Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0262, written 22 May 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 22 May 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0262 |
| Deceased | David Smart |
| Coroner | Joanne Andrews |
| Coroner area | West Sussex, Brighton and Hove |
| Source | judiciary.uk record |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). 1. CORONER I am Joanne ANDREWS, Area Coroner, for the coroner area of West Sussex, Brighton and Hove. 2. DATE OF REPORT 22 May 2026 3. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 4. THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO 1. University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust 2. NHS England & NHS Improvement 3. Department of Health and Social Care You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by July 17, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period if an appropriate application is made. 5. YOUR RESPONSE Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. I have a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner. In accordance with the Chief Coroner’s Publication Policy, you should send response. These me any representations regarding publication of your representations should be made at the same time as the response is provided. I will pass any representations received to the Chief Coroner for a decision. Please note any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. The names of those who do not respond to PFD reports are regularly published on the Chief Coroner’s webpages Non-responses to Prevention of Future Death (PFD) reports - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 6. SUMMARY OF CORONER’S CONCERN During the inquest I heard evidence that at the of Mr Smart's attendance to the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton that there were around 20 patients in the corridor as the Department had reached capacity and there was no clinical area available to do so. I understand from the area is not designated as a clinical area. previous inquests that I have heard in other inquests relating to deaths prior to June 2025 that is being taken by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust currently to (1) reduce the number of patients who present to the Emergency Department who could be seen by other services in the community and (2) to create an improved patient flow through the Royal Sussex County Hospital. The evidence in this inquest was that, despite these actions, the corridor continues to be used when the Emergency Department reaches capacity. I was also advised that the use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout country. the Prevention of Future Death reports in relation to the use of the corridor for patient care was made during investigations into deaths which occurred in December 2022 and February 2025 and the use of the corridor remains ongoing. 7. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action. 8. INVESTIGATION AND INQUEST On 18 June 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of David John Smart aged 79. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 May 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was that David John Smart died on 14 June the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton from 2025 at known complications of a treatment to reverse his Rivaroxaban. He needed the reversal in order to receive surgical treatment for a life-threatening rectal bleed which developed on 13 June 2025 following a polypectomy procedure on 5 June 2025. 9. CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH On 5 June 2025, David John Smart underwent a polypectomy. He was on Rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation which was stopped prior to the procedure due to the risk of increased bleeding. He underwent the procedure without any immediate complications and was discharged with instructions to resume his Rivaroxaban after 72 hours which he did. On Friday 13 June 2025 he developed a significant rectal bleed and was advised by the Endoscopy Unit to attend the Emergency Department at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton which he did that afternoon. He was assessed in the Emergency Department and a decision was made to attempt conservative management of the bleed but he continued to experience bleeding and a decision was made the next morning that he would undergo surgical intervention to attempt to resolve the same. He was then discussed with the Haematologists as to the implications of the Rivaroxaban and authorised to have the only reversal agent available. There were no complications with the surgery which sealed the bleeding vessels around the site of his polypectomy. The reversal treatment of Andexanet Alfa is known to have recognised complications of thrombosis which Mr Smart sadly suffered administration. after its He sadly died from the complications resulting from the use of the Andexanet Alfa treatment on 14 June 2025. 10. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest I heard evidence giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: During the inquest I heard evidence that at the of Mr Smart's attendance to the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton that there were around 20 patients in the corridor as the Department had reached capacity and there was no clinical area available to do so. I understand from the area is not designated as a clinical area. previous inquests that I have heard in other inquests relating to deaths prior to June 2025 that is being taken by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust currently to (1) reduce the number of patients who present to the Emergency Department who could be seen by other services in the community and (2) to create an improved patient flow through the Royal Sussex County Hospital. The evidence in this inquest was that, despite these actions, the corridor continues to be used when the Emergency Department reaches capacity. I was also advised that the use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout country. the Prevention of Future Death reports in relation to the use of the corridor for patient care was made during investigations into deaths which occurred in December 2022 and February 2025 and the use of the corridor remains ongoing. 11. COPIES AND PUBLICATION OF THIS REPORT I have a duty to send a copy of my report to every Interested Person who in my opinion should receive it. I also may send a copy of the report to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. I can confirm I have sent the report to: The family of Mr Smart I also have a duty to send a copy of the report to the Chief Coroner. You may make representations to me, the coroner, about the publication of the contents of this report in line with Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). Any representations will be sent to the Chief Coroner alongside the report. Please refer to box 4 above for additional information relating to the publication of reports and responses. 12. SIGNATURE Joanne ANDREWS Area Coroner for West Sussex, Brighton and Hove
