Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Robert Spring

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0123, written 23 Mar 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report23 Mar 2015
Reference2015-0123
DeceasedRobert Spring
CoronerPaul Smith
Coroner areaLincolnshire (Central)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedUnited Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

HM CORONER
Central Lincolnshire

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust

2. Air Liquide

3. Lincolnshire County Council

4. NHS Lincolnshire West Clinical Commissioning Group
CORONER

lam Paul Duncan Smith Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Central Lincolnshire, Lindum
House, 10 Queen Street, Spilsby, Lincolnshire, PE23 5JE.

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

on 4" April 2014, an investigation was commenced into the death of Robert Spring, aged 65 years.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6 March 2015. The conclusion of the
inquest was that Mr Spring died as a result of an accident, the medical cause of death being:

1a. Severe degree of burns
2 Excess of alcohol consumption.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

1. Mr Spring had a long history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. He was a smoker.
In February 2013 he was treated within the Emergency Department of Lincoln County
Hospital for a head injury sustained after drinking alcohol.

2. On3™ March 2013 he was admitted as an inpatient to Lincoln County Hospital where he
received treatment for bronchopneumonia.

3. On 25 March 2013, prior to discharge from hospital, he was assessed as meeting the
criteria for the provision of Home Oxygen. He was discharged from hospital on March 28",
He remained in receipt of Home Oxygen up until his death.

4. On 14 March 2014 Mr Spring died in a fire at his home, a flat forming part of a complex
providing independent sheltered living.

5. An investigation by Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) concluded that the cause
of the fire was either the use of a cigarette lighter, or a dropped cigarette. Mr Spring died in
his armchair. At the time of his death he was smoking whilst using an oxygen concentrator.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my
statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(I) Mr Spring was identified at the initial hospital assessment as being at high risk by virtue of
his use of Home Oxygen and also by virtue of his smoking habit. There was no mechanism
in place whereby such risk could be notified directly to LFRS notwithstanding that Mr
Spring had expressly consented to his personal information being shared with them. Such
reporting was deferred to Air Liquide.

(II) The fact that Mr Spring, as a smoker, was considered to be high risk was confirmed by risk
assessments undertaken by representatives of Air Liquide, the Home Oxygen supplier,
upon the installation of the Home Oxygen on 27 March 2013 and upon subsequent service
visits undertaken on 19 June 2013 and 8 January 2014.

(ill) Although a mechanism existed for the communication of that increased risk to LFRS by Air
Liquide, a facet of their system, designed to prevent duplicate notifications being delivered,
operated to prevent notification of his status as a smoker and LFRS were notified only that
Mr Spring was a user of Home Oxygen.

(IV) Evidence was given at Inquest that LFRS have available, free of charge, a variety of safety
equipment for those most at risk of such incidents. Such equipment comprises both smoke
and carbon monoxide alarms, flame retardant bedding and portable “misting systems’.

(Vv) The absence of full notification to LFRS meant that the extent of the risk to which Mr Spring
was exposed was not identified. As a consequence, he was not assessed by LFRS for the
provision of the safety equipment described above.

(VI) | Whilst a number of Properly Interested Persons have already met to discuss the concerns
raised by this death, and whilst Air Liquide have already taken steps to ensure that their
internal systems are more robust, there remains a need to put in place more extensive
lines of communication between all relevant agencies, to ensure that the heightened risks
posed by such patients are drawn to the attention of LFRS at the earliest opportunity.

(VII) | Evidence was also given at Inquest that the availability of such safety equipment is not well
known, and that by increased publicity to the relevant agencies in relation to their
availability, there may be a wider distribution of such material with a consequential saving
of lives.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you AND/OR your
organisation has the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by
18 May 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons

(a)
(b)
(c) Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Service

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may
make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

23 March 2015

P D Smith
Assistant Coroner

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (PDF)
Wye United Lincolnshire Hospitals L'77E¥

= a
equ NHS Trust
Trust Headquarters
Caring for Yow
Lincoln County Hospital
Mr Paul Duncan Smith Greetwell Road
Assistant Coroner for Central Lincolnshire i eee

Lindum House
10, Queen St, Spilsby,
Lincolnshire PE23 5JE Tel;

15" May 2015 Email

Dear Mr Smith,

| refer to the Regulation 28 Report issued by yourself following the inquest into the death of Mr
Robert Spring. The matters of concern you have raised have been addressed by United
Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (ULHT) taking the following action:

1. ULHT have met with Lincolnshire Fire & Rescue (LF&R) and Air Liquide to agree a process
for sharing information. This is described in a new document which has been incorporated
into Trust policy (see Attachment A).

