Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0125, written 19 Apr 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Apr 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0125 |
| Deceased | David Mason |
| Coroner | Nicholas Lane |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust · West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 6 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
WORCESTERSHIRE CORONER AREA PREVENTION OF FUTURE DEATHS REPORT DAVID ERNEST MASON HM ASSISTANT CORONER NICHOLAS H LANE REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) Chief Executive, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (WAHT) 2) Chief Executive, West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust (WMAS) 3) Executive Officer, Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) 4) Chief Executive, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 5) Chair, Clinical Committee, Society for Endocrinology 6) Chief Executive, NHS England 1 CORONER I am Nicholas H Lane, HM Assistant Coroner for Worcestershire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 13 March 2022 an investigation was commenced into the death of David Ernest Mason. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest hearing on 12 April 2023 at Stourport Coroner’s Court, in the Worcestershire Coroner Area. The conclusion (a ‘narrative’ conclusion in Box 4 of the Record of Inquest) was determined as follows: ‘David Mason died as a result of an acute adrenal crisis, caused by Addison’s disease and precipitated by the trauma of a fall and fractured hip. Insufficient administration of steroid medication by medical professionals was a contributory factor in David’s death.’ 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH David Mason was an 82-year-old gentleman with significant medical co-morbidities, including a known diagnosis of Addison’s disease. By March 2022, Mr Mason was becoming more frail and, owing to mobility issues, was suffering from recurrent falls. Mr Mason fell in his bedroom on the evening of 5 March 2022. An ambulance was called but it took a number of hours until paramedics arrived and transported Mr Mason to hospital. Once there, Mr Mason was diagnosed with a fractured hip, as a result of the trauma suffered when he fell. Mr Mason did not present as acutely medically unwell (as opposed to him having an obvious requirement for trauma assessment, followed by surgery) at any time after the fall or whilst in hospital and no clinician involved in his care appreciated that, without additional steroid medication, he was at high risk of developing an acute adrenal crisis, owing to his primary adrenal insufficiency (Addison’s disease) and the trauma and physiological stress that he had suffered following the fall. In the early hours of 7 March 2022, whilst in a bed on a surgical trauma ward, Mr Mason was found breathing abnormally and was obviously acutely unwell. Mr Mason went into cardiac arrest shortly after and died. Mr Mason had suffered an acute adrenal crisis, which was the cause of his sudden and unexpected deterioration and death. Following medical evidence heard at the inquest, the cause of death was determined as: 1a – acute adrenal crisis (on a background of a known diagnosis of Addison’s disease) 1b – fractured neck of femur following a fall 2 – frailty Box 3 of the Record of Inquest (which answered how, when and where Mr Mason came by his death) was determined as: ‘David Mason had been unwell for a number of years, including suffering from primary steroid insuffiency (Addison’s Disease), a condition which required the administration of replacement steroid medication. Owing to significant frailty, David had fallen over at home in the evening of 5 March 2022, suffering a fractured hip (diagnosed in hospital on 6 May 2022, following x-ray). An ambulance was not available for a number of hours owing to demand and resource factors, however paramedics attended on David at home and conveyed him to hospital early in the morning on 6 March 2022. No required additional steroid replacement therapy was administered to David by paramedics. In hospital, no required additional steroid replacement therapy was administered to David by clinicians over a period of approximately 19 hours, which led to David’s sudden deterioration and death in the early hours of 7 March 2022 at the Worcestershire Royal Hospital.’ 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation and inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows (numbered separately in respect of each organisation, who are required to respond to each of the numbered paragraphs relating to them): Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (WAHT) 1) Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that no clinician involved in providing care to Mr Mason (in both the emergency department and the surgical trauma department) appreciated that, as someone who had Addison’s disease and who had suffered the trauma of a fall, long lie and a fractured hip, Mr Mason required additional replacement steroid therapy, to prevent the development of an acute adrenal crisis. 2) The relevant internal Trust guideline disclosed by WAHT (‘Guideline for the management of adrenal insufficiency in adults’) very much focuses on presentations of acute adrenal crisis and procedure-based/perioperative situations, and (save for a small section containing ‘sick day’ rules, which are on the same page as advice to patients and families for long-term condition management) does not emphasise that replacement steroid therapy must be given to patients with adrenal insufficiency who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. 3) Evidence heard at the inquest (relating to the trauma/surgical department at WAHT) suggested that it is likely that many clinicians (including at consultant level) do not have a well-developed understanding of adrenal insufficiency and the crucial importance of administering replacement steroid therapy to patients who, although not presenting as acutely unwell, are at risk of suffering an adrenal crisis. 4) Evidence heard at that no prompts exist on emergency department/clerking documentation at WAHT for clinicians to check whether a patient suffers from adrenal insufficiency. Although the inquest was informed that changes have been made in inquest confirmed the this regard by WAHT to some peri-operative patient documentation, the National Patient Safety Alert (NatPSA/2020/005/NHSPS) requires acute trusts to review admission/assessment/clerking documentation to ensure such prompts are included. West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust (WMAS) 1) Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that no clinician involved in providing pre-hospital care to Mr Mason appreciated that, as someone who had Addison’s disease and who had suffered the trauma of a fall, long lie and a fractured hip, Mr Mason required additional replacement steroid therapy, to prevent the development of an acute adrenal crisis. 2) Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that when information is given to an EOC (emergency operations centre) call-handler at WMAS that a patient has a diagnosis of Addison’s disease and has suffered trauma, the call-handler question pathway (which, the inquest heard, is based on a computer-programmed logarithm (designed by NHS Digital, now part of NHS England)) does not go on to consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency and the requirement for replacement steroid therapy to commence immediately. This appears to be potentially relevant both in respect of whether time-critical steroid treatment may be required (and thus for a holistic consideration of call categorisation) and safety-netting advice that should be given (for additional doses of steroid medication to be taken by the patient, prior to any ambulance arrival). Safety- netting advice takes on even greater significance in the current climate, where healthcare demand and pressures on capacity are often causing severe delays in ambulance attendance. