Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Fred Reynolds

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0241, written 15 Jul 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report15 Jul 2021
Reference2021-0241
DeceasedFred Reynolds
CoronerSonia Hayes
Coroner areaMid Kent and Medway
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.    Chief Executive Officer Kent & Medway Social Care Partnership Trust  

1 

CORONER 

I am Sonia Hayes assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Mid Kent & Medway 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  20  November  2019  an  investigation  was  commenced  into  the  death  of  FRED 
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
MALCOM  REYNOLDS  (Ted),  90.  The  investigation  concluded  at  the  end  of  the 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  
inquest on 3 June  2021.The conclusion of the  inquest was Narrative  ‘Ted was at 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
risk of falls due to his low sodium, anaemia, increasing frailty and head injury, the 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 
combination of which contributed to his death’. The cause of death was 1a Acute on 
chronic  subdural  haematoma  (operated  on  7/9/19),  1b  Head  injury  and  II 
Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation. Ischaemic heart disease due to coronary artery  
atherosclerosis. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

4 

Ted died on 30th October 2019 at Kent and Canterbury Hospital of an acute on chronic 
sub-dural haematoma operated on 7th September due to head injury. Ted was admitted to 
hospital as an informal patient following a first onset of severe depression and self-harm. 
Ted had a history of low sodium and anaemia. He has CT scans that showed a non-
progressive chronic bilateral sub-dural haematoma up to the 19th July following falls on the 
ward. Ted was transferred to acute hospital and diagnosed with syndrome of inappropriate 
antidiuretic hormone and infrarenal aortic aneurysm. A CT scan on 30th August found acute 
on chronic sub-dural haematoma with midline shift and small mass effect. Ted fell on the 
ward on 2nd September and exhibited new neurological symptoms with suspicion of 
progression. Ted underwent burr hole evacuation and had post-operative delirium and was 
transferred to Kent and Canterbury Hospital. The sub-dural haematoma affected his 
swallow and his delirium persisted. He commenced at risk feeding and was treated for 
chest infection. Ted sustained falls on the ward on 6th and 23rd October with stable CT 
scans but was increasingly frail. An advanced care plan was agreed and he remained on 
the ward. 

Ted was at risk of falls due to his low sodium, anaemia, increasing frailty and head injury, 
the combination of which contributed to his death. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S  CONCERNS  

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 

Specialist neurology advice was given to conduct neurological observations every two hours 
for 48 hours following head injury. These observations were commenced but not continued. 
It was not possible to understand why these observations has been discontinued and there 
was no entry made in the medical records. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
and your organisation have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 9th September 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Family, the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NH Foundation Trust. I have also sent 
it to the Care Quality Commission who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

 Signature: 

 Sonia Hayes Assistant Coroner Mid Kent and Medway 
 15th July 2021 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Kmpt (PDF)
Sonia Hayes 
Assistant Coroner 
Mid Kent and Medway  

Chief Executives Office  

Trust Headquarters 

Farm Villa 

Hermitage Lane 

Maidstone 

Kent 

ME16 9PH 

Website: www.kmpt.nhs.uk 

10 August 2021 

Dear Assistant Coroner Hayes 

Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Fred Malcolm Reynolds 
Trust Response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Death 

I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report dated 15th July 2021, sent to Kent and Medway NHS 
Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) following the conclusion of the inquest, touching on the very sad 
death of Mr Fred Reynolds on 30th October 2019. 

In your report to the Trust, you raised the following matter of concern: 

Specialist neurology advice was given to conduct neurological observations every two hours 
for 48 hours following head injury. These observations were commenced but not continued. It 
was not possible to understand why these observations has been discontinued and there was 
no entry made in the medical records. 

We fully recognise the importance of continuing with any recommended treatment as advised by 
clinical experts from the acute trusts, and have endeavoured to establish why, in Mr Reynolds’s case, 
the neurological observations recommended were stopped. We have been unable so far to identify the 
decision point or decision maker This appears to be a matter where on this occasion an appropriate 
record for ceasing the neurological observations was not made, but we consider that the changes 
made since will mitigate the risk of this occurring again. We describe these below. 

Significant changes have been made and sustained since 2019 when Mr Reynolds sadly died, which 
now mitigate the risk of neurological observations being stopped without careful assessment and 
medical approval.  

Set out below is a description of the new and more robust systems we now have in place.  The new 
systems and in particular, electronic monitoring have significantly reduced the risk of neurological 
observations being stopped without careful assessment and medical approval. 

