Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Leah Barber

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0283, written 3 Aug 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 Aug 2023
Reference2023-0283
DeceasedLeah Barber
CoronerR Mahmood
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire Western
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Suicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council 

1  CORONER 

I am R MAHMOOD, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of West Yorkshire Western 
Coroner Area 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 12 June 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Leah BARBER aged 15. 
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28 April 2023.  The conclusion of 
the inquest was that: 

on 3 June 2019, Leah Barber was found deceased at the Bolton Woods Quarry, Bolton Hall 
Road in Bradford. Leah was suffering a range of mental health pressures in the last 18 
months of her life, and her mental health fluctuated in the terms of the nature and severity 
of those pressures. She had previous thoughts of taking her own life and had tried to do so 
on two occasions. 
On the morning of 3 June 2019 Leah left a note at her home address for family which 
indicated an intent to take her own life. From the location within the quarry at which she 
was discovered and a post-mortem examination it was apparent that Leah had fallen from a 
height of around 30 metres. The evidence showed that Leah had taken her own life. 

The medical cause of death was: 

1a. Multiple injuries with inhalation of water 
1b. Fall from a height 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

As per box 3 (immediately above). 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

A detailed review of the evidence in this case, which included evidence from two Schools 
(
), as well as from Bradford 
Children's Social Services, the TRACKS Education team (at Bradford Council), the SCIL 
Team and the Council's SEND Team, revealed that no one person or department at 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 Bradford Council had an overview of Council's involvement in relation to Leah (prior to her 
death). 

Of greater concern was that that remained so after each of the Council departments 
involved were notified that Leah had passed away. 

Every organisation which had contact with the Coroner's service in relation to Leah's death, 
with the exception of Bradford Council, was able to provide the Court with an 
overview/analysis of their involvement with Leah prior to her death and (where 
appropriate) the lessons they had learnt as a result their involvement with Leah. 

The Police and the local Mental Health Trust were examples of two public bodies who had 
and were able to provide an overview/analysis to the Court in terms of their involvement 
with Leah and confirm whether there were any lessons to be learned by them. 

The evidence provided by witnesses from the various Bradford Council teams which were 
involved with Leah, showed a clear disconnect in the involvement of the various Council 
departments. That was not caused by those individuals who had provided written 
statements to the Court or the two who attended to provide oral evidence. 

Whilst the Inquest hearing did not identify actions/omissions on the part of 
individuals/teams within the Council which more than minimally, negligibly or trivially 
contributed to Leah's death, the concern is that Bradford Council appeared not to have a 
system/process in place which allowed anyone (whether an individual / a team) within the 
Council to have an overview of deaths where there had been previous Council involvement 
with the deceased (in this case a child). 

In the apparent absence of such oversight Bradford Council would not be able to learn 
lessons from such cases (or even know if there were lessons to be learned).  The absence 
of such a single point of oversight as was apparent in Leah's case, contributes to the risk 
that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by September 15, 2023.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I have also sent it to 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 03/08/2023 

R MAHMOOD 
HM Assistant Coroner for 
West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from City of Bradford Council (PDF)
Department of Children’s Services 
Aiming High for Children  

Private & Confidential 
Mr R Mahmood 
HM Assistant Coroner for West Yorkshire 
Western Coroner Area 

Strategic Director’s Office 
Margaret McMillan Tower 
Prince’s Way  
Bradford 
BD1 1NN 

5 September 2023 

Dear Mr Mahmood 

Response to Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
Date of Regulation 28: 3rd August 2023 

I am writing to respond to the Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Death following the 
inquest into the tragic death of Leah.  

We have reviewed your report and the findings of your inquest into Leah’s death. In this, 
you did not identify actions or omissions on the part of individuals or teams within the 
Council which contributed to Leah's death.  You did however express concern that 
Bradford Council appeared not to have a system or process in place which allowed us to 
have an overview of deaths where different Council teams had been involved with a child 
or young person.  

Having taken time to look into the concerns, I am able to reassure you that following 
Leah’s death we do now have strengthened processes to make sure that we have 
organisational oversight where we have more than one team involved and a child dies.  
We acknowledge that our staff who gave evidence at the inquest did not share the 
arrangements that have been put in place since Leah’s death.  

We recognise that Children Services were facing a number of challenges in 2020, though 
efforts were being made both then, and since to continually improve.  Although we are far 
from complacent, the changes we have put in place, especially since November 2021, 
mean that our systems and processes are now more robust.  We will continue to learn and 
improve.  

