Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Edwin Thompson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0542, written 22 Dec 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report22 Dec 2014
Reference2014-0542
DeceasedEdwin Thompson
CoronerTerence Carney
Coroner areaGateshead & South Tyneside
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Terence Carney 
Solicitor 
Senior Coroner 
Gateshead & South Tyneside. 

35 Station Road 
Hebburn 
Tyne & Wear 
NE31 1LA 
Tel: 
Fax: 

Regulation 28 – Report to Prevent Future Deaths  

This Report is being sent to: 
Quality Care Commission,  Citygate, Gallowgate, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA 
Corporate Director Childrens Adults and Families, South Tyneside Council,  Town Hall & Civic 
Offices, SOUTH SHIELDS NE33 2RL 
Coroner 

1 

I am Terence Carney, Senior Coroner for Gateshead & South Tyneside. 

2 

Coroner’s Legal Powers 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/regulation/28/made 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/regulation/29/made 

3 

Investigation & Inquest 

4 

On 10th October 2011 I commenced an investigation into the death of EDWIN THOMPSON, aged 77 
years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 14 November 2014. The conclusion of 
the inquest was Natural Causes contributed to by neglect. 
Circumstances of the Death 
The deceased a 77 year old retired shipyard worker diagnosed with front lobal dementia was admitted 
initially early in 2011 for respite care but later as a long term patient to a residential home Conolley 
House in South Shields dedicated to the exclusive care of  individuals diagnosed with dementia.  He 
was found dead in a bathroom of the Home on 8 October 2011.   The post mortem examination 
confirmed the cause of Mr. Thompson’s death was the natural consequence of a  previously 
undiagnosed cardiovascular disease.   Further investigation has confirmed that this natural cause of 
death was in part contributed to by :- 

a)  Inadequate and inconsistent protective measures for the welfare and safety of a known 
vulnerable individual and the behavioural risks presented by his known Dementia. 
b)  Leading to a missed opportunity at an early stage on the presentation of potential cardiac 

related symptoms to summon medical assistance 

c)  The temporary but critical loss of contact with an individual with propensity to wander and  
d)  The consequent second missed opportunity to respond to a final medical crisis leading to his 

demise 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

Coroners Concerns 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory 
duty to report to you. 

The matter of concern are as follows:- 

A    The seeking of medical advice and assistance.    
There is a need to draft and disseminate to all care staff  a clear,  simple and  concise directive to care 
home staff  to seek medical advice or assistance in respect of residents presenting with pain, 
particularly of a cardiac nature without delay.    
Staff with no medical qualification must not seek to speculate as to  possible causes  of symptoms and 
should not seek to medicate ( unless otherwise previously prescribed by a Medical Practitioner) or 
prescribe “remedies” of no or no known worth to anyone in their care. 
B       As to Training  
Training in the practices and protocols within the establishment should be formalised, regularised and 
directed as a personalised   package to all staff.    It should be the  subject of planned periodic review 
and revision throughout the year and an integral part of the established annual appraisal of staff 
members and their performance. 
The quality  and effectiveness of in house training provision  should be an integral and essential 
element in and of the periodic appraisal of management performance. 
C      As to record keeping 
The accurate recording of incidents affecting the care and management of residents is an essential tool 
in keeping staff informed of the needs of  residents in order that the staff can be better able to react  
respond and plan for the essential needs of residents.  
The quality of the recording of notes must be evaluated by management on their regular reviews of 
residents care notes  and staff must be made aware in a timely fashion of any shortcomings in the notes 
and their content.    Assistance to improve in the recording of notes must be given an urgent priority in 
any training needs and recognised as a significant performance issue if there is consistent failure to 
adhere to the expected standard.  
 Ultimately and aspirationally  a computer based system of record keeping would be the preferred 
option, but the lesson of effective record keeping in whatever format, has to be reinforced by regular 
and effective file checks by Managers.  

6 

Action Should be Taken 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your 
organisation] have the power to take such action. 

7 

Your Response 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 9th 
March 2015.    I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for 
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 
Copies & Publication 

8 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons {NAMES} 
{and to the Local Safe-Guarding board (where the deceased was under 18)}. I have also sent it to the 
{NAMED PERSON} who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may 
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

Date: 22nd December 2014 

{Signature} 

Senior Coroner – Gateshead & South Tyneside

Related reports

Other reports by Terence Carney

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.