Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Tracey Oldfield

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0578, written 11 Nov 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Nov 2025
Reference2025-0578
DeceasedTracey Oldfield
CoronerAndrew Cox
Coroner areaCornwall and the Isles of Scilly
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Information Classification: CONTROLLED 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

, Chief Medical Officer, Royal Cornwall Hospital 

1  CORONER 

I am Andrew Cox, the Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Cornwall 
and the Isles of Scilly. 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and 
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 
On 10/11/25, I concluded the inquest into the death of Tracey Oldfield 
who died in RCHT on 24/10/24 at the age of 56. 

I recorded the cause of death as: 
1a) Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and aspiration pneumonia; 
1b) Cardiac arrest; 
1c) Combined effects of opiate-mediated respiratory depression and an 
absence of CPAP respiratory support for obstructive sleep apnoea. 
II) End-stage renal failure complicating insulin-dependent Type 2 
Diabetes Mellitus, valvular and hypertensive heart disease. 

I recorded a conclusion that Tracy died from complications that 
developed following an elective procedure resulting in an unanticipated 
admission into hospital. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Tracey was a 56-year-old lady with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes 
mellitus, end-stage renal failure, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea 
and peripheral neuropathy. She had been in receipt of dialysis since 
2020. She had a surgical fistula to facilitate treatment, but this needed 
revision.  
On 17/10/24, Tracey underwent an elective procedure in this regard as a 
day case which was technically unremarkable. Post-operatively, however, 
she was found to have low oxygen saturations and low blood sugars. She 
was admitted.  
Ordinarily, Tracey slept with CPAP ventilation due to her sleep apnoea. 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information Classification: CONTROLLED 

She had not brought her device into hospital with her and although 
documented in her admission records, this was not handed over to ward 
staff.  
Additionally, Tracey was not prescribed her normal medications but 
instead received a standard bundle of medication for surgical patients. 
This included two doses of oramorph for pain relief where opiate 
medication was contra-indicated for a patient in end-stage renal failure. 
The oramorph caused Tracey to become drowsy and unresponsive which 
was exacerbated by the lack of CPAP ventilation.  
There was also no senior medical review resulting in a lost opportunity to 
remedy the oversights.  
Tracey suffered a cardiac arrest on 19/10/24 and suffered a hypoxic brain 
injury. She deteriorated and died in Royal Cornwall Hospital on 24/10/24 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS  

During the course of these inquests, the evidence has revealed matters 
giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will 
occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty 
to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN have largely been identified and 
addressed by a Patient Safety Incident Investigation report that was 
available to the court. A number of changes and improvements have 
already been made or will be undertaken, for example, when the Trust’s 
IT systems are upgraded.   

One point that did not appear to have been fully resolved, however, 
centred on the need for patients who are admitted late and unexpectedly 
(of which the PSII recorded there are over 1,000 annually) to have their 
usual medication prescribed in timely fashion. 

On the facts of this case, Tracey was prescribed insulin when the family 
informed clinical staff she had a diagnosis of diabetes. Her pain relief was 
not prescribed at the same time, however, and as she became more 
uncomfortable after the nerve block used intra-operatively wore off, this 
resulted in her being prescribed opiates (inappropriately) rather than her 
usual Gabapentin. 

There was debate at the inquest as to who would be best placed to 
prepare the prescription and when. Matron 
done by an anaesthetist who would be reviewing the patient pre-
operatively in any event. 
could be better done by a junior doctor when a patient was admitted and 
clerked in. On the facts of this case, Tracey was not seen by a junior 
doctor (other than to have an insulin prescription) and was not formally 
clerked in. 

