Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Samuel Openshaw

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0280, written 20 Jun 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Jun 2014
Reference2014-0280
DeceasedSamuel Openshaw
CoronerPeter Dean
Coroner areaSuffolk
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

4. Po Chair of the CHD Review’s Clinical

Advisory Panel

2 Chair of the Congenital Heart Services Clinical

Reference Grou
3. ce: Director for the CHD Review
4. , Director of the East Anglia Team

CORONER

| am Dr Peter Dean, senior coroner for the coroner area of Suffolk

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On the 18" of May 2012 | commenced an investigation into the death of Samuel James
Openshaw, aged 15 months. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on
the 23 of May 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was Natural causes, the cause of
death being ‘Complex congenital heart defect (operated)’. Although, from the
pathological findings, this tragic death appears to have arisen from acute on chronic
failure of the operated heart, there were matters that became evident which gave cause
for concern, affected the clinical management as discussed below, and which could
affect the outcome for other children.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Samuel was born with serious and complex heart problems and had been under the
care of both the Evelina Children’s Hospital, where he had undergone an initial
operation followed by very major cardiac surgery, and the West Suffolk Hospital where
ongoing paediatric care was provided. He presented at the West Suffolk Hospital with
further clinical problems and his condition deteriorated. Transfer back to the Evelina
Hospital was arranged but delays with the specialist paediatric retrieval teams, who were
still engaged on other transfers, meant that Samuel was only admitted to their paediatric
intensive care unit more than twelve hours after the initial referral from the West Suffolk
Hospital, and he sadly passed away hours later. The situation was made more tragic by
the fact that there were difficulties with the secure electronic transfer of echo images
from the West Suffolk to the Evelina Hospital and that, had the Evelina been able to
receive this information, it is likely that the decision would have been made to keep
Samuel at the West Suffolk Hospital for palliative care, thus avoiding the very
considerable distress to Samuel and his family of the events of that last day.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the period of investigation and inquest, a number of other issues also became
apparent but | have not touched on these in this report as they were matters related to
the local hospital and | am satisfied that action has been taken to address them. | am,
however, concerned that, despite undoubted attempts to remedy the problem, slow
electronic transfer of Echocardiograph studies to tertiary centres remains a problem and
one that may affect other hospitals as well. There were also clearly difficulties with the
workload that the specialist paediatric retrieval teams were working under. While the
evidence here, sadly, was that even had earlier transfer to the paediatric intensive care
unit at the tertiary centre been achieved, the tragic outcome would have been the same
in this instance, the availability of these specialist retrieval teams for urgent patent

transportation and the need to be able to transfer electronic images in a secure and
timely manner, are issues that could affect the survival of sick children in other areas
and are matters requiring the involvement of those who commission healthcare services
themselves. | am therefore writing to you to ask that attention be given to this to try to
reduce the risk of similar fatalities in future.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your
organisations have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by the 15" of August. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, to Samuel's family, and to West

Suffolk Hospital Consultant Paediatrician i

1 am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

20-6-14 P\Qear Dr Peter Dean

NO

Related reports

Other reports by Peter Dean

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.