Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0553, written 15 Oct 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 15 Oct 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0553 |
| Deceased | Tamara Davis |
| Coroner | Joanne Andrews |
| Coroner area | West Sussex, Brighton and Hove |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 NHS England & NHS Improvement 2 Department of Health and Social Care 3 University Sussex NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Joanne ANDREWS, Area Coroner for the coroner area of West Sussex, Brighton and Hove 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 21 December 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Tamara DAVIS aged 31. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 14 October 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was that Ms Davis died from natural causes. As to the statutory questions in section 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 I recorded: Tamara Davis died on 13 December 2022 at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton from multi organ failure which developed due to bronchopneumonia caused by Influenza A infection. She had been admitted to hospital on 10 December 2022 having been unwell for 5 days and was treated but sadly rapidly deteriorated due to the infection and could not recover. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Tamara Davis had attended the Royal Sussex County Hospital on 10 December 2022 having been unwell for 5 days. She was assessed in Resus within the Emergency Department when her NEWS score was 8. She was treated for a suspected chest infection with IV antibiotics, fluids and paracetamol in the early hours of 11 December. Her clinical condition then appeared to be improving. She was moved into the Emergency Department corridor at 05:30 on 11 December as this was in use for patients. She then waited to be admitted to a ward for further treatment and Regulation 28 – After Inquest Template Updated 23/08/2024 TG observation. She remained in the ED corridor until 15:20 on 11 December. Tamara then moved to a cubicle in Majors within the Emergency Department and thereafter she experienced a significant deterioration in her condition which was treated and resulted in her admission to Intensive Care Unit. Despite treatment with supportive therapy she died on 13 December 2022. I did not find that the period in which Ms Davis was in the Emergency Department corridor caused or contributed to her death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: During the inquest I heard evidence from clinicians at University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust that when the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton reached capacity patients would be moved to and treated in the corridor as there was no clinical area available to do so. The area is not designated as a clinical area and is not included within the Nursing staffing template for the ED. When Ms Davis was treated in the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton on 11 December 2022 there were, at times, more than 20 patients in that area. Clinicians from University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust gave evidence as to the action that is being taken by the Trust currently to (1) reduce the number of patients who present to the Emergency Department who could be seen by other services in the community and (2) to create an improved patient flow through the Royal Sussex County Hospital. The evidence was however that, despite these actions, the corridor remains in use for patients currently as there is insufficient space within the department to care for patients. There was no evidence as to when, and if, this practice would no longer be necessary. I heard that the provision of care in the ED corridor meant that patients lacked privacy, toilet facilities and confidentiality. I understood from the evidence of the clinicians that they were concerned that patients were being moved into the Corridor but there appeared to be no other option when the Emergency Department exceeds capacity. I heard that in the event of a major incident University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust would have to clear the Emergency Department, as they had done on occasion, as this would be the only way to create the necessary clinical space when the department was already over capacity and using the corridor. I was also advised that the use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout the country when the capacities of Emergency Departments has been reached and there is nowhere to Regulation 28 – After Inquest Template Updated 23/08/2024 TG move patients to. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 10 December 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Family of Ms Davis University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 15/10/2024 Joanne ANDREWS Area Coroner for West Sussex, Brighton and Hove Regulation 28 – After Inquest Template Updated 23/08/2024 TG
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care) 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 10 December 2024 Our ref: HM Coroner Andrews Records Office, Orchard Street, Chichester, West Sussex By email: Dear Ms Andrews, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 24 October 2024 sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Ms Davis. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for urgent and emergency care. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms Davis’ death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure your concerns are adequately addressed. The report raises concerns over emergency department capacity, poor patient flow and the use of corridor care at Royal Sussex County Hospital (RSCH) and nationally. I understand that your report and matters of concerns have also been sent to NHS England, and they are best placed to respond with the specific actions being taken locally to improve urgent and emergency care performance at RSCH. At a national level, this government is committed to returning to the safe operational waiting time standards set out in the NHS Constitution. In doing so, we will be honest about the challenges facing the health service and serious about tackling them. The Health Secretary ordered an independent investigation of NHS performance to provide an assessment of the issues and challenges it faces. This report was published on 12 September 2024 and the investigation’s findings are feeding into the government’s work to develop a 10-year plan to radically reform the NHS and build a health service that is fit for the future. The plan's reforms will support a reduction in the demand pressures on the health service through three shifts to ensure the health service can tackle the problems of today and tomorrow. These are: • shifting care from hospitals to the community, • • sickness to prevention. from analogue to digital, and In the short-term, the NHS is taking a range of action this year to improve urgent and emergency care performance, including maintaining increases in acute hospital bed capacity and greater ambulance hours on the road. There is also a focus on increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute services across bedded and non-bedded capacity and directing patients to more appropriate services in the community where these can better meet their needs. I share your concerns regarding the use of Temporary Escalation Spaces (TES), also known as corridor care, at RSCH. NHS England highlighted key expectations regarding patient safety and overcrowding management in emergency departments in its winter operating assumptions letter, published on 16 September 2024: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long- read/winter-and-h2-priorities/. The letter reminds Integrated Care Boards and provider Chief Executives to prioritise patient safety and experience. The guidance urges NHS trusts to ensure that care outside standard cubicles or ward environments is not normalised and is employed only during periods of elevated pressure. Furthermore, TES use should be escalated to an appropriate executive member and at the system level, with the aim of minimising its duration. These recommendations align with the recently issued guidance on TES, which can be found via https://www.england.nhs.uk/long- read/principles-for-providing-safe-and-good-quality-care-in-temporary-escalation-spaces/ I agree with your concerns that the delivery of care in TES is not acceptable and should not be considered as standard practice. All patients should be able to access the highest possible levels of patient experience, care and safety during their treatment. I understand that NHS England will address what RSCH is doing to mitigate use of TES in their reply to you. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MINISTER OF STATE FOR HEALTH
Joanne Andrews
Area Coroner
The Coroner’s Office,
Woodvale,
Lewes Road,
Brighton
BN2 3QB
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
24 December 2024
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Tamara Davis who died
on 13 December 2022.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 15
October 2024 concerning the death of Tamara Davis on 13 December 2022. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Tamara’s family and loved ones. NHS England are
keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Tamara’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to respond to your Report, and I
apologise for any anguish this delay may have caused to Tamara’s family or friends.
I realise that responses to Coroner Reports can form part of the important process of
family and friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones and
appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
Your Report raises the concern that patients are being treated in the corridors of
Emergency Departments when the departments have reached their full capacity and
space in clinical areas is not available. This is considered by the Coroner to be a
national issue and does not just apply to the Royal Sussex County Hospital in
Brighton, where Tamara passed away.
My response to the Coroner has been informed by colleagues in the Urgent and
Emergency Care Team at NHS England and the South East Regional Clinical Quality
Improvement Team.
The delivery of care in temporary escalation spaces (TES) in departments
experiencing patient crowding (including beds and chairs) is not acceptable and
should not be considered as standard across the NHS. TES refers to care given in any
unplanned settings (such as corridors) and recently NHS England have published a
set of principles for supporting improved quality of care should patient demand outstrip
capacity - NHS England » Principles for providing safe and good quality care in
temporary escalation spaces (16 September 2024). These principles have been
developed to support point-of-care staff to provide the safest, most effective and
highest quality care possible when TES care has been deemed necessary, and the
principles should be applied alongside any local standard operating procedures and
arrangements governing flow pathways and safe staffing.
In the meantime, NHS England is working through the operating model so that NHS
England’s Regions can support providers to eliminate crowding in Emergency
Departments in the longer term. Improvements are being demonstrated through NHS
England’s operational planning guidance, where systems were asked to focus on
areas to deliver improved patient flow, and this has included increasing the productivity
of acute and non-acute hospital services, improving flow and length of stay, as well as
clinical outcomes. In addition to this, we are continuing to develop services that shift
activity from acute hospital settings to settings outside an acute hospital for patients
with unplanned urgent needs, supporting proactive care, alternatives to admission and
improving hospital discharge.
My Regional colleagues in the South East Clinical Quality Improvement team have
recently visited the Emergency Departments at both University Hospitals Sussex in
Worthing and Royal Sussex County Hospital as part of a programme of joint Nursing
and Integrated Care Board (ICB) visits to NHS Trusts, led by their Deputy Director.
The programme of visits aims to understand how and why patients are selected to
reside in non-designated areas, how they are observed for deterioration, and how
dignified care can be provided. These focused reviews of non-designated care
practices in the Emergency Department have included engaging with staff, patients
and relatives to test safety measures in place and provide detailed feedback for the
organisations on areas for improvement.
