Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0004, written 2 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Jan 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0004 |
| Deceased | Morgan Betchley |
| Coroner | Lisa Milner |
| Coroner area | West Sussex, Brighton & Hove |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Arundel Road, Worthing, West Sussex,
BN13 3EP via email
2.
Leeds, LS2 7UE via email
Chief Executive, NHS England, Quarry House, Quarry Hill,
1 CORONER
I am Lisa Milner, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of West Sussex,
Brighton and Hove.
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
3
On 21 March 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Morgan
Rose Betchley, formerly Sladovic, aged 19 years. The investigation was
concluded at the end of the Inquest on 22nd November 2024. The conclusion
given by the jury was a narrative conclusion namely:
Morgan died as a result of her own actions. Historical evidence suggests that in
all probability Morgan’s intent had been to self-harm as a cry for help and that it
was not her intention to end her life. Morgan was a young vulnerable adult who
had suffered with her mental health for many years, including a history of self-
harm and suicidal ideations. Following a significant decline in her mental health
she was admitted and Sectioned (under Section 2 and Section 136) on multiple
occasions to several medical facilities for her safety and to receive an enhanced
level of care.
The evidence shows repeated failures to follow policies and procedures by the
staff at Meadowfield Hospital. Failures relating to admission process,
understanding of existing diagnoses, risk management, record keeping, family
involvement and discharge planning prevented Morgan from receiving access to
services she needed at the time. We consider it probable that if policies and
procedures had been followed Morgan would have benefitted from a level of
care more closely aligned to her complex needs, including her diagnosis of
Autism.
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
In the days running up to Morgan’s death, there was a failure to act
professionally by some members of hospital staff. Following an earlier incident
of assault, the deceased’s attempts to apologise were not handled in a
professional manner by senior staff members of Rowan Ward, leading to a
fractured therapeutic relationship. Whilst nursing staff did not actively exclude
Morgan from receiving care, the situation was made unnecessarily stressful for
Morgan.
The evidence of the court focused on the frequency of observations on the night
of Morgan’s death. However, whilst it’s possible that more frequent observations
may have helped to better understand her level of risk, we feel it more probable
that better quality observations and interactions would have led to a great
understanding of Morgan’s state of mind.
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Morgan had been struggling with her mental health for some time, but there had
been a marked deterioration at the end of January 2023 due to various factors.
From January 2023 she had, on a number of occasions, self-harmed and made
attempts to take her life in the community, whilst detained under Section 2 of the
Mental Health Act 1983, and whilst a voluntary inpatient.
During this time, Morgan was admitted and discharged from mental health
settings, through the consultant led discharge process and via Morgan self-
discharging.
On the 27 February 2023 Morgan experienced a psychotic episode which
resulted in hospital staff being injured. As a result of this episode, Morgan self-
discharged herself. Whilst in the hospital grounds Morgan attempted to hang
herself from a tree and on this occasion, she was detained by the Police under
Section 136 Mental Health Act 1983.
Morgan was detained in the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit under Section 2 and
after assessment the section was rescinded and she was then transferred to
Rowan ward on the 3 March 2023, where she remained as a voluntary inpatient.
It was assessed that Morgan should be discharged into the community under
the care of the Crisis Team on the 6th March 2023. Whilst waiting for a
discharge meeting with the Crisis Team on the 9th March, in the early hours of
the morning, Morgan sadly
hung herself.
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the investigation, my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.
In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:-
There is no policy or guidance to staff for the assessment of risk posed by
fixtures and fittings supplied by the Trust (in this particular case it was the
Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust).
There is therefore the risk that fixtures and fittings supplied and/or not removed
by the Trust from patients, who are suffering from acute mental health, are at
risk of utilising these items to take their own life.
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you
(and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action.
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by 27th February 2025 I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is
proposed.
8 COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons: -
The family of Morgan Rose Betchley (formerly Sladovic)
Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
University Sussex Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
West Sussex County Council
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and
all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it
useful or of interest.
