Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0253, written 9 May 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 9 May 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0253 |
| Deceased | Samantha Angel |
| Coroner | Sarah Whitby |
| Coroner area | Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Queen Alexandra Hospital Legal Department 1 CORONER I am Sarah WHITBY, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 27 September 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Samantha Jane ANGEL aged 55. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25 April 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was that: On the 16th September 2022, the deceased, Samantha Jane Angel, was found hanged at Hampshire. She was under stress, as a result her home at of a work investigation. The deceased further discovered on the 16th September, that she had been consistently lied to and her money misused leading to great distress. Acting on impulse, she took the action to end her life that evening. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 16th September 2022, the deceased, Samantha Jane Angel, was found hanged at her home at , Hampshire. She was under stress, as a result of a work investigation. The deceased further discovered on the 16th September, that she had been consistently lied to and her money misused leading to great distress. Acting on impulse, she took the action to end her life that evening. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) 1. The delay in resolving the investigation commissioned into the deceased behaviour at work. 2. The ease with which the circumstances leading to the allegation were made public amongst the deceased's' work colleagues and the consequences of that. 3. The recognition that the distress caused to the deceased by the publication of the circumstances, should be a factor in accelerating a conclusion to an investigation, not just the consequences of any findings of an investigation if negative to the deceased. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by July 03, 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I have also sent it to who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 09/05/2024 Sarah WHITBY Assistant Coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
INHS Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust Trust Headquarters F Level, Queen Alexandra Hospital Southwick Hill Road Cosham PORTSMOUTH, POG 3LY Tel; 27" June 2024 Dear Mrs Whitby Response to Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths following the inquest into the death of Samantha Jane Angel | write to provide the Trust’s response to your regulation 28 report issued following the inquest into the death of Samantha Jane Angel. For ease of reference the matters of concern identified by you during the inquest are stated in italics below followed by the Trust’s response. 1. The delay in resolving the investigation commissioned into the deceased's behaviour at work. 2. The ease with which the circumstances leading to the allegation were made public amongst the deceased's work colleagues and the consequences of that. 3. The recognition that the distress caused to the deceased by the publication of the circumstances, should be a factor in accelerating a conclusion to an investigation, not just the consequences of any findings of an investigation if negative to the deceased. Trust Response 1. The delay in resolving the investigation commissioned into the deceased’s behaviour at work. 3. The recognition that the distress caused to the deceased by the publication of the circumstances, should be a factor in accelerating a conclusion to an investigation, not just the consequences of any findings of an investigation if negative to the deceased. With regard to concerns 1 & 3 the Trust responds as follows: Since Samantha’s sad death the Trust has made a number of improvements to the way it handles and investigates Human Resources (HR) issues. A summary of those changes was submitted to HM Coroner in the form of a statement from Nicole Cornelius, former Chief Chair: EE Chief Executive: | Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, PO6 3LY Registered charity number: 1047986 Working To drive excellence in care for our patients and communities INHS Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust People Officer at the Trust. Below is a summary of those points together with details of further improvements which have been made since submission of that statement: 1. We have refreshed the leadership within the HR Operational Team, appointing a new Head of Employee Relations and Inclusion to focus on providing methods to support our managers and their supporting HR staff to enable them to keep checking on cases and to ensure that staff welfare remains paramount. Concurrently, the new Head of Service, a senior role, collaborates with the team to establish reporting metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for all HR case work. 2. We are utilising our partnership with the IOW Trust to explore the integration of their Case Management System or a separate joint Case Management System to enhance our investigative processes. 3. In the meantime, we are using our existing resources, namely the Electronic Staff Record and Excel, to manage our caseload effectively. At any given time, we handle 35-40 cases with the support of a proficient HR Advisory Team comprising 7 qualified professionals. In line with our commitment to enhancing our investigative processes, significant improvements are in development in the recording and monitoring of cases. These enhancements provide a comprehensive overview of our total casework, facilitating more efficient prioritisation and systematic review based on the length and complexity of each case. By refining our recording and monitoring systems, this enables us to strategically prioritise cases based on various factors, including their length, complexity, and urgency. 4. The HR Advisory Team utilise the just culture approach and understand the critical importance of assessing the necessity for an investigation before a manager proceeds with that course of action, often highlighting the viability of informal actions or learning interventions as an appropriate alternative to a formal investigation. Ongoing efforts include providing refreshed training sessions for managers, utilising anonymised cases that underscore the significance of sound decision-making and adept case management. 5. In looking ahead to the future, our long-term vision includes a strategic and thorough assessment of our policies and processes to solidify and promote a culture centred on fairness and continuous learning. This involves a proactive and comprehensive review of all existing policies and procedures to ensure they align with the principles of a just and learning culture. Our plan encompasses a structured approach to embedding this culture throughout the organisation, focusing on fostering transparency, accountability, and a commitment to ongoing improvement. By revisiting and revising our policies, we aim to create a supportive and empowering work environment where employees feel encouraged to learn from ‘experiences, share feedback openly, and contribute to a culture of continuous development. This long-term strategy involves the implementation of tailored training programmes, workshops, and awareness campaigns to reinforce the values and behaviours associated with a just and learning culture. 