Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Samuel Shaw

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0076, written 26 Feb 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report26 Feb 2014
Reference2014-0076
DeceasedSamuel Shaw
CoronerTony Brown
Coroner areaNorth Northumberland
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Tony Brown LLM 
H M Senior Coroner 
North Northumberland 

Teleph 

     17 Church Street 
      Berwick-upon-Tweed 

TD15 1EE 

      Tel :          01289 304318 
 Fax :        01289 303591  

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Regional Director 
Highways Agency 
Lateral 
8 City Walk 
Leeds 
LS11 9AT 

1 

CORONER 

I am Tony Brown, senior coroner, for the coroner area of North Northumberland 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  31st  October  2013  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  Samuel  Eric 
Shaw,  age  70  years.  The  investigation  concluded  at  the  end  of  the  inquest  on  21st 
February  2014.  The  conclusion  of  the  inquest  was  that  Samuel  Eric  Shaw  died  as  a 
result of an accident, the medical cause of death being:- 

1a   Multiple Injuries 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Samuel  Eric  Shaw  and  his  partner  Janet  Cowan  were  staying  at  Haggerston,  Beal, 
Northumberland.    On  29.10.13  Mr  Shaw  had  travelled  with 
  by  bus  to 
Morpeth  and  Alnwick  before  returning  to  Haggerston  at  approximately  6.45  p.m.    On 
getting off the bus both Mr Shaw and 
began to cross the single carriageway 
section of the A1 to the centre of the road when Mr Shaw was struck by an ambulance 
travelling southbound.  Eric suffered multiple injuries due to the impact of that collision 
and his death was pronounced at the scene by paramedics at 7.04 p.m. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 my  opinion  there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is  taken.  In  the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

At  Haggerston  Holiday  Park,  adjoining  the  east  side  of  the  A1  trunk  road  there  are 
hundreds  of  caravans  located  and  several  hundreds  of  people  come  to  stay  and  visit 
regularly.  Access from public transport is by buses which also stop at various towns and 
villages along the A1 Trunk road. The road is the main strategic highway route between 
Scotland  and  England.    The speed  limit  at  Haggerston  is  60  miles  per  hour and  those 
travelling north on buses have to set down on the west side and cross both lanes of the 
A1  Trunk  road  traffic,  through  an  unlit  area  to  reach  Haggerston.    The  visibility  of 
pedestrians on the road for drivers travelling at up to 60 mph is restricted because of the 
need to use dipped headlights.  There is no warning sign for motorists travelling south to 
alert drivers of pedestrians crossing the road.  There is no central refuge for pedestrians 
crossing the road at the crossing point. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 26th April 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following  Interested 
Persons, 
 Executive Director of Place, Northumberland County Council, The 
Clerk  to  Ancroft  Parish  Council,  Managing  Director  Bourne  Leisure  Group,  General 
Manager, Arriva plc, 
I have also sent it North East Ambulance Service who may find it useful or of interest. 

 Bridge McFarland, solicitors.  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or  of  interest.  You  may  make  representations  to  me,  the  coroner,  at  the  time  of  your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

DATE      26th February 2014                                

TONY BROWN 
HM Senior Coroner for North Northumberland

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Highways Agency (PDF)
H I G H W A Y S
A G E N C Y

Sale roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers

HM Coroner’s Office
17 Church Street
BERWICK-UPON-TWEED
TD15 1EE

Regional Director, Yorkshire & Humber
and North East
Lateral
8 City Walk
Leeds LS11 9AT

For the attention of Tony Brown LLM

9 April 2014

Dear Mr Brown,

A1  Haggerston, Northumberland
In  relation to  the  Death  of  Mr  Samuel Eric  Shaw

I  refer  to  your  letter  of  26  February 2014  regarding the  death of  Mr  Samuel Eric  Shaw
that took  place on 29 October 2013. The  Highways Agency  was saddened by  the news
of  Mr Shaw’s death and we note  your  verdict that his death was  the result of  a collision
on the A1.

Following receipt of  your  letter a  detailed examination of  the  circumstances of  this  and
other  collisions  recorded  in  the  vicinity  of  the  Ancroft  Road  junction  have  taken  place,
and a detailed inspection and assessment of the location has been undertaken.

