Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0564, written 7 Nov 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 7 Nov 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0564 |
| Deceased | Richard Worswick |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) Bamford Grange Care Home 2) Stockport NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Alison Mutch, senior coroner, for the coroner area of Manchester South 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 4th June 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Richard Charles WORSWICK. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16th October 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was Narrative: Died of the complications of a spinal wound when the significant deterioration in the wound was not recognised until he became seriously unwell on the 17th May 2025.The medical cause of death was: 1a) Sepsis 1b) Infected spinal wound; and I) Parkinson's Disease, Frailty. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Richard Charles Worswick had multiple health conditions including Parkinson's Disease. He had become increasingly frail and had to move to Bamford Grange on a nursing care placement because of his poor health and complex needs. He developed an abscess in his spinal area because of his underlying poor health and immobility. A wound care plan was put in place for this wound whilst he was in Stepping Hill Hospital. He was discharged back to Bamford Grange on 2nd May 2025. It is unclear what information was communicated by Stepping Hill Hospital to Bamford Grange around wound management. His wound was noted to be deteriorating, and advice was sought from Tissue Viability Nurse team. It was not felt that the wound was infected at that time. On 17th May 2025 at about 05:30am he was noted to have become unwell. His observations were taken. Observations had not been taken the previous day. The observations identified that he was seriously unwell, and an ambulance was called. He was taken to Stepping Hill Hospital where the wound on his spine was found to be severely infected and to have led to him developing sepsis. Despite treatment he deteriorated and died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 19th May 2025. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – The inquest heard evidence that when he was discharged to the care home from the acute hospital that the care home felt that they did not understand what was required regarding wound care because the care plan regarding wound care was not clear .The Trust did not have a copy of what information had been provided. As a consequence of this, there was a lack of clarity regarding wound management. The Trust did not the inquest was told have a clear procedure that ensured that there was a clear, effective and documented communication system in relation to care plans that included wound management. The home did not have a clear escalation policy for actions to be taken when a resident arrived, and their staff were unclear how they were being asked to manage a wound by the hospital. In addition, the documentation surrounding concerns and attempts to escalate was limited. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 2nd January 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following interested persons namely the family of Mr Worswick, who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. They may send a copy of this report to any person who they believe may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner 07/11/2025
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Lentulus Properties T/A ,Bamford Grange Care Home 239 Adswood Road, Shaw Heath, Stockport, Greater Manchester. SK3 8PA Alison Mutch Senior Coroner for Manchester South 11 December 2025 Dear Ms Mutch, Inquest Touching the Death of Richard Charles Worswick Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 7 November 2025 following the Inquest into the death of Richard Charles Worswick. I am responding on behalf of both Lentulus Properties Ltd t/a Bamford Grange (hereinafter “the Home”) and the overall care provider, Springcare Limited. I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr. Worswick’s family, and I would like to take this opportunity to express my condolences for their loss. Concerns Raised In your Regulation 28 report you raised the following concerns with regards to the Home: “The inquest heard evidence that when he was discharged to the care home from the acute hospital the care home felt that they did not understand what was required regarding wound care because the care plan regarding wound care was not clear… As a consequence of this, there was a lack of clarity regarding wound management.” and “The home did not have a clear escalation policy for actions to be taken when a resident arrived, and their staff were unclear how they were being asked to manage a wound by the hospital. In addition, the documentation surrounding concerns and attempts to escalate was limited.” A concern was also raised in respect of Stepping Hill Hospital’s system for communicating and recording relevant patient information on discharge. Response At the outset I would like to reassure you that we have reflected seriously upon the contents of your Report, both within the Home and across the broader service, and that we welcome the opportunity to identify learnings as well the opportunity to both improve the quality of our care provision and strengthen the existing policies and procedures moving forward. I would further like to reassure you that both the Home and Springcare in general have always maintained a comprehensive policy pertaining to re-admissions to the home from hospital. This policy requires that any