Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0337, written 19 Sep 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Sep 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0337 |
| Deceased | Stephen Cassidy |
| Coroner | Simon Fox |
| Coroner area | Avon |
| Category | Alcohol, drugs medication related deaths, Care Home Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | North Bristol NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
M. E. Voisin
Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner
Area of Avon
19th September 2023
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Deputy Director of Patient Safety, Digital at the NHS
, North Bristol NHS Trust.
1
CORONER
I am Dr Simon Fox KC, Assistant Coroner for Area of Avon.
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 10th March 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Stephen William Cassidy. The
investigation concluded at an inquest on 18th September 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was –
“Mr Cassidy died from a known drug allergy because its existence was not obtained by hospital
medical staff from his Summary Care Record.”
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
In 2018 Barnet Hospital in London found Mr Cassidy to be allergic to Ceftriaxone and recorded this fact in
his Summary Care Record (an electronic patient record). Mr Cassidy appears to have been unaware of his
allergy – probably because he experienced it during a period of encephalitis such that he had no clear
memory of it.
On 4th March 2023 Mr Cassidy fractured his hip and clinical staff from South Western Ambulance Service
NHS Foundation Trust (SWAS) conveyed him by ambulance to Southmead Hospital, Bristol (SMH). SWAS
staff were able to access the Summary Care Record, obtain the history of Ceftriaxone allergy and record
this in their clinical record.
On admission to SMH a copy of the SWAS clinical record was scanned into the SMH records and a
member of SMH emergency department nursing staff noted the Ceftriaxone allergy, but it was not acted
upon further. Mr Cassidy was listed for surgical repair of his fractured hip the following day.
The Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL
None of the doctors who assessed Mr Cassidy in the emergency department, the trauma and
orthopaedics team or the anaesthetist at his operation were able to access the Summary Care Record to
obtain the history of Ceftriaxone allergy and none of them were aware of it.
On 5th March 2023 Mr Cassidy was administered intravenous Ceftriaxone as part of routine induction of
anaesthesia for his hip surgery. He immediately suffered a severe anaphylactic reaction to the
Ceftriaxone from which he died shortly afterwards despite appropriate and extensive attempts to
resuscitate him.
Despite the Ceftriaxone allergy being recorded on his Summary Care Record in 2018 and the potential
fatal outcome of such a history being disregarded, the evidence at the Inquest demonstrated that –
a) There was no provision for clinical staff at SMH to access patients’ Summary Care Record
routinely or easily;
b) This was despite provision existing for SWAS clinical staff to do so before a patient arrived at
hospital;
c) There was no provision for the Summary Care Record to be integrated with SMH’s hospital
electronic patient record (known as Careflow/Connect) or the primary care electronic patient
record (EMIS – Egton Medical Information System) – such that the Ceftriaxone allergy
automatically appeared in SMH’s electronic patient record;
d) As a result none of the emergency department doctors, the trauma and orthopaedics team or
the anaesthetist who administered the antibiotic with induction were able to ascertain Mr
Cassidy’s Ceftriaxone allergy;
e) This led to an avoidable fatal anaphylactic reaction.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory
duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
a) There is no provision for clinical staff at SMH to access patients’ Summary Care Record routinely
or easily;
b) This is despite provision existing for SWAS clinical staff to do so before a patient arrives at
hospital;
c) There is no provision for the Summary Care Record to be integrated with SMH’s hospital
electronic patient record (known as Careflow/Connect) or the primary care electronic patient
record (known as EMIS – Egton Medical Information System) – such that the Ceftriaxone allergy
automatically appears in SMH’s electronic patient record;
d) As a result hospital doctors are ignorant of important clinical information on the patients they
are treating;
e) This can lead to avoidable patient harm including death.
The Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take
such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14th
November 2023. I, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the chief coroner and to the family.
I am also under a duty to send the chief coroner a copy of your response.
The chief coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the chief coroner.