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that the position is different if information is given that the patient is medically unwell, particularly if concerns of a cardiac nature are present or adrenal insufficiency may be the direct cause of current illness, with the call-handler question pathway then going on to consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency. Currently there is a cohort of patients (which included Mr Mason) whose risk of developing an adrenal crisis is not being considered by call-handlers at WMAS. 3) The Serious Incident investigation report disclosed by WMAS did not make any recommendations in respect of improving clinicians’ knowledge of adrenal insufficiency and the importance of considering administering replacement steroid therapy. 4) Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that the investigation lead at WMAS had not been shown the inquest disclosure bundle, which had been disclosed to the legal department at WMAS a number of months prior to the inquest. This bundle contained relevant evidence from a different internal investigation (by WAHT), suggesting that the likely cause of Mr Mason’s deterioration and death was an acute adrenal crisis and not, as had been considered when a coronial referral had initially been made, hyperkalaemia and rhabdomyolysis (following a fall and long lie). This lack of internal co-ordination within WMAS prevented full internal investigation and learning in respect of the care given to Mr Mason by WMAS. The legal department of WMAS did not attend the inquest (it was their right not to) nor were WMAS legally represented by an external solicitor or barrister (it was their right not to be). Greater engagement and participation in the coronial investigation and inquest process would improve the Trust’s ability to learn from patient-safety incidents and enable the legal, governance and safety departments to better co-ordinate such investigations. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) 1) The relevant JRCALC (Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee) guideline for steroid dependent patients (which was disclosed by WMAS as part of inquest proceedings) places very little emphasis on the importance of administering steroid replacement therapy to patients who, although not presenting as acutely unwell, are at risk of developing an acute adrenal crisis, owing to them suffering from trauma or physiological stress. The relevant section (contained in bullet point 2 of the ‘administer hydrocortisone’ box) is itself a sub-section of an ‘emergencies in adults and children’ box and therefore is not able to be easily differentiated from treatment required for patients who are already established as being in an emergency situation. Further, it is stated that patients who are ‘unwell’ require hydrocortisone to prevent an adrenal crisis – it is not sufficiently clear that patients who may have suffered trauma or physiological stress also require steroid treatment, to prevent an adrenal crisis. To lend weight to this latter concern, evidence heard at the inquest suggested that the clinicians involved in treating Mr Mason considered ‘unwell’ in this context to mean obviously medically unwell, such as having signs of infection or sepsis, or gastro- intestinal symptoms, such as diarrhoea. There was no evidence of any understanding that this definition encompasses patients who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. 2) Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that when information is given to an EOC (emergency operations centre) call-handler at WMAS that a patient has a diagnosis of Addison’s disease and has suffered trauma, the call-handler question pathway (which, the inquest heard, is based on a computer-programmed logarithm (designed by NHS Digital, now part of NHS England)) does not go on to consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency and the requirement for replacement steroid therapy to commence immediately. This appears to be potentially relevant both in respect of whether time-critical medical treatment may be required (and thus for a holistic consideration of call categorisation) and safety-netting advice that should be given (for additional doses of steroid medication to be taken by the patient, prior to any ambulance arrival). Safety- netting advice takes on even greater significance in the current climate, where healthcare demand and pressures on capacity are often causing severe delays in ambulance attendance. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that the position is different if information is given that the patient is medically unwell, particularly if concerns of a cardiac nature are present or adrenal insufficiency may be the direct cause of current illness, with the call-handler question pathway then going on to consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency. The pathway and programmed- logarithm should be looked at, as currently there is a cohort of patients (which included Mr Mason) whose risk of developing an adrenal crisis is not able to be considered by ambulance service control centres. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 1) The relevant treatment guideline disclosed by WAHT (‘Guideline for the management of adrenal insufficiency in adults’) very much focuses on presentations of acute adrenal crisis and procedure- based/perioperative situations, and (save for a small section containing ‘sick day’ rules) does not emphasise that replacement steroid therapy must be given to patients with adrenal insufficiency who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. Evidence heard at the inquest suggested that this internal Trust guideline (and, one assumes, other such guidelines in other acute trusts in the country) is based upon various pieces of national guidance. It is my understanding that a new guideline in respect of managing the treatment of adrenal insufficiency is currently being developed by NICE. Consideration of these matters should be included as part of guideline development. Society for Endocrinology (Clinical Committee) 1) The relevant treatment guideline disclosed by WAHT (‘Guideline for the management of adrenal insufficiency in adults’) very much focuses on presentations of acute adrenal crisis and procedure- based/perioperative situations, and (save for a small section containing ‘sick day’ rules) does not emphasise that replacement steroid therapy must be given to patients with adrenal insufficiency who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. Evidence heard at the inquest suggested that this internal Trust guideline (and, one assumes, other such guidelines in other acute trusts in the country) is based upon various pieces of national guidance. The clinical committee of the Society for Endocrinology has previously been involved in providing guidance in respect of managing patients with adrenal insufficiency. The Society’s input going forward is important in respect of considering any future NICE or JRCALC guidelines regarding the management of adrenal insufficiency. 