Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0253, written 6 Jun 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 6 Jun 2014 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2014-0253 |
| Deceased | James Boylan |
| Coroner | Ian Smith |
| Coroner area | Cumbria (South & East) |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
2. Department of Health
3. NHS England
4. Care Quality Commission
5. Cumbria Clinical Commissioning Group
1
CORONER
I am Ian Smith, senior coroner/area coroner/assistant coroner, for the coroner area of
South & East Cumbria
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
[HYPERLINKS]
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 1st August 2013 I commenced an investigation into the death of James Edward
Boylan who was born on 3.6.64. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest
on 4th June 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was that James Edward Boylan died of
1a) hanging. I gave a conclusion that James Edward Boylan died as a consequence of
his own actions whilst suffering from mental illness.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mr Boylan suffered chronically from anxiety for which he took medical advice including
counselling from MIND, multiple appointments with his GP, several appointments with
his Psychiatrist. On 20th July 2013, he was admitted to Dova Unit, Dane Garth, Furness
General Hospital. In retrospect signs of an escalating level of his illness could be seen,
but this was not appreciated at the time and the opportunity arose for him to engineer his
own death by use of a phone charger cord and a rail in a bathroom designed for the use
of disabled patients.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
(1) Removable rails in a bathroom designed for use by disabled people had been left
inadvertently ever since the unit was opened. No one seemed to be aware that these
rails were removable and certainly nobody had removed them. This provided a ligature
point which would otherwise have been absent in a unit which was specifically designed
1
to have as few ligature points as possible. The Coroner is concerned that this same
situation may apply in other units and people need to be aware that ligature points in
mental health units should be limited as far as humanly possible, and specifically that
removable rails should be removed except when actually required.
(2) Mr Boylan appears to have brought onto the ward a stanley knife blade. This was
not discovered for several days. Mr Boylan only left the unit on one occasion and so
could only have brought the blade onto the unit either 7 days before his death or 3 days
before his death. The Coroner asks that thought be given to more robust searching of
patients’ property. The origin of the cord which Mr Boylan used is not clear. It may have
been his own, but the policy of having these kept centrally so that patients do not have
access direct to them was not adhered to on this occasion, and so again Mr Boylan had
access to something which he could use to hang himself with.
(3) There were numerous events over the 7 days during which Mr Boylan was present
on the ward for someone with an overall view to realise that his condition was escalating
and that he might become a danger to himself, but because no one person had overall
knowledge of all the facts, this was not recognised. It is suggested that communication
be improved in any way in which the Trust thinks possible.
(4) GRIST: Assessments should be more rigorously completed and disseminated so
that staff are aware of their contents, because in relation to Mr Boylan this did not
appear to have taken place so that an opportunity for communication of information was
lost.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 2.8.14. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons: Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Health; NHS
England; Care Quality Commission; Cumbria Clinical Commissioning Group and
copies to
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
6 June 2014 Ian Smith H M Senior Coroner South & East Cumbria
2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
» From Norman Lamb MP i or Minister of State for Care and Support | Department Department of Health | of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SW1A 2NS Mr I Smith Senior Coroner Central Police Station Market Street Barrow-in-Furness 02 SEP 2014 Cumbria LAI4 2LE DD cce Ke Gore , Thank you for your letter following the inquest into the death of James Boylan. I am replying as the Minister responsible for Mental Health. In your report you conclude that the cause of death was hanging. Mr Boylan died as a consequence of his own actions while suffering from mental illness. You found that Mr Boylan suffered from chronic anxiety, for which he had received counselling from MIND and a psychiatrist. He had had multiple GP appointments. In July 2013 he was admitted to a special mental health unit at Furness General Hospital. Within a few days he hanged himself using a phone charger cord, from a rail in a bathroom designed for use by disabled patients. You raise the following concerns: e There were removable bathroom rails in a bathroom designed for use by disabled people. These bathroom rails had not been removed and so provided a ligature point in a unit designed to have as few ligature points as possible. You are concerned this situation may exist in other units and want ligature points in mental health units to be limited as far as possible; e Mr Boylan had brought a Stanley knife blade onto the ward which was not discovered for several days. The origin of the phone cord Mr