Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Karen Day

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0682, written 10 Dec 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Dec 2024
Reference2024-0682
DeceasedKaren Day
CoronerEmma Mather
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (East)
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

OFFICE OF THE  
SENIOR CORONER 
for the County of West Yorkshire 
(Eastern District) 

His Majesty’s Coroner’s Office 
The Coroner’s Courts 
Burgage Square 
Wakefield WF1 2TS 

Telephone: 

Email: 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

    1. Meanwood Group Practice 

1 

2 

CORONER 

I am Emma Mather, Assistant Coroner, for the Coroner area of West Yorkshire (East). 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 29 July 2022 an investigation was commenced into the death of Karen Lesley Day, aged 58. 
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 28 November 2024. 
The medical cause of death was  
1a) Septicaemia  
1b) Soft tissue infection, Pneumonia              
1c) Traumatic Laceration   
II) Raynaud’s disease.   

The conclusion of the Inquest was: Accident. 
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

4 

Karen Lesley Day sustained a small laceration to her left lower leg in 2021 when she injured it 
on a van. She sought help from her GP practice to manage the wound in June 2021 and 
appointments with the practice nursing team commenced. Over the course of the following 11 
months, Karen attended multiple appointments where the appropriate lower limb framework 
was not followed and opportunities to escalate Karen’s deteriorating wound and overall 
condition were missed. Karen was admitted to hospital on the 26th May 2021 and was treated 
for an acute infection following which she was discharged to the care of the district nursing 
team. The lower limb framework was not used consistently and opportunities her increasing 
deterioration was not fully recognised and escalated. She was admitted to hospital on the 12th 
July 2022 where she was, by this point, extremely unwell. The hospital commenced active 
treatment to which she did not respond and care was orientated towards palliation and comfort. 
Karen died on the 14th July 2022.  

 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of my investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances 
it is my statutory duty to report to you.  

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

(1)  During the course of the inquest I heard evidence that the GP practice did not follow the 

lower limb framework, failed to refer to tissue viability appropriately, and failed to escalate 
concerns around the deteriorating wound or consider appropriate measures to support the 
deceased to either self-manage her wound with an at home compression bandaging kit, or 
to support her to attend appointments on a more regular basis.  I am concerned that the 
practice was unable to provide assurance that the same situation could not occur again. 

(2)  During the inquest I received evidence that the practice had not carried out any internal 

investigation in relation to this death and the practice accepted it should have done. I am 
concerned that the practice does not have adequate systems in place to ensure that 
patient safety incidents are reviewed in a timely way to allow lessons to be drawn from the 
findings.  

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation 
has the power to take such action. 

YOUR RESPONSE 

6 

7 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 
by Friday 07 February 2025.  I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 
namely  

1.  the Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust and  
2.  the Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust and to  
3.  the family who may find it useful or of interest.  

I am also copying my report to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the Integrated Care 
Board (ICB).  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner 
may publish either or both a complete or redacted or summary form. She may send a copy of 
this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your 
response by the Chief Coroner.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 9 

Signed: 

Date:  10 December 2024 

EMMA MATHER 
Assistant Coroner 
West Yorkshire (E)

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Meanwood Group Practice (PDF)
Response to Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

Re: Inquest of Karen Day (deceased) – 30.8.63 to 14.7.22  

NHS Number 

 – Case No. 2024-0682 

Meanwood Group Practice received a Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths from Emma 
Mather, Assistant Coroner for West Yorkshire (East) on 10 December 2024. 

The Inquest related to Karen Day who died on 14 July 2022. 

The matters of concern raised in your report were: 

1.  During the course of the inquest I heard evidence that the GP practice did not follow the 

lower limb framework, failed to refer to tissue viability appropriately, and failed to escalate 
concerns around the deteriorating wound or consider appropriate measures to support the 
deceased to either self-manage her wound with an at home compression bandaging kit, or to 
support her to attend appointments on a more regular basis. I am concerned that the 
practice was unable to provide assurance that the same situation could not occur again.  
2.  During the inquest I received evidence that the practice had not carried out any internal 

investigation in relation to this death and the practice accepted it should have done. I am 
concerned that the practice does not have adequate systems in place to ensure that patient 
safety incidents are reviewed in a timely way to allow lessons to be drawn from the findings. 

Practice response: 

Meanwood Group Practice was deeply concerned about this case and to receive this report. We 
would like to thank you for bringing these matters to our attention. We have carefully considered and 
discussed the concerns you’ve raised and their implications for the practice. 

The case had previously been discussed at a practice meeting on 25th July 2022 following the death 
of Ms Day. This is done for all patient deaths, and includes GPs, practice manager, practice 
pharmacist, and lead practice nurse. As with other case reviews it provided an opportunity to review 
and learn from the case.   