2) The relevant JRCALC (Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee) guideline for steroid dependent patients (which was disclosed by WMAS as part of inquest proceedings) place very little emphasis on the importance of administering steroid replacement therapy to patients who, although not presenting as acutely unwell, are at risk of developing an acute adrenal crisis owing to them suffering from trauma or physiological stress. The relevant section (contained in bullet point 2 of the ‘administer hydrocortisone’ box) is itself a sub-section of an ‘emergencies in adults and children’ box and therefore is not able to be easily differentiated from treatment required for patients who are already established as being in an emergency situation. Further, it is stated that patients who are ‘unwell’ require hydrocortisone to prevent an adrenal crisis – it is not sufficiently clear that patients who may have suffered trauma or physiological stress also require steroid treatment, to prevent an adrenal crisis. To lend weight to this latter concern, evidence heard at the inquest suggested that some of the clinicians involved in treating Mr Mason considered ‘unwell’ in this context to mean obviously medically unwell, such as having signs of infection or sepsis, or gastro-intestinal symptoms, such as diarrhoea. There was no evidence of any understanding that this definition encompasses patients who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. The Society’s input going forward is important in respect of considering any future NICE or JRCALC guidelines regarding the management of adrenal insufficiency. NHS England 1) Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that when information is given to an EOC (emergency operations centre) call-handler at WMAS that a patient has a diagnosis of Addison’s disease and has suffered trauma, the call-handler question pathway (which, the inquest heard, is based on a computer-programmed logarithm (designed by NHS Digital, now part of NHS England)) does not go on to consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency and the requirement for replacement steroid therapy to commence immediately. This appears to be potentially relevant both in respect of whether time-critical medical treatment may be required (and thus for a holistic consideration of call categorisation) and safety-netting advice that should be given (for additional doses of steroid medication to be taken by the patient, prior to any ambulance arrival). Safety- netting advice takes on even greater significance in the current climate, where healthcare demand and pressures on capacity are often causing severe delays in ambulance attendance. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that the position is different if information is given that the patient is medically unwell, particularly if concerns of a cardiac nature are present or adrenal insufficiency may be the direct cause of current illness, with the call-handler question pathway then going on to consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency. The pathway and programmed- logarithm should be looked at, as currently it appears that there is a cohort of patients (which included Mr Mason) whose risk of developing an adrenal crisis is not able to be considered by ambulance service control centres. 2) Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that no prompts exist on emergency department/clerking documentation at WAHT for clinicians to check whether a patient suffers from adrenal insufficiency. Although the inquest was informed that changes have been made in this regard by WAHT to some peri-operative patient documentation, the National Patient Safety Alert (NatPSA/2020/005/NHSPS) requires acute trusts to review admission/assessment/clerking documentation to ensure such prompts are included. It is not clear what follow-up action is taken by NHS England in relation to monitoring of compliance by NHS Trusts following National Patient Safety Alerts being issued. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisations have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE Your organisation is under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14 June 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. If any request is to be made for this period to be extended, please ensure this is made in writing at least 7 days prior to the above required response date. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the family of David Mason and the Chief Coroner. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Date: 19 April 2023 Signature: Nicholas H Lane HM Assistant Coroner for Worcestershire
6 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives 25 Farringdon Street London EC4A 4AB 12 June 2023 Nicholas H Lane, HM Assistant Coroner for Worcestershire Dear Mr Lane DAVID ERNEST MASON (DECEASED) I am writing in response to the preventing future deaths report that was sent to our executive officer at the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and I respond as our Managing Director on behalf of AACE. It may be helpful for us to explain that AACE is a private company owned by the English and Welsh Ambulance NHS Trusts. It exists to provide ambulance services with a central organisation that supports, co-ordinates and implements nationally agreed policy. Our primary focus is the ongoing development of the English ambulance services and the improvement of patient care. It is a company owned by NHS organisations and possess the intellectual property rights of the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee UK ambulance service clinical practice guidelines (the “JRCALC guidelines”). AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance services however it has national influence via the regular meetings of ambulance Chief Executives and Trust Chairs along with a network of national specialist sub- groups. Your first matter of concern relates to our ‘JRCALC guidance’ not being sufficiently clear that patients who may have suffered trauma or physiological stress also require steroid treatment, to prevent an adrenal crisis. The JRCALC guidelines have been in existence since the 1990’s but it was only in 2022 that we decided that a standalone guideline for steroid dependent patients was needed. We have decided that the wording and emphasis on administering steroids to patients who suffer trauma or physiological stress could have more emphasis placed on it, so we are now in the process of revising our guidance. We worked closely with members of the Addison’s disease self-help group and sought advice from The Addison’s Clinical Advisory Panel Chair guidance and are now re-engaged with them again to ensure our revised guidance is accurate and will also reflect advice that is given to patients. in developing our current steroid dependent patients With regard to your second matter of concern about the advice given in ambulance control centres to people who call 999. Calls to 999 in the West Midlands region are assessed in accordance with the Department of Health National Guidelines using a process called NHS Pathways (NHSP) and therefore we have no responsibility for making changes to this system. We are aware from West Midlands ambulance service that the mater has been raised with NHSP. We are however aware of the development of an educational e learning package for call handlers so they have a better understanding and awareness of Addison’s disease and steroid dependent patients. The package will be trialled in Yorkshire and is being developed in conjunction with The Pituitary Foundation. Once the learning package has been evaluated as effective, we will aim to push this out to other ambulance services for them to consider using for their own control room staff. On behalf of AACE, I would like to extend our sincere condolences to the family of David Ernest Mason. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to get in touch. Yours sincerely Managing Director
HM Assistant Coroner Nicholas H Lane
Worcestershire Coroner’s Court
The Civic
Martin’s Way
Stourport-on-Severn
Worcestershire
DY13 8UN
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
14 June 2023
Dear Mr Lane,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David Ernest Mason who
died on 7 March 2022.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 19 April
2023 concerning the death of David Ernest Mason on 7 March 2022. In advance of
responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my
deep condolences to David’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure
the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about David’s care have been
listened to and reflected upon.
I address the two concerns addressed to NHS England within your report below.
Concern One: That certain ambulance call-handler pathways do not allow for
patients at risk of developing an adrenal crisis to be adequately considered by
ambulance service control centres.
NHS Pathways is a telephone and digital triage Clinical Decision Support System
(CDSS) that has been in use since 2005 within the Urgent and Emergency care
setting. It is used in all NHS 111 and over half of the English ambulance services,
including West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust
(WMAS).
