Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Ronald Ellwood

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0222, written 15 Aug 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report15 Aug 2013
Reference2013-0222
DeceasedRonald Ellwood
CoronerAndrew Haigh
Coroner areaStaffordshire (South)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Private and Confidential 

Ms H Ashley 
Chief Executive 
Queen’s Hospital 
Belvedere Road 
Burton Upon Trent DE13 0RB 

06 February 2014 
AAH/ 
--- 

Dear Ms Ashley 

Re:   Ronald Sidney Ellwood (deceased) 

I make this report under paragraph 7 Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

On 28 May 2013I commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Ellwood 
aged 76. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15 August 
2013.  The conclusion of the inquest was “Complication of medical treatment”. 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless 
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

Mr Ellwood died as the result of a chest infection.  He had spent several 
weeks in the intensive care unit (ICU) at Queen’s Hospital and I heard helpful 
evidence from 
Clinical Lead for Critical Care about the number of 
bugs that those with invasive tubes are subject to and the need to treat the 
bugs that may be causing harm.  Mr Ellwood’s widow referred to the heat and 
a lack of fresh air in the ICY.  
conditioning but he was sympathetic to the suggestion of more fresh air 
although this was an estates issue.  This may have been considered in the 
past but I wonder if it may be to the benefit rather than detriment of patients in 
intensive care to have more fresh air (through opened windows) as opposed 
to recycled air through air conditioning? 

 indicated that the ICU did have air 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe 
you have the power to take such action.   You are under a duty to respond to 
this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Tuesday 29th 
October 2013. I may extend the period if required to do so. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following other 
persons 

  The Chief Coroner 
 
  PFD Reports, The Care Quality Commission 
  Mr D Winter, HM Coroner for the City of Sunderland 
         . 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner and others interested a copy 
of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me 
at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your 
response by the Chief Coroner. 

Yours sincerely 

Andrew A Haigh 
HM Senior Coroner 
Staffordshire (South)

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
Burton Hospitals hE
NHS Foundation Trust
Queen's Hospital

Belvedere Road
Burton Upon Trent

Medical Director: _

Staffordshire
28 October 2013
Mr A Haigh

HM Senior Coroner
Coroner's Office

No. 1 Staffordshire Place
Stafford

ST16 2LP

Dear Mr Haigh
Rule 43 - Ronald Sidney Ellwood (deceased)

Thank you for your letter dated 3 September, addressed to Ms Ashley, which has
been passed to me to respond.

In response to the request for information regarding the supply of fresh air in Critical
Care areas in relation to the death of Mr Ronald Ellwood, | am replying as follows.

While the experience of fresh air will add to an individuals feeling of wellbeing, there
are certain areas within a hospital where it is not recommended.

The guidance for the design and operation of air systems in health care
establishments comes from: Health Technical Memorandum 03-01: Specialised
ventilation for healthcare premises. Part A - Design and validation from the
Department of Health published 2007.

The Health Technical Memorandum specifies that ventilation in Critical Care should
be regarded as a critical system and as such requires annual verification of
performance.

The difference between ventilation and air-conditioning is made clear within this
document on Page 5, 1.27- 1.24. The areas that full air-conditioning is required are
indicated on Page 9, 2.19.

From this rationale “fresh air” from open windows for example, being introduced into
an air-conditioned system will negate air-conditioning.

Air conditioning will have tolerances within which it works, e.g. on a very hot day in
an area where there are large windows with sun beating on them, as is the case in
critical care areas within Burton Hospitals, will put a strain on the system. These
tolerances as defined in the document on Page 83, with 10 changes of air per hour
maintaining a temperature of 18-25 Celsius (in practice this will be maintained at the
uppermost levels as patients will have little coverings in Critical Care).

