Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Axel Price

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0195, written 15 Apr 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report15 Apr 2024
Reference2024-0195
DeceasedAxel Price
CoronerPenelope Schofield
Coroner areaWest Sussex, Brighton and Hove
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The Rt Hon Victoria Atkins MP 
Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 
39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

1  CORONER 

I am Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of West Sussex and Brighton 
and Hove 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 29th  April 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Axel Price aged 18.  The 
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 9th  October 2023.  The overall 
conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion which stated that:-

“At some time between the 15th April and 23rd April 2021 Axel, who had recently turned 
18 years old tied a ligature 

It cannot be determined if at the time he had intended to end his own life. On 22nd 
February 2021 Axel had an unplanned discharged from Hospital, following his arrest by 
Police, at a time when he was showing signs of a decline in his mental health. The agencies 
failed him in that:-

1. The Mental Health services failed to arrange a coherent planned discharge on 22nd 
February 2021 and provide a clear risk, crisis, and care plan on discharge. 
2. Adult Social Care failed to arrange a capacity assessment upon his discharge on 22nd 
February 2021 or anytime thereafter. 
3. There was lack of consideration by all agencies involved with Axel as to whether the 
accommodation provided to him was suitable for a young person, whose capacity fluctuated 
when in crisis, and who in those circumstances became unsafe to live alone. 
4. Axel’s lead Practitioner failed to assertively engage with Axel after discharge and meet 
with him in person. She was therefore not able to assess his ongoing risk or recognise his 
mental health deterioration. 
5. On 6th April 2021 following an obvious decline in Axel’s mental health presentation there 
was a failure by Adult Social Care staff to arrange a full risk assessment and mental health 
review. 
6. There was a lack of support and active engagement for Axel provided by the Adult 
Assessment and Treatment Service in Crawley pending his transfer to Adult Assessment 
and Treatment Service in Brighton. 

Axel’s death was contributed to by neglect” 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

At some time between the 15th April and 23rd April 2021 Axel, who had recently turned 18 
years old tied a ligature

. Axel had recently been detained under Section 

2 Mental Health Act 1983 but discharged following a violent incident in the hospital when he 
was taken into Police custody. He was released from Police custody into temporary 
accommodation in Brighton provided by Adult Social Care. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the investigation, my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

This case identified that there is a lack of clear understanding of the risk or accountability 
between the agencies when a young person transitions from CAMBS services at the age of 
18 to adult services. The expert who provided evidence in this case said that this was a 
well-recognised problem and whilst services across the country had tried to address this, 
there was a lack of national guidance and provision. 

In this particular case Axel was particularly vulnerable.  He was born Yasmin Price but 
identified as a male from a young age.  He had struggled emotionally during his teens and 
had indulged with alcohol and drugs. He had been detained on a number of occasions due 
to his mental health. 

At the age of 18 he transitioned to adult services but there was a lack of a recognised 
pathway for him. 

In the lead up to his death he had been discharged from a mental health provision following 
his arrest for criminal offences.  He was then discharged from the hospital and 
subsequently the Police station to temporary accommodation. 

There was little shared understanding between agencies of how Axel should best be 
supported and therefore he appeared to fall between the services. 

Substantial changes have been made locally by Sussex Partnership Foundation NHS Trust 
around the transition of those from CAMBS to Adult health services but looking at other 
Prevention of Future Death Reports this is not just a local issue.  There is a lack of national 
guidance and support in relation to the multi-agency approach that is needed to support 
those young people transitioning to adult health and social care services. Unless this is 
addressed nationally, sadly other deaths will occur. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 10th  June 2024 I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:-

a)  The family of Axel Matters (also known as Yasmin Price) 
b)  Sussex Partnership Foundation NHS Trust 
c)  East Sussex County Council 
d)  Priory Group 
e) 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 15/04/2024 

Penelope SCHOFIELD 
Senior Coroner for 
West Sussex, Brighton and Hove 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dhsc (PDF)
Maria Caulfield MP  
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for 
Mental Health and Women’s Health Strategy  

39 Victoria Street  
London 
SW1H 0EU 

 28 May 2024 

Our Ref: 

Penelope Schofield 
Senior Coroner 
West Sussex 
Brighton and Hove 
PO19 1DD 

By Email: 

Dear Ms Schofield, 

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 15 April 2024 
about the death of Axel Price. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for mental 
health and patient safety.      

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Axel’s 
death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances 
your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to 
my attention.  

Your report raises concerns about the transitions from children and young people’s mental 
health services to adult services at the age of 18. 

We recognise how important it is that young people with mental ill health get the level of 
care that is appropriate for their needs, and we want to ensure that they have access to 
the right mental health support, in the right place, and at the right time.  

Through the NHS Long Term Plan, local health systems were tasked with delivering a 
comprehensive offer for 0-25 year-olds to ensure young adults receive appropriate mental 
health support regardless of their age or diagnostic profile. Between the ages of 16-18, 
young people are more susceptible to mental illness, undergoing physiological change and 
making important transitions in their lives. As your report highlights, the structure of NHS 
mental health services sometimes creates gaps for young people undergoing the transition 
from children and young people’s mental health services to appropriate support including 
adult mental health services. The new approach to young adult mental health services for 
people aged 18-25 will better support the transition to adulthood. 

The NHS is extending current service models to create a comprehensive offer for 0-25 
year olds that reaches across mental health services for children, young people and 

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 adults. The new model is intended to deliver an integrated approach across health, social 
care, education and the voluntary sector, such as the evidence-based ‘iThrive’ operating 
model which currently covers around 47% of the 0-18 population and can be expanded to 
cover 18-25 year olds. 

In terms of providing mental health support up to the age of 18, there are now nearly 500 
mental health support teams in place across England, covering 4.2 million children or 
around 44% of pupils in schools and colleges. 

We have also offered all state schools and colleges a grant to train a senior mental health 
lead to support the introduction of effective, whole school approaches to mental health and 
wellbeing. Over 15,100 schools and colleges have received a senior mental health lead 
training grant, including more than 7 in 10 state-funded secondary schools in England. 

In addition, we are providing £8 million to fund 24 existing early support hubs across the 
country – ranging from Exeter to Liverpool. This will improve access for children and young 
people to vital mental health support in the community, offering early interventions to 
improve wellbeing before their condition escalates further. 

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.  

Yours sincerely,  

 MARIA CAULFIELD MP

Related reports

Other reports by Penelope Schofield

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.