Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0419, written 7 May 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 7 May 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0419 |
| Deceased | David Riley |
| Coroner | Linda Lee |
| Coroner area | Warwickshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 4 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths Report David RILEY THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Warwick Hospital Department of Health/Secretary of State NHS England and NHS Improvement NICE Copies to Family and 1. CORONER I am: Linda Lee, Assistant Coroner for Warwickshire, Warwick Justice Centre, Newbold Terrace, Royal Leamington Spa. 2. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, regulations 28 and 29. 3. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 17 June 2022, I commenced an investigation into the death of David RILEY (aged 72 years). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26th April 2024 at Warwick Coroners Court. The medical cause of death was confirmed as: 1a Multiple Cerebral Infarcts 1b Resolving Haemopericardium 1c Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation 4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH David Riley had symptomatic atrial fibrillation. A DC cardioversion had been performed but Mr Riley relapsed to atrial fibrillation after a few days. After considering the treatment alternatives, Mr Riley opted for lifestyle modification and AF ablation. The ablation was performed at the BMI Priory Hospital Edgbaston on 3 May 2023 without incident. Mr Riley was discharged with a sinus rhythm. Due to the increased risk of clots due to the ablation procedure, it was recommended that Mr Riley take Apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for at least 6 weeks following the AF ablation. Mr Riley developed chest pain and shortness of breath. Initially it was thought that this was an expected side effect of the procedure, and no other cause was found. An echocardiogram performed on 24 May 2023, whilst Mr Riley was on holiday in Montenegro, did not show a pericardial effusion but this was present after his admission on 31 May 2023 to the Warwick hospital. Initial investigations at the Warwick hospital did not reveal the cause of the pericardial effusion or Mr Riley’s symptoms of pain in the chest and back (unaffected by breathing in or out). The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a means of assessing the risk of stroke in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Evidence was given that whilst he was an inpatient at Warwick, Mr Riley’s score was four. Evidence was given that DOACs have a reduced risk of bleeding compared to Warfarin and that DOACs can be discontinued for a shorter period of time, if at all. An assessment as to the need for pausing or the period of pausing the DOAC has to be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on the clinical assessment of the patient and the procedure under consideration. Evidence was given that there is an inconsistency in decisions taken to pause DOACs not only from hospital to hospital but within different teams within the same hospital and much depended on consultant ‘confidence’ in the ability to pause DOACs. A decision was taken to perform a pericardiocentesis to drain the extra fluid from the pericardial cavity. The pericardiocentesis took place on 2 June 2023. It was not performed as an emergency procedure but primarily for the purpose of diagnostic testing and to a lesser extent as a means of relieving Mr Riley’s symptoms. In the event no fluid was obtained during the procedure, but no untoward event occurred. Evidence was given that in Mr Riley’s case, consideration could have been given to not pausing the Apixaban or to pausing it for only a short period of time before and after the pericardiocentesis. However, the decision to pause the Apixaban had already been taken by someone other than the Consultant who was to perform the pericardiocentesis. The instruction given by the Consultant once he had performed the pericardiocentesis to restart the Apixaban was not acted on promptly. The Apixaban was eventually restarted and then again paused for reasons that are not clear. The clinical records do not indicate who took the decisions to pause the Apixaban and what consideration was given as to the duration of the pause. The precise duration of the pausing of the Apixaban is not clearly recorded, but it appeared to have been paused for longer than was required. Mr Riley was under the care of three consultants and numerous middle grade doctors during his time as an inpatient at Warwick hospital. Concern was expressed in evidence as to the continuity of care Mr Riley received and the efficiency of communication between the medical staff engaged in his care. Evidence was also given that staff had difficulty in entering information on the computerised record and accessing that information, due to lack of familiarity with the system. The postmortem examination and the subsequent review did not reveal a definitive cause of the clotting which led to the stroke suffered by Mr Riley on the 9 June 2023, and his death on 10 June 2023. The pausing of the Apixaban may have increased the risk of Mr Riley suffering a stroke but it cannot be said to have caused it. 5. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the inquest, the evidence and information revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. Although the Warwick hospital conducted a Root Cause Analysis Investigation Report (RCAIR) of 6 July 2023 which indicated that the pausing of the DOAC was a lesson learned, it did not indicate what was learned. The only further action was limited to the incident being presented at the Grand Round, but this had not taken place at the time of the inquest, some 9 months after publication of the RCAIR. There are remaining outstanding matters of concern. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. Decisions regarding pausing of DOACs. It was not clear if there is national guidance available to clinicians regarding the pausing of DOACs and the considerations to be applied in making that decision. If there is such guidance, it is not widely understood or on the evidence given, followed consistently from hospital to hospital or within different teams. The inconsistency of approach appears from the evidence to increase the risk of misunderstanding and to put patients with atrial fibrillation at risk. 2. Effective communication From the evidence, there was a failure to effectively communicate, recognise and act on directions that were time critical, such as restarting the DOAC as directed. It does not appear that there was any consideration as to the timing of the pericardiocentesis to ensure that the DOAC was paused for a short a time as possible. The evidence suggested that this may be due to lack of continuity of care and the difficulties in the way in which computerised clinical/pharmacy records are updated and accessed. Clear communication between medical staff is essential to patient care. 6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that you have the power to take such action. 7. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 1 July 2024 I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the following: 1. HHJ Teague QC the Chief Coroner of England & Wales Chief Coroner's Office, 11th Floor Thomas More, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL. chiefcoronersoffice@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk 2. The family of David RILEY I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. Date: 7 May 2024 Linda LEE Assistant Coroner for Warwickshire
