Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0368, written 14 Nov 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 14 Nov 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0368 |
| Deceased | Karen Starling and Anne Martinez |
| Coroner | Keith Morton |
| Coroner area | Cambridgeshire and Peterborough |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
Pursuant to paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigation) Regulations 2013
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
1
CORONER
I am KEITH MORTON KC, an Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Cambridgeshire
and Peterborough
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 28 February 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Karen Lesley
Starling, who died on 7 February 2020 aged 54. The investigation concluded at the end
of the inquest on 11 November 2022.
On 31 December 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Anne Edith
Martinez, who died on 17 December 2020 aged 65. The investigation concluded at the
end of the inquest on 11 November 2022.
Both deceased underwent successful lung transplant procedures at the new Royal
Papworth Hospital. Both deceased subsequently contracted a hospital acquired
infection, namely Mycobacteria Abscessus (M abscessus) in consequence of which
they died. My Narrative Conclusion is summarised, so far as relevant to this report, in
the circumstances of the deaths below.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATHS
1. These inquests were heard concurrently because there was an issue common
to both, namely the presence of M abscessus in the water at the Royal
Papworth Hospital (“the hospital”), which caused both deceased to become
infected with M abscessus.
2. The hospital opened to patients on 1 May 2019. Mrs Starling and Mrs Martinez
underwent lung transplant procedures on 25 May 2019 and 5 July 2019
respectively. They were among the first patients to be treated at the new
hospital.
3. Neither Mrs Starling nor Mrs Martinez would have died at the time or in the
circumstances they did but for their exposure to M abscessus while patients at
the hospital.
4. M abscessus is an environmental non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM). It
can sometimes be found in soil, dust and water, including municipal water
supplies. It is usually harmless for healthy people but may cause opportunistic
infection in vulnerable individuals. Lung transplant patients and lung defence
patients such as Mrs Starling and Mrs Martinez were at particular risk of
infection from mycobacteria, including M abscessus.
1
5. The guidance available to those responsible for the design, construction and
operation of hospitals, including hospital water systems was Health Technical
Memorandum (“HTM”) 04-01 published by the Department of Health. That
guidance was directed at the identification and control of legionella and
pseudomonas. It gave no relevant guidance in relation to mycobacteria and
none in relation to M abscessus. HTM 04-01 did not require routine testing for
mycobacteria, including M abscessus, or provide guidance on acceptable
levels (if any) in the water systems. Therefore, compliance with the guidance
does not identify or guard against the risk from M Abscessus.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
1.
It is recognised that M abscessus poses a risk of death to those who are
immunosuppressed. That will be so for many patients at specialist hospitals
such as Royal Papworth and more generally for hospital patients. To date, 34
patients at Royal Papworth have contracted M abscessus from the hospital’s
water. Cases continue to be reported, albeit at a declining rate;
2. There is an incomplete understanding of how M abscessus may enter and/or
colonise a hospital water system;
3. Health Technical Memorandum 04-01 Safe Water in Healthcare Premises was
published by the Department of Health in 2016. It is concerned with the design,
installation, commissioning and operation of hospital water systems. This
guidance requires urgent review and amendment, whether by way of an
Addendum or otherwise because:
a.
It is a key document for hospital estate managers and Water Safety
Groups;
b.
It purports to provide comprehensive guidance on waterborne bacteria;
c. However, it provides no relevant guidance in relation to mycobacteria
and none in relation to M abscessus. It provides no guidance on the
identification and control of M abscessus. It does not require routine
testing for mycobacteria, including M abscessus or provide guidance
on acceptable levels (if any). Compliance with the guidance does not
identify or guard against the risk from M Abscessus;
d.
It provides no guidance on any additional measures that may be
required in respect of “augmented care” patients, including those who
are immunosuppressed;
e.
It is not in any event consistent with British Standard BS 8580-2:2022
on Water Safety.
4. There is evidence that the risk from M abscessus is especially acute for new
hospitals. Consideration needs to be given to whether special or additional
measures are required in respect of the design, installation, commissioning and
operation of hospital water system in new hospitals.