9
19th September 2023
Signature
Dr Simon Fox KC Assistant Coroner Area of Avon
The Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Dr Simon Fox
Avon Coroner’s Office
37 Old Weston Road
Bristol
BS48 1UL
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
Dear Coroner,
9 November 2023
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Stephen William Cassidy
who died on 5 March 2023.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 18
September 2023 concerning the death of Stephen William Cassidy on 5 March 2023.
In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like
to express my deep condolences to Stephen’s family and loved ones. NHS England
are keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Stephen’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
Following several meetings with colleagues at North Bristol Trust (NBT), NHS England
offer the following responses to each of the points raised.
1. There was no provision for clinical staff at SMH to access patients’ Summary
Care Record routinely or easily.
The Summary Care Record (SCR) have nationally established Pre-requisites for
access which are known to organisations. These include:
▪ access to the internet or a Health and Social Care Network (HSCN) connection.
▪
to ensure your organisation has completed a Data Security and Protection Toolkit.
(DSPT) self-assessment and or reviewed the latest updates to it. (DSPT - formerly
known as the Information Governance Toolkit).
including Identity Agent and NHS Credential
local
Management as per Warranted Environment Specification on all user computers.
technical configuration
▪
▪ an assigned privacy officer for alert and audit purposes when viewing SCR.
▪ agreed local processes to ensure robust governance - when viewing SCR the user
▪
is informed of the need to follow the Permission to View guidelines.
to have prepared training for users covering the features the organisation plans
to use.
The National Care Records Service (NCRS) is the improved successor to the
Summary Care Record application that allows health and social care professionals to
access and update a range of patient and safeguarding information across regional
Integrated Care Services (ICS) boundaries. The service is a web-based application
and can be accessed regardless of what IT system an organisation is using, providing
a summary of health and care information for care settings where the full patient record
is not required to support their direct care.
Access to SCR or NCRS requires a web link which can be bookmarked or added to
relevant desktop machines. Alternatively, access can be via a SCR 1-Click/NCRS
Integration, which allows local access to the National Care Records Service.
Authentication is required to ensure that only relevant healthcare professionals are
able to access special category personal identifiable information / clinical records.
Smartcards have been a common method to support authentication and access to
Spine services over the last few years for healthcare professionals. Spine allows
information to shared securely though national health services such as the Electronic
Prescription Services, the Personal Demographics Service, the Summary Care
Record and the e-Referral Service.
Staff require a smartcard to authenticate to Spine services, it is however
acknowledged that only a limited number of staff at NBT have and carry a smartcard.
NHS England are working with NBT to identify suitable alternative solutions to the use
of Smartcards.
While NBT staff have access to clinical records for patients who live within the footprint
of their local detailed care record, for patients who reside or are registered with a GP
outside of this footprint, the National Care Records Service (NCRS) provides a quick,
secure way to access national patient information to improve clinical decision making
and healthcare outcomes and it is free to use.
2. This was despite provision existing for South West Ambulance clinical staff
to do so before a patient arrived at hospital.
It is understood that South West Ambulance Trust have the technical ability to access
Spine services including SCR and have embedded organisational procedures to
access this information routinely.
A paramedic from South West Ambulance Trust accessed this patient’s SCR and
noted that this patient had an allergy to Ceftriaxone in their record. The paramedic
included information that this patient had an allergy to Ceftriaxone, in their handover
to A&E staff at SMH.
3. There was no provision for the Summary Care Record to be integrated with
SMH’s hospital electronic patient record (known as Careflow/Connect) or the
primary care electronic patient record (EMIS – Egton Medical Information
System) – such that the Ceftriaxone allergy automatically appeared in SMH’s
electronic patient record;
NHS England Summary Care Records team and digital safety experts within the
National Patient Safety Team have worked collaboratively with North Bristol Trust to
discuss and identify suitable options to access SCR.
The implementation of National Care Records Service (NCRS) will address two of
these points:
▪ The NCRS Integration ‘Deep Link’ is a quick and easy way of integrating NCRS
into local clinical systems.
▪ CIS2 (the authentication mechanism used by NCRS) permits a variety of
authentication methods in addition to Smartcards.
