Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0636, written 12 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 12 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0636 |
| Deceased | Erin Tillsley |
| Coroner | Darren Stewart |
| Coroner area | Suffolk |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust · Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 2 , Chief Executive, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust , Chief Executive, Suffolk and North East Essex Integrated Care Board 1 CORONER I am Darren STEWART OBE, HM Area Coroner for the coroner area of Suffolk 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 20th July 2023 I commenced an investigation touching the death of Erin Louise TILLSLEY aged 14. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 31st May 2024. The medical cause of death was confirmed as: 1a Ligature around the neck The Conclusion of the Inquest was that: Narrative Conclusion - Erin Louise Tillsley was described by her family as a bubbly, bright and loving young person who exuded warmth and charisma. A person whose company was uplifting and who had a desire to see the lives of those around her enhanced. Erin initially adjusted well to secondary schooling, however following the restrictions imposed during the COVID pandemic being lifted, she struggled with her attendance although an explanation why this was the case could not be established. Following a difficult period with a friend at the end of 2022, on the 31st December 2022 Erin consumed some of her mother’s prescribed medication which Erin described as an overdose. She attended hospital where she was assessed for her physical symptoms. These were not considered serious and she was discharged on the 1st January 2023. Emergency Department staff at the West Suffolk Hospital did not consider a referral to psychiatric liaison services to be appropriate during the admission; however advice was given for a referral by Erin’s GP to mental health services. This occurred on the 4th January 2023 with a referral being received by the Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Wellbeing Hub. The referral was screened and triaged and sent to Child and Family and Young Peoples mental health team (CFYP) for further action. Erin was contacted by the CFYP team on the 3rd May 2023 and arrangements were agreed for her to be referred to a counselling service. Safety netting advice was provided at this time. It has not been possible to establish whether such a referral was made to counselling services and at the time of Erin's death no further contact with mental health services had occurred. Following her return to school in January 2023, Erin’s attendance suffered further and in April 2023 it was agreed that she would transfer to another school which it was hoped would improve her attendance levels. This was not the case and her attendance levels Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 slipped further and she attended her new school for only 4 days between the end of the May half term break and her death on the 14th July 2023. On the 13th July 2023 Erin attended a meeting at her school with her father where arrangements were discussed to both improve her attendance and resolve a disagreement she had with another pupil in her tutor group. Although initially upset at the commencement of the meeting, Erin was observed to be smiling and cheerful when leaving the meeting. She had agreed to return to school the following day. During the evening of the 13th July Erin was observed at home to be happy and preparing to attend school the next day. On 14th July 2023 Erin was seen by her family during the early morning and showed no signs of being distressed or upset. During telephone calls with her father mid-morning, Erin stated that she would not be attending school and refused, despite attempts to persuade her otherwise by her father, to change her mind. Around 1030am her father became concerned that Erin had stopped responding to text messages or answering her phone and returned home to find Erin suspended by a ligature in her room. Emergency services attended and despite attempts at resuscitation Erin was pronounced deceased at the scene. Police enquiries revealed no suspicious circumstances or third-party involvement in the death. Erin Louise TILLSLEY took her own life. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The circumstances of the death are recorded in the Narrative Conclusion. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) Evidence received at Inquest included NICE guideline [NG225]; 'Self-harm: Assessment, Management and Preventing Recurrence.' Published: 07 September 2022. This guidance states inter alia that: "Following triage, patients who have self-harmed should receive the requisite treatment for their physical condition, undergo risk and full psychosocial needs assessment and mental state examination, and referral for further treatment and care as necessary” and “All people who have self-harmed should be offered an assessment of needs, which should be comprehensive and include evaluation of the social, psychological and motivational factors specific to the act of self-harm, current suicidal intent and hopelessness, as well as a full mental health and social needs assessment.” Evidence was also received in the form of a Joint Policy Document published by Suffolk and North East Essex Integrated Care Board (SNEE) and Suffolk County Council (SCC) (Version 21 – January 2023) titled ‘Suffolk and North East Essex Health & Social Care Protocol for the Support of Children and Young People in Crisis.’ This Policy document outlined the resources available in circumstances where Young People Present into an Emergency Department (ED) in Suffolk to facilitate NICE recommended urgent and emergency care, including NICE recommended treatment for self-harm. The available resources on a 24/7 basis for all age groups includes the Mental Health Liaison Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Service (MHLS) which offers specialist mental health care in a physical health setting by supporting the work of clinicians working in general health pathways, enabling EDs and wards in general hospitals to assess and support mental health needs as they present or arise among people being cared for in the general health pathway. Evidence received during the course of the Inquest indicated that neither the NICE Guidance nor the SNEE/SCC Policy were applied in relation to the care and treatment extended to Erin in the West Suffolk Hospital Emergency Department during her attendance over the period 31st December 2022 to 1st January 2023. The failure to apply this guidance/policy meant that there was a missed opportunity for mental health services to engage early with a vulnerable child who had presented to the Emergency Department having undertaken an act which she described as an overdose. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 7th January 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: Family of Erin Louise TILLSLEY Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Thomas Gainsborough Academy Ormiston Academy I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 12/11/2024 Darren STEWART OBE HM Area Coroner for Suffolk Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Mr Darren Stewart OBE
HM Area Coroner for Suffolk
Ipswich Coroner’s Court
Beacon House
Whitehouse Road
Ipswich
Suffolk
IP1 5PB
Sent by email only:
Dear HM Coroner
Legal Services
West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
Hardwick Lane
Bury St Edmunds
Suffolk
IP33 2QZ
Tel:
Email:
18 December 2024
Re: Response relating to Regulation 28 Report into the death of Erin Louise Tillsley
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 12 November
2024 concerning the death of Erin Tillsley on 14 July 2023. This is a joint response prepared
on behalf of both West Suffolk Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (WSFT) and the Integrated
Care Board (ICB).