2
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and
your Department of State have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 2 January 2023. I, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION
8
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:
1. The Family of Mrs Starling
2. The Family of Mrs Martinez
3. The Royal Papworth NHS Trust
4. NPH Healthcare Limited Royal Papworth
5. Skanska Construction UK Limited
6. OCS Group UK Limited
I have also sent it to the Chief Executive Officers of Cambridge University Hospitals and
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust who are responsible for the new
Cambridge Children’s Hospital and who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it
useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
Keith Morton KC
Assistant Coroner for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
14th day of November 2022
3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
• Department of Health & Social Care HM Assistant Coroner Keith Morton KC Area of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Lawrence Court Prin~ess Street Huntington PE29 3PA Dear Mr Morton, F:rom Lord Markham Parliamentary Under-Becretary of State 39 Victoria Street London SW1H0EU 24 July 2023 Thank you for your letter of 14 November 2022, to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Steve Barclay, about the death of Karen Starling and Anne Martinez I am replying as Minister with responsibility for the NHS capital, land and estates. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mrs Starling and Ms Martinez's death and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. As you set out in your report, the guidance available to those responsible for the design, construction and operation of hospitals, including hospital water systems is Health Technical Memorandum 04- 011. Health Technical Memorandums are owned by NHS England (NHSE) and they are the correct organisation to respond to the concerns you raised in your report. I note that NHSE wrote to you on 6 February 2023, setting out their response to each of your concerns. The Department of Health and Social Care does not have additional detail or information to add further to NHSE's letter. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. LORD MARKHAM CBE 1 https://www,england.nhs.uk/publication/safe-water-in-healthcare-premises-htm-04-01/
HM Assistant Coroner, Keith Morton KC
Area of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Lawrence Court
Princess Street
Huntington
PE29 3PA
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
06 February 2023
Dear Mr Morton,
RE: Inquests into the deaths of Karen Lesley Starling and Anne Edith Martinez:
Report to Prevent Future Deaths (PFD)
I am writing on behalf of NHS England in response to the PFD sent to the Secretary
of State for Health and Social Care dated 14th November 2022. Health Technical
Memorandum 04-01, Safe Water in Healthcare Premises (HTM 04-10), the subject
of the PFD, was published by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) in
2016, but responsibility for this guidance transferred from the DHSC to NHS England
in 2017.
My colleagues in NHS England’s National Estates Team and regional East of
England Team have contributed to this response to assist in outlining the wider
support that has been provided to the Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation
Trust (the Trust).
NHS England was not involved in these inquests, but we would like to extend our
condolences to Ms Starling and Ms Martinez’s families for their losses.
NHS England is grateful to HM Coroner for identifying your concerns in respect to
Health Technical Memorandum 04-01, Safe Water in Healthcare Premises (HTM 04-
01). I have endeavoured to respond to your concerns below, which I understand
from the PFD are as follows:
1. It is recognised that M abscessus poses a risk of death to those who are
immunosuppressed. That will be so for many patients at specialist hospitals
such as Royal Papworth and more generally for hospital patients. To date, 34
patients at Royal Papworth have contracted M abscessus from the hospital’s
water. Cases continue to be reported, albeit at a declining rate;
2. There is an incomplete understanding of how M abscessus may enter and/or
colonise a hospital water system;
3. Health Technical Memorandum 04-01 Safe Water in Healthcare Premises was
published by the Department of Health in 2016. It is concerned with the design,
installation, commissioning and operation of hospital water systems. This
guidance requires urgent review and amendment, whether by way of an
Addendum or otherwise because:
a. It is a key document for hospital estate managers and Water Safety
Groups;
b. It purports to provide comprehensive guidance on waterborne bacteria;
c. However, it provides no relevant guidance in relation to mycobacteria
and none in relation to M abscessus. It provides no guidance on the
identification and control of M abscessus. It does not require routine
testing for mycobacteria, including M abscessus or provide guidance on
acceptable levels (if any). Compliance with the guidance does not
identify or guard against the risk from M abscessus;
d. It provides no guidance on any additional measures that may be required
in respect of “augmented care” patients, including those who are
immunosuppressed;
e. It is not in any event consistent with British Standard BS 8580-2:2022 on
Water Safety.
4. There is evidence that the risk from M abscessus is especially acute for new
hospitals. Consideration needs to be given to whether special or additional
measures are required in respect of the design, installation, commissioning and
operation of hospital water system in new hospitals.