2. ULHT have formalised the discharge process for this group of patients. These steps are also
detailed in the same document and is now in place across the Trust.

3. As part of our standard operating procedure we have included a documented risk
assessment designed by LF&R to identify patients who are at increased risk of fire (see
Appendix 1 within the above attachment). The standard operating procedure also outlines a
clear and agreed communication process between‘all parties. This will provide LF&R an
opportunity to conduct a home assessment, and install any required safety equipment. ~

4. There is now increased clarity detailed within the standard operating procedure for when it is
appropriate to withdraw oxygen from patients due to unacceptable and unmitigated risks of
fire.

| hope you find the above provides the reassurance you are seeking following the issue of a
Regulation 28 Report, and covers all the points i) - vi) raise in the report.

Yours sincerely

= Director

(GMC No 2837444)

cc: Jane Lewington, Chief Executive

yt ABO,
{ Sooys MINDFUL
Chairman: Ron Buchanan 3 W/E MP
Chief Executive: Jane Lewington : Ade EMPLOYER

4/19

Attachment A

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS)

NHS Trust

Standard operating procedure for minimising the risk from fire
when ordering home oxygen for patients

Background

Oxygen is one of the elements of the fire triangle (heat, fuel and oxygen), and as
such it has the potential to injure or kill (1). A review of all reported cases of burns in
home oxygen users in the UK, highlighted that the elderly who smoke and use
oxygen are at greatest risk (2). In the UK, recent cases involving legal opinion found
that healthcare practitioners have a duty of care for protecting relatives, neighbours
and carers who live in and around the residence of home oxygen users who smoke,
as well as to the patient themselves (1). In order to safeguard patients and others by
minimising the risk of fire, the following standard operating procedure will be used for
patients being discharged from hospital who require oxygen. There is a second
procedure for patients who have been assessed as requiring oxygen as an
outpatient. For the purposes of this document, the term “others” will be used to
describe those that reside with or care for the patient.

The Process: For in-patients requiring oxygen on discharge
Step 1: patient fit for discharge, but requiring home oxygen

Step 2: As soon as the potential need for home oxygen is noted - discharging

team to contact the person designated to assess need, oxygen modalities and risk to

_ the patient and others. This will enable adequate risk assessment and patient/carer
education to take place, thereby reducing the possibility of delayed discharge.

Step 3: Risk assessment form (Appendix) completed and e-mailed to Fire Service:
HFSC@lincoln.fire.uk.org. Patients will be identified as low, medium, high or critical
risk by the document and the fire service will prioritise their visit accordingly. The
patient is asked consent to a home visit by Lincolnshire Fire & Rescue

Step 4: Patient and others are educated with regard to oxygen and safety. Patients
and others who smoke are identified and the dangers of smoking near oxygen are
highlighted. Oxygen and safety leaflet supplied.

Step 5: Patients and others who smoke are offered smoking cessation support via
Phoenix Smoking Cessation Service. Documentation of the offer and “declined” or
“accepted” is recorded in the patient's notes.

Step 6: Home Oxygen Consent Form (HOCF) (Appendix) is explained and signed by
the patient, relative or a physician from the team managing the patient. Oxygen
cannot be ordered if an HOCF is not signed for each patient. The HOCF is filed in
the correspondence section of the patient notes.

Standard Operating Procedure for Minimising the Risk from Fire When Ordering Home Oxygen for
Patients (V1) ULHT/G/2015/746 CESC Approved May 2015 (Chair) Review Date May 2017

5/19

Step 7: Home Oxygen Order Form (HOOF) (Appendix) is completed. The risk level
is stated in Box 14 Additional Patient Information. The HOOF is faxed to: 0870

8632111 or e-mailed to: alhomecarehcpsupport@nhs.net The HOOF is filed in the

correspondence section of the patient notes.