4 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From Maria Caulfield Minister for Mental Health and Women’s Health 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 28 June 2024 Our ref: PFD – 24-05-07 – RILEY HM Coroner Linda Lee Warwickshire Justice Centre Newbold Terrace Leamington Spa CV32 4EL By email: Dear Linda, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 7 May sent to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) about the death of David Riley. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for Patient Safety. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Riley’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns over national guidance available to clinicians regarding the pausing of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and the considerations to be applied in making that decision and effective communication between medical staff for essential patient care. I note that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and NHS England are also recipients of this report. Departmental officials have made enquires with both organisations and the Care Quality Commissions (CQC). I am informed that CQC’s medicines team will be contacting the Trust Chief Pharmacist to establish whether the pharmacy was informed and involved in the outcomes of the Trust investigation from a medicine management perspective. They will also be querying lessons learnt from this case and whether there are any other safety aspects to be reviewed. CQC would expect acute hospitals to follow national guidance when designing guidance/policy for staff and would expect there to be something to guide staff on pausing DOACs. CQC’s inspection team requested a copy of the guidance/policy used by staff at South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust (SWFT) on 17 June 2024 for an assessment. They received this document on 19 June 2024. CQC note that the hospital’s policy was updated this month (June 2024) in response to learning from an incident. The policy has been written using up to date national guidance, however, there is no reference to pausing anticoagulation medication in the case of surgery. SWFT had not shared details of this death with CQC. CQC inspectors requested a copy of the Root Cause Analysis on 17 June 2024 and received this on 24 June 2024. CQC will continue to monitor the Trust and will determine next steps once they have reviewed the relevant documents and made contact with the Chief Pharmacist. CQC note there is NICE guidance for managing atrial fibrillation Recommendations | Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management | Guidance | NICE with a section ‘1.11 Stopping anticoagulation’. There is also further guidance available from the British Society for Haematology and the NHS on pausing DOACs: Peri-Operative Management of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy (b-s-h.org.uk). NICE will be responding directly to your concern about national guidance on DOACs. As you will be aware, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is an executive non-departmental public body, sponsored by the DHSC. It is the independent body responsible for developing evidence-based guidelines for the National Health Service, following a rigorous process and extensive engagement with stakeholders and expert input to develop the scope of the guidelines. However, it is important to note that NICE guidelines do not override a clinician’s responsibility to make decisions appropriate to individual patients. NICE guidelines describe best practice, and the Government expects NHS commissioners to take them into account in designing services that meet the needs of their local populations. NHS England is operationally responsible for delivering health services across the country and will be responding directly to your concerns at length. NHS England is an executive non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Department of Health and Social Care. It is vital that lessons are learnt collectively, and changes are made to reflect where things have gone wrong, which is essential to ensure the NHS provides safe, high-quality care. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely,
Ms Linda Lee
Assistant Coroner for Warwickshire
Warwick Justice Centre
Newbold Terrace
Royal Leamington Spa
CV32 4EL
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
8 July 2024
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David Riley who died on
10 June 2023.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 7 May
2024 concerning the death of David Riley on 10 June 2023. In advance of responding
to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep
condolences to David’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the
family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about David’s care have been listened
to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report and I apologise for
any anguish this delay may have caused to David’s family or friends. I realise that
responses to Coroner Reports can form part of the important process of family and
friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones and appreciate
this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
Decisions regarding pausing of DOACs
Your first concern relates to the national guidance available to clinicians regarding the
pausing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), in this case Apixaban, and the
considerations to be applied in making that decision. You have raised that the
evidence at the inquest indicated that there was inconsistency around decisions taken
to pause DOACs, which may ultimately put patients with atrial fibrillation at risk.