Support provided to the Trust
Oversight and governance
Following notification by the Trust regarding the initial patients’ testing positive for
Mycobacteroides abscessus (M. abscessus), from 25th November 2020 incident
management meetings were established between the Trust and NHS England with
representation from Infection, Prevention and Control, Leadership and Quality and
Commissioners. The purpose of these meetings was to:
• Understand the incident and the effect on patients;
• Be assured of the actions being undertaken by the Trust to mitigate risk to
patients;
• Be assured of the communication and duty of candour actions regarding
current and future events and informed patient and carer decisions;
• Be assured that all necessary expert input had been sought and actions
implemented, and
• Offer support and advice.
In addition to the above meetings, NHS England’s Leadership and Quality Team
hold quarterly Clinical Quality Review Group (CQRG) meetings. This meeting is
chaired by the Director of Nursing, Leadership & Quality for NHS England (East of
England), and includes senior members from the Trust and NHS England, along with
representatives from Cambridge & Peterborough Integrated Care Board.
For the initial period of the M. abscessus incident the CQRG meeting paid particular
attention to M. abscessus. Assurance regarding patient communication and Duty of
1
Candour was a significant component of the assurance required at the CQRG
meetings by NHS England.
Assurance on patient experience
NHS England reviewed that the Trust’s website has clear explanations about the M.
abscessus incident on its website and the risk of M. abscessus is routinely discussed
as part of the pre-operation / consent process and decision making. NHS England
has been informed that, as of 22 November 2022, no patients have opted not to
continue with surgery.
Assurance was also required and given from the Trust regarding the mitigation and
on-going surveillance that was implemented to protect vulnerable patients and to
support them in the pre-operative decision making that was required by the patient.
NHS England has been given assurance that risk assessments are undertaken for
all patients on admission. Patients who are immunocompromised or at a higher risk
are provided with bottled water and additional Infection Prevention measures are
implemented. All patient rooms are single rooms with ensuite facilities, and all taps
and showers are fitted with additional filters which are changed regularly and in
between patients.
Stakeholder Collaboration
In addition to the quarterly CQRG meetings, a specific monthly meeting was
established between NHS England’s Leadership and Quality Team, chaired by the
Director of Nursing, Leadership & Quality for NHS England (East of England), and
colleagues from the United Kingdom Health Security Authority (UKHSA). The
purpose of these meetings was for UKHSA to provide assurance to NHS England of
the governance, the progress and completion of agreed actions from the incident
management meetings, and to ensure that optimum support and collaboration was
provided to the Trust in the management of the incident.
Meeting frequency reduced from July 2022 once support and collaboration were
evident, but the frequency will be increased if there are any concerns, which are
regularly monitored. Actions following the meeting are outlined below. Increased
support for the Trust from UKHSA colleagues at UKHSA’s Porton Down site has
been confirmed with offers to:
• Develop a sampling rationale/strategy and take samples from water sources
and outlets in Royal Papworth Hospital;
• UKHSA now attends the operational meetings internally at the Trust;
• Carry out air sampling using active and passive air sampling;
• Using nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates recovered from the
hospital environment to assess efficacy of disinfectants and compare their
susceptibility to isolates from elsewhere. The purpose of this is to ascertain if
there is evidence to suggest that Royal Papworth Hospital isolates have
increased tolerance; and
• Assess the impact of water chemistry, to establish if there is evidence to
suggest that the incoming water may facilitate persistence.
2
NHS England’s East of England Infection Prevention and Control lead has been
supporting and facilitating the collaborative working between the Trust and UKHSA.
This led to further specialist input from UKHSA National mycobacterium reference
lab, field services, and the environmental microbiologist at the Porton Down
laboratory, to support the Trust with water and environmental sampling.
The Trust’s Estates Team are actively engaged with NHS England’s Estates Team
and several visits from the regional team have taken place, including conversations
regarding the pipe work and recommendations for enhanced cleaning. These actions
are included and monitored through a Trust Executive Oversight Committee which
was established in July 2022, of which NHS England and UKHSA are core
members. This Committee meets quarterly and is chaired by the Director of Nursing
at the Trust. NHS England attendance at this meeting continues (with attendance
from the Director of Nursing, Leadership & Quality, Head of Nursing and Medical
Director for NHS England (East of England)), and the M. abscessus incident remains
a standing agenda item as it does at the CQRG meetings.
