Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Beryl French

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0198, written 30 Apr 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report30 Apr 2014
Reference2014-0198
DeceasedBeryl French
CoronerStephanie Haskey
Coroner areaNottinghamshire
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Lifestyle Care pic

1 | CORONER

| am Stephanie Haskey, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Nottinghamshire

2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 25" April 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Beryl French, aged
79, who died on 28" April 2013. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on
25" April 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was that Beryl French died as a result of a
pulmonary embolism as a result of a deep vein thrombosis with Dementia as a
contributory factor, and a Conclusion of Natural Causes was given.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Beryl French was a resident at Landmere Nursing Home in Nottinghamshire. She got
into respiratory difficulties whist receiving personal care. Nursing staff were summoned
and decided to make no active interventions as they believed that a completed Do Not
Attempt Cardio- Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) form was in place. This was not
the case.

5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1.That there was a lack of understanding amongst nursing staff at Landmere about the
nature of DNACPR forms and the information that should be provided for them to be
complete and appropriate to be relied upon.

Although the evidence disclosed that no active intervention would have saved Mrs
French, and that in was in her best interests not to intervene, this might not be the case
in other, similar circumstances.

2. That End of Life Care planning was insufficient to guide nursing and care staff to help
residents to die peacefully and with dignity in appropriate cases.

6__| ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your
organisation has the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 26" June 2014. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:

1. The family of Beryl French

| have also sent it to:

1. The Care Quality Commission

2. Nottinghamshire County Council Adult Safeguarding

3. The Nursing and Midwifery Council

who may find it useful or of interest.

lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful

or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

[DATE] [SIGNED BY CORON
30" April 2014 Stephanie Haskey jp AA

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Life Style Care (PDF)
Your Ref:

4 July 2014 hie Sule
Care

Coroner Stephanie Haskey
Nottinghamshire Coroner's Service

Resources (2011)
The Council House PL.C
Old Market Square —
Nottingham

NG1 2DT

Dear Coroner Haskey

| am writing in response to your Prevention of Future Deaths Report following the inquest touching on the
death of Mrs Beryl French.

First, | would like to again express my sincere condolences to the family and friends of Mrs French.
Your report raises two matters of concern, namely:

ill There was a lack of understanding amongst nursing staff at Landmere about the nature of
DNACPR forms and the information that should be provided for them to be complete and
appropriate to be relied upon;

2. That End of Life Care planning was insufficient to guide care and nursing staff to help residents to
die peacefully and with dignity in appropriate cases

Your report confirms that you were satisfied, at the conclusion of the inquest, that no active intervention
would have saved Mrs French, and that it was in her best interests not to intervene, however you were
concerned that in other cases this may not be in the case.

At the inquest it was confirmed that Landmere Nursing Home is closed. In view of this, your concerns have
been addressed to Life Style Care Plc who owned and operated Landmere Nursing Home and continue to
own and operate 38 homes throughout the United Kingdom.

| deal with your concerns below:

1. Lack of understanding amongst nursing staff_at Landmere about the nature of DNACPR
forms and information that should be provided for them to be complete and appropriate to
be relied upon

At the conclusion of the inquest your determination was that Mrs French died as a result of a massive
pulmonary embolism. Based on the evidence disclosed, you determined that it was likely the cause of this
was a DVT which travelled up from her legs. Your determination was that Mrs French died of natural
causes and you were satisfied that no active intervention would have saved her.

As confirmed at the inquest, Landmere Nursing Home is closed. | joined Life Style Care Plc at a late stage
in the problems which were experienced with Landmere. There was an unsettled management team in the
home over a long period. A robust auditing and monitoring system was in place at Landmere but the way it

was being used at the time was not as effective as it should have been.
LIFE STYLE CARE (2011) PLC
REGENT HOUSE
THEOBALD STREET, ELSTREE,
BOREHAMWOOD, HERTS. WD6 4S
TEL: (020 30
FAX: (020

Email: admin@lifestylecare.co.uk

Website: www.lifestylecare.co.uk
Registered No. 7709694

Life Style Care Plc has learnt a huge amount from the issues with Landmere. The home had issues with
the CQC and safeguarding. It was also the case that 15 or more staff at the home had been suspended.
Some members of staff were suspended for minor employment issues which was not the correct
procedure.

Three Relief Managers, all full time, were trying to support the staff at Landmere to bring the home through
its problems. Among the problems at Landmere was that the documentation at the home, including care
plans for residents, was not kept up to date and was in a muddle.