The safety of the clinical triage process endpoints resulting from a 111 or 999
assessment using NHS Pathways is overseen by the National Clinical Assurance
Group, an independent intercollegiate group hosted by the Academy of Medical Royal
Colleges (AoMRC). Alongside this independent oversight, NHS Pathways ensures its
clinical content and assessment protocols are consistent with the latest advice from
respected bodies that provide evidence and guidance for clinical practice in the UK.
This includes latest guidelines from
a. NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence).
b. The UK Resuscitation Council; and
c. The UK Sepsis Trust.
The system is built around a clinical hierarchy, meaning that life-threatening symptoms
are assessed at the start of the call triggering ambulance responses, progressing
through to less urgent symptoms which require a less urgent response (or disposition)
in other settings. NHS Pathways is not diagnostic, but instead works on the basis of
'ruling out'. This means that questions are asked in order to rule out possible reasons
for the patient’s symptoms, until a point where it is safe for the patient to manage their
own symptoms with advice or further intervention is needed by a clinician to establish
a possible cause.
The majority of calls taken using NHS Pathways are handled by a highly trained but
non-clinical Health Advisor. Health Advisors (as per the NHS Pathways Provider
Licence) should have access to support from clinicians to support safe call-handling.
Even though thorough training is provided, it is not within the remit of the Health
Advisor to be trained in, or understand more complex medical elements, such as in
this case. Indeed, such enquiry can add confusion and delays to the management of
the case and triaging process. It is for these reasons that questions on past medical
history or pharmacology are utilised sparingly across the system, and only where it is
deemed that a clear understanding can be sought.
If a patient is unconscious the lowest disposition (outcome) they can reach would be
a Category 2 emergency ambulance, and questions around adrenal insufficiency do
not present because it will not impact the category of ambulance. However, after
dispatch the system goes on to ask whether the caller has known adrenal insufficiency
and, if so, offers specific in-line advice about administration of an emergency steroid
kit.
Patients with adrenal insufficiency, such as David, are often knowledgeable about their
condition and have specific instructions from their specialist on when and how to use
emergency treatment kits. Injuries are common in the general population, but the
prevalence of adrenal insufficiency across that population, whose triage assessment
is supported by the NHS Pathways system, is relatively infrequent. If a patient with
adrenal insufficiency is conscious at the time of a call, the risk posed through extra
questioning on complex themes is thought to outweigh the urgency of advice. Adding
enquiries about a topic where, (a) affected patients are likely to be aware of what to
do and (b) such enquiries would delay the care or add confusion in the management
of unaffected patients, has been considered and balanced in the design of this system
and endorsed by the National Clinical Assurance Group.
However, having learned of this case, NHS Pathways will engage with its stakeholders
and monitor emerging evidence and guidelines with respect to emergency steroid
replacement therapy in the pre-hospital setting, with a view to making system changes
where appropriate in accordance with the governance framework. If it is established
that system-wide changes are required, NHS Pathways will work closely with
colleagues in the ambulance sector to ensure safety-netting advice is appropriate.
NHS England will also engage with Medical Priority Dispatch System, the suppliers of
the alternative telephone and digital triage system used by ambulance services in
England, to review their processes for assessing adrenal insufficiency.
Concern Two: It was not clear what follow-up action is being taken by NHS
England with regard to monitoring of compliance by NHS Trusts with National
Patient Safety Alerts. In this case, alert NatPSA/2020/005/NHSPS, requiring
acute trusts to review admission/assessment/clerking documentation to ensure
clinicians are prompted to check whether patients suffer from adrenal
insufficiency.
NHS England has worked closely with the Society for Endocrinology and the Royal
College of Physicians on the issue of under-recognition and treatment of adrenal
insufficiency or crisis. This culminated in the publication of ‘Guidance for the
prevention and emergency management of adult patients with adrenal insufficiency’ in
July 2020, which outlines the causes of adrenal insufficiency, groups at risk of an
adrenal crisis, emergency management and management for surgical procedures. As
a result of work in this area, a new NHS Steroid Emergency Card was developed, to
be carried by patients at risk of adrenal crisis and ensure the prompt delivery of
steroids to those patients presenting within an emergency or acute medicine setting.
The work above also resulted in the publication of the National Patient Safety Alert
(NatPSA), mentioned in your report, which includes the specific action that ‘Providers
that treat patients with acute physical illness or trauma, or who may require emergency
or elective surgical or other invasive procedures, including day patients, should review
their admission/assessment/examination/clerking documentation to ensure it includes
prompts to check for risk of adrenal crisis and to establish if the patient has a Steroid
Emergency Card.’ Trusts were expected to implement actions around this specific alert
by 13 May 2021.
Alert compliance data for NatPSAs is published monthly on the Central Alerting
System website. Guidance issued to NHS staff in August 2022, outlines the separate
roles and responsibilities of the national Patient Safety Team, the region, the
Integrated Care Board (ICB) and the providers regarding issuing and complying with
alerts. The national team at NHS England has statutory responsibilities for identifying
new or under-recognised issues and issuing NatPSAs when required but are not
responsible for overseeing compliance. It is the role of ICBs to have local mechanisms
in place to support compliance with any actions required in NatPSAs, in line with NHS
Standard Contract requirements and the national Patient Safety Strategy. Regions and
ICBs are expected to have sight of providers who do not complete actions by the
required dates and provide support and assurance where this occurs.
In this case, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust declared compliance in March
2022. There are currently three Trusts who remain non-compliant. The national team
at NHS England has asked regional colleagues to engage with the relevant ICBs
regarding these Trusts. It is ultimately the role of the Care Quality Commission (CQC)
to ensure the implementation of actions set out in alerts, which is made clear in all
NatPSAs, through the following statement; ‘Failure to take the actions required under
this National Patient Safety Alert may lead to CQC taking regulatory action’.