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
Dated 2nd January 2025
Lisa Milner
Assistant Coroner, West Sussex, Brighton and Hove
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Ms Lisa Milner
Assistant Coroner
West Sussex, Brighton & Hove
Record Office
Orchard Street
Chichester
PO19 1DD
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
27 February 2025
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Morgan Rose Betchley
who died on 9 March 2022
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 2
January 2025 concerning the death of Morgan Rose Betchley on 9 March 2023. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Morgan’s family and loved ones. NHS England are
keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Morgan’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise for
any anguish this delay may have caused Morgan’s family or friends. I realise that
responses to Coroners’ Reports can form part of the important process of family and
friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones, and I appreciate
this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
Your Report raises the concern that there is no policy or guidance to staff for the
assessment of risk posed by fixtures and fittings to patients with acute mental health
needs at Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SPFT).
NHS England’s Culture of Care Standards for inpatient mental health settings clearly
set out the importance of relationships between staff and patients being built on
openness and trust. Positive relationships between staff and the people they support
are fundamental to a person-centred care environment, and we know that trusting
therapeutic relationships are the strongest predictor of good clinical outcomes for
people receiving mental health care.
NHS England’s Culture of Care Programme includes focused work on moving away
from risk stratification as predictor of risk and supporting organisations to use a
personalised safety planning approach. We recognise the delicate balance of
supporting people to stay safe from self-harm and suicide, whilst ensuring the least
restrictive practices are used and people’s human rights are protected. In addition to
this, we are planning some future work in response to the upcoming Health Services
Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) investigation into creating conditions for learning
from deaths in mental health inpatient services that will further define what is meant
by the therapeutic relationship and how to promote and harness this within services.
NHS England has also engaged with NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board (ICB), the
responsible commissioner for SPFT’s inpatient mental health services, regarding the
concerns raised in your Report. We have been sighted on the Trust’s Serious Incident
Report and note that a number of actions have been identified as a result of the review
of Morgan’s care. These include raising awareness with staff of the importance of
updating care plans and therapeutic observations, with care plan audits in place, and
ensuring that care plans are updated promptly following any incidents. An action was
also taken to develop a training package for urgent care pathway and inpatient teams
to increase awareness of the needs and risks associated with care experienced
individuals. The ICB has provided assurance to NHS England that they are seeking
updates from the Trust on all actions identified in the report. We note that you have
also addressed your Report to SPFT and will consider their response to the Coroner
once we have been sighted on this.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Morgan, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
27 February 2025
Ms Lisa Milner
Assistant Coroner
Coroner Service: West Sussex, Brighton and Hove
Parkside Chart Way
Horsham, RH12 1XH
Office of the Chair & Chief Executive
Trust Headquarters
Portland House
44 Richmond Road
Worthing
West Sussex
BN11 1HS
Sent Via Email:
Dear Ms Milner
I write in response to your Regulation 28 report dated 2 January 2025 raising your concern
about the risk posed by Trust fixtures and fittings. I am grateful to you for raising your
concern and sharing the particular evidence that you heard during the Inquest touching the
sad death of Morgan Betchley.
Firstly, I wish to extend my sincere condolences to Morgan's family and friends. I know that
the Inquest into Morgan's death lasted two weeks which must have been an extremely
difficult experience for her family and friends. That said, I hope that the thoroughness of the
Inquest, together with this response will provide them with answers as well as assurances
as to the improvements made in the last two years.
I understand you are concerned about the extent of the Trust's policy/guidance in relation to
Trust fixtures and fittings because of the risk that they may pose if not removed from patients
who may utilise them as a means of taking their own life.
I am informed that you have already been confidentially provided with a copy of the Trust's
Ligature Anchor Point Risk Reduction Policy (the 'Policy'), for your personal assurance. The
Policy provides the Trust-wide guidance in relation to the elimination, reduction and control
of ligatures and anchor points in in-patient settings. I understand that you have been
expressly advised that the Policy is not, and must not be, available on our public website
due to the patient safety risks associated with it being in the public domain. I should also
add that restricting the accessibility of the Policy is in accordance with NHS England's
National Patient Safety Alert 2020/01, publication of which is also restricted, but confirmation
of its existence and general information about Patient Safety Alerts can be found here: NHS
England » Our National Patient Safety Alerts.