Your  letter  details  improvement  measures  that  you  suggest  should  be  considered  for
installation at this location, each of which is considered below:

Unlit  A1

No  street lighting has been provided on  the  A1 in the vicinity of  Haggerston. This is not
untypical for a length of rural de-restricted single carriageway road on the strategic road
network.  For  your  information,  no  street  lighting  exists  on  the  A1  between  Blagdon
Interchange, to the south, and A1167 Scremerston Roundabout, to the north, a distance
of approximately 50 miles.

The primary purpose of street lighting on the strategic road network is to reduce the risk
of  night-time personal injury accidents. The latest  available 5-year  accident record (the
period  most  frequently  used  when  assessing  accident  sites  and  trends)  confirms  that
two  slight  night-time  collisions  have  also  taken  place,  on  a  km  length  including  this
junction.

Bearing in mind the Government’s target to reduce carbon emissions; the introduction of
new  street  lighting schemes are  currently being given  a  comparatively low  priority, and
only considered at sites where a significant problem exists.

Page 1 of 3

 H I G H W A Y S
A G E N C Y

Sale roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers

Warning Signs on the Southbound Approach to Haggerston

Your report indicates that there are no warning signs on the A1 southbound approach to
Haggerston.  I  can,  however,  confirm  that  signs  have  been  in  place  since  2005
comprising an  ‘Accompanied Horses Crossing’  warning sign,  an  ‘Other Danger Ahead’
warning  sign  with  ‘Pedestrians  Crossing’  worded  supplementary  plate,  on  a  bright
yellow backing board. These signs exist on both the  north and southbound approaches
to  the  crossing  location  at  appropriate  distances  from  the  hazard.  These  signs  are
associated  with  a  SLOW  road  marking  laid  on  a  red  coloured  carriageway  surface
patch, to further highlight the hazard ahead. Please see Photograph 1 below.

Pedestrians
Crossing

-

t

>

g

Photograph 1: Warning signs and road markings on the A1 southbound approach to the
junction.

In  addition  to  this  sign  combination,  a  further  stack  type  advance  direction  sign  has
been  installed approximately 165m  north  of  the  centre  of  the  junction, which  indicates
the  directions to  a  number  of local destinations  accessed from  the  Haggerston/Ancroft
junction.

Photograph 2: Stack type direction sign on the A1 southbound approach to the  junction

Page 2 of 3

 
 
 H I G H W A Y S
A G E N C Y

Safe roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers

No Central Refuge Provided

Currently, lengths of footway are provided on both the eastern and western sides of the
A1 and a dropped crossing facility for pedestrians is provided on the northern side of the
minor road junction. This crossing facility has been installed as close as possible to  the
preferred  desire  line  of  pedestrians  walking  between  the  northbound  bus-stop  and
access to Haggerston, to minimise their inconvenience and thus maximise usage.

At  this  location  the  A1  includes  two  through  lanes,  a  central  ghost  island  right  turn
facility and  a  paved  merge  lane/bus-stop  area. Installing  a  central pedestrian refuge in
this  location  would  not  be  possible  due  to  the  need  to  safely  accommodate  turning
traffic.

The  existing  facilities  are  consistent  with  the  standard  of  Non-Motorised  User  (NMU)
facilities  provided  elsewhere  along  the  A1  in  Northumberland,  although  it  is  accepted
that  during  some  months  of  the  year,  pedestrian  crossing  movements  at  this  location
are.more frequent than at some other locations.

Actions

I  have  concluded  that  the  lighting  and  signing  provision  meets  current  standards  and
therefore no immediate action is required to address your concerns.

However,  I  have  arranged  for  an  investigation  to  be  undertaken  to  consider  possible
options to  install  an  improved pedestrian crossing facility in  the  vicinity  of  Haggerston.
This investigation will:

(cid:127)  Assess the current level of demand for crossing the carriageway;

(cid:127)  Appraise the existing NMU routes in this vicinity;

(cid:127) 

Identify  possible  locations  to  install  more  appropriate  pedestrian  crossing
facilities that  will  satisfy  the  needs  of  NMUs  and  motorists,  taking  account of
the  appropriate  highway  design  standards  and  the  positions  of  existing
junctions and bus-stops along this length of the A1.

I trust that this information is of assistance in explaining the approach that the Highways
Agency intends to take in relation to this location.

Yours sincerely

f P  

Regional Director, Yorkshire & Humber and North East

Page 3 of 3

Related reports

Other reports by Tony Brown

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.