Other considerations
NHS England has also engaged with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
(AACE), on the concerns raised in your report. The AACE are responsible for the Joint
Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee UK ambulance service clinical practice
guidelines (JRCALC guidelines). The guidelines advise that ambulance services in the
UK should carry hydrocortisone on their vehicles. The AACE had previously reviewed
what process each UK ambulance service had in place regarding adrenal
insufficiency, with all services responding that paramedics were able to administer
hydrocortisone for the emergency treatment of adrenal insufficiency, together with
most technicians/non-registered staff.
Following our engagement with the AACE, we have been advised that there will be
some amendments made to the JRCALC guidelines for steroid dependent patients, to
help improve understanding of the need for administering steroids in cases of trauma.
These amendments have already been drafted and will be published shortly.
I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking
place around Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by
the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other
clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings
and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national
and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may
require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2nd Floor 2 Redman Place London E20 1JQ United Kingdom +44 (0)300 323 0140 Mr Nicholas Lane H M Assistant Coroner, Worcester Coroner Area The Civic Martins Way Stourport on Severn Worcestershire DY13 8UN Dear Mr Lane, Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths letter David Ernest Mason, deceased I write in response to your regulation 28 report of 19 April 2023 regarding the very sad death of Mr David Ernest Mason. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Mr Mason's family. We have reflected on the circumstances surrounding Mr Mason's death, and the concerns raised in your report. We note your suggestion that the issues raised in your report should be considered in the development of our new guideline on adrenal insufficiency, particularly that replacement steroid therapy must be given to patients with adrenal insufficiency who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. I can confirm that the scope of this guideline covers adrenal crisis including identification and emergency management and preventing adrenal crisis during periods of physiological stress, which includes trauma. Membership of the guideline committee recruited for this topic includes two paramedic co-optees, as well as health professionals who see people with adrenal crisis or who are at risk of adrenal crisis in the emergency department. Please do let me know if you require any further information and again, I offer my sincerest condolences to Mr Mason's family. Yours sincerely, Chief Executive NICE www.nice.org.uk I nice@nice.org.uk
To Whom it May Concern, Thank you for forwarding us this information. We are so sorry to hear of the death of Mr David Mason, and collectively would like to offer condolences to his family. We note the circumstances described in the report. Information available currently states the need for additional hydrocortisone in adrenal insufficiency for trauma and physiological stress https://www.rcpjournals.org/content/clinmedicine/17/3/258 . All NHS health care providers have been sent the National Patient Safety Alert with gives as an example the death of a patient with a hip fracture, and point 3 states the need to give additional steroids for acute physical illness or trauma https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/national-patient-safety-alert-steroid- emergency-card-to-support-early-recognition-and-treatment-of-adrenal-crisis-in-adults/. We would strongly recommend that all health and care providers ensure their organization has put processes in place to ensure the four actions on the National Patient Safety Alert have been addressed. Trauma and physiological stress are within scope for the NICE guideline on adrenal insufficiency currently in development. There is representation from paramedics, Emergency Medicine, General Practice and lay members on the committee so the guidelines will cover pre hospital care. Once guidelines are published there is a plan for another round of communications to disseminate the information. The Society for Endocrinology will have opportunity to review this when it is shared with stakeholders and provide comments. Also, members of the Society for Endocrinology are on the committee writing the guidelines and will ensure these topics are covered. In terms of Ambulance service, JRCALC has protocols advising on the management of patients with adrenal insufficiency. present and we will ensure all protocols align and are clear about the need to give additional oral or IM hydrocortisone in trauma/injury. JRCALC guidelines state anyone can give IM hydrocortisone and we are aware that there is an issue around paramedics and technicians being reminded both groups can administer emergency treatment. This is important as different types of ambulance have different health care professionals working on them. is liaising with them, at In terms of the NHSE steroid emergency card, the wording states injury/shock. We will continue our work with both ambulance services and 999/111 services via NHSE patient safety team to ensure this is on the triage information to call handlers so a category 2 ambulance can be sent. All ambulances carry hydrocortisone, and both paramedics and ambulance technicians are able to administer IM hydrocortisone so this should not be a blocker to administration. JRCALC may be able to address this in their guidelines. It is possible thatmore work is needed to disseminate the information available and we can continue working with RCP Patient Safety Committee and NHSE Patient Safety team in this regard. We will also update our resources accordingly. In order to support health and care providers, the Society for Endocrinology has set up a webpage with resources to help health care teams develop resources to support management of adrenal sufficiency. We will review this once NICE guidelines are written and ensure that pre-hospital care is covered more clearly. We would be happy to work with Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust to review their materials if helpful. https://www.endocrinology.org/adrenal-crisis We are aware that, in the current climate with pressures on ambulance services and emergency departments, there may be delays in patients with adrenal insufficiency being managed appropriately. We will continue to liaise with the NHSE patient safety team and Royal College of Emergency Medicine to ensure that patients with adrenal insufficiency are given additional hydrocortisone in the appropriate way to prevent further deaths. Please let us know if you require any further information or clarification. , Consultant Endocrinologist, Chair of Clinical Committee Consultant Endocrinologist, RCP Patient Safety Committee, Medicines Safety Joint Working Group, NICE Topic Advisor adrenal Insufficiency Guideline , Consultant Endocrinologist, GIRFT Lead On Behalf of the Clinical Committee of the Society for Endocrinology
Mr Lane
HM Assistant Coroner for Worcestershire
The Civic
Martins Way
Stourport on Seven
DY13 8UN
1 June 2023
Dear Mr Lane
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David Ernest Mason
(Deceased)
Thank you for your email dated 20 April 2023 attaching your Regulation 28 Report.
Firstly, I am sorry that you have had to raise concerns with West Midlands Ambulance
Service University NHS Foundation Trust (WMAS) following the inquest of Mr Mason.
Can I please take this opportunirty to pass on my sincere condolences to the family of
Mr Mason.
Please see our response to your concerns.
