Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0283, written 3 Aug 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Aug 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0283 |
| Deceased | Leah Barber |
| Coroner | R Mahmood |
| Coroner area | West Yorkshire Western |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council 1 CORONER I am R MAHMOOD, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 12 June 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Leah BARBER aged 15. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28 April 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: on 3 June 2019, Leah Barber was found deceased at the Bolton Woods Quarry, Bolton Hall Road in Bradford. Leah was suffering a range of mental health pressures in the last 18 months of her life, and her mental health fluctuated in the terms of the nature and severity of those pressures. She had previous thoughts of taking her own life and had tried to do so on two occasions. On the morning of 3 June 2019 Leah left a note at her home address for family which indicated an intent to take her own life. From the location within the quarry at which she was discovered and a post-mortem examination it was apparent that Leah had fallen from a height of around 30 metres. The evidence showed that Leah had taken her own life. The medical cause of death was: 1a. Multiple injuries with inhalation of water 1b. Fall from a height 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH As per box 3 (immediately above). 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) A detailed review of the evidence in this case, which included evidence from two Schools ( ), as well as from Bradford Children's Social Services, the TRACKS Education team (at Bradford Council), the SCIL Team and the Council's SEND Team, revealed that no one person or department at Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Bradford Council had an overview of Council's involvement in relation to Leah (prior to her death). Of greater concern was that that remained so after each of the Council departments involved were notified that Leah had passed away. Every organisation which had contact with the Coroner's service in relation to Leah's death, with the exception of Bradford Council, was able to provide the Court with an overview/analysis of their involvement with Leah prior to her death and (where appropriate) the lessons they had learnt as a result their involvement with Leah. The Police and the local Mental Health Trust were examples of two public bodies who had and were able to provide an overview/analysis to the Court in terms of their involvement with Leah and confirm whether there were any lessons to be learned by them. The evidence provided by witnesses from the various Bradford Council teams which were involved with Leah, showed a clear disconnect in the involvement of the various Council departments. That was not caused by those individuals who had provided written statements to the Court or the two who attended to provide oral evidence. Whilst the Inquest hearing did not identify actions/omissions on the part of individuals/teams within the Council which more than minimally, negligibly or trivially contributed to Leah's death, the concern is that Bradford Council appeared not to have a system/process in place which allowed anyone (whether an individual / a team) within the Council to have an overview of deaths where there had been previous Council involvement with the deceased (in this case a child). In the apparent absence of such oversight Bradford Council would not be able to learn lessons from such cases (or even know if there were lessons to be learned). The absence of such a single point of oversight as was apparent in Leah's case, contributes to the risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by September 15, 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I have also sent it to who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 03/08/2023 R MAHMOOD HM Assistant Coroner for West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Department of Children’s Services Aiming High for Children Private & Confidential Mr R Mahmood HM Assistant Coroner for West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area Strategic Director’s Office Margaret McMillan Tower Prince’s Way Bradford BD1 1NN 5 September 2023 Dear Mr Mahmood Response to Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Date of Regulation 28: 3rd August 2023 I am writing to respond to the Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Death following the inquest into the tragic death of Leah. We have reviewed your report and the findings of your inquest into Leah’s death. In this, you did not identify actions or omissions on the part of individuals or teams within the Council which contributed to Leah's death. You did however express concern that Bradford Council appeared not to have a system or process in place which allowed us to have an overview of deaths where different Council teams had been involved with a child or young person. Having taken time to look into the concerns, I am able to reassure you that following Leah’s death we do now have strengthened processes to make sure that we have organisational oversight where we have more than one team involved and a child dies. We acknowledge that our staff who gave evidence at the inquest did not share the arrangements that have been put in place since Leah’s death. We recognise that Children Services were facing a number of challenges in 2020, though efforts were being made both then, and since to continually improve. Although we are far from