Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

David Heffer

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0274, written 4 Jun 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Jun 2025
Reference2025-0274
DeceasedDavid Heffer
CoronerSonia Hayes
Coroner areaEssex
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Chief Executive of East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation 

Trust  

CORONER 

I am Sonia Hayes, Area Coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act  2009  and  regulations  28  and  29  of  the  Coroners  (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  3  May  2024  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  DAVID 
HEFFER, AGE 84. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23 
April 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was     

I(a) Septicaemia 

(b)  Acute peritonitis 

(c)  Duodenal and Omental Perforation Post Endoscopic Retrograde 
Cholangio Pancreatography 

(d)   

II    Ischaemic Heart Disease, Obstructive Jaundice 

Mr Heffer died from a rare but recognised complication of a necessary 
medical procedure and the stent added to the risk of this complication.  

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

David Heffer died on 13 April 2024 of Septicaemia due to Acute Peritonitis 
secondary to Duodenal and Omental Perforation Post Endoscopic Retrograde 
Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP) on 8 April 2024 for Obstructive Jaundice 
in a background of Ischaemic Heart Disease. Mr Heffer was discharged the 

1 

2 

3 

4 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 same day as the ERCP and readmitted on 9 April 2024 in severe pain and 
diagnosed with biliary sepsis and perforation. Mr Heffer received treatment for 
sepsis but was not suitable for surgical intervention due to his underlying 
bladder cancer and probable cholangiocarcinoma. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest  the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)  The  treating  doctor  was  not  informed  when  Mr  Heffer  was  readmitted 
with  a  complication  of  the  ERCP  procedure,  and  his  advice  was  not 
sought  about  potential causes  of the complication.  The  treating  doctor 
only found out about the readmission on contact from coroner’s office.  

(2)  The medical records did not contain all of the pertinent and relevant 

information and some were illegible causing difficulty in interpretation.  

6 

7 

8 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
and your organisation have the power to take such action.  

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 30 July 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your  response must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following 
Interested Persons: 

•  Family  

I have also sent it to Care Quality Commission who may find it useful or of 
interest. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary  form.  She  may  send  a  copy  of  this  report  to  any  person  who  she 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

4 JUNE 2025 
HM Area Coroner for Essex Sonia Hayes 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
Ms Sonia Hayes 
Area Coroner for Essex 
Essex Coroners Service 
Seax House 
Essex County Council 
Victoria Road South 
Chelmsford 
CM1 1LX 

Dear Ms Hayes 

Colchester District General Hospital 
Turner Road  
Colchester  
CO4 5JL 

30 July 2025 

Our Reference: 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS – INQUEST TOUCHING UPON THE DEATH OF MR 

DAVID HEFFER WHICH CONLUDED ON 23 APRIL 2025 

I  write  in  connection  with  the  above-mentioned  Inquest  and  the  Regulation  28  Report  to  Prevent 

Deaths issued by yourself on 4 June 2025 (“the Report”). 

The  Report highlighted concerns  relating to  Colchester Hospital, those  concerns were expressed as 

follows: 

1.  The treating doctor was not informed when Mr Heffer was readmitted with a complication of 

the Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and his advice was not sought 

about  potential  causes  of  the  complication.  The  treating  doctor  only  found  out  about  the 

readmission on contact from coroner’s office.  

2.  The medical records did not contain all of the pertinent and relevant information and some 

were illegible causing difficulty in interpretation.  

The information presented below is intended to describe the actions which have been taken/are being 

taken by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) to mitigate the risk of future 

deaths and address the concerns you have raised. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The treating doctor was not informed when Mr Heffer was readmitted with a complication of the 

ERCP  procedure,  and  his  advice  was  not  sought  about  potential  causes  of  the  complication.  The 

treating doctor only found out about the readmission on contact from coroner’s office.  

