Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0473, written 29 Aug 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 29 Aug 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0473 |
| Deceased | Kasey Beech |
| Coroner | Xavier Mooyaart |
| Coroner area | London Inner (South) |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Medway NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. NHS England at FAO: NHS England Standardising Acuity Measures in Emergency Departments/Urgent Treatment Centres 2. 3. Care Excellence at , Chief Executive, National Institute for Health and , President of The Royal College of Emergency Medicine FAO Quality Tea at 4. CORONER 1 I am Xavier Mooyaart, an assistant coroner for the coroner area of Inner South London. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19 October 2021 an investigation commenced into the death of Kasey Beech, a 19-year-old woman who died following a cardiac arrest caused in turn by a likely infective exacerbation of her longstanding asthma. Her inquest was concluded on 8 November 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that she died by natural causes. Following the inquest further submissions and evidence were sought in relation to the risk of future deaths. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 4 On 5 October 2021 Ms Beech self-presented to the urgent treatment centre at Medway Maritime Hospital (MMH), in light of difficulty breathing. She had also been experiencing chest pain. At MMH the traditional Accident & Emergency service has been replaced by an Urgent Treatment Centre (UTC) for walk-in patients. The UTC operates the nationally stipulated STREAMing model (‘Simple Triage Rapid Emergency Assessment Method’), a system whereby patients are assessed on arrival and sent to the appropriate area for further review and care. Ms Beech was assessed and directed to the Medway on Call Care (MedOCC), where she was informed of a three hour wait. She decided to go to a friend’s home nearby where she could access a nebuliser more promptly. Shortly after arrival there her breathing worsened suddenly, she was unable to inhale deeply from the nebuliser and she arrested. She was subsequently taken by ambulance to MMH, and then transferred to St Thomas' Hospital London. Despite treatment she did not recover and she passed away at St Thomas’ on 13 October 2021. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – The focus of the current STREAMing guidance regarding the assessment of new non-injury ambulatory patients able to speak in complete sentences without becoming out of breath is on chest pain. The assessment relates to current chest pain and diagnostic investigations are in turn centred on whether there is a cardiac cause. Such patients who do not present with current chest pain are sent to the MedOCC. However: (i) pain can fluctuate over time and may not always be concurrent with the initial assessment; (ii) pain may be masked by analgesia taken prior to assessment; and (iii) the focus on a cardiac cause itself risks diverting a clinician from the wider question of identifying the cause of the pain. The consideration of differentials that may be immediately life-threatening, or place the patient at risk of a sudden deterioration (e.g. infective exacerbation of asthma) may be delayed, or not given adequate attention as a consequence. While it is understood that a cardiac issue is high risk and requires prompt diagnosis, and that the exclusion of a cardiac cause causing current chest pain is also diagnostically helpful, I am concerned that the prioritisation of current cardiac-sounding chest-pain and the streaming to a MedOCC/equivalent service may be to the detriment of other patients who are nonetheless at risk of sudden deterioration and therefore creates a risk of future deaths (in both cardiac and non-cardiac patients). It is understood that the current national guidelines are under review. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 6 In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Thursday, 24th October. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, to the family and to the other Interested Persons (Medway NHS Foundation Trust, and Medway Community Healthcare) I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 [DATE] [SIGNED BY CORONER] Thursday, 29th August 2024 Mr Xavier Mooyaart
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Xavier Mooyaart
Assistant Coroner
Inner South London
Southwark Coroner’s Court
1 Tennis Street
London
SE1 1YD
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
19 December 2024
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Kasey Beech who died on
13 October 2021.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 29
August 2024 concerning the death of Kasey Beech on 13 October 2021. In advance
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Kasey’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to
assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Kasey’s care have
been listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise for
any anguish this delay may have caused to Kasey’s family or friends. I realise that
responses to Coroner’s Reports can form part of the important process of family and
friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones, and I appreciate
this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
The matters of concern as presented in your Report include the use of the STREAMing
model / guidance to assess and exclude a cardiac cause of chest pain in new non-
injury ambulatory patients. In particular, you raised that the prioritisation of current
cardiac sounding chest pain and the streaming to the Medway on Call Care (MedOCC)
or an equivalent service may be to the detriment of other patients who are nonetheless
at risk of sudden deterioration, creating a risk of future deaths in both cardiac and non-
cardiac patients.
NHS England have engaged with colleagues at Medway Maritime Hospital to
understand how the STREAMing model upon which their Urgent Treatment Centre
(UTC) operates and I can confirm that NHS England does not endorse a particular
STREAMing model nationally.
The training and experience of the initial assessor at an UTC is critical to patient safety
and the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Faculty of Emergency Nursing (FEN)
have specific training and competencies for clinical staff working in initial assessment
roles.
Models of initial assessment currently in use prioritise a patient with chest pain as an
acuity 2 patient who should be seen urgently, with a general aim (based on
international consensus) that this should be within 10 minutes.
NHS England is currently developing a new initial assessment model in collaboration
with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), the RCN, the FEN, the
Emergency Nurse Consultant Group, and lay (patient) representation. This new model
has been successfully introduced in more than 20 sites across England and is
specifically focused on improving patient safety. This new model has been successful
in bringing down the time to initial assessment to below 15 minutes in sites where it
has been implemented.