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care) 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 08 June 2026 HM Coroner JOANNE ANDREWS Area Coroner for West Sussex, Brighton and Hove Dear Ms Andrews, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 22 May sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of David John Smart. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for urgent and emergency care. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Smart’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns over the continued use of corridors to care for patients at the Royal Sussex Country Hospital Brighton and more widely across the country. We recognise the concerns surrounding corridor care and are clear that it is unacceptable and should not be allowed to become an accepted part of care delivery. Its presence reflects broader pressures across urgent and emergency care, and we are committed to tackling and eliminating it. In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care have made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that these concerns are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response on the concerns you have raised. The Government and NHS England will continue to take action across the full urgent and emergency care pathway to improve patient flow, expand available capacity, and reduce avoidable demand on accident and emergency departments. This includes focused support for the most challenged trusts, alongside strengthened reporting arrangements and the introduction of a consistent national definition of corridor care to support greater transparency. We will also begin publishing data on corridor care for the first time, subject to assurance of data quality. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MINISTER OF STATE FOR HEALTH
Ms Joanne Andrews,
The Coroner’s Office
Woodvale
Lewes Road
Brighton
BN2 3QB
Dear Ms Andrews,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
7 July 2026
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David John Smart who
died on 14th June 2025.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 22nd
May 2026 concerning the death of David John Smart on 14th June 2025. In advance
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Mr Smart’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to
assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mr Smart’s care have
been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raises concerns that corridors are being used to treat patients when
hospitals have reached capacity across the country. You were concerned that corridor
care was raised as a concern in two Prevention of Future Death Reports from
December 2022 and February 2025 yet the issue continues to be a concern.
NHS England is clear that corridors are not designated clinical areas and their use for
patient care is a symptom of significant system pressure rather than planned practice.
Since your previous Reports to us, the NHS England Urgent and Emergency Care
Plan for 2025/26 has been published (in June 2025) and supported by the Medium-
Term Planning Framework, which sets out a national expectation that systems take
coordinated action to eliminate corridor care by improving end-to-end patient flow,
reducing avoidable hospital congestion and improving timely discharge from hospital.
Alongside this, NHS England has been and continues to support providers and
Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to improve internal hospital flow through faster senior
clinical decision-making, increased use of same day emergency care and virtual
wards, and more effective management of patient pathways. The plan also aims to
reduce demand on emergency departments through improved access to community
and primary care alternatives and strengthened admission avoidance pathways, so
that patients can be assessed and treated in the most appropriate setting.
A key element of improving patient flow is reducing delays in discharging patients who
no longer require acute hospital treatment. Delayed discharges contribute to high bed
occupancy, reducing capacity for emergency admissions and increasing pressure on
emergency departments. NHS England is supporting providers and ICBs to strengthen
discharge processes, including through the consistent use of criteria-led discharge and
discharge to assess models. NHS England is also developing “Model Discharge”
guidance to support trusts in reducing delays and improving patient flow.
NHS England recognises that, despite these actions, corridor care is still used in
exceptional circumstances in some providers when emergency departments are under
sustained capacity pressure. This is primarily to enable ambulances to be released
rapidly from hospitals, to address increased risk in the community. This reflects wider
system flow challenges, including constrained bed capacity, delayed discharges and
limited community care availability.
To strengthen oversight and drive improvement, NHS England is working through
regional teams to provide targeted support to systems experiencing the highest levels
of flow pressure. From May 2026, the routine publication of corridor care data has
begun, increasing transparency and enabling more focused intervention where risks
to patient safety are greatest.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr
Smart, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