The rationale for using air conditioning in this area is highlighted on Page 46, 7.5
and here lies the paradox of fresh air; in the days of rampant tuberculosis, as you will
know fresh air treatment in sanatoria was the only management with any chance of

success. Fresh air was preferable to the infected environment of tuberculosis and
Infectious Disease wards. Today by air changing so frequently, the risk of build up of
air borne bacteria will be minimised. Open windows will allow fresh air in but may not
remove pockets of infected air. The research indicates that fresh air will only
penetrate a maximum of 6 metres into a space; please refer to Page 8, 2.7. of Health
Technical Memorandum 03-0. in addition it should be noted that windows on the
Critical Care Unit have limited opening of 10 cm in order to comply with Health and
Safety legislation and penetration of any fresh air will be much more limited than for a
fully open window.

The guidance does not indicate that microbiological testing is necessary.

However, there is no evidence to suggest that there is environmental air
contamination in the Critical Gare Unit either at present or since February 2013. The
environment is surveyed when there is evidence of linked cases of the same
organism occurring in more than one patient. This was last done on the 11th
February 2013. It was found that there was minor contamination with a solitary
species of bacteria specifically spread by direct and indirect contact rather than being
related to air or the air conditioning.

A literature search has not revealed new guidance relating to the need to carry out
survey routinely.

| am aware of no other nationally published/adopted evidence to suggest that
windows should/could be open or closed. | would make the simple observation that
opening the windows will detrimentally affect air conditioning.

The critical care unit has a full fresh air system with no recirculation of air. The air
conditioning is a conventional system with heating and cooling and was installed
when the hospital was built. The extract air and supply air being separate frorn each
other.

The system is designed to operate with all windows closed so that the temperature
can be controlled. In 2001 when the High Dependency Unit was added to the
hospital, additional supplementary cooling was added to the critical care unit suite,
again with 100% fresh air.

Set points for the system are set with a general supply temperature of the Air
Handling Unit (AHU) of 18°C. When external temperature is below 18°C the extract
air goes through a heat exchanger for energy savings. Reheat batteries are set to
operate when the room temperature falls below 21 °C. The supplementary cooling
system is set to operate when temperature's rise over 23°C. The room temperature is
controlled as average between two room thermostats within the critical care unit.

The AHU is served by a G4 Filter as per HTM 20/25 when designed as apposed to
the current design guide (HTM 03) for F7 filters.

The systems are subjected to annual maintenance by the estates staff and this was
last carried out in March 2013. The ventilation duct work and systems were cleaned
and systems pressures and volumes were externally assessed by Total
Environmental and Mechanical Services (TEAMS) in July 2010 and there is no
requirement for alterations to the system before the next revalidation checks in 2015.

Following on from your letter the estates department has requested the filter
manufacturer to carry out a survey of the ITU system to look at the possibility of

converting the AHU to accept the more efficient F7 filter, but this is likely to result in a
decreased air flow to the areas served by this system and the Trust will take a view
on this change when further technical information is available for consideration.

A refurbishment of the Air Conditioning Systems units within the hospital is currently
planned to commence with the next years capital program. At this time the current
environmental conditions within the hospital will be re-evaluated and the system
designed to control the environment with the additional heat loads within the building,
especially within the ITU unit where the advancement in medical equipment has
substantially increased the heat loadings within ITU.

The Trust can demonstrate that the Critical Care Unit conforms to the applicable
guidance and memorandum for specialised ventilation. By opening the windows, it
makes this system less efficient and compromise air changes that may lead to
increased environmental air contamination. The system is appropriately maintained
and checked.

Although there may be a perception that the environment would be more comfortable
with more fresh air it must be balanced by the fact that comfort for staff and relatives
may come at a price that must be paid by the patient in terms of safety and exposure
to additional organisms. For these reasons the Trust considers that it would be to the
detriment rather than benefit of patients in the Critical Care Unit to compromise the
specialised ventilation system by opening windows and so the Trust will continue to
ensure that windows remain closed on the Critical Care Unit.

| greatly regret that I ouna the Critical Care environment unpleasant at a
time of great personal stress and while we accept that no system can be perfect we
believe that our air-conditioning system delivers the safest environment for our
patients and hope this reassures yourself and [i

if you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Haigh

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.