Concern 1
Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that no clinician involved in providing pre-
hospital care to Mr Mason appreciated that, as someone who had Addison’s disease
and who had suffered the trauma of a fall, long lie and a fractured hip, Mr Mason
required additional replacement steroid therapy, to prevent the development of an
acute adrenal crisis.
Response
In 2017 there was an update in the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee
(JRCALC) guidance emphasising the increased usage of Hydrocortisone for patients
with adrenal crisis,
in doubt administer
Hydrocortisone. This was communicated to all staff through the clinical times edition
30. The clinical times is an internal quarterly breifing which provides all staff with new
or updated clinical guidance.
further note stating
including a
if
In September 2020 under the medical emergencies section of JRCALC was updated
to highlight that a joint National Patient Safety Alert was issued by NHS Improvement
and NHS England about Steroid Emergency Cards to support early recognition and
treatment of adrenal crisis in adults. Small amendments were made in the guidelines
to highlight the need to be alert for a patient having an emergency card for a specific
condition. For example a steroid emergency card or an alert card for a patient with
COPD regarding oxygen therapy. This was highlighted to all staff through clinical
notice 431.
In February 2022 JRCALC issued a new guideline titled steroid dependant patients,
this guideline was highlighted to all staff through clinical notice 484. This also included
permitting WMAS ambulance technicians to administer hydrocortisone IM to patients
as well as Paramedics.
All WMAS clinicians are given access to the JRCALC guidelines through individual
licenses for the JRCALC Plus app. Staff are also provided a Trust personal issue Ipad
and the app can be accessed through this device, or there is the option for the app to
be also downloaded on other devices such as personal smart phones if they so choose
so. This allows clinicians to access the guidelines whilst at the patient side.
As well as the above a number of articles have been run within the WMAS weekly
briefing. The weekly breifing which is emailed to all WMAS employees provides all the
latest information about WMAS and any changes to guidance that have been made by
external bodies in relation to clinical practice that must be considered. An example of
such is below:
Steroid Emergency Card
All clinicians are to be aware of recently published national guidance that promotes a
new patient-held Steroid Emergency Card. The guidance and card are designed to
help healthcare staff identify adrenal crisis in adults and gives information on the
emergency treatment to start if the patient is acutely ill, or experience trauma, surgery
or other major stressors. For further information please go to:
www.rcpjournals.org/content/clinmedicine/20/4/371
www.endocrinology.org/
www.pituitary.org.uk/
www.addisonsdisease.org.uk/
www.jrcalc.org.uk/guidelines/
Concern 2
Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that when information is given to an EOC
(emergency operations centre) call-handler at WMAS that a patient has a diagnosis of
Addison’s disease and has suffered trauma, the call-handler question pathway (which,
the inquest heard, is based on a computer-programmed logarithm (designed by NHS
Digital, now part of NHS England)) does not go on to consider the risk of adrenal
insufficiency and the requirement for replacement steroid therapy to commence
immediately. This appears to be potentially relevant both in respect of whether time-
critical steroid treatment may be required (and thus for a holistic consideration of call
categorisation) and safety-netting advice that should be given (for additional doses of
steroid medication to be taken by the patient, prior to any ambulance arrival). Safety-
netting advice takes on even greater significance in the current climate, where
healthcare demand and pressures on capacity are often causing severe delays in
ambulance attendance. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that the position is
different if information is given that the patient is medically unwell, particularly if
concerns of a cardiac nature are present or adrenal insufficiency may be the direct
cause of current illness, with the call-handler question pathway then going on to
consider the risk of adrenal insufficiency. Currently there is a cohort of patients (which
included Mr Mason) whose risk of developing an adrenal crisis is not being considered
by call-handlers at WMAS.
Response
Calls to 999 are assessed in accordance with the Department of Health National
Guidelines using a process called NHS Pathways (NHSP).
NHSP is a patient assessment triage tool used to determine the most suitable level of
care, appropriate to the presenting symptoms of the telephone call. It is a national
requirement to use an assessment system to triage all 999 calls, to assist Ambulance
Services in prioritising the high number of calls received. WMAS are unable to make
changes to the system.
WMAS Integrated Emergency Urgent Care Clinical Commander who is the Lead for
NHS Pathways (NHSP) has raised the above as a clinical concern on the NHSP log.
WMAS are awaiting a response from Pathways.
Concern 3
The Serious Incident investigation report disclosed by WMAS did not make any
recommendations in respect of improving clinicians’ knowledge of adrenal insufficiency
and the importance of considering administering replacement steroid therapy.
Response
Following review of the serious incident investigation and receipt of the PFD we agree
a recommendation should have been made to raise awareness and improve clinicians
knowledge of adrenal insufficiency and the importance of considering adminsertering
replacement steroid therapy. Therefore we have reemphasised the care of the steroid
dependant patient with an in depth article with appropriate links for further reading and
education, publishing the below in the clinical times on the 12th of May 2023.
Steroid Dependant Patients - Jason Wiles, Consultant Paramedic for Emergency
Care
Following a recent coronial inquest, the Trust received a Regulation 28 Report to
Prevent Future Deaths in relation to clinicians’ knowledge adrenal insufficiency and
the importance of considering administering replacement steroid therapy particularly
in the patient who has suffered the trauma of a fall, long lie and a fractured hip. In this
case the patient required additional replacement steroid therapy, to prevent the
development of an acute adrenal crisis.
JRCALC provide guidance on the assessment and management of Steroid- dependent
patient which are available to all clinicians through the JRCALC+ app.
Incidence
Primary Adrenal insufficiency (when the adrenal glands cannot produce
cortisol) affects 1 in 20,000 people in western Europe affecting around 3,400
people in the UK.
Secondary Adrenal insufficiency (when the pituitary gland cannot produce
ACTH, and therefore cannot stimulate the adrenal gland to produce cortisol) is
more common with 150 – 280 people per million affected. It is more common
in women than men. The peak age of onset is between 50 and 60 years.
