Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Julie Robertson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0326, written 16 Jul 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Jul 2014
Reference2014-0326
DeceasedJulie Robertson
CoronerEleanor McGann
Coroner areaEssex
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

HM Coroner’s Court  
A Block – Ground Floor 
County Hall  
Victoria Road 
Chelmsford 
CM1 1QH 

Telephone: 0333 013 5000 
coroner@essex.gov.uk 

ANNEX A 

HM Senior Coroner for Essex  

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Southend University Hospital  

1 

CORONER 

I am Eleanor McGann, Area Coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 30th June 2014I commenced an investigation into the death of Julie Ann Robertson, 
Date of Birth 2nd October 1963. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 
2nd July 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was:- 

Narrative Verdict 

On 8th May 2013 Julie Ann Robertson had an operation for an elective total abdominal 
hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo Oophorectomy.  The operation was uncomplicated 
and in recovery she was fine. She was transferred back to the ward. At around 2.00 am 
on 9 May 2013 her blood pressure was low and her pulse rate was up. This is a known 
indicator for internal bleeding. A doctor was not contacted until 3.00 am and an SHO 
attended at 3.10 am followed by the Registrar at 3.40 am. Although there was difficulty 
in obtaining a blood sample the result of a bedside haemacue test was available by 4.40 
am and this showed the haemoglobin level was 8. This case was not immediately 
escalated to a more senior doctor. A full blood test was not available until 5.45 am and 
only then was a consultant contacted and for the first time there was some recognition 
that this was an emergency. By the time Mrs Robertson was seen by a senior 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 anaesthetist at 6.17 am she was unfit for immediate surgery. This was mainly due to 
blood for a transfusion still being unavailable despite the fact that the possible need for 
such blood had been recognised by 4.40 am. The blood eventually arrived at the ward 
by 6.55 am when the delayed blood transfusion was finally started. Despite the fact that 
2 surgeons were in theatre ready to operate by 7.19 am the operation could not 
commence until around 8.00 am because Mrs Robertson was too unwell to be given a 
General Anaesthetic. When they were able to operate the surgeons did their best but it 
was too late. Mrs Robertson’s chances of a successful recovery had been reduced by 
the earlier delays. Record keeping throughout was poor and timings were unclear. Julie 
Ann Robertson died on 11th May 2013 as a result of complications following the 
operation as set out above. 

4 

5 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
See Narrative conclusion above. 
CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1)  The possible need for blood had been anticipated as early as 4:40am. If there 
had been a blood fridge on the ward then the matched blood could have been 
brought to the ward so that when a transfusion was called for it would have been 
instantly available on the ward. The blood eventually arrived at 6.55am by which 
time Mrs Robertson was unfit for surgery. 

2)  Record keeping was poor and this was acknowledged in the Root Cause 

Analysis report. Although I heard evidence that there had been some training 
instigated there is no formal training and indeed witnesses at the inquest still 
seemed unaware of good practice as to record keeping. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you your 
organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 10th September 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons- Gadsby Wicks Solicitors for the family. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

16th July 2014 

Mrs Eleanor McGann, Area Coroner for Essex

Related reports

Other reports by Eleanor McGann

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.