For reference, the specific work relevant to WSFT follows first and from page 5, the ICB’s
specific reply is set out in full.
WSFT
In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Erin’s family and loved ones. WSFT are keen to assure the family
and HM Coroner that the concerns raised about Erin’s care have been listened to and reflected
upon. Whilst the inquest concluded on 31 May 2024, WSFT have been proactive in continuing
improvement work in respect of the access to Mental Health Services since that time and
specific details of that work, and the further work planned, is set out below.
Your Report specifically raises concerns over the failure to ensure that the Emergency
Department (ED) followed NICE Guidance (NG225) dated 7 September 2022 regarding the
management and assessment of patients presenting with signs of self-harm, and that you
received evidence during the course of the Inquest that neither the NICE Guidance, nor the
SNEE/SCC Policy (Suffolk and North East Essex Health & Social Care Protocol for the
Support of Children and Young People in Crisis) were applied in relation to the care and
treatment extended to Erin.
Please find below details of the action taken to date to address this concern, as well as some
additional information regarding how the referral process works:
1. The WSFT Mental Health Liaison Team work closely with all clinical staff across the
hospital. For those patients who attend ED with a mental health need, the aim is for
the MHLT to review the patient within one hour. For those patients already admitted to
the wards, they are seen within 24 hours.
WSFT’s policy: Mental Health – supporting patients with their mental health (PP459)
specifically highlights that:
“All patients who attend the hospital who have self-harmed should be offered to be
seen by the MHLT as per Nice Guideline (NG225) Self Harm: assessment,
management and preventing recurrence.
The service provides mental health assessment and support for service users who
have attended hospital to access mental health services or those with both physical
and mental health difficulties. This is not a Mental Health Act Assessment (see section
Care under the Mental Health Act (1983)). The team will meet with patients to explore
their mental state and will collaboratively create a care and risk management plan that
helps to improve their mental health. This information will be recorded on E- Care.
The service is available 365 days per year, 24/7 and is age inclusive.
Referrals can be made to the Mental Health Liaison Team via E-Care or by telephoning
01284 713386/713391.”
We hope this reassures HM Coroner that WSFT staff are aware of the NICE guidance
and the SNEE/SCC policy and continue to apply it regularly. For added reassurance,
a review of WSFT data regarding referrals of patients aged under 18 accessing mental
health services at WSFT confirms the following:
Year
2023
2024*
*YTD
ED Referral
Ward Referral
Total
313
287
64
85
377
372
Sadly, what this data shows is that every day a patient under 18 is referred by ED or
the ward to the MHLT for specialist input and support. Whilst terribly sad, this does
show that the referral system is working and WSFT staff do have a low threshold for
making referrals so that specialist input from the MHLT can be provided.
2. The reason a MHLT referral was not made in Erin’s case was because of an error of
clinical judgment. Staff believed that Erin’s case was one of an accidental not an
intentional overdose. Therefore, they believed a MHLT referral was not needed.
Hindsight confirms that was incorrect and our work has been focused on helping staff
make the right clinical decisions first time in future. That work, led by the Mental Health
team and ED Matrons has consisted of the following steps: -
a. additional reminders sent to the whole team about having a low threshold for
referrals to MHLT.
b. Additional training – this is targeted at specific staff groups for maximum effect:
Adult ED Nurses have bespoke mandatory MHLT training package run by the
MHLT.
Junior doctors have induction training every 4 months as new cohorts join us
and the Head of Mental Health will lead on that training moving forwards. The
focus on the training is for staff to feel encouraged and supported to have a low
threshold for suspecting a mental health condition/illness and for making a
referral.
Paediatric ED Nurses have been provided with additional training to make sure
staff know when an automatic referral to the MHLT has been made and how to
use the new triage form (discussed below). This is in addition to the mental
health training that is part of the new induction training for all new ED nurses.
The focus of the training is on the team working together and nurses are
encouraged to ask doctors to consider making a referral if they have any
suspicions. The above data confirms this is happening.
