Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Lady Lola Crouch

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0101, written 21 Feb 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report21 Feb 2025
Reference2025-0101
DeceasedLady Lola Crouch
CoronerSonia Hayes
Coroner areaEssex
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedMid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Chief Executive of Mid & South Essex NHS Trust 

1 

2 

3 

4 

CORONER 

I am Sonia Hayes, Area Coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act  2009  and  regulations  28  and  29  of  the  Coroners  (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 17 March 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Lady Lola 
Kay CROUCH, AGE 80. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 
on 30 January 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was 1a  Multi-Organ Failure 
1b Small Bowel Obstruction 1c Leiomyosarcoma of Small Intestine (operated) 
and  Abdominal  Adhesions  following  Hysterectomy  2  Chronic  Obstructive 
Pulmonary Disease 

A combination of malignancy and adhesions caused small bowel obstruction. 
Lady Lola was a high risk of developing adhesions due her historical abdominal 
procedures.  An  inpatient  CT  scan  in  December  2022  showed  potential 
malignancy was not followed up. 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Lady Lola Kay Crouch had a history of hysterectomy and laparotomies and died 
at Broomfield Hospital on 26 February 2023 of Multi-Organ Failure due to Small 
Bowel  Obstruction  caused  by Leiomyosarcoma of  Small  Intestine  (operated) 
and Abdominal Adhesions following Hysterectomy in a background of Chronic 
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A CT Scan in December 2022 showed small 
bowel  obstruction  with suspicion  for a mass  lesion  that  was not followed  up. 
Lady  Lola  was  treated  for  vomiting  and  abdominal  pain  on  attendance  to 
hospital overnight and sent home on 23 February 2023. Lady Lola reattended 
approximately 10 hours later with worsening symptoms and nasogastric tube 
was  inserted  approximately  6  hours  after  directed.  A  CT  Scan  confirmed 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 malignancy at the same site as the original scan. Lady Lola deteriorated with 
vomiting and metabolic derangement that required emergency laparotomy with 
bowel resection and histology confirmed localised Leiomyosarcoma of the small 
intestine.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)  Lady Lola was not informed of the findings of potential malignancy from 
a CT scan in December 2022. This was not followed up and was then 
not  given  as  part  of  the  history  when  Lady  Lola  attended  hospital  in 
February 2023.  

(2)  Staffing levels – A Medical Emergency call was not triggered overnight 
on  the  surgical  ward  when  elevated  NEWS  scores  required  medical 
review that was escalated but delayed due to doctor staffing levels. 

6 

7 

8 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
and your organisation have the power to take such action.  

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 16 April 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following 
Interested Persons: 

•  Family  

I have also sent it to Care Quality Commission who may find it useful or of 
interest. 

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary  form.  She  may  send  a  copy  of  this  report  to  any  person  who  he 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

21 February 2025 

HM Area Coroner for Essex Sonia Hayes 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Mid South Essex NHS Trust (PDF)
H.M Area Coroner 
Ms Sonia Hayes 
SEAX House 
Victoria Road South 
Chelmsford 
Essex 
CM1 1QH 

Our Ref: 

16 April 2025 

Dear Ms Hayes 

Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Lady Lola Kay Crouch 

I write further to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (PFDR) dated  21 
February 2025, relating to the Inquest of Lady Lola Kay Crouch. 

We have considered your concerns and set out our formal response to each matter using 
your numbering as follows. 

Matters of Concern 

(1) Lady Lola was not informed of the findings of potential malignancy from a CT 
scan in December 2022. This was not followed up and was then not given as 
part of the history when Lady Lola attended hospital in February 2023. 

We acknowledge that patients should always receive full, timely and accurate information 
about their imaging results, and it is our responsibility to share this information with them 
to deliver excellent care.  

Our  policy  ‘Communication  of  time  critical  or  unexpected  significant  findings  during 
diagnostic  reporting’  MSEPO-21240’  makes  clear  that  the  referring  clinician  is 
responsible  for  the  review  of  any  radiology  they  request.  Where  radiological  imaging 
reports  detect  an  unexpected,  significant  or  time  sensitive  finding,  our  policy  provides 
that  a  radiology  alert  is  sent  to  the  responsible  consultant  with  the  full  report  so  that 
prompt action can be taken, including communication with the patient.  