Pathophysiology
Glucocorticoid Steroid Dependant Patients
The cause of steroid dependency can be broken down into three types: primary,
secondary, and tertiary.
1. Primary adrenal insufficiency occurs in patients who have direct impairment of
the adrenal glands such as those with Addison’s disease (autoimmune
endocrine condition where the adrenal glands cease to function), congenital
adrenal hyperplasia (genetic condition) or surgery or trauma to the adrenal
glands.
2. Secondary adrenal insufficiency is caused by pituitary disease, hypothalamic
or pituitary tumours and their treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) or brain
injury.
3. Tertiary adrenal insufficiency may occur in patients who have taken steroids for
prolonged periods of time, high doses, multiple courses, or via multiple routes..
Prolonged use may lead to a reduction or cessation of naturally occurring
cortisol production by the adrenal glands.
Regardless of type, those with adrenal insufficiency are at risk of adrenal crisis which
can be life threatening.
Adrenal Crisis
Adrenal crisis, also termed acute adrenal insufficiency, is a life-threatening endocrine
emergency due to a lack of production of the adrenal hormone cortisol.
Adrenal crisis can also occur if existing cortisol replacement does not meet the body’s
increased need for cortisol due to illness such as fever, persistent vomiting or diarrhoea
or trauma. Equally, sudden cessation of corticosteroid medication for conditions listed
above, will risk adrenal crisis in those with adrenal insufficiency.
Identifying patients at risk and prompt management can save lives.
National guidance promotes a new patient-held Steroid Emergency Card to help
healthcare staff identify patients with adrenal insufficiency and provide information on
emergency treatment if the patient is acutely ill, experiences trauma, surgery or other
major stressors.
https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/national-patient-safety-alert-steroid-
emergency-card-to-support-early-recognition-and-treatment-of-adrenal-crisis-in-
adults/
Assessment and Management
Assessment and management of: Steroid Dependant Patients or at risk of adrenal
insufficiency
Assessment
Assess <C>ABCD MANAGEMENT
Major <C>ABCD problems, refer to Medical Emergencies in Adults – Overview
If any of the following TIME CRITICAL features present:
and Medical Emergencies in Children – Overview
Start correcting <C>ABCD problems.
Undertake a TIME CRITICAL transfer to nearest receiving hospital.
Continue patient management en-route.
Provide an ATMIST information call.
Symptoms and signs of adrenal insufficiency include:
Severe fatigue, lethargy, drowsiness, confusion, coma
Low blood pressure, postural dizziness and hypotension (≥20 mmHg drop in
BP from supine to standing position), dizziness, collapse, in severe cases
hypovolaemic shock
Abdominal pain, tenderness and guarding, anorexia, nausea, vomiting (in
particular in primary adrenal insufficiency), diarrhoea
Fever
Patients may have a history of weight loss and increasing skin pigmentation
over weeks to months (primary adrenal insufficiency)
Assess patient for underlying acute conditions that may have precipitated the
adrenal crisis and treat that condition too.
Follow Medical Emergencies in Adults – Overview and Medical Emergencies in
Children – Overview in addition to the specific management detailed below.
Measure and record pulse rate.
Measure and record respiratory rate.
Measure oxygen saturations
Measure and record blood glucose for hypoglycaemia.
Treat hypoglycaemia. Refer to Glycaemic Emergencies in Adults and Children.
Measure and record temperature.
These observations along with a blood pressure will enable you to calculate a
NEWS2 Score, refer to Sepsis.
If required, monitor and record 12-Lead ECG. Assess for abnormality, refer to
Cardiac Rhythm Disturbance.
Measure and record blood pressure, if required administer fluids, refer to
Intravascular Fluid Therapy in Adults and Intravascular Fluid Therapy in
Children.
Patients with adrenal crisis may be hypotensive or have postural hypotension.
Assess for postural hypotension if normotensive when lying / sitting.
There may be a profound postural drop in blood pressure when the patient is
moved from the lying position to semi-recumbent or sitting position. It may be
necessary to give IV fluids prior to moving the patient if extrication requires
head up posture.
Administer Hydrocortisone Administer hydrocortisone to:
Patients in an established adrenal crisis (IV or IM administration). Ensure
parenteral hydrocortisone is given prior to transportation.
Patients with suspected adrenal insufficiency or on long-term steroid therapy
who have become unwell or experience trauma to prevent them having an
adrenal crisis. IM administration is usually sufficient.
If in doubt about adrenal insufficiency hydrocortisone should be administered.
Pregnant women who have Addison’s disease who are established in labour
(regular painful contractions) should receive Hydrocortisone.
Refer to Hydrocortisone drug guideline.
Conveyance to hospital
Convey patients who have required intravenous fluids or management of
hypoglycaemia.
Convey patients if the underlying condition precipitating the adrenal crisis
needs hospital assessment / management.
Consider management in the community or referral to other services for:
Patients with mild illness / injury where they have followed their treatment plan
to increase steroid dose and have normal physiological parameters.
Appropriate advice
Patients on replacement steroids (e.g., Addison’s disease/hypopituitarism) may
have a treatment plan to increase their maintenance steroids in the event of
illness / injury. This should be followed but they may require monitoring and
higher doses for more significant illness / injury.
Key points
Adrenal Crisis is a Medical Emergency requiring prompt treatment with
Hydrocortisone and IV fluids.
Steroid Dependant Patients can have an Adrenal Crisis triggered when the
body’s requirement for corticosteroids increases such as due to infection or
trauma as the body is unable to increase its own production.
If extrication requires a head up posture, IV fluids may be required before
moving the patient to prevent profound postural hypotension.
Look for an underlying cause that may have triggered the episode and treat
that condition too.
