Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Kiefer Fraser-Phillips

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0216, written 14 Apr 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report14 Apr 2026
Reference2026-0216
DeceasedKiefer Fraser-Phillips
CoronerLouise Hunt
Coroner areaBirmingham and Solihull
CategoryMental Health related deaths
Organisation namedBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

1 

2 

3 

4 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

 THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust 
CORONER 

 I am Mrs Louise Hunt Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull 
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

 I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

 On 25 September 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kiefer Kiam 
Bolangi Fraser-Phillips. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest. The conclusion of 
the inquest was; Natural causes 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH  

 Mr Fraser-Phillips had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia with regular relapses and had 
been under the care of mental health services since 2015 and was an inpatient since 2018. As his 
condition was treatment resistant, he was managed on clozapine which improved his symptoms. 
Due to the risk of serious side effects from clozapine he was monitored closely. At the time of his 
death he was detained under S3 of the Mental health Act 1984 and resided on Magnolia Suite at 
the Oleaster unit in Birmingham where he had been since May 2024. He was also known to suffer 
from several physical health conditions included significant weight gain as a side effect of the 
medication and sleep apnoea. During his time on Magnolia suite he was mostly settled with some 
ongoing symptoms and plans were being made for his discharge. It took time to find a suitable 
placement and to secure necessary funding. He was due to start transitioning to supported 
accommodation on 18/09/25. He was found deceased in bed that morning by staff when they went 
to wake him at 08.15. He had last been seen alive at around 23.07 the previous evening when he 
was well. Staff carried out hourly observations throughout the night and staff thought they had seen 
him breathing in bed when the observations were taken at 07.00 and 08.00. It was clear from his 
condition when he was found that he had likely passed away when the last observations were 
undertaken however it cannot be ascertained exactly when he passed away but it was likely within 
2 hours of when he was found. Post mortem examination has confirmed he died from sudden 
unexplained death in schizophrenia. 

 Following a post mortem/Based on information from the Deceased’s treating clinicians the medical 
cause of death was determined to be: 

 1a   Sudden unexplained death in Schizophrenia 
 1b    
 1c    
 1d   
 II     
CORONER’S CONCERNS 

5 

 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is 
my statutory duty to report to you. 

  
  
  
  
 
  The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1.  Staff had not been completing the comments section during therapeutic observations as the 

electronic device they used would drop Wi-Fi signal making it impossible to record the 
observations until they were back in the ward office. This creates a risk that observations 
are not being recorded accurately and effectively and creates a risk of future deaths. 
2.  Many patients with enduring mental health conditions on long term medication will have 

significant physical health conditions due to the side effects of the medication. These often 
include considerable weight gain, and in Mr Fraser-Phillips' case sleep apnoea and the 
associated risk of position asphyxia. There was no care plan in place to address these 
risks. Consideration needs to be given to ensuring patients with significant physical 
healthcare needs have adequate care plans in place to address any risks identified.  

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

 In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to 
take such action. 

YOUR RESPONSE 

 You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 
10 June 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.  

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 

Mr Phillips’ next of kin 

I have also sent it to the Medical Examiner, ICS, NHS England, CQC, who may find it useful or of 
interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She 
may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You 
may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or 
the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
 15 April 2026  

Signature: 

Mrs Louise Hunt 
HM Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull 

6 

7 

8 

9

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
RESPONSE TO A REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 

When a coroner sends a prevention of future deaths (PFD) report to a person or organisation, 
they must respond within 56 days. Recipients of a PFD report can apply to the coroner for an 
extension.  A response to a PFD report must detail the action taken or to be taken, whether in 
response to the report or otherwise, or it must explain why no action is proposed. 

The purpose of the response template below is to promote clarity, ensure that responses 
address the coroner’s concerns directly and transparently, and support consistency and good 
practice across organisations and sectors. It does not restrict how a person or organisation 
formulates their response; recipients remain responsible for determining what action is 
appropriate and for ensuring that their response accurately reflects the steps taken or planned. 

In accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026) representations regarding 
publication of a response should be sent to the coroner. These representations should be made 
at the same time as the response is provided. The coroner will pass any representations 
received to the Chief Coroner for a decision 

RESPONSE TO A REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 

(Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in accordance with the 
Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026)) 

 THIS RESPONSE IS BEING SENT TO: 

 HM SENIOR Coroner Louise Hunt for Birmingham and Solihull in response to a ‘REPORT TO 
PREVENT FUTURE DEATH REGULATION 28’ following an inquest into the death of Keifer 
Fraser-Philips that concluded on 15 Apil 2026.  

 RESPONDENT 

 In line with our duty under Regulation 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Trust provides this response within 56 days 
(plus any extension granted) of the date of the Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

 DATE OF RESPONSE  

9 June 2026 

1 

2 

 
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
  
 
  
  CONFIRMATION OF CORONER'S MATTERS OF CONCERN 

 The MATTERS OF CONCERN were identified in the report as follows: 

3 

1. Staff had not been completing the comments section during therapeutic observations as 
the electronic device they used would drop Wi-Fi signal making it impossible to record the 
observations until they were back in the ward office. This creates a risk that observations 
are not being recorded accurately and effectively and creates a risk of future deaths. 

2. Many patients with enduring mental health conditions on long term medication will have 
significant physical health conditions due to the side effects of the medication. These often 
include  considerable  weight  gain,  and  in  Mr Fraser-Phillips'  case  sleep  apnoea  and  the 
associated  risk of  position  asphyxia.  There  was  no  care  plan  in  place  to  address  these 
risks.  Consideration  needs  to  be  given  to  ensuring  patients  with  significant  physical 
healthcare needs have adequate care plans in place to address any risks identified.  

 DETAILS OF ACTION TAKEN, how has the concern been addressed. 
(If no action is proposed please explain why here) 

 Please note that any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked for 
sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. 

Wifi signal on the wards  

1.  A Survey has now been carried out on a number of the acute wards to understand the 
extent of the Wifi problems on the wards and ICT are exploring the best solution to resolve 
the issue where hot spots have been noted. Whilst this might seem like a straightforward 
problem to solve the ideal solution would be to move the receivers from above the ceilings 
but  due  to  the  nature  of  the  clinical  area  that  creates  a  ligature  risk.  Alternatives  are 
currently being explored and the trust and will be tested to ensure efficacy for Wifi, as well 
as it being clinically safe to use with mitigations in place whilst this is completed.  

2.  Whilst a more permanent solution is finalised staff have access to desktops and laptops 
on the ward to input their observations. Staff have also been reminded of the importance 
of documenting their observations. Staff are being involved to ensure that the solution is 
sourced as a matter of urgency. I can assure you that the Trust will continue to review 
this matter until a satisfactory outcome is resolved.  

4 

Recording of physical heath conditions in care plans. 

1.  Thank you for raising concerns through the Prevention of Future Death report regarding 
the  management  of  physical  health  risks  in  patients  with  enduring  mental  health 
conditions who are prescribed long‑term psychotropic medication. 

2.  We  recognise  and  fully  accept  the  Coroner’s  concern  that  patients  with  significant 
physical health conditions arising from, or exacerbated by, their mental health treatment 
require clear, documented care plans to identify and mitigate risks, including those related 
to  weight  gain,  sleep  apnoea  and  the  associated  risk  of  positional  asphyxia.  We 
acknowledge that, in this case, an explicit care plan addressing these risks was not clearly 
articulated. 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Existing Physical Health Assessment and Documentation Systems 

3.  The  Trust  utilises  the  RIO  electronic  clinical  records  system,  which  includes  a 
comprehensive  Physical  Health  Assessment,  Systemic  Enquiry  and  Physical 
Examination form. This structured record, in addition to other comprehensive questions 
and areas of enquiry, also captures: 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

Current physical health problems 
Past medical history and long‑term conditions 
Relevant risk factors associated with mental health medication 
Action Plan sections 
Follow‑up and ongoing management plan sections 

4.    These  sections  are  designed  to  prompt  clinicians  to  identify,  document  and  actively 
manage  physical  health  needs  alongside  mental  health  care,  and  to  ensure  risks  are 
translated into clear actions and review plans. However, we recognise that the presence 
of an electronic template alone does not guarantee consistent or effective care planning, 
and  that  further  assurance  is  required  to  ensure  physical  health  risks  are  clearly 
addressed and followed through in practice.  

