Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Dumile Thompson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0281, written 2 Aug 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report2 Aug 2023
Reference2023-0281
DeceasedDumile Thompson
CoronerJanine Wolstenholme
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (Eastern)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

NHS England 
NHS National Patient Safety Alerting Committee 

CORONER 

I am Janine Wolstenholme,  Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of West Yorkshire 
(Eastern) 

2 

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7,  Schedule 5,  of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and  INQUEST 

On 12 November 2020 an investigation was commenced into the death of Dumile Daniel 
Thompson, aged 49 years, who died on  31  October 2020.  The investigation concluded 
at the end  of the inquest on  5 July 2023.  The medical cause of death was 1 a)  Hypoxic 
Brain Injury with  myoclonic status epilepticus 1 b) Ramipril  Induced Angiodema  II  End 
stage renal failure requiring dialysis,  hypertensive heart disease.  The conclusion was a 
narrative conclusion,  reflecting the circumstances of the death as set out below. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mr Thompson was a  man of African-American origin.  He suffered a reaction to recently 
prescribed Ramipril medication and developed angioedema on 23 October 2020.  He 
attended hospital at around 09.15hr.  ACE Inhibitor induced angioedema was confirmed 
following assessments by the emergency department he was referred to an  ENT 
consultant who commenced treatment with a plan to admit to ITU and set a low 
threshold for intubation upon deterioration.  Following reassessment by an  ITU 
consultant it was determined admission to that unit was  not required and admission to a 
high observation unit was appropriate. 

ACE Inhibitor angioedema is a rare event and the limited knowledge of its trajectory, 
including the potential for rapid deterioration in  circumstances where Mr Thompson 
appeared to be improving, offered false reassurance at a number of points in care 
namely, there was no request for specialist input from  immunology, the  potential for an 
alternative medication regime was therefore not considered,  there was no clear plan for 
ongoing monitoring requirements,  and  he was not admitted to ITU. 

At approximately 20.20hr he was seen by an A&E doctor because of a report of 
increased  swelling, which was the first report of a deterioration since admission.  This 
should  have prompted a request for reassessment by a specialist in  airway compromise 
who would likely have attended  promptly and noted the decline in  Mr Thompson's 
condition.  Shortly after 20.35hr Mr Thompson suffered a respiratory collapse which 
caused a catastrophic brain  injury and  passed away several days later when life support 
was withdrawn. 

 5 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the  inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.  In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. 

The evidence,  including that of Independent experts in  Immunology and Adult Critical 
Care and Anaesthetics, highlighted that: 

include 

•  National Guidance and training for front line/emergency staff did not, and still does 
not, 
of  angioedema 
the 
(histamine/bradykinin  mediated),  the  risk  factors,  and  the  diverging  treatment 
pathways,  including  the  need  for  speciality  medicine  input with  certain  types  of 
angioedema. 

specifics 

various 

about 

types 

•  NICE  does  not currently  publish  guidance or a  clinical  knowledge  summary on 

emergency management of angioedema. 

•  Those treating  Mr Thompson  on  23  October 2020  in  the  A&E  department were 
therefore  not  aware  of  the  complexity  and  fickle  nature  of  ACE  Induced 
angioedema,  including  the  potential  speed  of deterioration  in  symptoms,  even 
after what appeared to  be initial  improvement. 

•  ACE  Inhibitor  angioedema  is  more  common,  up  to  four  to  five  times  more,  in 
individuals of Black African or African Caribbean origin.  This increased risk factor 
is  not published  in the BNF. 

•  The  NICE  recommendation  about  using  ARB  as  the  preferred  choice  of 
medication  in  patients  of  Black  African  or  African  Caribbean  origin  is  not 
highlighted  in  BNF,  notwithstanding  the  BNF  is  the  go-to source for  medication 
management, contraindications, and cautions. 

It also came to light that Mr Thompson had transferred geographical areas such that 
clinicians were unable to access his  previous medical records to determine why ARB's, 
an alternative to ACE Inhibitors, had  been preferred  by clinicians on  a previous 
occasion.  His now treating clinicians were unable to access this information because 
such records are not readily available to,  or shared with,  clinicians in a different 
area/Trust.  The reason for this  is  not entirely clear and was thought to  be  related to data 
protection though there is nothing to suggest Mr Thompson withheld his consent,  or 
would have done so. 

6 

ACTION  SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my opinion action should  be taken to prevent future deaths and  I believe you and your 
organisation  have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You  are under a duty to respond  to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by Thursday 28 September 2023.  I,  the coroner,  may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to  be taken,  setting out 
the timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action  is  proposed. 

 8 

COPIES and  PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to: 

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

The Chief Coroner 
Mr Thompson's wife 
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 
Medicines and  Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency 
Royal College of Emergency Medicine 

I am  also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted  or summary 
form .  He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find  it 
useful or of interest.  You  may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of 
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief 
Coroner. 

9 

2nd August 2023 

I

Janine Wolstenholme 
Assistant Coroner

Related reports

Other reports by Janine Wolstenholme

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.