changes to a treatment plan for wounds are put in place without delay and that any resident who appears unwell should be monitored closely using the relevant approved scoring systems such as NEWS 2 / RESTORE 2. The policy also requires that where no information is received from the discharging hospital, persistent efforts should be made to contact the hospital and obtain details of the relevant treatment plan(s) with these efforts being clearly documented and recorded in the care notes. Unfortunately, that policy was not followed or adhered to in relation to Mr. Worswick’s discharge on 2 May 2025. I can confirm that at no time has the Home ever been provided with a Ward Summary/Transfer of Care document as referenced by Stepping Hill during the course of the Inquest in connection with the discharge of any resident. The Home has only ever been provided with a hospital discharge summary which, on this occasion did not provide any details for the treatment of Mr Worswick’s spinal abscess. The senior carer on duty at the time did initially twice attempt to contact the hospital for details of the wound care plan but was unsuccessful. Unfortunately these attempts were not documented in the care records and consequently not followed up by other members of staff. There was a delay in referring Mr. Worswick to the TVN. As a result of the Inquest findings and I can confirm that the following action has been taken to ensure proper adherence to the existing policies and procedures going forwards particularly with regard to the re-admission of residents to the Home from hospital and arrangements for monitoring of wound care and clinical observations: Staff issued with refresher guidance as to the requirements of the existing policy and importance of following the same. All calls to hospital/community teams are to be documented including if unsuccessful, and staff must also document what mitigation is put in place in the event of a missing treatment plan. All hospital calls for admission/discharge planning to be recorded on the electronic record system Nourish including details of date and time of call, who was spoken to, and any follow up needed. Referrals to TVN or other community teams to be made within 24 hours of identified need and to contain all relevant information including photographs and current treatment plan. In addition to reinforcing the above, the following additional action has been taken to improve the care provision going forwards: A review of all currently unstageable pressure ulcers in the Home and Registered Office Address. Nicholson House, Shakespeare Way, Whitchurch, Shropshire. SY13 1LJ Company No. 08988410 implementation of enhanced observations to identify softer signs of deterioration or flag where more urgent escalation is needed. Implementation of a sepsis risk assessment for all residents with chronic wounds. Regular and routine checks and audit of entries on Nourish by Home Manager and Deputy to ensure wound care is being delivered as per prescribed treatment plan. Springcare Limited also continues to carry out a monthly review of deaths and hospital admissions/re-admissions to identify any themes or trends which may need to be addressed. Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that appropriate action is being taken to address those concerns. Yours sincerely, Operations Manager Springcare Limited
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Ms Mutch HM Senior Coroner Manchester South Coronial Area Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Ref: Mr Richard Worswick DOD: 19/05/2025 Dear Ms Mutch, Oak House Stepping Hill Hospital Poplar Grove Stockport Cheshire SK2 7JE 15 December 2025 I am writing to you further to the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Mr Richard Worswick on 16 October 2025 and in response to the Prevention of Future Deaths report in relation to your concerns regarding a lack of clear, effective and documented communication to the care home in relation to care plans that included wound management. Upon investigation into this matter, the Trust had an audit trail which showed the ward did complete the Transfer of Care documentation on the IT system (Advantis) however this does not automatically save on the system (and this functionality is not available) and therefore there was no evidence or copy of the document which was sent to the care home. The Trust issued a Trust wide alert on 20 November 2025 in relation to Transfer of Care documentation and action required from all areas to ensure two copies of the documentation are printed; one to go with the patient to the care home and one to be placed in the patient’s records. Please find a copy of the Trust wide alert attached. In order to provide assurance that this practice is fully embedded across the Trust, a Trust wide audit will take place. Five patient discharges to other care providers will be audited per ward for discharges which have taken place in December. The audit will be carried out in the first two weeks of February 2026 and will check that there is a copy of the Transfer of Care documentation within the patient’s record. During the course of this review, we have also identified that improvements are needed to the quality and information included in the discharge checklist. A task and finish group has been set up for this piece of work and will commence in January 2026. We hope the information provided above offers assurance that Stockport NHS Foundation Trust has taken the findings of the inquest into Mr Worswick’s care extremely seriously. We remain dedicated to continuous improvement in patient safety and care quality. Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours faithfully Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.