Care Planning Improvements: Implementation of Dialog+ Care Planning 

5.  To  strengthen  and  standardise  care  planning  across  inpatient  settings,  the  Trust  has 

recently implemented Dialog+ Care Planning in all inpatient services. 

Dialog+ Care Planning provides a structured, patient‑centred framework that ensures key 
domains  are  proactively  explored,  agreed  and  documented  during  care  planning 
discussions.  Importantly,  Physical  Health  is  a  core  Dialog+  domain,  alongside  mental 
health, medication, daily activities and safety. 

6.   This approach supports: 

- 

- 
- 
- 

Explicit  identification  of  physical  health  risks  linked  to  medication  and 
comorbidity 
Collaborative formulation of clear actions to mitigate identified risks 
Improved visibility of physical health needs within the overall care plan 
Regular review and updating of agreed actions 

We believe this represents a more robust and systematic approach to integrating physical 
healthcare needs into mental health care planning. 

Audit and Assurance Framework 
7.      In  response  to  the  Coroner’s  concerns,  the  Trust  has  strengthened  its  Audit  and 
Assurance  Framework  for  Dialog+  Care  Planning  at  ward  level.  This  framework 
includes: 

- 
- 

- 

- 

Routine ward‑level audits of Dialog+ care plans 
Specific checks that relevant domains are being appropriately used, including 
the Physical Health domain 
Assurance that identified physical health risks are clearly reflected in the action 
plan, with proportionate and documented follow‑up arrangements 
Feedback  to  clinical  teams  and  incorporation  of  findings  into  local  quality 
improvement activity 

8.    This provides additional governance and oversight to ensure that physical health risks 
are  not  only  identified  but  are  actively  addressed  through  documented  actions  and 
review. This will be further supported by implementation and auditing of the Inpatient 
MDT standards where senior clinical inpatient staff (including medical and nursing, and 

 
 
 
 
 other  professionals  as  appropriate)  will  be  supporting  with  follow  up  of  any  required 
actions identified in the Physical health action plan.  

Learning and Prevention of Future Risk 
9.   The Trust has shared learning from this case across inpatient teams, emphasising: 

- 

- 

- 

The  increased  physical  health  risks  associated  with  long‑term  psychotropic  
medication 
The importance of translating physical health assessments into clear, actionable 
care plans 
The  need  to  explicitly  address  risks  such  as  sleep  apnoea,  obesity  and 
positional asphyxia where relevant 

10.  Combined  with  enhanced  care  planning  through  Dialog+  and  strengthened  audit 
arrangements, these actions are intended to reduce the risk of similar omissions occurring in 
the future and to ensure that patients with significant physical healthcare needs have clear, 
documented plans to manage identified risks. 

11.  The Trust is grateful for the opportunity to reflect on this case and remains committed to 
continuous improvement in the integration of physical and mental healthcare for our patients. 

 DETAILS OF FURTHER ACTION PROPOSED 

 Please note that any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked for 
sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. 

During our investigations the Trust has also put into place actions to review the observations 
on the ward more closely, to ensure a high quality of observations. Monthly audits will now 
be taking place to review the quality of the observations. Actions will be taken where staff 
do not comply with policy and results of the audits will be taken to Quality Assurance Group 
for assurance, to ensure the Trust is providing the best care possible to our in-patients. This 
will  also  enable  the Trust  to monitor  not  just the  quality  of  the  observations  but ensure  if 
there are any systemic issues, these are raised and addressed immediately.  

5 

 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  SIGNATURE 

6 

Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Louise Hunt

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.