The Emergency Care Data Set, introduced in 2017, discouraged the concepts of
'cardiac chest pain' and 'non-cardiac chest pain' for the reasons identified in your
Report. Instead, all chest pain was coded solely as 'chest pain'.
In response to your specific concerns relating to the care of Kasey, I have consulted
with NHS England’s National Clinical Director for Heart Disease. They advise that it is
recognised that pain can often fluctuate over time but that the lack of ongoing pain in
someone with other features suggesting a low risk profile is clinically reassuring, and
the streaming / direction of Kasey to the MedOCC was appropriate in the
circumstances.
As noted in your Report, pain can also be masked by analgesia, especially if
intravenous or intramuscular opiates have been administered prior to assessment.
This is a key reason why other features such as the general condition of the patient
and any breathlessness must be assessed. These assessments are included in the
STREAMing pathway.
Following their review, I am advised by the National Clinical Director that the
STREAMing pathway in use by Medway Maritime Hospital does not have an undue
prioritisation of chest pain (particularly cardiac-sounding chest pain). As indicated
above, the general condition of the patient, any signs of breathlessness, their ability to
talk in sentences and their ability to walk unaided are all assessed. In this tragic case,
the initial assessments all pointed towards a low-risk situation for which direction to
the MedOCC was appropriate. A low risk initial assessment does not completely rule
out the possibility of future deterioration but usually indicates the lack of a need for
immediate treatment.
In this case, Kasey deteriorated rapidly after leaving the MedOCC. It does not appear
that modification of the STREAMing pathway would have been likely to have predicted
that or altered the outcome of the initial assessment.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Kasey, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
2nd Floor
2 Redman Place
London
E20 1JQ
United Kingdom
04 November 2024
Xavier Mooyaart
HM Area Coroner
Coroner’s Court,
London Inner South
Southwark Coroners Court
1 Tennis Street
London
SE1 1YD
Sent via email:
Our reference:
Dear Mr Mooyaart
Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report (of Kasey Beech)
I write in response to your regulation 28 report dated 29 August 2024 regarding the
very sad death of Kasey Beech. I would like to express my sincere condolences to
Kasey’s family.
The patient safety leads at NICE have carefully considered the content of your
report and understand that your request relates to the use of the clinical streaming
model and the organisation of acute care within the NHS.
Given that the matters of concern relate to the prioritisation system (STREAMing)
which was produced by NHS England, these are not areas that are within NICE’s
remit. We believe that the issues raised are best addressed by NHS England, and
note that you have also sent your report to them for response.
Although not directly mentioned in your report, you may be interested to learn that
we are updating our guideline on Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma
management and this update is expected to publish on the 27 November.
I am sorry that we cannot comment further on the matters raised, and would like to
reiterate my condolences to Kasey’s family.
Yours sincerely,
Chief executive
Page | 2
Mr Xavier Mooyaart Assistant Coroner for Inner South London 1 Tennis Street London SE1 1YD 26th September 2024 Dear Mr Mooyart, Further to your prevention of Future Deaths Notice following the conclusion of your inquest (8th November 2023) into the death of Kasey Beech who died on 13th October 2021, we would like to extend our sympathy and condolences to the family and friends of Ms Beech. We note the initial assessment took place in an Urgent Treatment Centre (UTC) rather than Emergency Department (ED); from the described circumstances of Ms Beech’s death, it is not clear whether the UTC was effectively ‘gatekeeping’ access to an emergency department or not. Regarding the Simple Triage Rapid Emergency Assessment Method ‘STREAMing Model’a, we have not been able to find any specific details regarding what appears to be an initial assessment tool, and we do not believe that this is an assessment tool that is routinely used in emergency departments. As a consequence, we are not able to provide any specific response to your concerns regarding the apparent prioritisation of cardiac sounding chest pain over other potentially life-threatening conditions. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) has issued the following guidance regarding the initial assessment (triage) of patients [1] • The front door of the Emergency Department should be managed by the ED and fall within its quality improvement and governance systems. • Gatekeeping to the ED by non-Emergency Department services is not supported. • Emergency Departments use simple or complex streaming [2], as part of their initial assessment processes. Both processes should be resourced to meet variation in demand and be delivered by trained clinical staff. The RCEM has collaborated with NHS England to standardise the definition and processes that might be used in the initial assessment of a patient attending the emergency department [2]. The RCEM continues to work with NHS England to promote the standardisation of initial assessment of patients presenting to emergency departments. Our current work has involved a Streaming is the process of allocating patients to different physical areas / services, pathways or processes, to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The main objective of streaming is to ensure that the patient is directed to the correct location / service and to the correct person to manage their clinical needs. Streaming should always be performed by a trained clinician. an evidence-based review of the effectiveness of current triage systems as well as helping to design a new initial assessment process for implementation in all emergency departments throughout England [3]. Yours sincerely, Chair, Quality in Emergency Care Committee References Initial Assessment of Emergency Department Patients. RCEM, 2017. 1. https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SDDC_Intial_Assessment_Feb2017.pdf Accessed 16.09.2024 2. Guidance for emergency departments: initial assessment. NHS England, August 2022. https://www.england.nhs.uk/guidance-for-emergency-departments-initial-assessment/ Accessed 16.09.2024 3. Standardising Acuity Clinical Guide. NHS England, in publication.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Medway NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.