Further reading
https://bnf.nice.org.uk/treatment-summaries/adrenal-insufficiency/#management-of-
adrenal-crisis
https://www.addisonsdisease.org.uk/emergency
https://www.pituitary.org.uk/information/adrenal-insufficiency/
Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee, Association of Ambulance Chief
Executives. Steroid-dependant Patients. JRCALC Clinical Guidelines 2022: Class
Professional Publishing 2022.
Concern 4
Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that the investigation lead at WMAS had not
been shown the inquest disclosure bundle, which had been disclosed to the legal
department at WMAS a number of months prior to the inquest. This bundle contained
relevant evidence from a different internal investigation (by WAHT), suggesting that
the likely cause of Mr Mason’s deterioration and death was an acute adrenal crisis and
not, as had been considered when a coronial referral had initially been made,
hyperkalaemia and rhabdomyolysis (following a fall and long lie). This lack of internal
co-ordination within WMAS prevented full internal investigation and learning in respect
of the care given to Mr Mason by WMAS. The legal department of WMAS did not
attend the inquest (it was their right not to) nor were WMAS legally represented by an
external solicitor or barrister (it was their right not to be). Greater engagement and
participation in the coronial investigation and inquest process would improve the
Trust’s ability to learn from patient-safety incidents and enable the legal, governance
and safety departments to better co-ordinate such investigations.
Response
Due to new staff starting within within the WMAS Coroners team, sending the bundle
to the Lead investigator was missed on this occasion. Please accept our sincere
apologise for this error in administration.
The legal team at WMAS aim to attend as many inquests a possible. However, due to
the increasing number of inquests throughout the West Midlands it is not possible to
attend all inquests.
May I once again please pass on my sincere condolences to the family of Mr Mason.
I hope this response provides you and the family with the appropriate level of
assurance that as a Trust we have dealt with the concerns highlighted within your
report.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate contact me.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive Officer
Office of the Chief Executive Officer 12 June 2023 Mr N H Lane HM Assistant Coroner Worcestershire Coroners Court The Civic Martin’s Way Stourport on Severn Worcestershire Dear Mr Lane Re Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths Please accept this letter in response to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths sent on 19th April 2023, following the Inquest touching on the death of Mr David Mason. In your Regulation 28 report you identified the following matters of concern relating to the Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (WAHT) 1) Evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that no clinician involved in providing care to Mr Mason (in both the emergency department and the surgical trauma department) appreciated that, as someone who had Addison’s disease and who had suffered the trauma of a fall, long lie and a fractured hip, Mr Mason required additional replacement steroid therapy, to prevent the development of an acute adrenal crisis. 2) The relevant internal Trust guideline disclosed by WAHT (‘Guideline for the management of adrenal insufficiency in adults’) very much focuses on presentations of acute adrenal crisis and procedure- based/perioperative situations, and (save for a small section containing ‘sick day’ rules, which are on the same page as advice to patients and families for long-term condition management) does not emphasise that replacement steroid therapy must be given to patients with adrenal insufficiency who have suffered trauma or physiological stress. 3) Evidence heard at the inquest (relating to the trauma/surgical department at WAHT) suggested that it is likely that many clinicians (including at consultant level) do not have a well-developed understanding of adrenal insufficiency and the crucial importance of administering replacement Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust | Executive Suite, Sky Level 3 | Worcestershire Royal Hospital Charles Hastings Way | Worcester | WR5 1DD Office of the Chief Executive Officer steroid therapy to patients who, although not presenting as acutely unwell, are at risk of suffering an adrenal crisis. 4) Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that no prompts exist on emergency department/clerking documentation at WAHT for clinicians to check whether a patient suffers from adrenal insufficiency. Although the inquest was informed that changes have been made in this regard by WAHT to some peri-operative patient documentation, the National Patient Safety Alert (NatPSA/2020/005/NHSPS) requires acute trusts to review admission/assessment/clerking documentation to ensure such prompts are included. Responding to the concerns raised; 1. In order to raise awareness and educate clinicians, the following actions have been taken. Individual feedback was given and reflection undertaken by clinicians involved in July 2022 (appendix 1). On the 9th May 2023 at the Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) Governance meeting attended by 33 multidisciplinary staff including T&O Consultants this case was discussed and reflected upon (appendix 2). A teaching session was delivered by the Deputy Chief Medical Officer to 40+ Surgical trainees at a Regional Teaching Session on the 9th May 2023 (appendix 3). A teaching session highlighting the risk of adrenal insufficiency for T&O Junior Doctors delivered by a consultant Anaesthetist is now given three times per year as part of the induction programme (appendix 4). A Lesson of the Week has been shared on 25th May 2023 (appendix 5), with Governance teams to disseminating it through Divisions, in the Trust “Worcestershire Weekly”, Datix Incident management system and the Trust Intranet page. 2. The Trust guideline, based on National guidance, has been amended to include clear advice for all patients in the Emergency Departments who require admission (appendix 6). Following discussion with our Endocrinology and Emergency Department teams, it was felt that this would be the most effective way of ensuring that clinicians were aware of the need for additional steroid replacement therapy for patients at risk of adrenal crisis due to physiological stress and pain. 3. Covered in point 1 above. 4. Changes have been made to the ED admission documents, implemented 6th June 2023, to include prompts on time critical medications, including steroids, and to consider increasing the dose of steroids (appendix 7). The T&O admission document, as discussed at the Inquest, was updated in October 2022 to include Steroid Management prompts (appendix 8). I hope that the above addresses your concerns about the quality of our initial review. I have no representations in respect of publication of the Regulation 28 or this response by the Chief Coroner. Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust | Executive Suite, Sky Level 3 | Worcestershire Royal Hospital Charles Hastings Way | Worcester | WR5 1DD Office of the Chief Executive Officer I shall be grateful if you could kindly send a copy of my response to anyone to whom you copied your Regulation 28 report. Yours sincerely Chief Executive Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust | Executive Suite, Sky Level 3 | Worcestershire Royal Hospital Charles Hastings Way | Worcester | WR5 1DD
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.