Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Andrew Vizard

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0273, written 20 Jul 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Jul 2023
Reference2023-0273
DeceasedAndrew Vizard
CoronerMichael Wall
Coroner areaNottinghamshire
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust - NHCT 

1  CORONER 

I am Michael WALL, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Nottingham City and 
Nottinghamshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 11 November 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Andrew Vizard, aged 
58 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest which took place before 
myself as coroner sitting alone on 6 July 2023.  My conclusion at the end of the inquest 
was: 

Natural causes. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Andrew Vizard was 58 years old when he died on 14 July 2022 at Queen’s Medical Centre, 
Nottingham. He died from a pulmonary embolism. 

At the time of his death, he was detained on the Rowan 1 Ward of Highbury Hospital under 
section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and was subject to constant 1:1 observations. He 
had a relatively short but significant history of mental ill-health dating back to March 2021. 
Andrew also had the following physical health conditions: Systemic Hypertension; 
Hypertensive Heart Disease; Ischaemic Heart Disease; and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea. None 
of these conditions caused or contributed to his death. Andrew’s hypertension was 
identified upon admission to Rowan 1 on 2 July 2022 and was monitored regularly 
throughout his admission. 

On 14 July 2022, at approximately 12:23pm, the healthcare assistant responsible for 
observing Andrew became concerned about him snoring loudly. At approximately 12:25 she 
asked a colleague peer support worker for a second opinion. At approximately 12:27, that 
colleague left and returned one minute later with the Ward Manager. Andrew was still 
breathing at that time but he was unresponsive to voice or pain. A minute after that, at 
approximately 12:29, other members of staff arrived with physical monitoring equipment 
and a life support bag. The ward trainee GP was summoned and arrived at Andrew’s room 
at 12:32. He identified that Andrew was in cardiac arrest and commenced CPR. An 
ambulance was called at 12:34:06, over 10 minutes after concerns were first identified. 
Further, the staff who performed CPR prior to the attendance of the paramedics were 
unaware that the life support bag contained a Bag Valve Mask. In its place, they used a 
rebreather mask to deliver oxygen. That device will provide oxygen but, unlike a Bag Valve 
Mask, will not assist to push that oxygen around the body. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 A single paramedic and a double crewed ambulance attended within 3 and 15 minutes of 
the 999 call respectively. Paramedics provided emergency care and achieved return of 
spontaneous circulation at 12:50pm. Andrew sadly suffered a further cardiac arrest at 
13:20. He was transported under blue lights to Queen’s Medical Centre, arriving at 13:34. 
He continued to receive emergency treatment at hospital. Sadly, he did not recover and 
was declared deceased at 14:05 on 14 July 2022. 

The Serious Incident Investigation revealed several concerning issues with the staff 
response when concerns arose for Andrew’s wellbeing on 14th  July 2022. I heard evidence 
that appropriate action has since been taken to address those issues, with further work 
ongoing. 

However, in respect of the timeliness of the response to the emergency situation, the 
Serious Incident Investigation concluded that “the response to Mr AV when he went into a 
medical emergency, found that the staff reacted immediately to the situation.”  One of the 
authors of that report and the current Service Manager of Highbury Hospital gave evidence 
at the inquest. They both expressed views consistent with that conclusion. 

I found this difficult to reconcile with the chronology of events above. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

Despite there being concerns for an unresponsive patient’s breathing, it took: 

a) 
b) 
c) 

At least 6 minutes to obtain and utilise physical monitoring equipment. 
Nearly ten minutes for a ward doctor to attend the patient. 
Over 10 minutes for an ambulance to be called. 

Existing staff training and systems of emergency response do not appear to ensure an 
immediate and effective response in circumstances where there are concerns for a patient’s 
breathing. 

Although the delays did not cause or contribute to death in this case, I am concerned that if 
there are similar delays in similar life-threatening situations in future, deaths will occur. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by September 20, 2023.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

1.  Andrew’s family 
2.  Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 20/07/2023 

Michael WALL 
Assistant Coroner for 
Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Related reports

Other reports by Michael Wall

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.