Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Garry Mills

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0212, written 10 Apr 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Apr 2026
Reference2026-0212
DeceasedGarry Mills
Sourcejudiciary.uk record
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1

2

Wales

1

CORONER

Attorney General of England and

Director of Public Prosecutions

I am Darren STEWART OBE, HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey for the coroner area of Surrey

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 17 September 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Garry MILLS aged
46.

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 02 February 2026.

The conclusion of the inquest was:

Narrative Conclusion - Gary MILLS was a much loved and desperately missed
member of his Family. His Family recalls him as a loving, caring, proud husband
and father who placed his family’s interests above his own.

On the 8th September 2020 Mr. MILLS was arrested in relation to a Police
investigation concerning activity which Mr. MILLS was alleged to have
coordinated online, including on the dark web. He was interviewed by Police and
released on Police bail on the 9th September 2020.

On the 28th September 2020 a financial restraint order was placed on Mr. MILLS
and which imposed a £250 pound limit on weekly living expenses for Mr. MILLS
and his Family.

Mr. MILLS subsequently suffered from considerable anxiety and stress and he
experienced feelings of failure and hopelessness which he expressed to his family
and therapist.

In July 2021 Mr. MILLS was advised that the Police investigation was unlikely to
be completed before mid-2022 and his family noted that this adversely impacted
on his mood, stress levels and anxiety.

On the 6th September 2021, Mr. MILLS seemed his usual self and was last seen
around 11.30 hours by a family member. He was observed on security cameras
departing his residence at 11.56 hours.

Concerns were raised by his wife when he failed to collect their son from school
that afternoon which was out of character for him.

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 Subsequent Police enquiries lead to Mr. MILLS being found at a business premises
in
2021.

at around 1750 hours later that day, 6th September

death was verified at the scene. A subsequent Police investigation revealed no
evidence of third-party involvement or suspicious circumstances in relation to the
death.

His

The restraint order, which had the effect of significantly impacting on Mr. MILLS
and his family’s standard of living, along with the time he had been subject to
Police investigation weighed heavily on Mr. MILLS and is likely to have influenced
the actions he undertook on the 6th September 2021.

Gary MILLS took his own life whilst suffering from the effects of stress and
anxiety.

The medical cause of death was confirmed as:

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Narrative Conclusion see Part 4

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

Mr. MILLS was subject to a Restraint Order on all his assets made under the
Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) 2002. In circumstances where this occurs, the
Restraint Order should contain an exception allowing the person subject to the
Order to make expenditure from their assets on their reasonable living expenses
and those of their dependents. The relevant provision under POCA is Section 41 (3).

'Reasonable living expenses' is not specifically defined within the legislation, those
applying the provisions of Section 41 (3) rely upon guidance issued by either the
National Crime Agency (NCA) (in the case of Financial Investigators) or the Crown
Prosecution Service (CPS) (for prosecutors presenting proposed Restraint Orders to
the Crown Court).

For Financial Investigators, NCA training material disclosed at the Inquest sets out
NCA guidance in respect of confiscations and restraint. Parts of this training
material have been updated with effect 3rd April 2020. Guidance for CPS
Prosecutors is contained within the document 'Practical Guidance for Lawyers on
Drafting Restraint Orders from Precedent A or B'. This document sets out the sum
of £250.00 per week as the usual minimum starting point to be put forward by
prosecutors to the Crown Court (pg. 10 refers). Initial applications for Restraint
Orders are prepared by Financial Investigators, submitted by CPS Prosecutors and
issued by the Crown Court without the subject of the Restraint Order being aware
due to concerns over potential concealment, removal or destruction of assets.

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 The Inquest heard that as a consequence of this guidance, the initial Restraint
Order will typically be issued with the exception of £250.00 per week made for
reasonable living expenses. This was the case for Mr. MILLS. Provision exists for
this amount to be varied, however the Inquest heard that the process is
understandably challenging and requires specialist legal representation if it is to
have any chance of success. Due to the terms of the Restraint Order, assets are
specifically excluded from being realised to pay for legal representation. The
Inquest heard evidence that although Legal Aid funding is available for defendants
in criminal proceedings, applications to vary Restraint Orders is considered a non-
criminal matter and therefore the provision of Legal Aid funding is rare. No
application to vary the Restraint Order applicable to Mr. MILLS was made.

The sum of £250.00 per week has not been varied since 2009, despite considerable
upward movement in the cost of living during the ensuing 17 years. Evidence
heard at the Inquest was that no review of this figure has occurred since 2009.

In Mr. MILLS’ case, he and his five dependants (his wife and four children) were to
meet their reasonable living expenses from £250.00 per week, in part
supplemented by Universal Credit payments.

I am concerned that the figure used by the CPS to set the minimum per week figure
for reasonable living expenses (£250.00) and which is initially imposed in ex parte
proceedings has not been reviewed since 2009. The almost universal use of this
figure, unadjusted for inflation or broader cost of living increases, on the subject of
the Restraint Order and their dependants, significantly impacts on their mental
health and wellbeing which gives rise to a risk of death.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by Juen 5, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons

Family of Gary MILLS
West Midlands Police
Cowans Solicitors

I have also sent it to

National Crime Agency

who may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.  

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it
useful or of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response.

9

Dated: 10/04/2026

Darren STEWART OBE
HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey for
Surrey

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Track Garry Mills

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Garry Mills, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.