It is not within NHS England’s remit to publish the relevant clinical guidance on this
matter. We would refer you to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
(NICE), who we note you have also addressed your Report to, and who have published
national guidance on the use of Apixaban, which was last updated in April 2024. The
guidance states that patients may need to temporarily stop taking Apixaban if they
require surgery or any other invasive procedure, and this depends on the patient’s risk
of having a thromboembolic event along with the bleeding risk associated with the
procedure. For “procedures with a high bleeding risk, the last dose of apixaban should
be taken 3 days before the procedure”. We understand from follow-up correspondence
with you that David’s dose of Apixaban was paused for four days, 1-4 June 2023, and
then paused again on the evening of 7 June 2023, because of further consideration
about another attempt to aspirate the pericardial collection.
There is also further national free-to-access guidance for clinicians via the Apixaban
UK Clinical Pharmacy Association (UKCPA) Handbook: Apixaban - UKCPA Handbook
of Perioperative Medicines (ukclinicalpharmacy.org). The guide aids clinicians to
decide how to manage DOACs perioperatively, including determining the dose, the
bleeding risk of the surgery / procedure and the decision on pre-operative cessation.
The guide also includes post-operative advice around timings for restarting Apixaban
following a procedure / surgery, dependent on the bleeding risk.
The 2020 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and
management of atrial fibrillation recommends continuous anticoagulation for two
months post atrial fibrillation ablation, with consideration of prolonged duration in those
at high risk of thromboembolism. Pericardial effusion is a recognised complication of
catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. The decision whether to withhold anticoagulation for
pericardiocentesis depends on several factors including:
•
•
the size of the effusion
its location around the heart and patient physique (which determine ease of
access to the effusion and influence the risk of the procedure).
The decision should be made in discussion with the individual performing the
procedure. Where it is felt that temporary cessation of anticoagulation is required, this
should be done for the minimum timeframe applicable.
The Regional Chief Pharmacist in the Midlands has also been asked to review your
Report and consider whether any learnings need to be shared across the ICBs within
the Midlands region.
Effective communication
You also raised the concern that there was a failure to effectively communicate,
recognise and act on time critical directions, including restarting the DOAC, and that
this may be due to a lack of continuity of care and difficulties in accessing and updating
the computerised clinical / pharmacy records. We note that your Report has also been
sent to Warwick Hospital (falling under the South Warwickshire University NHS
Foundation Trust), and they would be best placed to address these concerns and their
local arrangements.
My regional Midlands colleagues have made NHS Coventry and Warwickshire
Integrated Care Board (CWICB) aware of the concerns raised in your Report, and how
they relate to South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust, for which they
are the commissioner, and who we note you have also sent your Report to.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of David,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
2nd Floor
2 Redmond Place
London
E20 1JQ
United Kingdom
26 June 2024
Ms Linda Lee
Assistant Coroner for Warwickshire
Warwick Justice Centre
Newbold Terrace
Royal Leamington Spa
CV32 4EL
Sent via email:
Our ref: EH-336418
Dear Ms Lee
I write in response to your regulation 28 report, regarding the very sad death of Mr David
Riley. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Mr Riley’s family.
We have reflected on the circumstances surrounding Mr Riley’s death and the concerns
raised in your report, in particular decisions regarding pausing of direct oral anticoagulants
(DOACs).
Our guideline on venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-
acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism [NG89] covers VTE risk assessment
but does not specifically cover pausing of DOACs such as apixaban. It is not possible to
cover all clinical circumstances in our guidelines. Nevertheless, NICE will further consider
the issues raised through our guideline surveillance process to see if an update to the
guideline is required.
The Clinical Knowledge Summary (CKS) on anticoagulation – oral may also be relevant to
this case. The CKS gives prescribing and management information for adults receiving
apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban and covers whether apixaban should be
stopped if surgery or dental treatment is required. We commission an external company,
Agilio Software, to develop the CKS which are designed to summarise the evidence on the
treatment of specific health conditions that present in primary care. They use a variety of
sources and may include NICE guidance, if there is any that is relevant, but they use many
other sources too. We publish them on our website as a source of advice and information for
health professionals working in primary care, but they do not constitute NICE guidance.
