Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Christopher Williams

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0131, written 19 Mar 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report19 Mar 2014
Reference2014-0131
DeceasedChristopher Williams
CoronerAlan Moore
Coroner areaCheshire
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

DECEASED: CHRISTOPHER RICARDO WILLIAMS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The Chief Executive 
St Mary’s Hospital 
Floyd Drive 
Warrington 
Cheshire 
WA2 8DB 

1 

CORONER 

I am Alan Gordon MOORE Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Cheshire 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 11 November 2013 I commenced an investigation into the death of Christopher 
Ricardo WILLIAMS, then aged 50. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 
on 7 March 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was Natural Causes and the medical 
cause of death was Massive Pulmonary Embolism. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

(1) At the time of his death Christopher was detained under Section 37 of the Mental 
Health Act 1983.  He was resident at Adams Ward, St Mary’s Hospital, Warrington, 
Cheshire.  Adams Ward is a medium secure unit.  

(2) On 5 November 2013 Christopher complained of shortness of breath during the 
previous few days.  He had a past medical history of pulmonary tuberculosis.  He was 
seen by the GP the same day.  The GP diagnosed a chest infection and prescribed 
antibiotics.  

(3) Christopher was subject to Level 1 observations (every 30 minutes).  Throughout the 
night, up to and including the check at 5.30 am on 6 November 2013, Christopher 
appeared to be sleeping in his bed, giving no cause for concern.  At 6 am he was found 
to be out of bed, kneeling on the floor against the bed.  He appeared to be ‘snoring’ but 
was unresponsive.  An ambulance was called.   

(4) A defibrillator machine was brought from an adjacent ward.  The defibrillator did not 
work.  Staff changed the battery pack but the defibrillator still did not work. 

(5) A second defibrillator machine was sent for but by the time it had arrived the 
ambulance paramedics were already at the scene.   

(6) Christopher was pronounced dead at the scene at approximately 6.30 am. 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1) The defibrillator machine did not work, even when the battery pack was changed. 

(2) The defibrillator had not been checked on 5 November, although there was a 
requirement for the equipment to be checked daily for serviceability by the nursing staff.  

(3) There was no ‘cross-check’ or ‘double check’ system in place. 

(4) There was no policy or protocol in place at the hospital for the management of 
sudden / unexpected deaths.   

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and / or 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 14 May 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: 

I have also sent it to: 

(1) HM Inspectorate of Prisons 
(2) National Offender Management Service 
(3) Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in custody 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

19 March 2014                                                       A G Moore   Assistant Coroner 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Alan Moore

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.