Due to the problems with staff levels at Landmere, Life Style Care Plc negotiated with a staff recruitment
agency to ensure there was some consistency with the cover staff at Landmere. Four experienced
members of care staff were also drafted in from other Life Style Care Plc homes to provide some
consistency.

Unfortunately despite the best efforts of Life Style Care Plc it was felt the problems at Landmere could not
be rectified and a decision was taken that it was in the best interests of all concerned that the home be
closed.

The experience with Landmere has resulted in huge improvements at Life Style Care Plc in particular with
regards to assessing staff training and competencies. In approximately April 2013 Life Style Care Plc were
way below the average standard for compliance when assessed by the CQC. In April 2014 Life Style Care
Plc were assessed again by the CQC and have now been confirmed as higher than the national average in
terms of compliance.

The auditing process and the support and training for staff has improved since Landmere and if any
improvements are recommended after an audit then these recommendations will be actioned.

The improvements since Landmere have included better staff training and the new attached protocol in
respect of decisions as to whether a service user should be resuscitated. This protocol is being put through
an extensive consultation process at Life Style Care Plc with input from staff at ground level in various
homes and is currently at the stage of being reviewed by the Quality Assurance team in consultation with
the Regional Directors. We anticipate that this protocol will be signed off and implemented in the full
portfolio of homes by the end of September 2014.

Life Style Care Plc now require a DNAR form signed by a GP to be in place on a service user's file in order
for it to be effective. Life Style Care Plc is not able to develop its own DNAR form because homes in
different regions and boroughs are often required to use a particular DNAR form which is individual to that
particular local health authority. With a DNAR form signed by a GP in place this provides clarity to both staff
and paramedics about the status of the service user.

If a service user is admitted to a Life Style Plc home from hospital or another care setting with a DNAR in
place then they are reviewed by a GP and a nurse and if appropriate a DNAR form is produced and signed
by the GP.

Once the protocol has been signed off, this will be delegated down from senior management to the
Regional Directors who will then provide appropriate training to the home managers. The home managers
will then filter the information down to their staff by way of meetings and handovers and will also provide
appropriate training.

Page 2 of 3

2. That End of Life Care planning was insufficient to quide care and nursing staff to help
residents to die peacefully and with dignity in appropriate cases

As stated above, the documentation at Landmere was a muddle and not always kept up to date. Mrs
French did have in place an End of Life care plan and an extract of this was provided at the inquest.
However, due to the issues regarding documentation management at Landmere the End of Life care plan
for Mrs French was not sufficiently comprehensive.

The first stage in End of Life care planning now is that there will be a Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting
which will include all bodies involved in the care of a service user. These meetings used to be fragmented
with different parties meeting together but now the meeting will include all bodies. At the conclusion of the
meeting an informed judgment will be made and a comprehensive End of Life care plan will be drafted if
appropriate. The End of Life care plan provides clarity and clear guidance to staff.

| attach a template of the End of Life care plan and a redacted copy of an example of a care plan used for a
service user. The plan includes parts on pain relief and medication, personal care and elimination, skin
integrity and mobility, mouth care, eating and drinking and visitors. There is also provision in the plan for
documenting when the plan was discussed with the service user or relative. The purpose of the care plan is
to ensure that respect and dignity is maintained for service users. The parts of the care plan include
evaluation sheets for when the plan is evaluated once every day or more than once a day if appropriate.
Provision is also made to document should the part of the care plan be discontinued at any point.

The End of Life care plan has been piloted in 3 homes in different areas. In one home the pilot has been
running for approximately 4 months and in the other 2 homes the pilot has been running for approximately
3 months. We have received regular positive feedback from the staff in the homes regarding the care plan.
We have also received positive feedback from the CQC who had the view that the plan was clear and
provided good guidance to staff.

The End of Life care plan is currently being considered by the Quality Assurance team and we anticipate
this will be signed offer by the end of September 2014. Once the care plan is signed off it will be
implemented into the full portfolio of Life Style Care Plc homes with appropriate training for staff being
provided.

Once implemented, both the protocol and care plan outlined above will be reviewed at least every 3 years
as a minimum to identify whether any changes are required. The protocol and care plan will be reviewed
before the end of the 3 year period if changes are required such as if new legislation is introduced or an
incident occurs which triggers a review.

Please let me know if | can be of any further assistance.

Yours sincerely

Clinical & Operations Director
Life Style Care Plc

Page 3 of 3

Related reports

Other reports by Stephanie Haskey

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.