Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0171, written 10 Feb 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 10 Feb 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0171 |
| Deceased | Lisa Thompson |
| Coroner | Sonia Hayes |
| Coroner area | Oxfordshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive of Oxford Health NHS Trust 1 CORONER I am Sonia Hayes assistant coroner for the coroner area of Oxfordshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 16 March 2020 an investigation was commenced into the death of LISA MARIE THOMPSON . The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19th November 2020 . The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. The medical cause of death was Ia Hypoxic Brain Injury, Ib Cardio Respiratory Arrest, Ic Asphyxiation , II Depression 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Lisa was found unresponsive at home at approximately 10:30 on 14th March 2020 having tied a ligature around her neck and attaching this to the spindle of the staircase with the intention of ending her life. She was resuscitated and conveyed to the John Radcliffe Hospital where she died of an Hypoxic Brain Injury due to cardiorespiratory arrest caused by asphyxiation. Lisa had taken significant overdoses of her prescribed medication for severe anxiety and depression in December 2019 and January, February and March 2020 each time minimizing her actions despite apparent escalation of her behaviour, assurances each time this was impulsive and, she would not do it again. She was sensitive to the side effects of medication and reported no beneficial effects. She was known to be in crisis during this period and was prescribed diazepam on 10th March and reviewed by a new psychiatrist on 13th March. Her explanations of her overdoses were not consistent with her actions and contained inaccuracies, she was not challenged about this by the mental health team. Her care plan and risk assessments were not up-to-date. 1 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – Evidence was heard that: (1) There was no clear care plan in place following an emergency review of Mrs Thompson on 13th March 2020 (2) The care plans and risk assessments at the mental health Trust were not updated: (a) with material information on the facts and circumstances of Mrs Thompson’s overdoses of her medication. (b) the two most recent overdoses were not recorded (c) with further information disclosed by the doctor who treated her most recent overdose that Mrs Thompson had lied about the severity of her overdose that it was probably double that which she initially disclosed also that this was her 4th overdose and another could not be ruled out. (d) on 13th March 2020 following a review with the Trust Consultant Psychiatrist (e) on 13th March 2020 when there was a telephone conversation between Mrs Thompson and her care co-ordinator 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 7th April 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 2 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons (husband). I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 10th February 2021 Signature: Assistant Coroner Oxfordshire 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Ms S Hayes Assistant Coroner for Oxfordshire Oxfordshire Coroner's Office The Oxford Register Office Second Floor 1 Tidmarsh Lane Oxford OX1 1NS Chief Executive’s Office Trust Headquarters Littlemore Mental Health Centre Sandford Road Littlemore Oxford OX4 4XN 6 April 2021 Dear Ms Hayes REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF MRS LISA THOMPSON I write in response to your report dated 10 February 2021. Firstly, thank you for your report. The Trust has considered your concerns very carefully and I hope that my reply will provide you with assurance that the Trust is taking appropriate action. Following the conclusion of the inquest into Mrs Thompson’s death your office provided the Trust with an audio recording of your summary of the evidence, findings of fact and conclusion. A copy of the audio recording was shared with the Trust’s Head of Quality Governance, Clinical Director for Oxfordshire Mental Health (Dr Rob Bale, who gave evidence at the inquest) and the author of the completed Root Cause Analysis Report. Separately, the Trust received a complaint from Mrs Thompson’s husband on 1st October raising 10 concerns and the Complaint Investigating Officer, who is a Service Manager at the Trust, has listened to the recording. As such, the Trust has been on notice of your concerns and had the opportunity to include your concerns as part of the investigation into Mr Thompson’s complaint. The concerns you raised with us were: (1) There was no clear care plan in place following an emergency review of Mrs Thompson on 13th March 2020 (2) The care plans and risk assessments at the mental health Trust were not updated: (a) with material information on the facts and circumstances of Mrs Thompson’s overdoses of her medication; (b) the two most recent overdoses were not recorded; (c) with further information disclosed by the doctor who treated her most recent overdose that Mrs Thompson had lied about the severity of her overdose that it was probably double that which she initially disclosed also that this was her 4th overdose and another could not be ruled out; (d) on 13th March 2020 following a review with the Trust Consultant Psychiatrist on 13th March 2020 when there was a telephone conversation between Mrs Thompson and her care co-ordinator. In Mrs Thompson’s case, there are several points at which updated