3. To further support staff to make the right decisions in future, WSFT’s policy: Mental
Health – supporting patients with their mental health (PP459) has been updated in
August 2024. A new section 5.3 has specifically been added, focussing on how the
policy applies to emergency admissions, an extract is below:
“5.3. Emergency Admissions
Patients admitted through ED will be triaged using the Manchester Triage Tool. If the
patient presents following for example, overdosing and self-harm this will then trigger
a bespoke/extended patient safety checklist which provides a closer assessment of
the patient’s mental health risk state. Part 1 of the Mental Health Risk Assessment
should also be completed which is triggered on E care.
If the patients are assessed as vulnerable or at high risk to self or others the
“Observation of patients: One to one “Clinical guideline must be followed, to ensure
that their safety and safety others is met. Observations will be recorded on the
observation form (Appendix 1).
Whilst being cared for in ED staff must ensure that the patient isn’t placed in a high-
risk ligature area (as per ligature assessment) and complete the environment safety
checklist (Appendix 2).
Waiting can be difficult for anyone who is ill or in pain, the patient may find the waiting
extremely difficult, and this can lead to additional problems, for example, ‘behaviours
which may challenge’. ED staff should consider offering a quieter waiting area with
clear information to the patient and their family/carer if they are with them.
A safe room is available to be used by the MHLT for assessing the patient. This meets
the PLAN standards:
• Patients without a medical need will be referred directly to the MHLT.
• Patients with a medical need will be referred to the MHLT once assessed as
being medically fit enough for their mental health to be assessed. The MHLT
will assess the patient within one hour.”
4. Further work following a review of Erin’s case by the ED team has resulted in the triage
process discussed in point 3 being extended to patients under 18. The Manchester
Triage system used for suspected mental health conditions was originally designed for
adult patients and has been working successfully for some time. However, that has
been adapted and extended for use in under 18’s care. Briefly there are 5 categories
within the triage process that trigger automatically at the point of triage for MHLT
review/referral. These include patient’s that present with an overdose. This leads to an
additional assessment by the triage nurse at that time and, once completed, that sends
an alert to the MHLT for them to complete part 2 of the referral. Examples of the new
process and subsequent risk assessments are included in Appendix 1. The categories
are highlighted red in the boxes on the form. This process has been developed over
the summer and has now been included on the electronic patient record system –
Ecare. It went live two weeks ago.
5. Whilst safety netting did work in Erin’s case, as the safeguarding team reviewed her
case the following day and made contact with the GP so that further assistance could
be provided, during the reviews after her sad death, we have identified the opportunity
to improve the safeguarding process further. There is now a triage for safeguarding
which allows them to prioritise patients attending with a mental health condition which
are graded as red so that they are reviewed as a priority.
6. All under 18’s attending ED also have their discharge letter sent to the GP and school
nurse, or if under 5 the Health Visitor, automatically in every case.
Patient Safety Review & Learning
WSFT also undertook a Patient Safety Review, which was completed on 24 October 2023.
This proved the catalyst for further review and discussion and helped to bring together a
number of projects and workstreams, discussed and highlighted above. Policies have been
reviewed, training refined and extended, triage forms changed, and additional safety netting
put into place The report was also shared with external partners and incorporated into their
wider review.
Future Action and Proposed timetable for implementation
As part of the constant evolution of Mental Health Services in acute care, the Mental Health
team, led by Natalie Bailey (Head of Mental Health at WSFT), confirms that the children and
young people in crises protocol is currently under review by SNEE (Suffolk and North East
Essex Integrated Care Board). Currently there is a consultation exercise underway with all key
stakeholders, including WSFT, Norfolk and Suffolk Mental Health trust, parents, service users,
ESNEFT and the ICB. This consultation and review will be completed next year and a working
group will be established thereafter at WSFT to implement any changes.
In order to minimise harm and prevent occurrences like this happening in future, WSFT will
continue to work with all system partners, both to monitor and review performance as we look
for new ways to address the difficulties treating this cohort of patients.
ICB
The ICB would like to begin its part of the formal response by extending its deepest
condolences to Erin’s family. The concerns within the Regulation 28 report have been
carefully reviewed.
For ease of reference, the concern relating to the ICB indicated that neither the NICE guidance
nor the Suffolk and North East Essex Health and Social Care Protocol for the Support of
Children and Young People in Crisis was applied in relation to the care and treatment provided
to Erin during her attendance at West Suffolk Hospital.
Response:
The ICB, in partnership with its provider services and system partners, regularly reviews the
Suffolk and North East Essex Health and Social Care Protocol for the Support of Children and
Young People in Crisis. This is to ensure it contains the latest guidance, evidence-based
practice, configuration of local services, children and young people’s (CYP) mental health
services, and support for our clinicians in delivering care for CYP in crisis. An update is
currently underway, which the ICB will share widely on completion, seeking robust assurance
of local implementation across its services.
The ICB has forums in place to review and monitor all Regulation 28 reports. This will include
the actions taken for improvement as identified in this response.
Thank you for bringing this important patient safety issue to our attention. We hope this
information assists to address your concerns and please do not hesitate to contact us should
you need any further information.
Yours sincerely
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive, WSFT
Chief Executive, SNEE ICB
Encs – Appendix 1 Triage and Assessment forms
Appendix 1
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.