Our  policy  details  the  expectations  around  communication  of  radiology  results  in  the 
broadest sense, including verbal discussions with staff, recording key information in the 
patient record, and if appropriate, raising alerts to share with other professionals including 
primary  care.  Our  policy  is  subject  to  annual  audit  to  monitor  compliance  and 
effectiveness. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This process provides assurance that diagnostic imaging is reviewed by the right person 
in a timely manner to inform clinical decision making and facilitate patient communication 
of possible diagnosis. 

As  part of  our  digital improvement  innovation  project,  we  have  signed  up  to the  ‘NHS 
App’  radiology  reporting  service  whereby  patients  now  receive  a  copy  of  their  own 
imaging  reports to their personal NHS App. The  reports include  a summary of  clinical 
findings that can be read by patients to improve communication and understanding of 
their own health record. 

I am advised by my surgical colleagues that presentations to the Emergency Department 
(ED) with signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction, particularly small bowel obstruction, 
have a  variety  of  differential diagnoses.  As  in  Lady  Lola’s  case,  with  a  background of 
multiple  previous  complex  open  operations,  adhesions  are  the  leading  cause  of  small 
bowel obstruction.  

Lady  Lola  had  a  short  presenting  history  and  a  CT  scan  suggestive  of  small  bowel 
obstruction  with  differential  diagnoses,  but  suggestive  of  adhesive  obstruction  as  the 
most likely cause. Taking all these features into account and coupled with the fact that 
her symptoms completely resolved within two days of conservative management alone, 
this would be suggestive of adhesive small bowel obstruction.  

Further, full  resolution  of  Lady  Lola’s  symptoms  for  two  months  subsequent  to  an  ED 
presentation would also be a highly unexpected outcome in a case of malignant small 
bowel obstruction. When discussing results with any complex, unwell surgical patient in 
the emergency setting, scan results could be poorly communicated or misunderstood.  

It  has  been  recognised  that  further  investigation  and  information  for  the  patient  would 
have been appropriate in this case and this learning has been shared across the general 
surgical team through morbidity and mortality meeting discussion. 

(2) Staffing levels – A Medical Emergency call was not triggered overnight on the 
surgical  ward when elevated  NEWS  scores required  medical review  that  was 
escalated but delayed due to doctor staffing levels. 

Our ‘NEWS2’ escalation policy was in place at the time of Lady Lola’s attendances. The 
outcome of Lady Lola’s case was communicated at both our July 2024 and August 2024 
general surgical audit meetings to share learning. During the meetings we highlighted 
the importance of compliance with the NEWS2 escalation policy again and reminded the 
surgical  staff  about  the  role  of  the  trigger  response  team,  and  our  local  departmental 
escalation  process.  The  trigger  response  and  hospital  out  of  hours  team  are 
automatically  notified  by  the  electronic  observation  system,  NEWS  escalations  and 
attend the unwell patient.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Since  Lady  Lola’s  case  we  have  established  the  hospital  out  of  hours  service  in  the 
surgical  department  to  provide  a  more  robust  response  to  the  surgical  wards.  This 
process has been in place for other specialties previously and we know it works very well.  

Along with the hospital wide trigger response team and hospital out of hours service, this 
provides the surgical team, with senior nursing support who can provide the more junior 
surgical  resident  with  clinical  support,  vascular  access,  resuscitative  support,  and 
escalation prompting. We have further reiterated the NEWS and local clinical escalation 
process to the new residents as part of our standard induction process.  

In terms of staffing, we have a policy that clearly identifies the actions required to address 
unfilled  junior  doctor  rota  gaps.    This  involves  enacting  the  acting  down  policy: 
‘Unforeseen duties – Consultant, MSEPO21041’.  Where we have unfilled junior doctor 
gaps in the rota that cannot be filled, the Consultant and Registrar for general surgery 
and urology will act down to ensure that sufficient support is provided.  

We  have  implemented  the  necessary  changes  to  ensure  that  patients  are  properly 
informed  of  their  imaging  results,  and  embedded  new  processes  within  our  surgical 
teams to make sure surgical colleagues are well supported overnight for urgent cases 
and when required the Consultants act down as per policy.  

I am assured that we have appropriately addressed your concerns in this case, however 
if I can assist further with these matters, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive 
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Related reports

Other reports by Sonia Hayes

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.