information is added to Mrs Thompson’s records, but the Trust agrees with you that the updates were not added under the Care Plan and Risk Assessment sections of the records. That is not in line with our policy. In relation to the review on 13th March 2020, there is a plan written down in the main body of the notes on 13th March 2020. However, the care plan and risk assessment were not updated. As you heard, the care co-ordinator then spoke to Mrs Thompson. On reflection since the inquest recognises that it was not clear to the family what the plan was, even when the care co-ordinator made her call. The family did not go home with a clear message. We have considered our approach in terms of ensuring patients and their families go home following a consultation with a clear plan. This will be picked up in the quality improvement work that I describe below. We recognise that often patients and their family members may be in a state of distress in such consultations and our clinicians need to ensure that our patients understand clearly the plan made at the end of a consultation. The Trust’s complaint investigation has been completed and the Trust wrote to Mr Thompson on 12th March 2021 to report on the findings of the investigation. I can report to you that the Complaint Investigation Officer identified the following issues to be addressed by the Trust: 1. To ensure patients on the Care Programme Approach have a current and up to date risk assessment and care plan which is shared with the patient (and their family as appropriate). 2. Review how risk formulations and assessments are recorded and reviewed in the electronic care record, ensuring consideration of family’s views and ensuring best practice is adopted in relation to involving families in our patient’s safety plans. 3. Embed Multi-disciplinary Team care plan reviews for patients at risk of suicide. 4. Review the current Clinical Risk Assessment and Management mandatory training to include safety planning which takes into account family involvement using the triangle of care approach1. In common with many mental health trusts, OHFT uses the Triangle of 1 https://www.oxfordhealth.nhs.uk/carers/triangle/ 2 Care, which is a therapeutic alliance between carers, service users and professionals. This is a national accrediated scheme which seeks to ensure at all times the involvement of carers and families in care and treatment. For further information I attach a leaflet produced for professionals (“A”) and a leaflet for service users (B”), which I hope is helpful. The Complaint Investigation has recommended actions to be taken and those are in place. Some issues have been worked on previously and there is ongoing work for the Trust to continue to carry out in order to keep the quality of our services under constant review. One of the actions we are taking is being completed by our Chief Nurse, who is working with senior colleagues to review themes that have arisen from complaints, serious incident investigations and inquests. This is to ensure that we can particularly identify themes, such as ensuring family involvement in care and treatment and improving how risk formulation is documented, in order to improve outcomes for patients. Based upon the thematic findings from the investigations of complaints and serious incidents we think that a Quality Improvement approach should be taken to explore risk assessment, formulation and documentation processes within our mental health services in order to improve practice in these areas. To that end, the Trust has a Quality Improvement team2 who are dedicated to working with our local teams to continually improve the quality of our services. Our Chief Nurse has asked the Quality Improvement team to ensure areas of improvement relating to this tragic serious incident are considered alongside other themes identified from the thematic review, in particular: - Ensuring family members are included in care and treatment in a systematic way using the triangle of care. - Ensuring risk formulation and suicide risk assessment are enhanced and embedded in the safety planning for patients, including their families and ensuring cumulative deliberate self-harm events are noted and acted upon. Please be assured that this work is a high priority for the Trust. Trust audits in the coming year will include looking at the the quality of risk assessments and care plans. We have also included safety planning questions into our CPA and Essential Standards audits. I also hope it will help to inform you about work being carried out if I attach the Trust’s Action Plan record (“C”). 2 The Oxford Healthcare Improvement (OHI) centre supports the trust in providing safe, better quality care to patients and improve the working lives of staff. OHI’s aim is to improve patient safety and the quality of care for people in hospital, communities and homes through a programme of quality improvement, research, training and collaboration. OHI team members come from a range of backgrounds to ensure that practice-based problems are viewed through different lenses and improvement projects are approached in a systematic manner with clear evaluation. The team includes clinicians, non-clinicians, researchers and analysts. 3 Once again, thank you for your report and please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like any further information at this stage. I am happy to write to you again if you would like to receive an update on the work being carried out by our Quality Improvement team. Yours sincerely Chief Executive 4
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.