SCR is fully integrated with EMIS, a provider GP IT system for 60% of GP Practices
in England. EMIS update the data which is displayed in SCR every time the information
in the SCR is updated (approximately 1 million updates per day).
In addition, there is the ability to view SCRs within the EMIS system, which multiple
practices routinely do to support the care of temporary resident patients and newly
registered patients.
The SCR viewing requirements require clinical systems and organisations that
consume the SCR to only present the information as human readable and not machine
processed i.e., a human must read the information, assimilate this, and transcribe
relevant content in the correct way, into their local patient record.
NHS England is committed to other programs of work (e.g., GP Connect / MIG) which
are currently delivering solutions that convey allergy information end to end in a
machine processable way.
4. As a result none of the emergency department doctors, the trauma and
orthopaedics team or the anaesthetist who administered the antibiotic with
induction were able to ascertain Mr Cassidy’s Ceftriaxone allergy;
All healthcare providers are required to perform medicines reconciliation during
relevant patient contacts. Medicines reconciliation includes obtaining an accurate
allergy history for each patient, this requires at least two sources of information e.g.,
from the patient / carer, and from the SCR.
In the case presented it appears that Mr Cassidy did not self-report the Ceftriaxone
allergy or the patient was only able to report vague details about an allergy which could
not be matched to a unique drug when they were asked about allergies by NBT staff.
It is recognised that some NBT staff may not have been aware that out of area patients
may not have their allergy information recorded on local NBT systems.
5. This led to an avoidable fatal anaphylactic reaction.
NHS England is fully committed to working with provider organisations to improve
access to all available sources of critical patient information.
I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed
by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends
that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
14th November 2023
The Coroner’s Court
Old Weston Road
Flax Bourton
BS48 1UL
Office of the Chief Medical Officer
Trust Headquarters
Southmead Hospital
Westbury on Trym
BS10 5NB
FAO: Dr Simon Fox KC, Assistant Coroner Area of Avon
Dear Dr Fox,
Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths report following Inquest into the death of Stephen
Cassidy
I write further to the Regulation 28 report, dated 19th September 2023, issued as a result of the inquest
into the death of Mr Stephen Cassidy. North Bristol NHS Trust offers the following responses to the
points raised:
a) There is no provision for clinical staff at SMH to access patients Summary Care Record (SCR)
routinely or easily.
North Bristol NHS Trust (NBT) moved to Careflow EPR in July 2022 and changed its authentication
method from Smartcard-based to password-based authentication. The routine use of smartcards
since then has declined as they are not required for access to NBT local systems, or to the wider
primary care interface – Connecting Care. Since the receipt of the Regulation 28 report, the
following actions have been taken and planned:
1. Non-smartcard-based access to NCRS (National Care Record Service): Following discussions
with NHSE, NBT IT team have explored access to the new NCRS with existing authentication
protocols without having to use Smartcards. This has already been trialled successfully for a
pilot cohort, and after a planned limited clinical deployment we would be in a position to make
access available to all Trust staff in the first quarter of 2024. This would allow staff to access the
NCRS from any browser by using the Microsoft authenticator app and without having to use a
Smartcard.
2. One-click/in-context access to NCRS: The ability to access the SCR (and its follower NCRS) in
context unfortunately could not be deployed in 2022 at the time of the move to Careflow owing
to technical incompatibilities. Following discussions, the IT teams of NHSE, NBT, and System C
(producers of Careflow) have had a meeting on the 6th of November to agree a way forward on
integration, and the Director of IT at NBT has communicated the requirement to System C so
that this at the highest priority for rapid deployment. This is a complex piece of integration
work which requires System C, NBT, and NHSE to align digitally, the pathway was agreed in the
last meeting and we are aiming for its completion in the first half of 2024.