Step 8: Patient is discharged and the fire service is responsible for undertaking the
home risk assessment. If the fire service consider that the risk to the patient or
others’ lives is significant , the prescribers are notified and an oxygen removal order
may be issued following discussion with the consultant team.

The Process: For patients assessed as an outpatient as requiring oxygen
Step 1: Patient is assessed as requiring home oxygen as an outpatient.

Step 2: Patient and others are educated with regard to oxygen and safety. Patients
and others who smoke are identified and the dangers of smoking near oxygen are
highlighted. Oxygen and safety leaflet supplied ~

Step 3a: Patients and others who smoke are offered smoking cessation support via
Phoenix Smoking Cessation Service. Documentation of the offer and “declined” or
“accepted” is made in the patient's notes.

Step 3b: Patients who smoke and who do not have chronic hypoxia (ambulatory
oxygen and short burst oxygen users) will be given the opportunity to give up
smoking prior to prescribing oxygen. The offer of a further appointment after
stopping smoking 8-12 weeks later will be made. Those who require Long Term
Oxygen Therapy (LTOT) who are not distressed by breathlessness can be offered
the same. It has been noted previously that stopping smoking has improved
patients’ pO2 to above the level at which LTOT is required.

Step 4: Risk assessment form (Appendix) is completed and e-mailed to Fire Service:
HFSC@lincoln.fire.uk.org. Patients will be identified as low, medium, high or critical
risk by the document and the fire service will prioritise their visit accordingly. The
patient is asked consent to a home visit by Lincolnshire Fire & Rescue

Step 5: Home Oxygen Consent Form (HOCF) (Appendix) is explained and signed by
the patient or relative. Oxygen cannot be ordered if an HOCF is not signed for each
patient. The HOCF is filed in the correspondence section of the patient notes.

Step 6: Home Oxygen Order Form (HOOF) (Appendix) is completed. The risk level
is stated in Box 14 Additional Patient Information. The HOOF is faxed to: 0870

8632111 or e-mailed to: alhomecarehcpsupport@nhs.net The HOOF is filed in the

correspondence section of the patient notes.

Step 7: Patient's oxygen is ordered and the fire service is responsible for .
undertaking the home risk assessment. If the fire service consider that the risk to the
patient or others’ lives is significant , the prescribers are notified and an oxygen
removal order may be issued following discussion with the consultant team.

Standard Operating Procedure for Minimising the Risk from Fire When Ordering Home Oxygen for
Patients (V1) ULHT/G/2015/746 +CESC Approved May 2015 (Chair) Review Date May 2017

6/19

Further information
Withholding or withdrawal of home oxygen

There are three circumstances under which home oxygen may not be ordered, or an
existing order may be withdrawn despite there being a clinical indication for home
oxygen. All three circumstances will be discussed with a respiratory consultant
before a final decision is made.

1) Where the discharging team believes, following an individual assessment, that

the risk of fire is such that any potential health benefits are outweighed by the

risk of harm.

Where an individual who is assessed by the discharging team as being at
high risk of fire refuses to consent to a home assessment by Lincolnshire Fire
& Rescue

Where an individual who is assessed by the discharging team as being at
high risk of fire has a home assessment by Lincolnshire Fire & Rescue who
identify that there are substantial on-going risks of fire, and a serious risk of
harm that they are unable to modify through available safety measures.

2

~~

3

=

Persons designated to assess need, modalities and risk to patients and others:
Pilgrim Hospital, Boston Tel;
Respiratory Nursing Team: Ext

Lincoln County Hospital Tel:
Respiratory Nursing Team: Ext

Grantham and District Hospital Tel: 01476 565232
Respiratory Nursing Team: Ext:

Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Service Tel: 01522 582222
Phoenix Smoking Cessation Service Tel: 01522 550681 i
References:

1. Cooper B (2015) Home oxygen and domestic fires. Breathe 11(1):5-12

2. Lindford A, Tehrani H, Sassoon E, O'Neill T (2006) Home oxygen therapy and cigarette
smoking: a dangerous practice. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters 19: 99-100

Standard Operating Procedure for Minimising the Risk from Fire When Ordering Home Oxygen for
Patients (V1) ULHT/G/2015/746 ~CESC Approved May 2015 (Chair) Review Date May 2017

TIO

Related reports

Other reports by Paul Smith

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.