The Trust acknowledges that the treating endoscopist was not informed of Mr Heffer’s readmission 

with  a  complication.  The  treating  endoscopist  was  only  made  aware  of  the  readmission  following 

contact from the coroner’s service. The Trust acknowledges this represents a missed opportunity for 

early  clinical  input  from  the  treating  endoscopist,  for  reflective  learning  regarding  the  case  and 

equipment  used  (specifically,  the  stent  size)  and  to  have  open  discussions  with  Mr  Heffer  and  his 

family.  

The  Trust  acknowledges  the  need  for  better  communication  between  clinicians.  Reminders  will  be 

provided  to  all  general  surgical  teams,  who  remain  the  primary  team  managing  ERCP-related 

complications,  as  agreed  unanimously  at  the  regional  ERCP  Clinical  Delivery  Group—that  where 

feasible, the procedural endoscopist should be informed of any complication arising from an ERCP they 

performed. The expectation is that a phone call should be made to inform the procedural endoscopist 

of the readmission. Informing procedural endoscopists of any complication arising from an ERCP they 

performed  will  be  included  in  departmental  handover  guidance  and  reinforced  through  clinical 

education sessions. 

The  Trust  is  committed  to  learning  from  deaths.  The  Division  has  agreed  to  conduct  a  Bi-monthly 

Endoscopy  Governance  meeting  at  the  Colchester  site  to  align  with  the  Governance  meetings that 

currently take place at Ipswich Hospital and promote a consistent approach to Governance at a local 

level. The Bi-monthly Endoscopy Governance meeting will include a standing agenda item to review 

all Colchester Hospital ERCP-related complications and deaths. Minutes will be taken at these meetings 

and shared with all endoscopy colleagues to ensure that those who are not able to attend are informed 

of the discussions that have taken place and any actions required.  The Division are arranging the date 

for the first meeting to take place at Colchester Hospital which is planned for 1st September 2025.  

The Division has also implemented a cross-site ERCP Governance review meeting which takes place 

every three months. This meeting is attended by all ERCP clinicians at both  Colchester and Ipswich 

Hospital and provides a forum for case studies to be reviewed, from both sites, to look at outcomes 

and to share any learning.  

In  addition  to  the  Governance  meetings  outlined  above,  the  Trust  will  be  conducting  a  yearly  site 

specific ERCP audit. This audit will be presented locally and regionally to ensure patterns are identified 

and lessons disseminated.  

 
 
 
 
 
 The medical records did not contain all of the pertinent and relevant information and some were 

illegible causing difficulty in interpretation.  

The Trust acknowledges the concerns regarding the quality and completeness of Mr Heffer’s medical 

records, including legibility and availability of key clinical information. 

The Trust is in the process of implementing a new electronic patient record system, provided by EPIC, 

to transition their patient records system to an electronic system, meaning that by October 2025, all 

ESNEFT patient record keeping will be done electronically. 

This will have the benefit of being more user friendly and provide greater compliance with completing 

documents, as the system is able to be programmed to ensure areas of information are documented 

before being able to proceed through the system. It is also possible to set alerts that are triggered by 

timeframes to ensure staff are notified of any immediate actions that need to be carried out. 

EPIC will allow for real time, centralised access to clinical documentation, investigations and procedure 

details across sites. Records within EPIC will be  input  electronically,  they will be  time stamped and 

legible.  This  will  help  to  improve  continuity  and  clarity  of  information  contained  within  medical 

records.  

An electronic medical records system will improve auditability and traceability of patient pathways. 

This will allow for prompt case review and early identification of learning. Specifically in relation to the 

endoscopy unit there will be structured templates and mandatory fields which include stent type and 

sizing. This will reduce any omissions.  

The  Trust  hopes  that  the  above  information  demonstrates  the  learning  and  training  that  has  been 

implemented and adequately responds to your concerns 

I would like to personally extend our sincerest condolences to David’s family for their loss.  

If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive Officer 
East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Related reports

Other reports by Sonia Hayes

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.