NHS England has also reviewed the response to the Coroner from University Hospitals
Sussex NHS Foundation Trust dated 10 December 2024. We note and welcome the
various workstreams in place to improve flow through the hospital, reduce hospital
attendance and optimise discharge pathways.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Tamara, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps
us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
HM Area Coroner Ms Joanne Andrews West Sussex, Brighton and Hove Parkside Chart Way Horsham RH12 1XH 10 December 2024 Dear Ms Andrews University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust Trust Headquarters Royal Sussex County Hospital Eastern Road Brighton BN2 5BE www.uhsussex.nhs.uk Your ref: Our ref: Inquest into the death of Tamara Davis Thank you for your letter of 15 October 2024, enclosing your formal report under Regulation 28 to Prevent Future Deaths, to NHS England & NHS Improvement, Department of Health and Social Care, and the Trust. First, my sincere condolences to Tamara’s family. Thank you for confirming that the period in which Tamara was in the Emergency Department (ED) corridor did not cause or contribute to Tamara’s death. However, I understand that you are concerned that caring for patients in the ED corridor may create a risk of future deaths. Your Regulation 28 report has been reviewed by both the Executive team and the Medicine Division, including the Chief of Service and the Divisional Director of Nursing. As you know from the inquest, the Medicine Divisional Leadership team are working alongside the Hospital Directors and Executive team on several separate but linked workstreams, all with the overarching aim to eradicate the use of the ED corridor for patients. The Medicine Divisional Improvement Board has been developed to oversee and implement a number of improvement actions to enable this to be achieved. The focus is also to improve the safety, quality of care, and overall outcomes and experience for patients presenting to the ED. The Medicine Division have employed an Operational Flow Improvement Manager who is leading the Hospital Alternative Oversight Programme. The aim of this work is to reduce admissions, optimise flow through the hospital, and smooth discharge pathways and processes. A number of the initiatives already in progress are as follows: • Unscheduled Care Navigation Hub • Frailty Care Home Outreach & Red Bag Launch • Frailty High-Weald Lewes & Havens Outreach • Integrated Front Door Therapies Team RSCH (Royal Sussex County Hospital) Interprofessional Standards • Virtual Health, both General Virtual Ward and Respiratory Home Monitoring Services • Frailty & Respiratory SDEC (Same Day Emergency Care) Optimisation • • UTC (Urgent Treatment Centre) Optimisation • Early Discharge Planning • Deconditioning Prevention • Tiered Acuity Model These initiatives are in collaboration with colleagues from the ICB (Integrated Care Board), Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust (SCFT), South East Coast Ambulance Service (SECAmb) and Brighton & Hove City Council (BHCC). Unscheduled Care Navigation Hub In the Southeast, only 2.1% of call outs are conveyed somewhere other than ED. There is underutilisation of alternative pathways to admission, with 53.9% of incidents conveyed to ED. This model seeks to enhance the hear & treat and see & treat performance of SECAmb and reduce attendance to our hospitals where appropriate, and act as pre-cursor to NHS England’s Single Point of Access (SPOA) model. Continuous Flow Model - Reducing overcrowding in the Emergency Department Continuous Flow will improve the early movement of patients from the Acute Floor. This will improve the quality of care for patients who are being treated in non-clinical spaces in the ED. In addition, it will reduce the time patients are waiting in the ED, in particular it will reduce patients waiting over 12 hours for admission to a ward. The continuous flow model commenced on 11 June 2024 and provides guaranteed transfer of patients from the Acute Assessment Unit (AAU) to the Specialty Medicine and Frailty wards at set times planned in advance. This is currently being implemented across the Trust. Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) The SAU opened in October 2024 and is being expanded in line with nursing recruitment. This will increase the hospital’s bed stock by 12 patient trolley beds and 12 patient chairs. It is expected to manage most surgical patient presentations to the ED and receive ambulances directly. The SAU represents the first phase of our Acute Floor Reconfiguration which is a £48 million capital improvement programme that will improve patient and staff experience at the RSCH significantly. I hope this letter provides you and Tamara’s family with assurance that we are committed to making significant improvements to patient flow and the quality and safety in the Emergency Department. Once again, my sincere condolences to Tamara’s family. Yours sincerely Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.