We will share your report with Agilio Software for their awareness.
Please do let me know if you require any further information and again, I offer my sincerest
condolences to Mr Riley’s family.
Yours sincerely,
Chief Executive
Page | 2
Glen Burley Chief Executive Warwick Hospital Lakin Road Warwick CV34 5BW Our ref: GWB/ci 12 July 2024 Mrs Linda Lee Assistant Coroner for Warwickshire Warwickshire Justice Centre Newbold Terrace Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 4EL Dear Mrs Lee, Regulation 28 report - Mr David Riley DoB 01/10/1950 DoD 10/06/2023 Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 7 May 2024 relating to your investigation into the death of Mr David Riley. I was sorry to read of your outstanding concerns following the 26 April inquest and hope that the following information will provide you with further reassurance. I am also grateful for the extra time granted to allow the Trust to respond. Following receipt of your report, the Trust convened a Working Group to review, and critically reappraise, the care and decision-making relating to Mr Riley in light of the concerns you raised in your report. The Group consisted of the Trust’s Chief Medical Officer and his Deputy, our Acute Medicine General Manager, our Cardiology Operational Manager, our Chief Nursing Officer and one of our Cardiology Consultants. It may be helpful to begin this response by acknowledging that the Trust has revised its view that an air embolus was a more likely cause of the stroke than a clot following a multidisciplinary discussion and review of the CT scans. In particular we have recently been given access to CT scans undertaken at University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire which do not show evidence of air embolus. We agree that the “pausing of the Apixaban may have increased the risk of Mr Riley suffering a stroke but it cannot be said to have caused it” and recognise that lessons can be learnt regarding the pausing of DOACs – irrespective of whether this “pausing” contributed towards Mr Riley’s stroke and death. To address your specific concerns I have, for ease of reference, repeated your concerns in bold below. The Trust’s response follows. Although the Warwick hospital conducted a Root Cause Analysis Investigation Report (RCAIR) of 6 July 2023 which indicated that the pausing of the DOAC was a lesson learned, it did not indicate what was learned. The Trust is committed to being environmentally friendly, therefore where possible we use 100% recycled paper. This paper has been made using no harmful chemicals in the manufacturing process. Although the decisions to stop, restart and then stop again Mr Riley’s Apixaban were not, in themselves, wrong, they highlighted insufficient documentation in Mr Riley’s medical notes. There was no note to say that Apixaban had been stopped, when it should restart, and no related note explaining this decision in the context of risks vs benefits. The Trust will address this as follows: By reminding all staff, via a Safety Practice Alert, and at a Grand Round meeting in July, of the importance of documenting in a patient’s medical records when a DOAC is stopped or restarted. Those same communications will reemphasise the importance of recording the risk vs benefits analysis behind such decisions, and also that patients who have had their DOAC stopped must have this decision reviewed by an appropriate clinician on a daily basis until the DOAC is restarted. The two points above will be incorporated into the Trust’s updated SWH 01778 Oral Anticoagulant Guideline and will be subject to a future audit to check compliance has been embedded. The only further action was limited to the incident being presented at the Grand Round, but this had not taken place at the time of the inquest, some 9 months after publication of the RCAIR. I can only apologise that, over a year after his death, Mr Riley’s case has still not been presented at the Trust’s Grand Round. His case will be presented by one of our Cardiology consultants to Grand Round on 19 July – and will incorporate the learning from the concerns you have raised in your Regulation 28 report. Grand Round is an “open to all staff” learning forum – held weekly both in person and online – and there are always a large number topics vying for attention. This, combined with staff availability, means that there can sometimes be a significant time lag between an incident occurring and the learning being shared. That said, the delay in this particular instance is unacceptable, and we have asked our Medical Education Co-ordinator (who manages the programme) to ensure that priority slots are given to those cases where a formal investigation recommends that a case be discussed at Grand Round. Decisions regarding pausing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC). It was not clear if there is national guidance available to clinicians regarding the pausing of DOACs and the considerations to be applied in making that decision. If there is such guidance, it is not widely understood or on the evidence given, followed consistently from hospital to hospital or within different teams. The inconsistency of approach appears from the evidence to increase the risk of misunderstanding and to put patients with atrial fibrillation at risk. National guidance is available in The British Journal of Haematology’s Guideline: Peri- operative management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. In addition, the Trust has its own Oral