Having looked into the matters raised in the Regulation 28 report, there are now clear 
processes in place from 2021 that ensure an individual (the Director of Children’s 
Services) and appropriate teams have an overview of a child’s death. This has been 
supported by revised and new processes that ensure information is collected and shared 
across all parts of Children’s Services and continues to be in place following the operation 
of the Trust. These processes and the quality of the information collected will enable 
lessons to be learned in future. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2) 
5 September 2023 

Specific changes implemented since Leah’s death are:  

Individual/Team Oversight of Child Deaths 

The Children’s Services Departmental Management Team (DMT) now maintain a risk 
register to ensure their oversight of any serious incidents or significant events and that 
current progress is made on identified actions, and that lessons learned are acted on.   At 
the DMT meeting the circumstances of the incident is discussed between the Director of 
Children Services (DCS) and the Assistant Directors (ADs) within Children Services.  
Where appropriate, actions are agreed, including the team that will coordinate a response.  
The child remains on the risk register until the actions have been resolved. This change 
means that the DCS as an individual and the appropriate team asked to coordinate the 
actions, have oversight and responsibility for those actions.   

 Notification Processes and within Council Coordination   

There have been improvements to the notification process following the death of a child 
since 2019.   Children’s Services Review Guidance (2022) has been produced and this 
includes a new form and improved processes that systematically collects information 
within children services when a child has died.   This form also seeks to identify systemic 
issues, key lines of enquiry and provides recommendations.  This is coordinated by the 
Council’s Education Safeguarding Team.  

The Serious Incident or Significant Events Guidance, Form and processes, were further 
developed and implemented in 2020. These processes are used when there is a death of 
any child, including where abuse or neglect are thought to have contributed to the child’s 
death.  This also includes death by suspected suicide. One of the key changes to the form 
was the requirement for the relevant Head of Service (HoS) to set out the actions to be 
taken and for the relevant Assistant Director to give a view about any additional actions 
need to be taken.  This is sent to the DCS to review and is then discussed on 
Departmental Management Team as outlined earlier.  This makes sure that senior leaders 
in Children’s Services are sighted and reviewing information and decisions about a 
significant or serious event quickly.  This change was put in place in November 2021.  
Since the establishment of the Bradford Children and Families Trust in April 2023, the 
guidance and notification process continues to operate along similar lines with senior 
leaders in the Trust being aware of significant or serious events whilst ensuring that the 
DCS is informed quickly so that this can be reviewed and considered by the Children’s 
DMT. 

Although there was not a single review by Bradford Council there were contemporaneous 
partnerships reviews that included Bradford Council resulting in recommendations of 
suicide prevention training led by the multi-agency suicide prevention group.  

In terms of wider partnership working, following Leah’s death, the Bradford Safeguarding 
Children Board Chair reviewed the information in line with government guidance, and 
concluded that there was no obvious safeguarding, abuse or neglect issue that would 
warrant a Rapid Review.  Individual agencies did their own internal reviews to inform this. 
This was noted by the case review subgroup on the on the 25.07.2019.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (3) 
5 September 2023 

Leah’s death was then referred (as the Safeguarding Board recommended) to the Child 
Death Overview Panel.  As you will know, the role of the Child Death Overview Panel 
(CDOP) is to analyse the information obtained in order to confirm or clarify the cause of 
death, to determine any contributory factors, and to identify learning arising from the child 
death review process that may prevent future child deaths. The CDOP can also to make 
recommendations to all relevant organisations where actions have been identified which 
may prevent future child deaths or promote the health, safety and wellbeing of children. 
Although, the Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP) are not able to review Leah’s death 
until all the relevant legal processes have been completed, the CDOP identified that there 
had been two deaths by suicide in the year that Leah died and produced a report in 2022 
that outlined six recommendations to prevent suicide.  These recommendations were 
implemented.  Bradford council also has a council wide suicide prevention group (SPG) 
and the terms of reference for this group were updated in 2021. This group is responsible 
for district wide suicide prevention training.   

I acknowledge again that these changes were not reflected fully in the evidence given to 
the Inquest and can assure that the right processes are in place to enable us to learn from 
such cases in the future. The DCS is the single point of oversight with their DMT to ensure 
that we have oversight and learn any lessons that arise.  

Yours sincerely 

Strategic Director 
Children’s Services

Related reports

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.