Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Peter Patrick Adrian Barnes

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0291, written 8 Nov 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Nov 2013
Reference2013-0291
DeceasedPeter Patrick Adrian Barnes
CoronerNeil Cameron
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (West)
CategoryMental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Chief Operating Officer, 
Cygnet Healthcare Ltd., 
Cygnet Hospital Stevenage, 
Graveley Road, 
STEVENAGE, 
Herts.    SG1 4YS 

Your ref:  

Our ref:     NC/B2047B-11 

8 November 2013 

Dear 

Re:  

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

Inquest into the Death  of  Peter Patrick Adrian Barnes 
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

Coroner 
I am Neil Cameron, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of West Yorkshire (Western) Area.   

Coroner’s Legal Powers 
I  make  this  report  under  paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of  the  Coroners  and  Justice  Act  2009  and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.   

Investigation and Inquest 
On 25 October 2011 I commenced an investigation into the death of Peter Patrick Adrian Barnes, 
31.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6 October 2013.  The conclusion of 
the  inquest  was  that  the  deceased  died  from  asphyxia  caused  by  hanging,  that  he  died  in  the 
grounds of the Cygnet Hospital, Wyke whilst detained at that hospital under Section 3 of the 
Mental Health At 1983, that he took his own life whilst the balance of his mind was disturbed, and 
that his death was contributed to by neglect in that the deceased’s Responsible Clinician had not 
been given information about serious incidents which were known to nursing staff at the hospital 
which  led  the  Responsible  Clinician  to  make  an  inappropriate  decision  to  grant  the  deceased 
unescorted leave which gave him the opportunity to take his own life.   

Circumstances of the Death 
The circumstances of the death were summarised in a narrative verdict by the jury at the inquest, 
which is in turn further summarised at paragraph 3, above.  The serious incidents which were not 
drawn  to  the  attention  of  the  Responsible  Clinician  occurred  on  1  October  2011,  when  the 
deceased was overheard talking about committing suicide by using his shoelaces and later the same 
day when he was observed to have marks on his neck. Although these matters were recorded by 
the nursing staff who observed them in the deceased’s continuous medical record, they were not 
drawn to the attention of the Responsible Clinician when he chaired Multi-Disciplinary Team 
(“Ward Round”) meetings on 3 October 2011 and 12 October 2011, and at each of those meetings 
the Responsible Clinician made decisions to grant the deceased unescorted leave. 

Continued/…… 

-2- 

 
City Courts   The Tyrls   Bradford  BD1 1LA 
Telephone :    01274 391362 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 November 2013 

5. 

Coroner’s Concerns 
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.  In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.  In the circumstances it is 
my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

The hospital’s systems by which information about patients relating to matters which had 
been observed by nursing staff - including in particular information about serious incidents 
- were communicated to the patients’ Responsible Clinician appeared to be inadequate to 
ensure that such information was full and/or accurate and/or up to date.   

The hospital’s systems by which decisions about patients’ care made by the Responsible 
Clinician were communicated to nursing staff appeared not to have operated properly and 
accordingly may be inadequate to ensure that such information about such decisions is 
communicated in an appropriate and/or timely manner. 

There appeared to be no system of checking upon or auditing the systems referred to at 
paragraphs (1) and (2) above to ensure that the Responsible Clinician was receiving full, 
accurate and up to date information and that nursing staff were receiving appropriate and 
timely information about the Responsible Clinician’s decisions. 

There appeared to be no system to ensure that members of patients’ families were invited 
to be involved in the process by which decisions are made about their  
notwithstanding  that they may often be able to impart useful information based upon the 
patient’s past behaviour, potentially including information about particular matters which 
might increase or decrease the risk of harm to or self-harm by such patients. 

care, 

The hospital’s procedure for responding to patients being absent without leave included 
reporting such patients to the police as missing persons, but did not appear to be adequate 
to ensure that members of staff so reporting, or thereafter giving further information, to the 
police had access to all of the information about the patient which was likely to be required 
by the police for the purpose of their enquiries.   

6. 

7. 

Action Should be Taken 
In  my  opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent future deaths  and I believe  you and/or your 
organisation have the power to take such action. 

Your Response 
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 3 
January 2013.  I, the coroner, may extend the period, and do hereby so extend it (in the light of the 
forthcoming Christmas vacation) to 18 January 2014. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken,  setting  out  the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8. 

Copies and Publication 
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:  

-3- 

Continued/……… 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 November 2013 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.  He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.  You 
may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9. 

Date:  8 November 2013 

Yours sincerely, 

Signed on behalf  of 
N. A. Cameron 
Assistant Coroner 
By T. H. Ratcliffe, Assistant Coroner 

Cc 

The Chief Coroner

Related reports

Other reports by Neil Cameron

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Mental Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.