3. Smartcard use in NBT: The majority of NBT staff have active Smartcards even though they are
not required for access to Careflow EPR. Following the issuance of the Trust safety alert in April
2023 which encouraged staff to access the NCRS/SCR we requested NHSE interrogate access
requests and they could confirm that the NCRS was accessed 3,810 times and SCR 2,787 times
from NBT since 17th April 2023, with 473 access events for NCRS in the week of 23 October
2023. In the same week the SCR (which can only be accessed with a Smartcard) was accessed
356 times. NHSE were further able to confirm that in the 12 months leading up to October 2023
SCR was accessed from NBT using Smartcards on 30,247 occasions. While we are unable to
audit the details of such access, the data confirms that Smartcard use in NBT for accessing NCRS
and SCR remains frequent, making information visible to clinicians upon request.
b) This is despite provision existing for SWAS clinical staff to do so before a patient arrives at
hospital.
SWASFT access the SCR on a regular basis and populate this information in their documentation.
NBT have implemented a process by means of which the ambulance handover letter is printed and
scanned into the Electronic Database Management System (EDMS) upon arrival of the patient. All
information from the ambulance handover is therefore available to clinicians within minutes after
arrival of the patient by ambulance. Safety alerts encourage clinical staff to access the information
from EDMS and from Connecting Care, in addition to seeking it from the patient or their relatives,
and if an allergy is identified they are expected to add it as an alert to Careflow which then remains
visible to clinical staff. This process is now reflected in policies published on the NBT Intranet. Since
April 2023, the recording of allergy related alerts in Careflow is audited and has seen a 500%
increase in recording of such alerts compared to the preceding period prior to the alert and change
in process.
c) There was no provision for the Summary Care Record to be integrated with SMH’s hospital
electronic patient record (known as Careflow/Connect) or the primary care electronic patient
record (EMIS – Egton Medical Information System) – such that the Ceftriaxone allergy
automatically appeared in SMH’s electronic patient record.
We have addressed the progress towards integration of SCR/NCRS in-context in a) 2. The ability to
populate alerts across systems was discussed in meetings with NHSE in October, however this poses
significant logistical challenges in definition of data points and creation a ‘single source of truth’
across systems. NHSE are aware of the challenges faced and will be best placed to address the
specific question of ‘seamless integration’ of EPR systems across England spanning primary and
secondary care.
d) As a result, none of the emergency department doctors, the trauma and orthopaedics team or
the anaesthetist who administered the antibiotic with induction were able to ascertain Mr
Cassidy’s Ceftriaxone allergy.
Until we achieve seamless access to the NCRS, we have taken the following actions:
1. Clarified to staff about the requirements to ascertain allergy information from a minimum of
two sources and updated the trust guidelines to reflect this.
2. Actions to be taken to record and communicate allergy alerts in Careflow along with simple
guidelines on how to do this have been communicated and reinforced with reminders by
email, face to face, and in safety bulletins.
3. Face to face teaching on this topic has been provided to junior doctors in their teaching
sessions by the Pharmacy team.
4. We have worked closely with the ICB and the Connecting Care team, they have updated their
system to provide clear advice if Connecting Care is unable to reflect the information contained
in the NCRS/SCR/EMIS to "Connecting Care cannot display information on this patient at this
time, PLEASE access this information from the National Summary Care Record (NCRS) by
accessing the NHS Spine Portal".
e) This can lead to avoidable patient harm including death.
NBT recognises the cross system digital processes and human factors which contributed to this
tragic avoidable death.
In addition to the work set out above to improve accessibility to the NCRS/SCR, NBT are also
working on two other projects:
1. Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) – EPMA systems have been
demonstrated to reduce medication error across healthcare. NBT have commissioned the
implementation of this system, with plans for this to be deployed in the third quarter of 2024.
In addition to providing safeguards to medical prescribing, this will also serve as a repository
for allergy information across the trust.
2. Red Wrist Bands – We have completed a scoping exercise for deployment of ‘Red Wrist Bands’
for patients with allergy alerts. This is designed to be a ‘human factor’ intervention to bring
forth an appreciation for recognition of allergy or similar alerts. This is in business planning
stage, and we hope to implement this by the third quarter of 2024.
I hope you will take some assurance from this letter setting out our response in relation to the
concerning points that you made in your Regulation 28 report.
Yours sincerely,
Medical Director - Safety and Quality
North Bristol NHS Trust
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North Bristol NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.