessed on e-learning for healthcare 
https://www.e-lfh.org.uk/programmes/sepsis/; 

•  The sepsis educational digital game, an accessible introduction to sepsis for all 

clinical and non-clinical staff; 

•  Deterioration, NEWS and Sepsis in Care Homes is a training session 

designed for care home staff to ensure care home residents receive appropriate, 
timely medical care; 

•  The Leadership in Primary Care module, designed for non-clinical and clinical 
leaders working in primary care, looks at the challenges in leadership roles in 
identifying and managing acute deterioration and sepsis; and,   

•  Development of an animation to promote resources available through HEE on 
sepsis, how to access them and opportunities for their use.  This video is 
anticipated to be launched shortly and hosted on the HEE YouTube Channel.   

A metric in the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Improvement Assessment 
Framework helps embed the use of these educational resources by prompting CCGs to 
ensure that sepsis education takes place for staff in all the services that they commission. 

The Department’s 2019/20 Mandate to HEE includes objectives to:  

•  Explore training needs for pharmacists working in primary care networks and 
community settings to review the dose, duration and appropriateness of 
antimicrobial prescriptions; 

• 

Increase awareness of sepsis among health and care workers including 
pharmacists working in primary and community settings, health visitors, community 
nurses, and domiciliary and care home workers; and,  

•  Commission projects to fulfil specific education and training gaps in antimicrobial 

resistance and sepsis. 

Regarding whether sepsis training should be mandatory, this is currently an employer 
decision, and I note the action taken by the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS 
Foundation Trust to introduce multidisciplinary training for medical and nursing staff 
involved in the acute paediatric care and mandatory three-yearly sepsis training updates.   

In relation to the third matter of concern and messaging related to prescribing to ensure 
prescribers are not overly cautious, we recognise the critical balance needed for optimal 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 prescribing of antibiotics.  Optimal prescribing can be a very complex practice and 
something that medical and non-medical prescribers should be supported to do in the best 
way possible, with availability of testing, point-of-care diagnostics and support for clinical 
decision making.   

There is a clear need for more supportive guidance to drive forward best practice of 
optimal use of antimicrobials and many organisations are working together to provide best 
practice guidance for infection management.  For example, the British Infection 
Association recently created a quick reference guide on sepsis in adults, and the Royal 
College of General Practitioners has completed a spotlight project on sepsis leading to 
creation of a sepsis toolkit aimed at providing knowledge, tools and guidance for GPs3. 

At the end of 2019, the AOMRC agreed a proposal from the Faculty of Intensive Care 
Medicine (FICM) for cross-college work on sepsis management following concerns over 
the current management of sepsis and alignment of guidance.  A multi-organisational 
group with experts in the field are advising on the development of guidance to reduce 
unnecessary antibiotics and create national uniformity when diagnosing sepsis.   

I am advised that the guidance will be based on the clinical analysis sequence, and 
consists of three questions:  

1.  Is the patient sick?  
2.  Does the patient have an infection?  
3.  What is the degree of urgency in specific components of treatment? (including time 

to antimicrobials). 

The group has chosen to develop a clinical pathway with NEWS as the entry point, taking 
into account clear guidance, clinical judgement and flexibility on antimicrobial prescribing.  
The pathway is currently being piloted amongst trainee colleagues of the group and the 
guidance is expected to be launched in the Summer.   

It is of course essential that hospitals and emergency departments have effective 
procedures in place for taking, recording and confirming the contact details of their patients 
or their families and carers, to avoid such unfortunate circumstances as in this case.  

I am aware that the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust has taken 
action to improve its processes in this regard to include mandated checks at the point of 
patient discharge from hospital, as well as the establishment of a formal escalation plan for 
staff to follow if or when they are unable to contact a patient or family following discharge.  

My officials have brought this concern to the attention of the NHS National Director of 
Patient Safety, Dr 
and the actions taken by the Trust can be acted upon more widely through existing 
national patient safety processes. 

 at NHSEI, to explore whether insight from Sheldon’s death 

3 Sepsis Toolkit (rcgp.org.uk) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I expect the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust to ensure that it has 
taken all the learnings from the circumstances of Sheldon’s death and the findings of your 
investigation to prevent future tragedies.  

I am informed that the Trust has taken a range of action to improve the identification and 
management of sepsis, particularly in children, including improvements to processes and 
policies, and as noted above, introduced multidisciplinary training for medical and nursing 
staff involved in the acute paediatric care, as well as mandatory three-yearly sepsis 
training updates.  

You may be aware that the CQC identified issues around the timely administration of 
antibiotics to patients diagnosed with sepsis in an inspection of the Trust conducted in 
early 2020.  The CQC also highlighted that the Trust must ensure that paediatric nursing 
staff have sepsis awareness training and access to recognised sepsis tools.  The CQC 
noted in its report of the inspection that the Trust was aware of these issues and was 
taking action to improve.   

Following inspection, the CQC received regular progress updates from the Trust in relation 
to management of sepsis, including paediatric nursing staff receiving sepsis awareness 
training. The CQC has requested that the Trust provide a report of any investigation 
completed in relation to Sheldon’s death, lessons learned and improvements secured.  
The CQC will continue to monitor the Trust in accordance with its regulatory activities.  

I hope this response is helpful.  Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.  

NADINE DORRIES 
MINISTER OF STATE FOR PATIENT SAFETY, SUICIDE PREVENTION AND MENTAL 
HEALTH

Related reports

Other reports by Derek Winter DL

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.