6. Regular reviews of cases are routinely conducted by our HR operational team and a monthly review of cases completed by our professional standards committee ensures ongoing oversight of case progress. Our letters which go out to employees during informal Chair: Chief Executive: Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, PO6 3LY 5 Registered charity number: 1047986 Working To drive excellence in care for together our patients and communities INHS Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust and formal processes routinely contain information about support and wellbeing services available, including access to “Care First” for confidential counselling and mediation services. In addition, employees under investigation are assigned a wellbeing contact who will check in with the employee throughout the duration of the investigation. 7. Further enhancing our initiatives, we are developing a comprehensive training programme for our HR advisory team, specifically focusing on areas such as safeguarding and fostering equality in the workplace. To bolster our investigative capabilities, we are expanding our pool of trained investigators across the Trust, a move intended to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our hearing procedures. While external investigators are occasionally engaged for cases involving urgent or serious issues, the associated costs inhibit routine utilisation. 8. The introduction of a Protected Time Agreement and Protocol for Investigating Officers underscores our commitment to prioritising the health and wellbeing of all parties involved in investigations. Notably, the Protocol outlines steps for immediate action to address signs of distress or wellbeing concerns during the investigation process. It is designed to establish a framework that ensures Investigating Officers have dedicated time to effectively conduct investigations, review documents, interview involved parties, and prepare reports in accordance with disciplinary and grievance processes. It also emphasises the importance of ensuring the wellbeing of all individuals involved in the investigation process. Included in the protocol are the following points: 1. Observation and Action: Investigating Officers are tasked with observing signs of distress, anxiety, or other issues that may impact the mental or physical health of any party during the investigation PIOGESS: Immediate action is required to address these situations promptly. 2. Supportive Measures: If signs of distress or concerns regarding health and wellbeing are identified, appropriate steps should be taken to offer support and assistance. This can include referring individuals to internal support services, HR representatives, occupational health services, or external counselling services as necessary. 3. Escalation Process: In cases where distress or wellbeing concerns are significant and require urgent attention, the Investigating Officer is instructed to escalate the matter promptly to the designated authority in the Human Resources department. 4. Documentation and Sensitivity: Instances where concerns are raised for the health and wellbeing of individuals involved in the investigation should be documented properly and handled with sensitivity, confidentiality, and professionalism to ensure effective support and resolution. 2. The ease with which the circumstances leading to the allegation were made public amongst the deceased's work colleagues and the consequences of that. With regard to concern 2 the Trust responds as follows: . Chi Chief Executive Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, PO6 3LY Registered charity number: 1047986 Working To drive excellence in care for our patients and communities INHS Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust 1.The Trust has an established risk management system (Datix Cloud IQ, known as Datix or DCIQ) and this includes a category for staff to report staff on staff incidents. In some cases, there may be direct conversations which are not reported onto the system, and instead discussed with Managers and/or the Human Resources team who will log this. When an incident is submitted there is a pop up on the narrative section to remind staff not to include any personal identifiable data (PID) information in the free text box, however staff on occasion continue to do this. All training that is provided, and in the guidance documents, it is clearly stated not to use PID in free text boxes. The reviewers of incidents are advised to ensure that PID is removed when an incident review commences and to remind the reporter not to do this if it has been included. As a result of learning from this case, a new message has been added to the front page of the system that all reporters of incidents see when they log in: “Please be aware that Personal Identifiable data (PID) MUST NOT be included in the description and action taken fields of any incident that you are reporting”. ; 2.The distribution list for incident forms includes those members of staff who require visibility of the incident in their area of work or speciality to enable them-as part of their role and responsibilities-to review, investigate, have awareness of, and manage incidents. For example, the Accredited Security Management Specialist is notified in order that they can give specialist input and offer advice regarding any review/investigations related to violence and aggression. In response to concerns raised regarding the notification list, we have requested Governance Leads to review their notifications lists to check for accuracy, this is planned for completion by the end of July. 3.In partnership with the Trust Communications Team, we have also initiated a communications and engagement plan for all staff to remind them of the importance of not including PID, in the “description” and “actions taken” fields of any incident reported on DCIQ. This plan includes direction and guidance regarding not circulating details, including PID of incidents they have visibility of, in line with Caldicott Principle 4: Access to confidential information should be on a strict need-to-know basis. The Trust wide messaging will be via ‘Trust Talk’, a weekly electronic newsletter delivered to all staff with a Trust email account, various Trust authorised social media accounts and across associated:-social media platforms and finally the Trust screensaver which has reach across all Trust computers. ni iii Chief Executive: Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, PO6 3LY e Registered charity number: 1047986 Working To drive excellence in care for together our patients and communities INHS' Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust Sam’s death was a tragedy for her, her family and friends, and colleagues as well as the Trust which lost a valued employee. | hope that the contents of this response provides HM Coroner with appropriate assurance that the Trust has learnt from Sam’s sad death and is working hard to provide the wellbeing support needed to those employees involved in HR investigations. Yours sincerely Chief Executive Chair: Melloney Poole OBE Chief Executive: Penny Emerit Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, PO6 3LY u Registered charity number: 1047986 Working To drive excellence in care for t our patients and communities m4 = ie 7
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.