Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Jackie Scott

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0022, written 16 Jan 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Jan 2014
Reference2014-0022
DeceasedJackie Scott
CoronerTony Brown
Coroner areaNorth Northumberland
CategoryProduct related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Tony Brown LLM 
H M Senior Coroner 
North Northumberland 

Teleph 

     17 Church Street 
      Berwick-upon-Tweed 

TD15 1EE 

      Tel :          01289 304318 
 Fax :        01289 303591  

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Owner 

INDIAN BRASSERIE 
40-42 Main Street 
Seahouses 
NE68 7RQ 

1 

CORONER 

I am Tony Brown, senior coroner, for the coroner area of North Northumberland 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 25th June 2013 I commenced an investigation into the death of Jackie Scott, age 35 
years.  The  investigation  concluded  at  the  end  of  the  inquest  on  19th  November  2013. 
The  conclusion  of  the  inquest  was  that  Jackie  Scott  died  from  natural  causes,  the 
medical cause of death being:- 

1a   Acute Anaphylaxis 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Jackie  Scott  lived  in  Aberdeen  but  was  volunteering  at  Bamburgh,  Northumberland  on 
an archaeological dig.  He was staying with colleagues at a camp site in Seahouses.  On 
20th June 2013 Mr Scott returned to the camp site at around 18.13 hours after collecting 
a  curry  from a  local  Indian  restaurant  (The  Indian  Brasserie).    On  eating  the  food  with 
colleagues  Mr  Scott  became  ill  and  lost  consciousness.    A  colleague  performed  CPR 
until  an  ambulance  arrived.    Resuscitation  attempts  were  continued  and  Jackie  Scott 
was  taken  to  Wansbeck  General  Hospital  where  death  was  confirmed  at  20.27  hours 
due to a suspected allergic reaction. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my  opinion  there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is  taken.  In  the 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

I  was  informed  at  the  Inquest  by  Jackie  Scott’s  parents  that  he  had  been  able  to  eat 
take-away  curries  in  the  past  without  any  problems  but  it  is  believed  that  his  allergic 
reaction was likely to have arisen from consuming food containing peanuts or peanut oil.  
It seems that Jackie Scott would have been unaware that the food he purchased (Tikka 
Massala)  may  have  contained  peanut  oil  or  peanuts.    Given  the  timing  of  his  sudden 
allergic  reaction  which  occurred  as  soon  as  he  ate  the  meal,  which  sadly  lead  to  his 
death from anaphylactic shock, it is almost certain that this was a result of the meal he 
consumed without knowing that it contained peanuts or peanut oil. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or 
your organisation have the power to take such action. It is known that a number of food 
manufacturers, suppliers and restaurants display warnings on their products, menus or 
premises,  alerting  customers  who  might  be  allergy  sufferers  to  the  fact  that  products 
sold may contain peanuts or peanut oil.  You are asked to consider taking similar action 
to warn customers in the hope that a similar death in the future might be prevented. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 17th March 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons,
I have also sent it to the Acting Director of Public Health (
Northumberland County Council who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

DATE      16th January 2014                                     

TONY BROWN 
HM Senior Coroner for North Northumberland

Related reports

Other reports by Tony Brown

See all →

More reports categorised “Product related deaths”

See all →

Track Product related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Product related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.