As you will have seen, the Policy covers the risk posed by fixtures and fittings and how that
risk is managed, with emphasis on the need for comprehensive risk assessment, safety
planning and therapeutic observations. I understand that you heard evidence during the
Inquest about how, in practical terms, clinicians dynamically risk assess and manage risk,
yet are unable to completely remove all risk. Notably, the Policy specifically states that:
Chair:
Chief Executive:
Head office: Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Portland House,
44 Richmond Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1HS
A teaching trust of Brighton
and Sussex Medical School
'The Trust recognises the need to balance clinical risk management against issues of
privacy, dignity and the need to take positive therapeutic risk'.
I understand that bedding and curtains were of particular concern to you during Morgan's
Inquest. It must be recognised, that whilst these are items that could be used as a ligature,
or cause other harm, they are also necessary for comfort, dignity and privacy and I agree
with the evidence you heard at Inquest that it is not, and should not be, routine practice to
remove these items. The expected practice, in line with the Policy, is that the potential risk
posed by items must be individually and dynamically risk assessed, and the risk
incorporated into the patient's individualised risk assessment. So, in response to a significant
risk of harm from ligature, enhanced observations can be put in place, or, in exceptional
cases, following comprehensive risk assessment, anti-ligature clothing is available.
However, these are restrictive interventions which can only be used if they are the least
restrictive practice.
Whilst the Policy, that was in place two years ago, did, and does, cover assessing and
removing items, following receipt of your Regulation 28 report revisions to Appendix 6 of the
Policy have been made, with specific inclusion of bedding and curtains. The revisions
expressly reference bedding and curtains as items to be considered during the assessment
of items in a patient's bedroom that could potentially be used as a ligature. The Appendix 6
revisions are currently progressing through the Trust's policy ratification processes and will
be incorporated into the Policy once ratification is completed, expected to be by the end of
March. However, I enclose a draft copy of the revised Appendix 6 for your assurance; for
the patient safety reasons set out above, this must not be more widely shared.
As an immediate measure, following receipt of your Regulation 28 report, a Patient Safety
Briefing was circulated to ward staff to highlight your concern and to reinforce compliance
with the Policy, specifically, the necessity to undertake comprehensive risk assessment to
ensure patients can safely be allowed access to items of risk including their own clothes,
bedding, towels, curtains etc. I enclose a copy of that Patient Safety Briefing for your
assurance and, again, for the patient safety reasons set out above, this must not be more
widely shared.
For completeness, I confirm that, refreshed ligature risk, assessment and awareness
training was launched in July 2024. I understand that you have already been provided with
details of the training package and, further, I can now confirm that the training will become
mandatory in April 2025.
Regarding other fixtures and fittings, I understand that you heard significant evidence in
relation to the new anti-ligature alarmed bedroom doors and I am pleased to confirm that
installation is now complete on Rowan Ward, with work having now also commenced on
Maple Ward. As you will be aware, work on other Trust sites is dependent on the needs of
the particular site and is also subject to funding being secured.
For ongoing assurance, I confirm that the Trust has a Trust-wide ligature group which
oversees all ongoing improvement works relating to ligatures and ensures all ward staff are
fully aware of the ligature risks in their areas, through a consistent and standardised use of
heat maps, photos and other resources to pinpoint ligature risks. That group considers and
learning and on-going
responds
improvement.
to enable cross-organisational
incident data
to
Thank you for raising your concern and bringing it to my attention. I hope that the contents
of this response provide you and Morgan's family with assurance that action has been taken
to address the concern and that the Trust has procedures in place to continue to make
ongoing improvements to maintain patient safety. However, if I can be of any further
assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.