complacent, the changes we have put in place, especially since November 2021, mean that our systems and processes are now more robust. We will continue to learn and improve. Having looked into the matters raised in the Regulation 28 report, there are now clear processes in place from 2021 that ensure an individual (the Director of Children’s Services) and appropriate teams have an overview of a child’s death. This has been supported by revised and new processes that ensure information is collected and shared across all parts of Children’s Services and continues to be in place following the operation of the Trust. These processes and the quality of the information collected will enable lessons to be learned in future. (2) 5 September 2023 Specific changes implemented since Leah’s death are: Individual/Team Oversight of Child Deaths The Children’s Services Departmental Management Team (DMT) now maintain a risk register to ensure their oversight of any serious incidents or significant events and that current progress is made on identified actions, and that lessons learned are acted on. At the DMT meeting the circumstances of the incident is discussed between the Director of Children Services (DCS) and the Assistant Directors (ADs) within Children Services. Where appropriate, actions are agreed, including the team that will coordinate a response. The child remains on the risk register until the actions have been resolved. This change means that the DCS as an individual and the appropriate team asked to coordinate the actions, have oversight and responsibility for those actions. Notification Processes and within Council Coordination There have been improvements to the notification process following the death of a child since 2019. Children’s Services Review Guidance (2022) has been produced and this includes a new form and improved processes that systematically collects information within children services when a child has died. This form also seeks to identify systemic issues, key lines of enquiry and provides recommendations. This is coordinated by the Council’s Education Safeguarding Team. The Serious Incident or Significant Events Guidance, Form and processes, were further developed and implemented in 2020. These processes are used when there is a death of any child, including where abuse or neglect are thought to have contributed to the child’s death. This also includes death by suspected suicide. One of the key changes to the form was the requirement for the relevant Head of Service (HoS) to set out the actions to be taken and for the relevant Assistant Director to give a view about any additional actions need to be taken. This is sent to the DCS to review and is then discussed on Departmental Management Team as outlined earlier. This makes sure that senior leaders in Children’s Services are sighted and reviewing information and decisions about a significant or serious event quickly. This change was put in place in November 2021. Since the establishment of the Bradford Children and Families Trust in April 2023, the guidance and notification process continues to operate along similar lines with senior leaders in the Trust being aware of significant or serious events whilst ensuring that the DCS is informed quickly so that this can be reviewed and considered by the Children’s DMT. Although there was not a single review by Bradford Council there were contemporaneous partnerships reviews that included Bradford Council resulting in recommendations of suicide prevention training led by the multi-agency suicide prevention group. In terms of wider partnership working, following Leah’s death, the Bradford Safeguarding Children Board Chair reviewed the information in line with government guidance, and concluded that there was no obvious safeguarding, abuse or neglect issue that would warrant a Rapid Review. Individual agencies did their own internal reviews to inform this. This was noted by the case review subgroup on the on the 25.07.2019. (3) 5 September 2023 Leah’s death was then referred (as the Safeguarding Board recommended) to the Child Death Overview Panel. As you will know, the role of the Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP) is to analyse the information obtained in order to confirm or clarify the cause of death, to determine any contributory factors, and to identify learning arising from the child death review process that may prevent future child deaths. The CDOP can also to make recommendations to all relevant organisations where actions have been identified which may prevent future child deaths or promote the health, safety and wellbeing of children. Although, the Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP) are not able to review Leah’s death until all the relevant legal processes have been completed, the CDOP identified that there had been two deaths by suicide in the year that Leah died and produced a report in 2022 that outlined six recommendations to prevent suicide. These recommendations were implemented. Bradford council also has a council wide suicide prevention group (SPG) and the terms of reference for this group were updated in 2021. This group is responsible for district wide suicide prevention training. I acknowledge again that these changes were not reflected fully in the evidence given to the Inquest and can assure that the right processes are in place to enable us to learn from such cases in the future. The DCS is the single point of oversight with their DMT to ensure that we have oversight and learn any lessons that arise. Yours sincerely Strategic Director Children’s Services
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.