It is noted that as part of the collaborative working with external stakeholders, the
Trust reviewed its internal governance structure which led to a new M. abscessus
governance structure. This allowed for NHS England and UKHSA to be part of the
discussions via the Trust’s Executive Oversight Committee which directly feeds into
the Trust’s Quality and Risk Committee and in turn the Trust’s Board of Directors.
The Trust’s Executive Oversight Committee is multi professional and multi
organisational and provides a system of oversight of the recommendations and
action plans associated with the M. abscessus incident. It brings together the
updates and actions from the groups within the Trust’s M. abscessus governance
structure and provides oversight and assurance of the actions and their progress
whilst offering a forum for discussion and clarification.
Principal Engineer site visit
NHS England’s National Principal Engineer undertook a site visit of Royal Papworth
Hospital on 23rd February 2022 in conjunction with the Trust’s Director of Estates
and Facilities, to look at the physical environment and the water system.
A large, complex water system has been installed at the hospital which has required
40 flushing valves to subsequently be installed. It was understood that a number of
different disinfectants had been tried on the system and was having a deleterious
effect on the pipework and fittings with valves only two years old being changed due
to degradation.
At the site visit the design intent, configuration, operation, material/product suitability
and control strategy for the pre-heat of make-up water system were discussed with
the Trust, with a view to the Trust reviewing these aspects of the water system.
It was also fed back to the Trust at this site visit that the larger press-fit fittings that
had been used on the system needed further investigation. This was due to the
potential for the fittings to retain a quantity of stagnant water that would be against a
3
polymeric seal which could prove an ideal habitat for bacterial growth and would be
virtually impossible in normal use to clean/sanitise. In turn this may lead to a harbour
area where NTM’s could grow and be pushed into the flow stream in the pipe and
detach and contaminate the system. These fittings are approved under the Water
Regulations Approval Scheme, but this does not mean that there is any evidence of
their suitability for healthcare applications.
Ongoing work to support required changes continues. A follow-up site visit is in the
process of being arranged with the Trust.
Background to HTM 04-01
HTM 04-01 was published by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) in
2016, but responsibility for this guidance transferred from the DHSC to NHS England
in 2017.
HTM 04-01 provides guidance on the legal requirements, design applications,
maintenance and operations of hot and cold-water supply storage and distribution
systems in all types of healthcare premises. It also provides advice and guidance on
the control and management of the risk posed by water borne pathogens within a
healthcare setting such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas
maltophilia, Mycobacteria as well as Legionella.
The guidance on the control of waterborne pathogens is divided dependent upon the
route of administration of the infection. For instance, with Legionella there is no
evidence of patient-to-patient or patient-to-outlet transfer, whereas Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Mycobacteria may be transferred to and from outlets and the water
from both patients and staff.
Part C of HTM 04-01 focuses on additional measures that should be taken to control
and minimise the risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Whilst the main focus of Part C
is on the control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, given this is the most common
pathogen, the document explicitly states that it may also have relevance to other
waterborne pathogens such as atypical Mycobacteria. There are many different
species of Pseudomonas and Mycobacteria. M abscessus, the subject of the PFD, is
a species of Mycobacteria and is also referred to as a NTM.
Commissioned review
NHS England is committed to improving patient safety and has therefore taken your
concerns extremely seriously. As a result, we have commissioned Dr Susanne
Surman-Lee to undertake the following work:
1. To carry out a
review of HTM 04-01 specifically
to
immunosuppressed patients and NTM, to determine if HTM 04-01 contains
suitable advice regarding testing, and to ensure any additional required
measures are identified;
relation
in
4
2. The above review is to include identification of any specific measures required
for new hospital premises; and
3. To carry out a gap analysis between British Standard BS 8580-2:2022 on Water
Safety and HTM 04-01 with respect to safe water in healthcare premises.
is a leading expert in the detection, survival and control of
pathogenic microorganisms, especially the prevention of infections from
opportunistic waterborne pathogens, with unique experience in dealing with
healthcare building water systems.
Any suggested amendments to HTM 04-01 which derive from this review will be
carefully considered, and appropriate amendments will be written into a technical
bulletin, which in turn will be published to ensure HTM 04-01 is accurate and up to
date. The aim is to publish the technical bulletin by the Spring.
I hope this is of assistance, and please let me know if there is anything else NHS
England can assist you with in this matter.
Yours sincerely
National Medical Director
NHS England
Cc.
, Director of Estates and Head of Profession at NHS England
5
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.