Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0535, written 7 Oct 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 7 Oct 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0535 |
| Deceased | James Agius |
| Coroner | Sonia Hayes |
| Coroner area | Essex |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Chief Executive Officer of North East London NHS Foundation Trust
1
CORONER
I am SONIA HAYES, area coroner, for the coroner area of ESSEX
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
[HYPERLINKS]
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 4 January 2022 an investigation was commenced into the death of James
Warren Agius aged 42. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest
on 4 October 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide with a medical
cause of death of1a Suspension by Ligature.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
James Agius was found deceased at home on 17 December 2022 on a
welfare check,
. Mr Agius had a mental
health disorder and severe complex trauma and was undergoing trauma
therapy. There was a history of previous suicide attempts and self-harming
and substance misuse for which he sought assistance from the mental health
team. Mr Agius appeared to read a phone message on the morning of 17
December 2022 but had not responded. Mr Agius suspended himself on 17
December 2022 and intended the outcome to be fatal.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In
the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
1. The medical record documentation for Mr Agius had significant omissions that
included an incomplete risk assessment in February 2022 for Mr Agius
following his transfer following crisis intervention with the Home Treat Team
to avoid an admission to hospital when Mr Agius attempted to take his own
life.
1
2. The evidence of assessments of Mr Agius’s mental state provided to the
inquest indicated a difference of opinion as to whether Mr Agius was
displaying hypermanic symptoms on 12 and 13 February 2022.
3. Evidence was heard that there is new national training for assessing risk for
patients with mental health concerns but there was no evidence that the Trust
has implemented this training.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 2 DECEMBER 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons Family of Mr Agius. I have also sent it to the Care Quality Commission who
may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
9
7 OCTOBER 2024
HM Area Coroner for Essex
2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Chief Executive Officer
Trust Head Office
West Wing
CEME Centre
Rainham
Essex
RM13 8GQ
29th November 2024
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Ms S Hayes
HM Coroner
Essex Coroner’s Service
Seax House
Victoria Road South
Chelmsford
Essex
CM1 1QH
By email only to:
Trust ref: 1512
Dear Madam,
Re: Inquest touching upon the death of Jamie Agius
I refer to your Regulation 28 report, dated 7 October 2024, detailing your concerns about the risk
of future deaths in light of the findings of this Inquest.
I should like to extend my sincere condolences to the family of Mr James Agius. This must have
been an extremely difficult time for them, and I hope that my response provides them, and you,
with assurances that the North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT) has taken action to
address the issues set out in your report.
I note that your concerns relate to:
1.
2.
3.
The medical record documentation for Mr Agius had significant omissions that
included an incomplete risk assessment in February 2022 for Mr Agius following
his transfer following crisis intervention with the Home Treat Team to avoid
admission to hospital when Mr Agius attempted to take his own life.
The evidence of assessments of Mr Agius’s mental state provided to the inquest
indicated a difference of opinion as to whether Mr Agius was displaying hypomanic
esymptoms on 12 and 13 February 2022.
Evidence was heard that there is new national training for assessing risk for
patients with mental health concerns but there was no evidence that the Trust has
implemented this training.
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
The Trust acknowledges your concerns and wishes to advise that prior to, and following, the sad
passing of Mr James Agius, a number of changes have been put in place, and I would like to
highlight that these include the following:
1. Medical Record Documentation
The Trust has completed a thematic review of patient safety incidents with the intention of
identifying themes and patterns occurring within these. Resulting from this was the establishment
of Trust wide workstreams aimed to address the identified gaps and then embed learning around
these across the Trust. Of pertinence to the concerns raised in this instance, is the Improving
Quality of Record Keeping and Clinical Documentation workstream.