REGULATION 29 RESPONSE TO A REPORT ON ACTION TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Please do not include any living person names in this document, in accordance publication policy PDF. THIS RESPONSE IS BEING SENT TO: The Area Coroner, Joanne Andrews for the Coroner Area West Sussex, Brighton and Hove REGULATION 28 and an inquest that concluded on 19 May 2026. REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATH David John SMART, 1. RESPONDENT In line with our duty under Regulation 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust provides this response within 56 days of the date of the Report to Prevent Future Deaths or any extension granted. 2. DATE OF RESPONSE 19 June 2026 3. The MATTERS OF CONCERN were identified in the report are as follows: During the inquest I heard evidence that at the of Mr Smart's attendance to the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton that there were around 20 patients in the corridor as the Department had reached capacity and there was no clinical area available to do so. I understand from previous inquests that the area is not designated as a clinical area. I have heard in other inquests relating to deaths prior to June 2025 that is being taken by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust currently to (1) reduce the number of patients who present to the Emergency Department who could be seen by other services in the community and (2) to create an improved patient flow through the Royal Sussex County Hospital. The evidence in this inquest was that, despite these actions, the corridor continues to be used when the Emergency Department reaches capacity. I was also advised that the use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout the country. Prevention of Future Death reports in relation to the use of the corridor for patient care was made during investigations into deaths which occurred in December 2022 and February 2025 and the use of the corridor remains ongoing. DETAILS OF ACTION TAKEN, how has the concern been addressed. 4. The use of Emergency Department (ED) corridors to care for patients is a significant national problem. The Executive team is working closely with very senior members of the local ICB (Integrated Care Board), CQC (Care Quality Commission), local mental health Trust, and social care providers to tackle the problem. As a Trust we cannot solve the problem without all partner organisations working together. I am so sorry you have had the need to write to us again with your concerns and I too share these concerns. The Medicine Divisional Leadership team, the Hospital Directors, and the Executive team are continuously working on several separate but linked workstreams aiming to eradicate the use of the ED corridor. This is vital for patient care to ensure that our patients are treated in the most appropriate clinical environment, with dignity, and without delays. who are accepted for care directly by the relevant specialty on presentation to the ED. We are continually looking to expand the acceptance criteria to ensure that we are maximising this process. Additionally, we are directing inter-hospital referrals away from the ED and transferring patients directly to the in-patient bed base. We have strengthened our Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) medical model from a 7 day a week service to a 24/7 unit where patients can be streamed away from the ED and seen and treated on the Acute Medical Unit (AMU). These workstreams have all been overseen through the ED Quality Oversight Group. The Trust is currently exploring working with a company (NEWTON) to increase the opportunity for decompressing the EDs, further strengthening the SDECs across the Trust, and improving flow once patients do not have a criteria to reside. All specialties in-reach to the ED and we operate a 3/2/1 bleep system to week. These allow line-by-line reviews of every patient in the corridor to ensure all appropriate pathways are considered; this is known as check and challenge and provides live escalation. The Hospital Alternative Oversight Programme (HALO) is embedded in daily practice and continues to be reviewed regularly to ensure all opportunities are maximised. This work is aimed at the avoidance of inappropriate hospital admissions, to optimise patient flow through the hospital, and smooth discharge pathways and processes. This includes: Unscheduled care Navigation Hub Frailty Care Home Outreach & Red Bag Launch Frailty High Weald Lewes & Havens Outreach Integrated front door therapies team RSCH (Royal Sussex County Hospital) Virtual Health, both General Virtual Ward and Respiratory Home Monitoring Services Frailty and Respiratory SDEC (Same Day Emergency Care) Optimisation Interprofessional Standards UTC (Urgent Treatment Centre) Optimisation Early Discharge Planning Deconditioning Prevention Tiered Acuity Model These initiatives are in collaboration with our colleagues from the ICB, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust (SCFT), South East Coast Ambulance Service (SECAmb), Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SPFT), and Brighton & Hove City Council (BHCC). There continues to be ongoing collaborative work with the local Mental Health Trust, SPFT to ensure that patients requiring mental health hospital admission are admitted to an appropriate mental health unit as quickly as possible or avoid ED attendance in the first place. We continue to use ambulatory space as effectively as possible across the ED to maximise clinical space and reduce overcrowding. The Continuous Flow Model is embedded within the Medicine Division and continues to ensure earlier movement of patients from the Acute Floor and reducing the time patients are waiting in the ED for admission to a ward. There are ongoing discussions with clinical Divisions outside the Medicine Division to implement a similar model. We recognise that the contributory factors leading to corridor care are multi- faceted and complex. As these issues involve a multi-agency approach, working alongside our system partners, we acknowledge that eradicating care in non-clinical environments will take considerable time. Therefore, alongside these actions, the ED team is continuing to implement local measures to improve the quality and safety for patients receiving care in these areas. Examples of these are: Digitisation, including electronic observations and prescribing Intentional Rounding Fundamental Standards of Care and Corridor standard work Weekly review of high risks Repurposing clinical space to facilitate dedicated space for monitoring patients who have been stepped down from the Resuscitation area of ED. Our Acute Floor Reconfiguration, which is a £48 million capital improvement programme to improve patient and staff experience at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, is well underway. The first phase has now been completed with the opening of the new Acute Medical Unit and 24/7 Medical SDEC (same day emergency care). Phase 2 is scheduled to commence in early 2027. 5. DETAILS OF FURTHER ACTION PROPOSED We all agree that corridor care must be stopped both locally and nationally. The Trust has made great progress with this and continues to work with the ICB and other organisations for their assistance to make sure flow in and out of ED is possible so when patients who do not require acute hospital care for a physical health condition, they are in appropriate mental health and social care environments outside of the acute Trust. 6. SIGNATURE Chief Executive University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Joanne Andrews, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.