 (Head of Patient Safety) felt it 

 thought it could be 

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information Classification: CONTROLLED 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such 
action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 8 January 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons: 

-  Family of Tracey  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

[DATE]                                              [SIGNED BY CORONER] 

11/11/25                                         

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital (PDF)
Chief Medical officer’s office 
Royal Cornwall Hospital 

Truro  

Cornwall 
TR1 3LJ 

Date: 30 December 2025 

Private and Confidential  
Mr. Andrew Cox 
H.M Senior Coroner for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly 
Pydar House 
Pydar Street 
Truro 
Cornwall 
TR1 1XU 

Dear Mr Cox,  

Re: The Late Tracey Oldfield – Regulation 28 PFD Report and Response 

I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, dated 11 November 2025 
and  received  on  the  13  November  2025.  This  was  issued  following  the  inquest  into  the  death  of 
Tracey Oldfield which concluded on 10 November 2025. 

I  would  like to take  this  opportunity  to  express  my  sincerest  condolences  to  the  family  of  Tracey 
Oldfield for their loss.  

During the inquest, the evidence revealed a matter giving rise to concern. Which is as follows: 

•  How surgical day case patients who are admitted at short notice have their usual 

medications prescribed in a timely fashion. 

Please find below the response from the Trust and the detail of the actions being taken in relation to 
the above concern. 

Response: 

1.  A multidisciplinary group of relevant clinicians has been established to advise strengthening 
existing  governance  related  to safe,  accurate  and  timely  prescribing  of  a  patient’s  regular 
medications  following  unexpected  hospital  admission  following  Day  Case  Surgery.  It  will 
report to  Clinical  Effectiveness Group  on  25th March  2026  for  action  plan  sign  off  prior to 
implementation by 27th May 2026.  

                          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                         
 
 
 
 2.  The following 4 workstreams have been identified: 

i. 

ii. 

iii. 

iv. 

v. 

Identify  the  systems  used  which  alert  all  day  surgery  patients  with  an  unplanned 
inpatient admission due to unexpected change in clinical condition including location, 
reason for admission and responsible consultant. 
Ensure all current patient data platforms triangulate and provide accurate information 
on this patient subset to the site co-ordination office, responsible senior and resident 
doctors. Influence the planning and implementation of the new integrated clinical care 
platform, eCare to further strengthen tracking these patients. 
Ensure a responsible consultant is identified and aware of the patient admission at 
the  time  of  admission.  This  consultant  can  either  be  the  operating  clinician,  or  the 
relevant specialty on-call consultant if the admission occurs out of hours.   
Strengthen  resident  doctor  and  nursing  staff  training  and  awareness  of  the 
requirement to conduct a thorough  documented clinical  review  (clerking) of  all  day 
surgery patients admitted as an inpatient post operatively due to unexpected clinical 
change. 
Ensure  medical  and  nursing  staff  adhere  to  existing  pharmacy  prescribing  policies 
including  medicines  reconciliation  with  a  focus  on  ‘high  risk  medications’  such  as 
insulin, opioids, anticoagulants, psychotropics and immunosuppressants.  

3.  Following implementation, we will audit postoperative prescribing of all patients admitted as 
inpatients following day case surgery against each of the five workstream recommendations. 
This audit will be commissioned and monitored by the Clinical Effectiveness Group with an 
expected completion date in September 2026. Any learning and further work identified will 
be reviewed by the group 25th November 2026. 

4.  Immediate Response pending implementation of the above workstreams: The findings of 
the  PSR2  and  PFD  report  and  response  will  be  shared  with  Care  group  leadership  and 
clinical governance teams at Patient Safety Incident Review Oversight Group (PSIROG), with 
a request to cascade to all clinical specialty groups and teams providing day surgery services 
to review and strengthen current practice to ensure patients unexpectedly admitted following 
day surgery under go full clerking by a resident doctor with review of regular medications with 
appropriate senior oversight.   

I hope that this letter provides both you and Tracey’s family with assurance that the Trust has taken 
seriously the concern you raised in your report and that the Trust has taken appropriate action to 
prevent future deaths.  

Yours Sincerely, 

PP 

, Deputy Chief Medical Officer 

Chief Medical Officer 
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust 

Page 2 of 2

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Cox

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.