We are proud to be smoke free                 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 1.  Our Falls Policy, which is NICE compliant, provides guidance regarding neurological 

observations. It clearly sets out that neurological observations should be completed every thirty 
minutes for two hours. Only when it is confirmed that no abnormalities have been detected, this 
becomes hourly observation for the next four hours, and then two-hourly after that, until 
medical review has occurred. Staff are sufficiently trained and compliance with this quality 
standard is monitored through our Falls Care Pathway and incident reporting. We have a well-
established system for sharing lessons learnt through our quality governance meetings, and Mr 
Reynolds’s story has been presented there.  

2.  Neurological observations are part of every handover if clinically indicated, as set out in the 

Inpatient Handover Protocol which was introduced in protocol in December 2018, and on the 
patient status board/at a glance board. Shift handover processes are regularly reviewed, and 
are subject to quality checks through our programme of CLIQ Quality assurance audits, in 
order to ensure ongoing quality improvement.  

3.  All patients on our wards have a set of vital signs recorded via NEWS2, i.e. the National Early 

Warning Score 2 since an electronic observations project was rolled out across 2019.  This is a 
system designed to standardise the assessment and response to acute illness.  Any patient 
returning from a visit to A&E, or the general hospital, have their vital signs recorded on eObs, 
an electronic recording system, that will calculate National Early Warning Score (NEWS2). This 
encompasses a consciousness level assessment, and will identify the need for Glasgow 
Comma Scale (GCS) to be completed. Neurological observations utilising GCS are 
implemented when clinically indicated, or following a reduced consciousness score from 
NEWS2. 

4.  Within NEWS2, which was launched in 2019, there is a 5-point consciousness scale. This is 
the standard observation undertaken for all our inpatients, and is completed as a minimum. 
NEWS2 is monitored through CLIQ Quality assurance audits on a bi-monthly basis. Results of 
these audits are shared and discussed at ward, service and Trust level, including up to Sub-
Board Quality Committee.   

5.  At the time of Mr Reynolds’s death, we had commenced a Trust wide programme of work to 
gradually implement electronic observations (eObs) using National Early Warning Score 2 
(NEWS) across all our wards. eObs is an electronic recording system accessed through a 
tablet device. The physical observations results are linked to Rio, our health record system, 
and can be accessed virtually by clinicians. This electronic system was not available on 
Woodchurch ward at the time of Mr Reynolds’s treatment; it came into effect in March 2020. At 
the time of Mr Reynold’s treatment, a paper version of Modified Early Warning System 
(MEWS) including assessment of conscious level was in place.  

The new electronic NEWS2 system has significantly improved the way in which we undertake 
and monitor physical health observation for our patients. It has importantly also improved our 
ability to monitor and scrutinise compliance with our standards, at multiple levels across the 
Trust. This means that when observations indicated for a patient are not completed at the 
agreed time, an alert is issued as a reminder for staff. The NEWS2 system also indicates to 
staff the frequency required for ongoing monitoring, depending on the score. For senior 
clinicians such as Doctors, they can easily access the results remotely and act if there are 
abnormal readings.  

As part of the roll out of this new system, training was provided and completed by all members 
of staff, and there is ongoing training offered to new nursing and medical staff. Their 
competencies are assessed and signed off as part of this training, further demonstrating the 
steps we have taken to improve staff knowledge, skills, and confidence with undertaking neuro 
observations.    

 
 
 
 6.  In addition to staff training, the use of digital technology, and the improved quality governance 
and assurance systems in place, we have also employed specialist Physical Health Nurses on 
each ward as part of our nursing skill mix. This ensures that we have staff with relevant 
technical expertise to teach, support and supervise provision of high-quality physical health 
care to our patients. This was not in place at the time of Mr Reynold’s treatment.  

7.  Our resuscitation service has further developed a Trust-wide “Train the Trainer” course for 

neurological observations and the Glasgow Coma Scale, and has delivered this to all physical 
health nurses. Since March 2021, all the physical health nurses across the Trust have been 
trained, and we now offer a short refresher training session for each team, and will continue to 
facilitate these sessions as required. This training is also available via iLearn (virtual learning 
platform) for all staff to access as needed.  

8.  Following Mr Reynolds’s death, the Older Adults Care Group developed and disseminated a 

learning bulletin to all staff, reiterating the need for neurological observations to be completed 
for any seen or unseen incident where a patient is presenting with a head injury, possible 
stroke symptoms or any medical emergency. It clearly reminded staff that observations should 
be completed using the Glasgow Coma Scale. 

We are sincerely sorry for the shortcomings in our care of Mr Reynolds and are committed to ensuring 
that the improvements we have made are sustained.  

I hope that the detailed information provided offers you a level of assurance about both the 
seriousness with which we have received and responded to your concerns, and the significant 
improvements we have made since the sad passing of Mr Reynolds. 

We are, as always, happy to provide further information or evidence if that would be helpful. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Sonia Hayes

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.