The aim of this workstream is to establish any system weaknesses associated with poor record
keeping, understand the behaviour associated with this and to improve recording keeping and
create a healthy record keeping culture. The Quality Improvement initiatives around this
workstream have so far been successful in creating a Trust wide intranet page accessible to all
staff offering direction on the importance of accurate and good record keeping. In addition to
this, the Trust has develoepd quick access to guidance and information on issues such as cut
and paste and commonly used acronyms and clinical abbreviations. Readily accessible links to
good record keeping practice are also available and consequences of failing to comply with this
and guidance on how to escalate concerns are also captured and available to all staff within this
platform.
Revised training packages have also been put in place that cover the principles of good record
keeping standards. These are essential training for all staff and are covered as part of the
induction to NELFT.
To support good record keeping practice in the Home Treatment Teams (HTT) in NELFT, all staff
completing home visits to service users are expected to complete their records utilising an agreed
template. This ensures that the visit and documentation of what took place will cover areas
including (though not limited to), mental state examination, social situation, physical health
concerns, risk assessment, safeguarding and that these lead to a clear plan to be followed by
the team. Adherence to this is monitored within through a fortnightly progress note audit that is
completed. The last audit that was completed for the Barking and Dagenham HTT was on 3rd
November 2024, with the team scoring 100% for adherence to use of the correct template. All
entries reviewed also included a full Mental State Examination and risk assessment.
2. Varying opinion on diagnosis
Mr Agius was under the care of the Barking and Dagenham HTT (BDHTT) for a period of three
days over the weekend of 11th - 13th February 2022. The concern highlighted was in reference to
the difference of opinion regarding whether Mr Agius was displaying hypomanic symptoms on
the 12th and 13th February 2022.
According to his electronic care records, on 12th February 2022, Mr Agius reported feeling elated
in mood, but it was the opinion of the HTT staff member that visited that there was no objective
symptoms observed in the interaction that took place to confirm this. The staff member, it
appears made this conclusion based on Mr Agius’ speech being considered normal in all
modalities and a general perception that he appeared to be settled. When Mr. Agius was again
visited on 13th February 2022, he reported his mood to be fluctuating and that he was “hyper
manic” and suffering from BiPolar Disorder. The opinion of the staff member on this day was that
other than appearing slightly anxious he was again otherwise considered settled in mental state
with reference to an absence of any speech abnormalities or psychotic symptoms.
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Mr Agius’ medical records would suggest that there was consistency in the opinion of the two
staff members that visited, in as much that they both did not see evidence of an elated mood.
Had Mr Agius been under the BDHTT for a period longer than the three days he was, he would
have been reviewed by the medical team, in line with the HTT Standard Operating Procedure
and greater clarity regarding his diagnosis would have been achieved.
When HTT staff complete their mental state examinations, where there is a potential concern
regarding a mood disorder, staff will make reference to a service user’s speech and observation
of any psychotic symptoms. This is completed as abnormalities within these domains can be
common features of a manic episode (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and
Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10)).
3. Incomplete Risk Assessment
The final concern raised related to the risk assessment completed and NELFT’s progress in
transitioning from the previous risk stratification model of assessing risk to that of risk formulation.
As correctly referenced in your report, this change will reflect national recommendations on the
most effective means of assessment of the risk suicide and self-harm (NICE NG225 Self Harm:
assessment, management and preventing recurrence).
The Trust does have a programme in place to roll out training in relation to this. The Acute and
Rehabilitation Directorate (ARD, which the HTTs are part of) was identified as the first directorate
to engage in this risk formulation training. This roll out began in September 2024. All qualified
clinical staff within the directorate will be trained in this approach by the end of December 2024.
The roll out of this will then be extended throughout the Trust, with all areas fully trained by April
2026. Within the Barking and Dagenham HTT, 16 of the 19 qualified staff have been trained,
with the remaining staff all booked to complete this training in December of this year.
I hope this response gives assurance that the Trust continues to take learning from Inquests very
seriously and has put actions in place following Mr Agius’s sad death.
If I can be of any further assistance or if you would like a further update on the progress made to
address your concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.