Boylan used to hang himself is also unclear. You ask both for a more robust approach in searching patient property and that the policy of having dangerous items held centrally is followed; j : i Hl | i : i Department of Health e During the seven days Mr Boylan was on the ward there were signs his condition was escalating and that he might become a danger to himself but no-one appeared to have overall knowledge of all the facts. You suggest that communication is improved by the Trust; e Patient assessments should be more rigorously completed and disseminated to staff. In addition, in your covering letter, you point out that in Cumbria alone in a ten month period from April 2013 to January 2014, twenty people, who had been in touch with mental health services within the previous week, died by suicide. You enclose a document from Cumbria CCG provided in response to another Regulation 28 case. This quotes a report by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in which it is reported that a similar pattern, ie of people who have been seen by mental health staff in the previous week dying by suicide, is being seen nationally. You draw our attention to this and consider it a matter of grave public concern. I note that you have also addressed your report to the Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and I would expect them to properly address the four concerns relating to events during Mr Boylan’s time on the Dova Unit at Furness General Hospital. It is of course a matter of great concern to me that suicides are occurring despite patients’ recent contact with mental health services. It may help if I provide some information about our current and future suicide prevention work. The NHS Outcomes Framework sets out the outcomes and corresponding indicators used by the Government to hold NHS England to account for improvements in health outcomes. It remains a high priority for us to ensure that NHS England learns from all incidents and reduces premature deaths. This happens in a number of ways. All reported incidents, such as the one you outline in your report, are reviewed and used to inform future learning. The National Reporting Learning System (NRLS) is used by the NHS to handle patient safety incidents. NHS England uses collated information to help NHS services learn from mistakes or potential incidents. Incidents related to mental health are reviewed by NHS England’s H | | Department | of Health iD > From Norman Lamb MP ‘i Minister of State for Care and Support patient safety team personnel and key learning points are identified. This learning is then used to assist in the design of resources which seek to prevent suicides. NHS England has used this learning to introduce a variety of resources designed to help clinical staff appreciate the importance of risk assessment and multidisciplinary working in the field of mental health. They have developed audit tools for both inpatient and community care use so that a local trust can measure compliance against these standards. These are available from the following website at: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?EntryId45=65297 NHS England has more recently developed further suicide prevention measures and is working with the NHS Confederation to ensure the impact of these are as wide as possible. More details are available from the website address given: http://www.nhsconfed.org/Publications/briefings/Pages/Preventing-suicide.aspx From April 2010, serious incidents (i.e. incidents that result in severe harm or death) reported by English NHS trusts to the NRLS have been shared with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as required by the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009 (Regulation 16). From April 2013 all incidents that are reported to the NRLS have been directly shared with the CQC. All suicides of people in contact with secondary mental health services in the year prior to their death are reviewed in detail by the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by people with mental illness (NCISH) — the most recent annual report can be accessed from the following link: http://Awww.bbmh.manchester.ac.uk/cmhr/centreforsuicideprevention/nci/reports /Annualreport2014.pdf NHS England and NCISH are part of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy Advisory Group. Chaired by Professor Louis Appleby, who also heads NCISH, the group provides leadership and support in ensuring successful Ee .e) 0 epartment f Health implementation of the Government’s suicide prevention strategy for England. It advises the Department of Health, and where relevant other Government Departments and organisations, on the relevance of emerging issues for the suicide prevention strategy and reviews potential changes to priorities and areas for action. NHS England has identified the need for both a Mental Health Patient Safety Expert Group and an Expert Safety Primary Care Group to improve safety of patients in NHS funded care further. These groups have been established by NHS England to provide senior clinical advice to the NHS commissioning system, support NHS England priorities in patient safety, and lead on the development and dissemination of advice and guidance for both commissioners and providers. Membership of these groups is multi-professional and includes representation from all sectors of the health community. This helps to foster a positive approach to mental health and wellbeing in every aspect of healthcare delivery. I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Mr Boylan’s death to my attention. NORMAN LAMB
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.