Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Ololade Olaobaju

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, written 10 Dec 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Dec 2015
DeceasedOlolade Olaobaju
CoronerPhilip Barlow
Coroner areaLondon Inner (South)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

Professoff EE President ENT UK, 35-43 Lincoin’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A
3PE

President Royal College Anaesthetists, Churchill House, 35 Red Lion
Square, London WC1R 4SG

CORONER

lam Philip Barlow, Assistant Coroner for Greater London (Inner South)

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 5 March 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Ololade Olaobaju. The
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 November 2015. The conclusion
of the inquest was: Natural Causes to which unsuccessful medical attempts at intubation
contributed.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
On 26 February 2014 Ms Olaobaju was treated at University Hospital Lewisham for
progressive respiratory failure after developing community acquired pneumonia. She
was transferred to the ICU where a decision was taken to intubate for mechanical
ventilation. Attempts at intubation, needle cricothyroidotomy and “Quicktrack” were
unsuccessful. During an attempt at establishing surgical tracheostomy by an ENT
surgeon, Ms Oiaobaju suffered a cardiac arrest from which she could not be
resuscitated.

The medical cause of death was: 1a respiratory failure 1b Acute Lung Injury 1c
Community Acquired Pneumonia 2 Recent third trimester delivery with uterine infection
causing on-going vaginal bleeding.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) For the purposes of the inquest | received an expert report from Dr Andrew Hartle.
Reference was also made to the Difficult Airway Society Guidelines 2004 and 2015. The
DAS guidelines suggest that, for an anaesthetist, an appropriate progression would be to
undertake surgical (scalpel) cricothyroidotomy after unsuccessful cannula
cricothyroidotomy. In this case, an ENT surgeon (clinical fellow grade) arrived and took
over before scalpel cricothyroidotomy was attempted. The ENT surgeon decided to
attempt tracheostomy rather than scalpel cricothyroidotomy. The benefit of tracheostomy
is that it would have provided a more permanent airway.

The evidence was that this is an unusual situation and that the experience of all the
witnesses was therefore limited in performing emergency cricothyroidotomy and
emergency tracheostomy. | concluded that the decision as to whether to opt for
tracheostomy or scalpel cricothyroidotomy was a clinical judgment made in the light of
the circumstances at the time. However, this was rapidly deteriorating situation and the
ENT surgeon accepted that scalpel cricothyroidotomy may have been a simpler
procedure.

This became a “Can’t Intubate Can't Oxygenate” situation in which both anaesthetists
and ENT surgeons were present. My understanding is that the DAS guidelines are
provided for anaesthetists. Different considerations may apply to ENT surgeons. The
question as to the preferred mode of front of neck access in this situation therefore
appears not to be covered by the existing guidelines. Individual practitioners faced with
such a situation are likely to have limited experience. My understanding is that there is
currently no joint guidance to cover this type of situation when both anaesthetists and
ENT surgeons are present.

! appreciate that this is an uncommon situation in a specialist area and | understand that
you may consider it necessary to forward this report to, for example, the Difficult Airway
Society.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

in my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the
power to take such action.

|
|
|
|
:

7

o]

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this tepor
namely by 27 November 2045. |, the coroner, may extend the period,

the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION
| have sent a copy of my report to the Chiet Coroner and to the following Interested

Scott Moncrieff solicitors) and Catherine Wood (Lewisham and Greenwich NHST). |
have also sent it to Dr Andrew Hartle who may find it useful or of interest,

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary

or of Interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner,

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out

Persons: Mr David Oluwole (Ms Olaobaju’s partner, represented by Sarah Harman of

form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful

t,

Dated 10 December 2015

Assistant Coroner for Greater London (Inner South)

4

Related reports

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.