Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Archie Hexall

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0081, written 5 Mar 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report5 Mar 2015
Reference2015-0081
DeceasedArchie Hexall
CoronerPhilip Barlow
Coroner areaLondon Inner (South)
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedLewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

| REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Mr Tim Higginson, Chief Executive, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust,
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Stadium Road, London SE18 4QH

1 | CORONER

| am Philip Barlow, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Inner London South

2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 10 April 2013 | commenced an investigation into the death of Archie Haxell, age 5
days. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 February 2015. The
conclusion of the inquest was that the medical cause of death was extensive brain
haemorrhage and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. The narrative verdict was as
follows:

About 2 hours after his birth at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Archie Haxell suffered
a respiratory arrest. He was found to have had extensive brain haemorrhage
and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy although the underlying cause of these
remains unknown. He was transferred to St Thomas’ Hospital where he died on
29 March 2013. Breakdowns in communication between healthcare
professionals and with Archie’s parents contributed to the delay in recognising
Archie’s deteriorating condition.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The circumstances are also set out in the Trust’s serious incident investigation report
dated 12 August 2013. Briefly, Archie was the eldest of twins and was born in seemingly
good condition in theatre by forceps delivery on 24 March 2013. About 2 hours after his
birth Archie suffered a respiratory arrest. He was transferred to SCBU and then to St
Thomas’ where he died at the age of 5 days.

5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) About 25 minutes after his birth Archie was noted to be grunting and he then
developed nasal flaring, both of which are potential signs of respiratory distress. He was

_ rformed alset of observations, including oxygen Satlirations,: °
ind she’also. noticed vorniting, grunting and nasal-flaring! The evidence at theiinquest’ :
3: the observations on:a piéce of Paper because’ the medical
Tecords were not immediately availablé (her observ tions:were. performed sHortly after
the birth of, Archie's brother who required resuscitation). Midwife later-transcribe
these results into the medical records. However, the evidence was that midwife
was not aware of the vomiting, grunting and nasal flaring not icec idwife
although midwife IIlllbelieves she did pass this informatio

During this'petiod-attention ray, underst
brother. HoWeyer;!I
Signs of respiratory
midwives: ;

Also, the piece of paper on which the observations were recorded was not.retained. | am
concerned that this should have been retained in the medical records.

(2) No-one informed Archie’s ts of the concerns about Archie's breathing. After
returning. to delivery suite ae left alone with Archie for a period of between 7
and 10 miputes. During this period I noted that Archie’s breathing was irregular.
My finding 'at the inquest was that if, he had known of the midwives’ concerns he would
have raised the alarm sooner, although it was not possible to say from the evidence
whether this would have altered the outcome.

| do of course understand ‘that a balance needs to be maintained between sharing
relevant information with parents and causing unnecessary alarm. However sharing
relevant information potentially enables parents to make important contributions to their
child’s care and my concern is that this opportunity was lost in this case.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN : dare EY : i

In my opinion action should be taken, to prevent future deaths and | believe'you and/or
your organisation have the:power to take such action. ; :

t

T

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under:a duty to tespond to this report within 56 days of {he date of this report,
namely by 1 May. 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. i

Your response must contain details of action takenior proposed to be taken, setting out,
; e timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION fat one pF oy

| have sent;a copy, of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the solicitors of, Archie’s
parents as Interested Persons and to the LOCAL SAFEGUARDING BOARD (where the
deceased was. under 18)]._., | ! et it 4

duty.to send thé'Chief Coroner a copy oi \your fesponse. :

lam also under

The Chief Coronef may publish’ either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy ofthis report to any person,who he bélieves may find it useful
or of interest. You may, make representations tome, ‘the :coroner; at the time of your
response, about the relegse or the publication of your'resporise' by the Chief Coroner.'

Bie gh i

5 March 2015 en aria) ~ Philip Bar

i

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Lewisham Greenwich NHS Trust (PDF)
Lewisham and Greenwich

Queen Elizabeth, Woolwich

Dr P Barlow Stadium Road
Her Majesty's Assistant Coroner Woolwich

London
Inner South District, Greater London SE18 4QH

Southwark Coroner's Court

Tel: 020 8836 6000
1 Tennis Street
Southwark Chief Executive’s Office

SE1 1YD

17™ April 2015

Dear Dr Barlow

Re: Regulation 28 to Prevent Future Deaths report re Archie Hexall

| am writing in response to your Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) Report dated 6" March
2015 received following the inquest into the death of baby Archie Hexall.

Your report informed me that at the inquest it was established that Archie, the eldest of twins
had been born on 24" March 2013 at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich by forceps delivery
in seemingly good condition. About 2 hours later he suffered a respiratory arrest. He was
found to have had extensive brain haemorrhage and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy,
although the underlying cause of these remains unknown. He was transferred to SCBU then
to St Thomas’ Hospital where he died on 29 March 2013 at the age of 5 days. Breakdowns
in communication between healthcare professionals and with Archie’s parents contributed to
the delay in recognising Archie’s deteriorating condition. The Trust undertook a Serious

Incident investigation following the incident.

