Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Ethel Smith Leese

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0184, written 7 Aug 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report7 Aug 2013
Reference2013-0184
DeceasedEthel Smith Leese
CoronerAndrew Haigh
Coroner areaStaffordshire (South)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Private and Confidential 

Ms M Oldham 
Chief Executive 
Stafford Hospital 
Weston Road 
Stafford ST16 3SA 

06 February 2014 
AAH/ph/40-13 
--- 

Dear Ms Oldham 

Re:   Ethel Smith Leese (deceased) 

I am Andrew A Haigh, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of South 
Staffordshire and I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of 
the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the 
Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

On 9 January 2013 I commenced an investigation into the death of 
Ethel Smith Leese aged 94. The investigation concluded at the end of 
the inquest on 7 August 2013.  The conclusion of the inquest was 
accidental death Mrs Leese having died from  “1a Intracerebral and 
subdural haemorrhage  1b Fall and warfarin induced coagulopathy and 
2 Fracture left neck of femur and congestive cardiac failure”. 

Mrs Leese’s home address was 67 Summerfield Court, Altona Close, 
Stone.  In November 2012 she had a stroke and broke her pelvis.  She 
was initially admitted to the University Hospital of North Staffordshire 
but then moved to Stafford Hospital.  She was prescribed warfarin for 
the remainder of her life.  From Stafford Hospital she was discharged to 
a care home in Dunston.  On 1 January 2013 she fell at the home and 
suffered head and leg injuries.  She was admitted again to the 
University Hospital of North Staffordshire where she died on 4 January 
2013. 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will 
occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty 
to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)   There was one matter of concern which relates to the monitoring of 
Mrs Leese’s warfarin levels.  The move to the care home required Mrs 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Leese to be changed to a different GP practice.  The checking by the 
hospital of Mrs Leese’s address (including the address for posting for 
the yellow booklet) appears to have been fairly chaotic.  Her address 
on the paperwork seems to have remained unchanged, there appears 
to have been doubt  as to whether Cumberland House Medical Practice 
in Stone or the Penkridge Medical Practice (covering Dunston) were 
her GPs practice and indeed on one occasion information was sent to 
the wrong GP practice in Stone (Mansion House).  It may be that Mrs 
Leese was initially considered to be a temporary resident at the care 
home in Dunston but I wonder if there is a possibility to record 
addresses better.  Possibly this may not just apply in the Haematology 
Department but in the hospital as a whole.  Whilst this may not have 
been directly relevant in this case it could be significant in other deaths. 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will 
occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty 
to report to you. 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action.   You are under a duty 
to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 7 October 2013. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the 
following Interested Persons 
at Dunston, 

 (son), Longridge Care Home 
 at Cumberland House Medical Practice in Stone, 

at Penkridge Medical Practice, Mr Derek Winter HM Senior 

Coroner for Sunderland and The Department of Health, Whitehall, 
London. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yours sincerely 

Andrew A Haigh 
HM Senior Coroner 
Staffordshire (South)

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Haigh

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.