Anticoagulant Guide SWH 01778 Oral Anticoagulant Guideline The Trust is committed to being environmentally friendly, therefore where possible we use 100% recycled paper. This paper has been made using no harmful chemicals in the manufacturing process. This guideline has now been updated to include a link to the UK Clinical Pharmacy Association’s Handbook of Perioperative Medicines which provides national guidance re perioperative medicine. The Trust’s haematology lead advised the Working Group that, despite guidance and resources being available to staff, there has been a tendency to ask the haematology department for case-by-case advice. Whilst this will remain an import resource we intend to further update our Oral Anticoagulant Guideline to provide clearer guidance. Effective communication From the evidence, there was a failure to effectively communicate, recognise and act on directions that were time critical, such as restarting the DOAC as directed. It does not appear that there was any consideration as to the timing of the pericardiocentesis to ensure that the DOAC was paused for a short a time as possible. The evidence suggested that this may be due to lack of continuity of care and the difficulties in the way in which computerised clinical/pharmacy records are updated and accessed. Clear communication between medical staff is essential to patient care. Whilst some of the above points are covered in actions set out above, to ensure clear documentation of decision-making, the Trust will also: work towards a dedicated consultant to consultant in person handover, with nursing handovers managed separately. This work will be led by the Cardiology Operational Manager and Clinical Lead. Of note, a medical handover sheet is now being used on the ward, separately to nursing handover and managed by the Physicians Associate and Doctors in Training. Seek to ensure that our future Electronic Patient Record system (Cerner) better highlights information around pausing medication and that medical staff are aware of that functionality as the training in Cerner rolls out. We are aware that it affords more functionality in highlighting temporary stops/prompts for review, than our current system. I am grateful that your Regulation 28 Report provided us with a further opportunity to consider and improve our care to patients prescribed DOACs. The latest position on all of the actions arising from both our RCA Investigation and the further review arising from your Regulation 28 Report can be found at the foot of this letter. I hope that this provides you with the assurance that you require but if, having read this letter, you have outstanding concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely Chief Executive The Trust is committed to being environmentally friendly, therefore where possible we use 100% recycled paper. This paper has been made using no harmful chemicals in the manufacturing process. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Actions Recommendation Incident to be fed back to UHCW stroke team regarding the outcome of the review. The incident to be presented by the cardiology consultants at Grand Round Incident to be fed back to nursing staff regarding the escalation process when there in a patient’s condition or change in GCS score. is a change Remind all staff of the importance of clear documentation re stopping and re-starting of DOACS, and recording risk vs benefits of decisions. Advise all staff that patients who have had their DOAC stopped must have this an appropriate clinician on a daily basis until the DOAC is restarted. Recommendations 5 and 6 (above) to the Trust’s be updated Oral Anticoagulant Guideline. incorporated SWH reviewed decision 01778 into by Action to Address Recomme ndation Report to be sent to UHCW Presentation at Grand round By whom? By when? Evidence of Progress and Completion Evidence that will demonstrate the risk has been reduced Patient Safety Team 31/10/2023 26/09/2023: Report sent to UHCW Cardiology Consultant 31/10/2023 Incident to be presented at Grand Round on 19 July 2024. 15/02/204: Update from Ops Manager: Bespoke Immediate Life Support (ILS) sessions have been run across the Cardiology unit, delivered by the Resus Team and Cardiology ACPs. The Clinical Lead continues to work hard supporting the junior nursing team and is working with the new ward manager to ensure a robust training plan is in place to support junior staff. Feedback to Nursing staff Clinical Lead 31/10/2023 Safety Practice Alert Patient Safety Team 31/07/2024 Safety Practice Alert Patient Safety Team 31/07/2024 Update guideline Haematolog y lead 31/10/2024 Improve processes for both nursing and medical handovers on the cardiology wards. that our future Electronic Ensure Patient Record system (Cerner) better highlights information around pausing medication and that medical staff are aware of that functionality as the training in Cerner rolls out. Consultant to consultant in- person handover. Introduction of Electronic Patient Record system (Cerner) new Cardiology Operational Manager and Clinical Lead 31/10/2024 IT/ Innovate Late 2025 Recommendations 4 and 5 to be audited is embedded. to ensure compliance Clinical audit of patient records Cardiology medical team February 2026 The Trust is committed to being environmentally friendly, therefore where possible we use 100% recycled paper. This paper has been made using no harmful chemicals in the manufacturing process.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.