You further expressed concern that future deaths could occur should the following issues not

be acted upon:

1 - Communication had been lost during handover between two midwives, contributed to by
the fact that notes of observations of Archie’s condition at the time had been written on a
loose piece of paper then later transcribed into the clinical notes once they had become
available. Not ail the observations were transcribed

across and it appears that important information about possible further signs of respiratory
distress had been lost. The loose piece of paper was not retained in the medical records and
you were concerned that it ought to have been.

2 — The midwife who had noted some concerns about Archie’s breathing had not expressed
these concerns to his father; had Archie’s father been aware of the concerns he would have
raised the alarm earlier when he later noticed that Archie’s breathing had become more
irregular. It is important that clinicians share relevant information with parents to enable them
to make important contributions to their child’s care; such an opportunity was lost in this

case,

! am now writing to set out what we have done within the Trust, and indeed were already in
the process of doing in relation to communication issues, to act upon these concerns, and
reduce the likelihood of avoidabie harm to future patients.

| have been assisted in this response by Head of Midwifery for our Maternity
Service which is now run across two hospital sites (Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich and
University Hospital Lewisham) making up the current Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust.

1 — Documentation

This issue was raised by the PFD report in relation to loose paper being used to document
observations contemporaneously and later transcribed into the clinical notes. In this case the
observations taken from Archie were transcribed into the clinical notes by a different person
to the member of staff who had performed the observations. All members of staff have been
reminded that any loose documentation must be secured into the main clinical notes even if

written on a small piece of paper.

2 — Wider Communication issues

Communication is recognised by the Maternity service as a vital component to the care we
deliver. Communication both between teams of professionals and between professionals
and families for whom we are caring can be challenging at times, especially during
emergency and complex situations. It is however recognised as very important.

Just 5

This daily communication meeting is held daily (Monday to Friday) and is attended by all staff
working in the maternity unit that day. Issues such as recent clinical incidents, complaints
and user feedback are discussed.

After Action Reviews

An AAR is held following incidents, compiaints or when a complex case has gone very well,

to help learn lessons and share good practice. The maternity unit is working hard to embed
the AAR technique in everyday working life to encourage learning to be initiated by front line
staff.

Midwifery Mandatory Training

Communication issues are presented and discussed at the mandatory training days. In
addition all staff attend training on communication in various forms. Conflict resolution
training is also a Trust mandatory training element and there is strong focus on
communication skills and strategies.

SBAR

Work is currently underway to embed the use of this communication tool (Situation,
Background, Assessment, Recommendation) within the maternity service. This is a simple
tool used by many NHS organisations to ensure that communication between healthcare
professionals is clear and concise, and to support effective escalation of situations when

necessary.

This technique is already underway in the Children’s Division, the Maternity Service, and has
been incorporated into a wider Trust initiative under the umbrella of the national Sign Up To
Safety campaign and our pledge to reduce harm to the ‘deteriorating patient’. Progress will
be monitored at the Trust’s Quality and Safety Committee where quarterly updates will be
presented by the pledge leads. This committee is chaired by the Trust’s Deputy Medical
Director for Quality and Safety.

May | express on their behalf to Archie's parents the condolences of the staff involved, and
hope that they too will be reassured that the Trust is trying hard to improve communication
with parents within the Maternity Service, and thank them for their contribution to raising

awareness of these important issues.

eaReUNR tan RR TT

Within the maternity service there are several forms of training and updating for both
obstetric and midwifery staff to ensure that communication skill remains high on our agenda.
Within the medical workforce the consultants undergo a yearly appraisal. One domain
assessed is communication with colleagues and other health professionals. In addition it is
now mandatory that a 360 degree appraisal is completed every three years. The appraisal
focuses on working relationships as well as communication.

Communication skills are addressed as part of junior medical staff training with 360 degree

feedback being mandatory every two years.

Several communication workshops have been heid over the past few years both
multidisciplinary and involving women and their partners who have used our service.
Feedback from service users is considered a very important part of learning. Some other
initiatives which have been used to improve communication between staff and service users

include:

Goldfish Bowl

This initiative has been held three times within our Trust with excellent feedback from those
who attended. Members of the multidisciplinary team are invited to listen to the experience
of women who have used the service. These may be positive or negative experiences. After
this the audience discuss who women felt about the care they received and what

improvements could be made.

‘Whose Shoes?’

This was piloted by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust as an initiative across London to
improve women's experience of maternity services. Again the audience is multidisciplinary
and each small group includes one or two service users. There is debate about how care is
delivered, the impact of the language we use, and how we involve families in their care.
Following the event pledges are made by those attending as to what they will-change. This
event was heid in November 2014, and second session is planned for spring / summer 2015.

Joint Teaching Session
Biannual joint teaching sessions are held for midwives and medical staff on cornmunication
skills. These sessions are facilitated by a consultant obstetrician and a supervisor of

midwives.

rea ena

| hope that this information about the initiatives that have been started since Archie's death -

provide you with assurance that the Trust is actively using different techniques to help
improve communication both within and between clinical teams and between clinicians and
patients and their carers, We have also raised awareness about the importance of retaining
all clinical documentation. The Trust is also actively participating in the national Sign Up to
Safety campaign with a Trust wide initiative to reduce avoidable harm from failure to identify

and act on the deteriorating patient.

Yours sincerely

Tim Higginson
Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Philip Barlow

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.