Following the inquest the case was discussed again at a practice meeting on 2nd December 2024 
with all partners, salaried GPs and GP registrars, practice manager and deputy, practice nurse lead 
and reception manager and a full significant event analysis was presented and discussed. This led to 
the use of a detailed wound care template for all relevant wound management consultations, a 
review of the use of Tissue Viability Team referral process to ensure no other referrals are rejected, 
and GPs and the practice nursing team updating their knowledge, training and processes for wound 
care, in line with Leeds guidelines. 

As a result of the significant event analysis and practice team discussion the following action plan 
was agreed and implemented: 

• 

, GP partner, has been appointed the Wound Care Lead for the practice, with 

 the practice nurse lead.  

 •  To ensure the wound care template is used in full at the first consultation and then every 4 weeks 
in line with Leeds guidelines, to confirm that all the information needed is recorded for each 
patient contact. This will include regular use of photography, with images retained with the 
record, to document a wound and enhance continuity of care. 

•  To review all current patients in a practice meeting with all clinicians present in the first instance, 

using a large screen monitor to enable full review of the patient’s clinical record. 

•  To audit all patients receiving regular wound care within the practice every month, and once the 

system is assured every 3 months.  

•  Datix Incident reports will be filed in the event of risks being identified. A Datix incident form has 
been filed because of this inquest regarding the risk associated with the withdrawal of funding 
for the community wound care clinic and the pressures being placed on General Practice nursing 
services because of this. 

•  Wound management training to be organised for the practice nursing team and GPs with the 

Lead Vascular Nurse Specialist, LGI, on 24th February 2025. 

•  Home 2-layer hosiery kits or Velcro-based adjustable compression kits to be offered to all 

appropriate patients by the community wound care team, in line with local clinical guidelines.  

•  The practice will adopt a process that all foot wounds that have shown no improvement or are 
static within four weeks would trigger a review and referral to podiatry and all leg wounds that 
have shown no improvement should be reviewed and considered for referral to the Tissue 
Viability service. 

•  Systems will be improved within the daily duty doctor arrangements to ensure all clinical contact 
related to a patient is appropriately recorded.  As part of this whenever a GP is asked to review a 
patient by a nurse the patient’s name should be added to the duty-list as a prompt for the duty 
GP to record their review, in addition to the practice nurse’s consultation, in the notes. 

•  We have reviewed our clinical management of dependent oedema to ensure in all cases a clear 
plan for investigating heart failure and other causes is documented in the clinical record, in line 
with Leeds guidelines. 

•  Wound care and management will be made a standing item as part of the weekly practice 
meeting agenda with contributions from partners/GP Registrars/Nursing/ Pharmacy teams. 

•  We will hold regular multi-disciplinary team discussions for patients with complex or wounds 

that are failing to heal. The lead nurse to bring forward patients the nurses are concerned about.  
The result of the MDT will be record in the patient’s record. 

•  We have invited a District Nurse representative to attend a practice meeting once every three 

months to review cases they are dealing with and facilitate a closer working relationship with our 
Leeds Community Healthcare colleagues. 

•  To discuss the case with other practices within our Primary Care Network at the next meeting on 

28 January 2025, to share learning and improve quality of care across the area. 

 •  The practice will have a lower threshold to complete a full significant event analysis.  These will 
be discussed in the weekly practice clinical meeting and any lessons learnt recorded and acted 
on. 

•  To request legal representation at any subsequent inquests. In this case, MPS supported the 
preparation of an initial statement but advised that legal representation wasn’t necessary. 
However, Leeds Community Healthcare and Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust had legal 
representation present. The inquest caused significant distress for those attending and the 
practice has a duty of care to support them. 

•  To write to the ICB, LCH, LTHT and CQC, sharing the Section 28 report, and to request an urgent 

meeting to learn lessons from this case and seek improvement to the community wound service.  
Other areas within West Yorkshire and elsewhere in the country have greater access to specialist 
wound care services and yet in Leeds the limited wound clinics have recently been discontinued. 
The practice should not be expected to care for patients with chronic wounds that are not 
healing and will work to ensure all relevant patients are referred. 

•  The practice will inform the ICB in Leeds of its intention to no longer provide long-term wound 
care management and would refer all relevant patients to a specialist service for wound care 
management.  The practice would expect the ICB to commission the necessary service. 

Summary 

The practice has responded to the two matters of concern raised by the assistant coroner.   

1.  The practice has reviewed in detail how patients with wound care needs are managed, has 
made significant changes to our systems to ensure all wound care is done following Leeds 
clinical guidelines and delivered to the highest standards.  A lead clinician has been 
appointed, and a process of monthly audit of consultations and referrals is now in place. 
2.  The practice has strengthened its arrangements to review and learn from all deaths and 

significant events as part of its weekly multi-disciplinary team meetings. 

In closing we acknowledge that your concerns arose out of your investigation into the death of Karen 
Day and on behalf of the Practice, I would like to take this opportunity to offer our sincere 
condolences once again to her family in relation to her death and the impact it has had on them. 

Senior Partner 
Meanwood Group Practice 
Leeds LS6 4JN

Related reports

Other reports by Emma Mather

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.